AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory MonitoringNCT06000852

Comparison of Non-Invasive Respiratory Monitoring System (RMS)

A study testing Makani Science Respiratory Monitoring System in people with Respiratory Monitoring, run by Michael Chu.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the performance of a novel non-invasive respiratory monitoring system against the gold standard methods (manual counting) in healthy human subjects. The main question it aims to answer is whether the novel monitoring system comparable to the current standards. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 22 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Respiratory Monitoring
What is being tested?
Makani Science Respiratory Monitoring System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
27 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
3 Aug 2022to 29 Oct 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 22 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Between age of 22-99
  • BMI between 15 and 35 kg/m^2

Who cannot join

  • Medical history of serious cardiac or pulmonary diseases/conditions.
  • History of serious skin irritation caused by medical adhesives (tape).
  • Cannot lay still on your back for one (1) hour.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Unable to give written informed consent.

About this study

Official title: Makani Science Respiration Monitoring System Pivotal Clinical Study Protocol

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the performance of a novel non-invasive respiratory monitoring system against the gold standard methods (manual counting) in healthy human subjects. The main question it aims to answer is whether the novel monitoring system comparable to the current standards.

Participants will be asked to breath normally and according to a number of different procedure while wearing both monitors.

Being tested
Makani Science Respiratory Monitoring System

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Makani Science Respiratory Monitoring SystemDevice

    Non-invasive Respiratory Monitoring System

Study groups in NCT06000852
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Device ArmExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Makani Science Respiratory Monitoring System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Respiratory Rate Accuracy Between the Respiratory Monitoring System and Manual Counting by a Trained Professional for the Supine Position

    Respiratory rate is measured concurrently by the respiratory monitoring system and by manual counting performed by a trained professional while the subject was in the supine position. For each paired measurement, the percent difference is calculated. The root mean square percent error (RMSE) is then calculated across all paired supine measurements for all subjects. The RMSE is calculated by taking the square root of the average of the squared percent differences between each measured value from the respiratory monitroing system and its corresponding reference value from the manual counting.The 95% confidence intervals is calculated for the RMSE.

    Measured: 2 hours

  2. Respiratory Rate Accuracy Between the Respiratory Monitoring System and Manual Counting by a Trained Professional for the Recline Position

    Respiratory rate is measured concurrently by the respiratory monitoring system and by manual counting performed by a trained professional while the subject is in the recline position. For each paired measurement, the percent difference is calculated. The root mean square percent error (RMSE) is then calculated across all paired recline measurements for all subjects. The RMSE is calculated by taking the square root of the average of the squared percent differences between each measured value from the respiratory monitroing system and its corresponding reference value from the manual counting.The 95% confidence intervals is calculated for the RMSE.

    Measured: 2 hours

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Respiratory Rate Bias Between the Respiratory Monitoring System and Manual Counting by a Trained Professional for the Supine Position

    Respiratory rate is measured concurrently by the respiratory monitoring system and by manual counting performed by a trained professional while the subject is in the supine position. For each paired measurement, the percent bias is calculated across all paired supine measurements for all subjects. Bias can be interpreted as the geometric mean of the paired relative differences between Makani RMS and manual counting. The 95% confidence intervals is calculated for the bias.

    Measured: 2 hours

  2. Respiratory Rate Bias Between the Respiratory Monitoring System and Manual Counting by a Trained Professional for the Recline Position

    Respiratory rate is measured concurrently by the respiratory monitoring system and by manual counting performed by a trained professional while the subject is in the recline position. For each paired measurement, the percent bias is calculated across all paired recline measurements for all subjects. Bias can be interpreted as the geometric mean of the paired relative differences between Makani RMS and manual counting. The 95% confidence intervals is calculated for the bias.

    Measured: 2 hours

  3. Respiratory Rate Precision Between the Respiratory Monitoring System and Manual Counting by a Trained Professional for the Supine Position

    Respiratory rate is measured concurrently by the respiratory monitoring system and by manual counting performed by a trained professional while the subject is in the supine position. For each paired measurement, the percent precision is calculated across all paired supine measurements for all subjects. Precision can be interpreted as the standard deviation of the relative paired differences. The 95% confidence intervals is calculated for the precision.

    Measured: 2 hours

  4. Respiratory Rate Precision Between the Respiratory Monitoring System and Manual Counting by a Trained Professional for the Recline Position

    Respiratory rate is measured concurrently by the respiratory monitoring system and by manual counting performed by a trained professional while the subject is in the recline position. For each paired measurement, the percent precision is calculated across all paired recline measurements for all subjects. Precision can be interpreted as the standard deviation of the relative paired differences. The 95% confidence intervals is calculated for the precision.

    Measured: 2 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2023
  2. Study start3 Aug 2022
  3. Primary completion29 Oct 2022
  4. Study completion29 Oct 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
27 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06000852
Sponsor's protocol ID
MAKANI-002
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
10 Aug 2023
Last updated
25 Mar 2026
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Makani Science Respiratory Monitoring System in people with Respiratory Monitoring, run by Michael Chu.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Mar 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Respiratory Rate Accuracy Between the Respiratory Monitoring System and Manual Counting by a Trained Professional for the Supine Position (time frame: 2 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in