AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastric CancerNCT05999019

Intraoperative Adverse Events in Robotic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

An observational study of Gastric Cancer, run by Fujian Medical University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Surgical quality control is a crucial determinant of evaluating the tumor efficacy. We assess the ClassIntra grade for quality control and oncological outcomes of robotic radical surgery for gastric cancer (GC). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Gastric Cancer
What is being tested?
robotic surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
366 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Aug 2016to 1 Jun 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: This study included 366 patients who underwent robotic gastrectomy at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, between August 2016 and September 2019, where over 800 gastrectomies were performed annually for patients with GC.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma through pathology;
  • Preoperative chest radiograph, abdominal ultrasonogram, and full abdominal CT examination showed no distant metastasis to the liver, lungs, or abdominal cavity;
  • Patients who underwent robotic radical gastrectomy.

Who cannot join

  • Intraoperatively existing distant metastases
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Missing general and video data.

About this study

Official title: Appraisal of Surgical Outcomes and Oncological Efficiency of Intraoperative Adverse Events in Robotic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Surgical quality control is a crucial determinant of evaluating the tumor efficacy. We assess the ClassIntra grade for quality control and oncological outcomes of robotic radical surgery for gastric cancer (GC).

Read the detailed description

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common malignant tumor worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Surgery remains the cornerstone of GC treatment, and there is a significant lack of research on iAE compared with postoperative complications. Owing to the influence of reporting and cultural acceptance, there have been issues of inadequate reporting and non-standardized practices regarding iAE reporting.

The previously reported laparoscopic results showed that the ClassIntra grade is an effective prognostic and surgical quality control index for laparoscopic radical surgery for gastric cancer therefore it could be included in routine hospital care and surgical quality control. (DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005727). Here, iAEs in patients who underwent robotic radical gastrectomy significantly correlated with the occurrence of postoperative complications and a poor long-term prognosis. Therefore, utilization and inclusion of ClassIntra grading as a crucial surgical quality control and prognostic indicator in the routine surgical quality evaluation system are recommended.

Conditions
Gastric Cancer
Being tested
robotic surgery
Keywords
gastric cancer
Medical subject headings
Stomach Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • robotic surgeryProcedure or surgery

    robotic surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. ClassIntra grade

    Patients who experienced iAE were classified into the iAE group using ClassIntra grading (version 1.0). The iAEs were further classified into five sublevels (ranging from I to V according to severity) based on the ClassIntra grade

    Measured: 1 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS)

    Surgical performance was assessed using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS)

    Measured: 1 months

  2. 3-year overall survival

    Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of surgery to death from any cause or the last follow-up.

    Measured: 36 months

  3. 3-year disease-free survival

    Disease-free survival (DFS) was calculated from the date of surgery to recurrence (locoregional and systemic), death from any cause, or the last follow-up.

    Measured: 36 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2023
  2. Study start1 Aug 2016
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2019
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
366 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05999019
Sponsor's protocol ID
RGiAE-01
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
6 Aug 2023
Last updated
21 Aug 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Gastric Cancer, run by Fujian Medical University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

ClassIntra grade (time frame: 1 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in