Adhesive CapsulitisNCT05988255
Efficacy of Static Progressive Stretch Versus Traditional Stretch in Adhesive Capsulitis
A study testing Static progressive stretching and Cyclic manual stretching in people with Adhesive Capsulitis and Stretch, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This study will be conducted to compare the effectiveness of static progressive stretching using the joint active system (JAS) shoulder device with cyclic manual stretching and controls on shoulder range of motion (ROM), time to gain ROM, and function in patients with adhesive capsulitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Adhesive Capsulitis, Stretch, Physical Neglect
- What is being tested?
- Static progressive stretching and Cyclic manual stretching
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 45 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2023to 5 Apr 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients of both genders with unilateral primary adhesive capsulitis.
- Patients aged between 40-65.
- Pain duration of three months or more.
- Range of motion loss of greater than 25% in at least 2 planes and passive external rotation loss that is greater than 50% of the uninvolved shoulder or less than 30° of external rotation.
Who cannot join
- Previous surgery or manipulation under anesthesia.
- Other conditions affecting the shoulder as (rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, rotator cuff disease, or malignancies).
- Neurological deficits affecting shoulder function.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Static Progressive Stretching Technique Versus Traditional Stretching in Primary Adhesive Capsulitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
This study will be conducted to compare the effectiveness of static progressive stretching using the joint active system (JAS) shoulder device with cyclic manual stretching and controls on shoulder range of motion (ROM), time to gain ROM, and function in patients with adhesive capsulitis. The study includes three groups. Group A (15 patients) will receive static progressive stretch using the JAS device. Group B (15 patients) will receive cyclic manual stretching in flexion, abduction, and external and internal rotations. Group C (15 patients) is a control group that will receive no treatment until the end of the study.
Read the detailed description
The study design: Prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial (therapy, level 1B). A flow diagram according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement will be presented to illustrate the progression of the study.
The sample size is calculated using G*power software (version 3.1.9.7, Franz Faul, Universitat Kiel, Germany) and it suggests that 42 participants (14 per group) will be needed using the MANOVA test. Cohen's d is set to be 0.25 with 80% power (alpha = 0.05) to detect an effect size.
Patients are randomly assigned to either of three groups (A, B, or C) using a computer-generated list. They are allocated by an outside party who isn't involved in the treatment using sequentially numbered sealed envelopes.
Inclusion criteria: (1) Patients of both genders with unilateral primary adhesive capsulitis (2) Patients aged between 40-65. (3) Pain duration of three months or more. (4) Range of motion loss of greater than 25% in at least 2 planes and passive external rotation loss that is greater than 50% of the uninvolved shoulder or less than 30° of external rotation.
Exclusion criteria: (1) Previous surgery or manipulation under anesthesia. (2) Other conditions affecting the shoulder as (rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, rotator cuff disease, or malignancies). (3) Neurological deficits affecting shoulder function.
Demographic data will be collected for all subjects regarding age, gender, dominance, and painful side. After patient selection according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we will measure shoulder range of motion (ROM) using a Baseline Digital Absolute Axis Goniometer, and shoulder function using the SPADI scale.
Range of motion will be assessed at baseline (before the start of treatment), at the end of each week, and at the end of 12 weeks.
Shoulder function will be assessed using SPADI at baseline (before the start of treatment) and at the end of treatment.
The mean time needed to reach ROM at 3 months will be assessed in each group and compared between groups.
Treatment procedures:
All patients in the three groups will be educated about the natural history of the disease and instructed to stay active at home through encouraging activity modification without pain. Each patient in the treatment groups will receive two treatment sessions per week for a series of 12 weeks.
- Static progressive stretching using JAS shoulder device (Group A): The static progressive stretch device applies stretch toward external and internal rotation from different degrees of scapular plane abduction. After adjustment of the device, it will be worn for 45 minutes (30 minutes stretching toward external rotation and 15 minutes toward internal rotation). The stretch position will be held for a series of 5 minutes and rest in between according to patient tolerance.
- Cyclic manual stretching (Group B): Five to twenty seconds of stretching and 10 seconds of rest will be used 10 times in each of the following directions (flexion, scapular plane abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation) and stretch to target rotator cuff interval. The stretching dose will be determined based on the patient's level of irritability.
- Group C: Fifteen patients will receive no physiotherapy treatment until the end of the study. As an ethical consideration, subjects in this group will receive the full treatment after the end of the study after data collection.
Statistical analysis:
Data will be analyzed using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) computer program version 24 software (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Descriptive statistics will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables.
The normality of data will be examined using Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test.
Repeated measures ANOVA test will be used to determine the difference between baseline and post-treatment scores for the ROM and time to gain ROM within each group.
Wilcoxon signed-rank test will be used to determine the difference between baseline and post-treatment scores for pain and function.
Kruskal Wallis ANOVA will be used for pain and function scores difference between groups (ordinal data).
A MANOVA test will be used to identify the difference between the three groups regarding ROM (flexion, extension, abduction, internal rotation, external rotation in adduction, and external rotation in abduction).
- Conditions
- Adhesive Capsulitis, Stretch, Physical Neglect
- Being tested
- Static progressive stretching, Cyclic manual stretching
- Keywords
- Adhesive capsulitis, Static progressive stretch
- Medical subject headings
- Bursitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Static progressive stretchingDevice
Also called Stretching exercises
A stretching technique applies a mechanical progressive stretch
Cyclic manual stretchingOther
Also called Stretching exercises
A stretching technique applies an intermittent manual stretch
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Static progressive stretch | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Static progressive stretching |
| Cyclic manual stretch | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Cyclic manual stretching |
| No treatment | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Range of motion
Shoulder flexion, extension, abduction, external rotation and internal rotation will be measured using Baseline Digital Absolute Axis Goniometer
Measured: Three months
Function
The patient will be advised to select the number that best reflects the intensity of their discomfort and the degree of trouble they are having using the affected shoulder using SPADI.
Measured: Three months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Time to gain range motion
Mean time needed to reach ROM at 3 months will be assessed in each group and compared between groups.
Measured: Three months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Aug 2023
- Study start1 Sep 2023
- Primary completion1 Mar 2024
- Study completion5 Apr 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Adhesive CapsulitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial (therapy, level 1B)
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Shaimaa Ramadan Ibrahim Abdul-ghani El Deab, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05988255
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P.T.REC/012/004172
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Static Progressive Stretching Technique Versus Traditional Stretching in Primary Adhesive Capsulitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05988255
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P.T.REC/012/004172
- Conditions
- Adhesive Capsulitis, Stretch, Physical Neglect
- Keywords
- Adhesive capsulitis, Static progressive stretch
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Apr 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will be conducted to compare the effectiveness of static progressive stretching using the joint active system (JAS) shoulder device with cyclic manual stretching and controls on shoulder range of motion (ROM), time to gain ROM, and function in patients with adhesive capsulitis. The study includes three groups. Group A (15 patients) will receive static progressive stretch using the JAS device. Group B (15 patients) will receive cyclic manual stretching in flexion, abduction, and external and internal rotations. Group C (15 patients) is a control group that will receive no treatment until the end of the study.
Detailed description
The study design: Prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial (therapy, level 1B). A flow diagram according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement will be presented to illustrate the progression of the study.
The sample size is calculated using G*power software (version 3.1.9.7, Franz Faul, Universitat Kiel, Germany) and it suggests that 42 participants (14 per group) will be needed using the MANOVA test. Cohen's d is set to be 0.25 with 80% power (alpha = 0.05) to detect an effect size.
Patients are randomly assigned to either of three groups (A, B, or C) using a computer-generated list. They are allocated by an outside party who isn't involved in the treatment using sequentially numbered sealed envelopes.
Inclusion criteria: (1) Patients of both genders with unilateral primary adhesive capsulitis (2) Patients aged between 40-65. (3) Pain duration of three months or more. (4) Range of motion loss of greater than 25% in at least 2 planes and passive external rotation loss that is greater than 50% of the uninvolved shoulder or less than 30° of external rotation.
Exclusion criteria: (1) Previous surgery or manipulation under anesthesia. (2) Other conditions affecting the shoulder as (rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, rotator cuff disease, or malignancies). (3) Neurological deficits affecting shoulder function.
Demographic data will be collected for all subjects regarding age, gender, dominance, and painful side. After patient selection according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we will measure shoulder range of motion (ROM) using a Baseline Digital Absolute Axis Goniometer, and shoulder function using the SPADI scale.
Range of motion will be assessed at baseline (before the start of treatment), at the end of each week, and at the end of 12 weeks.
Shoulder function will be assessed using SPADI at baseline (before the start of treatment) and at the end of treatment.
The mean time needed to reach ROM at 3 months will be assessed in each group and compared between groups.
Treatment procedures:
All patients in the three groups will be educated about the natural history of the disease and instructed to stay active at home through encouraging activity modification without pain. Each patient in the treatment groups will receive two treatment sessions per week for a series of 12 weeks.
- Static progressive stretching using JAS shoulder device (Group A): The static progressive stretch device applies stretch toward external and internal rotation from different degrees of scapular plane abduction. After adjustment of the device, it will be worn for 45 minutes (30 minutes stretching toward external rotation and 15 minutes toward internal rotation). The stretch position will be held for a series of 5 minutes and rest in between according to patient tolerance.
- Cyclic manual stretching (Group B): Five to twenty seconds of stretching and 10 seconds of rest will be used 10 times in each of the following directions (flexion, scapular plane abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation) and stretch to target rotator cuff interval. The stretching dose will be determined based on the patient's level of irritability.
- Group C: Fifteen patients will receive no physiotherapy treatment until the end of the study. As an ethical consideration, subjects in this group will receive the full treatment after the end of the study after data collection.
Statistical analysis:
Data will be analyzed using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) computer program version 24 software (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Descriptive statistics will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables.
The normality of data will be examined using Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test.
Repeated measures ANOVA test will be used to determine the difference between baseline and post-treatment scores for the ROM and time to gain ROM within each group.
Wilcoxon signed-rank test will be used to determine the difference between baseline and post-treatment scores for pain and function.
Kruskal Wallis ANOVA will be used for pain and function scores difference between groups (ordinal data).
A MANOVA test will be used to identify the difference between the three groups regarding ROM (flexion, extension, abduction, internal rotation, external rotation in adduction, and external rotation in abduction).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial (therapy, level 1B)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Static progressive stretch | Experimental | Device: Static progressive stretching |
| Cyclic manual stretch | Active comparator | Other: Cyclic manual stretching |
| No treatment | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients of both genders with unilateral primary adhesive capsulitis.
- Patients aged between 40-65.
- Pain duration of three months or more.
- Range of motion loss of greater than 25% in at least 2 planes and passive external rotation loss that is greater than 50% of the uninvolved shoulder or less than 30° of external rotation.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Previous surgery or manipulation under anesthesia.
- Other conditions affecting the shoulder as (rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, rotator cuff disease, or malignancies).
- Neurological deficits affecting shoulder function.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Static progressive stretchingAlso: Stretching exercisesA stretching technique applies a mechanical progressive stretch | Device | Static progressive stretch |
| Cyclic manual stretchingAlso: Stretching exercisesA stretching technique applies an intermittent manual stretch | Other | Cyclic manual stretch |
Primary outcome
Range of motion
Time frame: Three months
Shoulder flexion, extension, abduction, external rotation and internal rotation will be measured using Baseline Digital Absolute Axis Goniometer
Function
Time frame: Three months
The patient will be advised to select the number that best reflects the intensity of their discomfort and the degree of trouble they are having using the affected shoulder using SPADI.
1 secondary outcome
Time to gain range motion
Time frame: Three months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Feb 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Adhesive Capsulitis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Clinic Versus mHealth Application-Based Shoulder Rehabilitation in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis
Adhesive Capsulitis
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Physiotherapy Outcomes in Postmenopausal Women With Frozen Shoulder
Frozen Shoulder, Adhesive Capsulitis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Posterior Capsular Stretching With and Without Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Exercises in Frozen Shoulder
Frozen Shoulder
Active, not recruiting
Spencer vs. Ola Grimsby Techniques With Scapular Motor Training in Idiopathic Adhesive Capsulitis
Idiopathic Adhesive Capsulitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
OMT for Adhesive Capsulitis
Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder, Frozen Shoulder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Static progressive stretching and Cyclic manual stretching in people with Adhesive Capsulitis and Stretch, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Range of motion (time frame: Three months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2025.