AzTrials
AzTrials

PowerNCT05969197

Effects of Match Play Exercises and Plyometric Training on Explosive Power, Agility and Functional Performance

A study testing Match Play Training and Plyometric Training in people with Power and Functional Performance, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Technique is the most important part of football for scoring goal and in defense of the goal lower limbs are the most important part of the player to be focused on as moving with the ball and training method is important in training football players for their matches. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 28 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Power, Functional Performance
What is being tested?
Match Play Training and Plyometric Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
22 Dec 2022to 30 Jun 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 28 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • • Only Male
  • Ages 15-28(10)
  • Forward , Mid fielders and Defenders (11)
  • Both Right and Left Side players are included

Who cannot join

  • • Lower Extremity Injuries (12)
  • Lower Extremity Deformities
  • History of pain within the previous month prior to testing;
  • Not regular training during the month prior to testing;
  • Musculoskeletal lower limb injury in three months prior to testing.
  • Goalkeepers were excluded from the analysis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Pakistan Sports Board

    Lahore, Punajb, 5400

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Comparative Effects of Match Play Exercises and Plyometric Training on Explosive Power, Agility and Functional Performance in Football Players

Technique is the most important part of football for scoring goal and in defense of the goal lower limbs are the most important part of the player to be focused on as moving with the ball and training method is important in training football players for their matches. Use of training method in football players can either be a match play training or plyometric training. Plyometric training is considered an effective tool for increasing tendon stiffness. Plyometric training produces improvements in jump performance and lower body strength performance. A training program for young football players, using minimum equipment and effort, can result in improved player performance and a reduction in the risk of a possible overuse injury, reflected by an improvement in lower limb range of motion. Match play training patterns are mostly followed by the coaches to enhance the performance and plyometric are used for the efficient training programs.

This study will be a randomized clinical trial conducted at Pakistan sports board in Lahore. The study will be completed within the time duration of Six months. Non probability convenient sampling technique will be used to collect the data. The sample size of 15 participants each group will be taken in this study to find the effects of match play exercise versus plyometric on explosive power, Agility and functional performance in football players. Football players will be divided into 2 groups Group A will be given the match play training and Group B will be given plyometric trainings and at the end of the 6 week the results will be checked on power, agility and fictional performance. Power: (MRC scale) , Agility: Comprehensive Agility Measurement Tool (CAMT), Functional Performance: The Functional Movement Scale (FMS) tools will be used to measure the difference between the training pattern of 6 weeks which is more effective for the football players. The data will be collected using the SPSS 24. In descriptive statistics Frequency tables, pie charts, bar charts will be used to show summary of group measurements measured over time... The objective of this study is to Determine Comparative Effects of Match play training and plyometric training on Explosive power, Agility and Functional performance in football players.

Read the detailed description

To Compare the Effects Of Match Play Exercises And Plyometric Training On Explosive Power, Agility And Functional Performance In Football Players Randomized clinical Trials will be used. Non-probability convenient sampling technique will be used Data will be collected from Pakistan Sports Board, Lahore

DATA COLLECTION TOOL

  1. POWER Vertical Jump Tests
  2. AGILITY Illinois Agility Test
  3. The Functional Movement Scale (FMS)
Being tested
Match Play Training, Plyometric Training
Keywords
exercise, plyometric, agility, power, functional performance
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Match Play TrainingOther

    15 participants will be in Match play training group giving the Match play exercise protocol along with warm-up sessions for 6 weeks, measuring values before giving them protocol and after protocol.

  • Plyometric TrainingOther

    15 participants will be in Plyometric training group giving isotonic exercise protocol along with warm-up sessions for 6 weeks, measuring values before giving them protocol and after protocol.

Study groups in NCT05969197
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A - Match Play TrainingExperimental15 participants will be in Match play training group giving the Match play exercise protocol along with warm-up sessions for 6 weeks, measuring values before giving them protocol and after protocol.
Receives: Other: Match Play Training
Group B - Plyometric TrainingExperimental15 participants will be in Plyometric training group giving isotonic exercise protocol along with warm-up sessions for 6 weeks, measuring values before giving them protocol and after protocol.
Receives: Other: Plyometric Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Power

    Vertical jump tests are among the most common means of evaluating physical fitness in various populations. Though principally used to evaluate leg power in sports, such as basketball and football. vertical jump tests have also been used to evaluate non-athletic populations (including children (Acero et al., 2011) and elderly people (Pereira et al., 2012)), particularly because vertical jump training has been reported to improve bone mineral density (Allison, Folland, Rennie, Summers, \& Brooke-Wavell, 2013). Vertical jump tests have been proposed as important for talent identification purposes, with young elite athletes displaying higher values than their non-elite counterparts.(13)

    Measured: 6 weeks

  2. Agility

    Agility is an important characteristic of team sports athletes. There is a growing interest in the factors that influence agility performance as well as appropriate testing protocols and training strategies to assess and improve this quality. Agility tests generally offer good reliability, although this may be compromised in younger participants responding to various scenarios. A human and/or video stimulus seems the most appropriate method to discriminate between standard of playing ability. Decision-making and perceptual factors are often propositioned as discriminant factors; however, the underlying mechanisms are relatively unknown.(14)

    Measured: 6 weeks

  3. The Functional Movement Scale (FMS)

    Functional (e.g., deficits in balance and strength/power performance), neural (e.g., loss of sensory/motor neurons), muscular (e.g., atrophy of type-II muscle fibers in particular), and bone-related (e.g., osteoporosis) deteriorations. Traditionally, balance and/or lower extremity resistance training were used to mitigate these age-related deficits. However, the effects of resistance training are limited and poorly translate into improvements in balance, functional tasks, activities of daily living, and fall rates.

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Aug 2023
  2. Study start22 Dec 2022
  3. Primary completion30 May 2023
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05969197
Sponsor's protocol ID
REC/RCR & AHS/23/0409 Laeeq
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
6 Jun 2023
Last updated
1 Aug 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Petway AJ, Freitas TT, Calleja-Gonzalez J, Medina Leal D, Alcaraz PE. Training load and match-play demands in basketball based on competition level: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2020 Mar 5;15(3):e0229212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229212. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32134965
  • Miguel M, Oliveira R, Loureiro N, Garcia-Rubio J, Ibanez SJ. Load Measures in Training/Match Monitoring in Soccer: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 8;18(5):2721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052721.

    PubMed 33800275
  • Silva JR, Nassis GP, Rebelo A. Strength training in soccer with a specific focus on highly trained players. Sports Med Open. 2015;1(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40798-015-0006-z. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

    PubMed 26284158
  • Taheri E, Nikseresht A, Khoshnam E. The effect of 8 weeks of plyometric and resistance training on agility, speed and explosive power in soccer players. European Journal of Experimental Biology. 2014;4(1):383-6.

  • Davies G, Riemann BL, Manske R. CURRENT CONCEPTS OF PLYOMETRIC EXERCISE. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Nov;10(6):760-86.

    PubMed 26618058
  • Moreno-Perez V, Rodas G, Penaranda-Moraga M, Lopez-Samanes A, Romero-Rodriguez D, Aagaard P, Del Coso J. Effects of Football Training and Match-Play on Hamstring Muscle Strength and Passive Hip and Ankle Range of Motion during the Competitive Season. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 2;19(5):2897. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052897.

    PubMed 35270589
  • Moreno-Perez V, Campos-Vazquez MA, Toscano J, Sotos-Martinez VJ, Lopez-Del Campo R, Resta R, Del Coso J. Influence of the Weekly and Match-play Load on Muscle Injury in Professional Football Players. Int J Sports Med. 2022 Aug;43(9):783-790. doi: 10.1055/a-1533-2110. Epub 2022 Feb 21.

    PubMed 35189659
  • Maughan PC, MacFarlane NG, Swinton PA. Quantification of training and match-play load across a season in professional youth football players. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2021;16(5):1169-77.

  • Morgans R, Di Michele R, Drust B. Soccer Match Play as an Important Component of the Power-Training Stimulus in Premier League Players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 May 1;13(5):665-667. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0412. Epub 2018 Jan 2.

    PubMed 28422525
  • Horsley IG Dr, O'Donnell V, Leeder J. The epidemiology of injuries in English professional squash; A retrospective analysis between 2004 and 2015. Phys Ther Sport. 2020 Nov;46:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

    PubMed 32823248
  • MOHANTA N, KALRA S, PAWARIA S. A Comparative Study of Circuit Training and Plyometric Training on Strength, Speed and Agility in State Level Lawn Tennis Players. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research. 2019;13(12)

  • Prvulović N, Lilić A, Hadžović M. THE PREVALENCE OF FOOT DEFORMITIES IN ATHLETES WITH VARIOUS SPORTS BACKGROUNDS. Facta Universitatis Series: Physical Education and Sport. 2021:667-79.

  • Balsalobre-Fernandez C, Glaister M, Lockey RA. The validity and reliability of an iPhone app for measuring vertical jump performance. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(15):1574-9. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.996184. Epub 2015 Jan 2.

    PubMed 25555023
  • Paul DJ, Gabbett TJ, Nassis GP. Agility in Team Sports: Testing, Training and Factors Affecting Performance. Sports Med. 2016 Mar;46(3):421-42. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0428-2.

    PubMed 26670456
  • Granacher U, Gollhofer A, Hortobagyi T, Kressig RW, Muehlbauer T. The importance of trunk muscle strength for balance, functional performance, and fall prevention in seniors: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2013 Jul;43(7):627-41. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0041-1.

    PubMed 23568373

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Match Play Training and Plyometric Training in people with Power and Functional Performance, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Power (time frame: 6 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05969197, which also lists 15 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in