AzTrials
AzTrials

Myoma;UterusNCT05967936

Paracervical Block Versus Transcervical Block in Outpatient Procedural Hysteroscopy

A study testing Bupivacaine Injection in people with Myoma;Uterus and Polyp Uterus, run by Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Hysteroscopy is a minimally invasive, diagnostic and therapeutic gynecological surgical technique and the gold standard in the study of the uterine cavity. Thanks to the decrease in the diameter of hysteroscopes and to the vaginoscopic approach, anesthesia is no longer necessary in diagnostic hysteroscopy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Myoma;Uterus, Polyp Uterus
What is being tested?
Bupivacaine Injection
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
242 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
1 Sep 2023to 1 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female patients
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Indication of outpatient surgical hysteroscopy for polypectomy and myomectomy

Who cannot join

  • Women under 18 years old
  • Unable to understand how to score a visual analog scale pain score
  • Hysteroscopy contraindication
  • Patients with medical history or current status that makes outpatient procedure usafe

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Janey Fang, MD contact

5142513051

jfang85@uwo.ca

Chantal Rivard, MD contact

5142513051

rivardch@videotron.ca

Canada1 site
  • CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Île de Montréal

    Montreal East, Quebec, H1T 2M4

    Janey Fang, MD, 5142513051, jfang85@uwo.ca

    Chantal Rivard, MD, 5142513051, rivardch@videotron.ca

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Different Types of Local Anesthesia in Outpatient Procedural Hysteroscopy

Hysteroscopy is a minimally invasive, diagnostic and therapeutic gynecological surgical technique and the gold standard in the study of the uterine cavity. Thanks to the decrease in the diameter of hysteroscopes and to the vaginoscopic approach, anesthesia is no longer necessary in diagnostic hysteroscopy. Nevertheless, in operative hysteroscopy, given the instrumentalization and the need of cervical dilation, the use of local anesthesia, with or without sedation, is recommended. The different alternatives described in the literature are the following:

  1. Cervical/ intracervical block: injection of local anesthetic into the four quadrants of the cervix.
  2. Paracervical block: injection of local anesthetic in the cervicovaginal junction at 5 and 7 o'clock positions.
  3. Transcervical (uterine) anesthesia: instillation of a local anesthetic agent via catheter through the cervix and into the uterine cavity.
  4. Topical cervical anesthesia: application of local anesthetic in gel or spray to the cervix.

To assess the best anesthetic pathway to decrease pain during outpatient hysteroscopy, the investigators will perform a prospective multicentric study that compare two types of local anesthesia in outpatient procedural hysteroscopy: paracervical block, that is the actual gold-standard, and transcervical instillation.

Read the detailed description

To assess the best anesthetic pathway to decrease pain during outpatient hysteroscopy, the investigators will perform a multicentric prospective randomized trial, single-blinded, that compares two types of local anesthesia in outpatient procedural hysteroscopy: paracervical block, that is the actual gold-standard, and transcervical instillation.

The population studied will consist in adult women with indication of an outpatient surgical hysteroscopy (myomectomy or polypectomy). Every one of them will be invited to participate the day of their procedure. In the outpatient hysteroscopy clinic, the investigators will verify inclusion and exclusion criteria, explain the objectives of the study, collect data and obtain the patient's consent.

The sample size is 242 patients (121 in each group). The study will be performed in two different centers:

  • Integrated University Health Center and Social Services of the East of the Island of Montreal
  • Integrated University Health Center and social services of the South Center of the Island of Montreal

Right before each procedure the patients will be randomized through anonymous and alternized enveloppes that will be distributed in each center, to either receive paracervical or transcervical anesthesia before hysteroscopy.

Each patient will receive a pre-established dose of sedative before the procedure, according to their weight: Fentanyl 0,5 mcg/kg IV and Midazolam 0,02 mg/kg. The subsequent doses will be noted.

Under sedation, with the patient in lithotomy position, a medium size speculum will be inserted. The vagina will be disinfected with chlorhexidine and the anterior lip of the cervix will be gripped with a Pozzi forceps.

According to previous randomization, each patient will receive one of the following alternatives of local anesthesia:

  • Group A: Paracervical 10cc Bupivacaine 1%, without epinephrine, at 0.5-1 cm depth of the cervicovaginal junction at 5 and 7 o'clock positions (20cc in total).
  • Group B: Transcervical (uterine) 10cc Bupivacaine 1% through the endocervix using an 17-Gauge epidural catheter

During the procedure (T1), the nurse will be in charge to fill the scale (to avoid bias). The patients will be given a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to fill 15 minutes after the procedure (before discharge), to assess pain.

For each group the investigators will calculate the average rate of pain according to the Visual Analogue Scale during and immediately after the procedure (15 minutes). The investigators will subdivide each group into pre and postmenopausal women and into nulliparous and parous women and compare their Visual Analogue Scale as well.

Statistical analysis will be performed to compare results.

Being tested
Bupivacaine Injection
Keywords
hysteroscopy, pain, local anesthetic, ambulatory care, bupivacaine, paracervical block, transcervical block
Medical subject headings
Myofibroma, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bupivacaine InjectionDrug

    Also called evaluation of pain by using two different types of local anesthesia

    evaluation of pain by using two different types of local anesthesia

Study groups in NCT05967936
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Paracervical blockActive comparator10cc Bupivacaine 1% at 0.5-1 cm depth of the cervicovaginal junction at 5 and 7 o'clock positions (20cc in total).
Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine Injection
Transcervical blockExperimental10cc Bupivacaine 1% through the endocervix using an 17-gauge epidural catheter
Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine Injection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To assess the best anesthetic pathway to decrease pain during outpatient hysteroscopy

    comparing 10 point visual analogue scale (from 0 to 10 points) between two groups of patients recieving Bupivacaine administrated through a paracervical block versus a transcervical block

    Measured: during hysteroscopy

  2. To assess the best anesthetic pathway to decrease pain during outpatient hysteroscopy

    comparing 10 point visual analogue scale (from 0 to 10 points) between two groups of patients recieving Bupivacaine administrated through a paracervical block versus a transcervical block

    Measured: 15 minutes post hysteroscopy

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Compare the pain experience based on the visual analogue scale between pre and post-menopausal patients

    Compare the pain experience based on the 10 point visual analogue scale (from 0 to 10 points) between pre and post-menopausal patients

    Measured: during hysteroscopy

  2. Compare the pain experience based on the visual analogue scale between pre and post-menopausal patients

    Compare the pain experience based on the 10 point visual analogue scale (from 0 to 10 points) between pre and post-menopausal patients

    Measured: 15 minutes post hysteroscopy

  3. Compare the pain experience based on the visual analogue scale between nulliparous and parous patients

    Compare the pain experience based on the 10 point visual analogue scale (from 0 to 10 points) between nulliparous and parous patients

    Measured: during hysteroscopy

  4. Compare the pain experience based on the visual analogue scale between nulliparous and parous patients

    Compare the pain experience based on the 10 point visual analogue scale (from 0 to 10 points) between nulliparous and parous patients

    Measured: 15 minutes post hysteroscopy

  5. To evaluate the need for an extra intravenous sedative dose.

    Number of patients who demand an extra dose of sedative during hysteroscopy

    Measured: during hysteroscopy

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Aug 2023
  2. Study start1 Sep 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Multicentric, prospective, randomized trial, single-blinded, where eligible patients will be randomized to either receive paracervical or transcervical anesthesia before outpatient surgical hysteroscopy
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
242 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05967936
Sponsor's protocol ID
MP-12-2023-3238
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
19 Jun 2023
Last updated
1 Aug 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: There is not a plan to make IPD available

Publications

  • Readman E, Maher PJ. Pain relief and outpatient hysteroscopy: a literature review. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004 Aug;11(3):315-9. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60042-4.

    PubMed 15559340
  • Lau WC, Tam WH, Lo WK, Yuen PM. A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of transcervical intrauterine local anaesthesia in outpatient hysteroscopy. BJOG. 2000 May;107(5):610-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13301.x.

    PubMed 10826574
  • De Silva PM, Mahmud A, Smith PP, Clark TJ. Analgesia for Office Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jul-Aug;27(5):1034-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

    PubMed 31982584
  • Bettocchi S, Selvaggi L. A vaginoscopic approach to reduce the pain of office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997 Feb;4(2):255-8. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(97)80019-9.

    PubMed 9050737
  • Cicinelli E, Didonna T, Ambrosi G, Schonauer LM, Fiore G, Matteo MG. Topical anaesthesia for diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal women: a randomised placebo-controlled double-blind study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Mar;104(3):316-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11460.x.

    PubMed 9091008
  • Lau WC, Lo WK, Tam WH, Yuen PM. Paracervical anaesthesia in outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Apr;106(4):356-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08274.x.

    PubMed 10426243
  • Zupi E, Luciano AA, Valli E, Marconi D, Maneschi F, Romanini C. The use of topical anesthesia in diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril. 1995 Feb;63(2):414-6.

    PubMed 7843454
  • Broadbent JA, Hill NC, Molnar BG, Rolfe KJ, Magos AL. Randomized placebo controlled trial to assess the role of intracervical lignocaine in outpatient hysteroscopy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Sep;99(9):777-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13886.x. No abstract available.

    PubMed 1420022
  • Cooper NA, Khan KS, Clark TJ. Local anaesthesia for pain control during outpatient hysteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c1130. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1130.

    PubMed 20332307
  • Kosus N, Kosus A, Guler A, Simavli SA, Turhan NO. Transcervical intrauterine levobupivacaine infusion or paracervical block for pain control during endometrial biopsy. Exp Ther Med. 2012 Apr;3(4):683-688. doi: 10.3892/etm.2012.463. Epub 2012 Jan 30.

    PubMed 22969951
  • Guida M, Pellicano M, Zullo F, Acunzo G, Lavitola G, Palomba S, Nappi C. Outpatient operative hysteroscopy with bipolar electrode: a prospective multicentre randomized study between local anaesthesia and conscious sedation. Hum Reprod. 2003 Apr;18(4):840-3. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg075.

    PubMed 12660281
  • Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. No abstract available.

    PubMed 22588748
  • Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986 Oct;27(1):117-126. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9.

    PubMed 3785962
  • Chudnoff S, Einstein M, Levie M. Paracervical block efficacy in office hysteroscopic sterilization: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jan;115(1):26-34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c51ace.

    PubMed 20027030

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bupivacaine Injection in people with Myoma;Uterus and Polyp Uterus, run by Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Janey Fang, MD (5142513051, jfang85@uwo.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To assess the best anesthetic pathway to decrease pain during outpatient hysteroscopy (time frame: during hysteroscopy). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05967936, which also lists 14 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in