Transtibial Amputation - UnilateralNCT05964855
Comparison of Various Prosthetic Foot-Ankle Mechanisms
A study testing MIT Variable Stiffness Prosthesis v1, MIT Variable Equilibrium Angle Prosthesis v1 and MIT Sliding Beam Passive Prosthesis in people with Transtibial Amputation - Unilateral, run by Massachusetts Institute of Technology at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
In summary, subjects will be asked to wear a number of sensors and use different ankle-foot prostheses in place of their customary prosthesis. Data will be collected from the wearable sensors, VICON motion capture system, video cameras, and force sensors in the ground as they walk on level-ground, on a treadmill, and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Transtibial Amputation - Unilateral
- What is being tested?
- MIT Variable Stiffness Prosthesis v1, MIT Variable Equilibrium Angle Prosthesis v1 and MIT Sliding Beam Passive Prosthesis
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 28 Jul 2023to 1 Apr 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Person with unilateral transtibial amputation
- K3 or K4 Medicare mobility rating
- Ages 18-65
Who cannot join
- Below K3 Medicare mobility rating
- Outside of age range (liability and safety reasons)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
A Step Ahead Prosthetics
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01803
MIT Media Laboratory
Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139
About this study
In summary, subjects will be asked to wear a number of sensors and use different ankle-foot prostheses in place of their customary prosthesis. Data will be collected from the wearable sensors, VICON motion capture system, video cameras, and force sensors in the ground as they walk on level-ground, on a treadmill, and on stairs. The controller of any powered prosthesis will be electronically adjusted between trials or while the subject walks to determine how their gait changes in response to these changes. Trials will also be conducted with a standard passive prosthesis that would be prescribed for a person of similar height and weight.
Read the detailed description
Subject Selection and Consent:
Subjects will be selected based on the following priority. Subjects who have previously participated in similar studies with the Biomechatronics lab and who have already been screened for health and mobility level will be contacted first. If additional subjects are needed, a recruitment flyer and screening questionnaire will be sent to potential candidates. Copies of both the flyer and questionnaire are included in the attachments section. Prior to the experimental sessions, subjects will be asked to read and sign a informed consent form and will explain the project to them and answer any questions that they may have. They will also be given time to become familiar with the equipment being used before beginning any trials. If needed, subjects will be aligned and fitted by a professional prosthetist at A Step Ahead Prosthetics in Burlington, MA. No personnel at A Step Ahead Prosthetics will conduct research or have any vested interest in research outcomes or publication.
Attire:
Subjects will be asked to wear tight-fitting clothes, such as a skin-tight shirt, running shorts and low-profile shoes. If this is not possible, clothes will be provided according to subject needs. The investigators will provide and may require subjects to wear a skin-tight Velcro outfit that allows us to place reflective balls for video camera capture.
Location(s) and Timeline:
Experimental sessions will be conducted in the MIT Biomechatronics Laboratory (E14-274), 75 Amherst St., Cambridge, MA 02139 and the basement connecting MIT Building 66, 68, and E19 (31 Ames St., Cambridge, MA 02139). The basement is a publicly accessible area, and visible signage will be posted to alert passerby. Any alignment and fitting of prosthetic devices will take place at either the aforementioned location or at A Step Ahead Prosthetics, 21 A. St., Burlington, MA 01803 by a trained prosthetist.
Total study duration is expected to be 8 hours per subject, likely over two 4-hour sessions. These sessions can be completed either in a single day or over two days.
Powered Prosthesis:
Subjects will be given three or four computer-controlled quasi-passive (QP) ankle-foot prostheses to attach in place of their customary prosthesis during a session, depending on the arm. These include the Blatchford Elan, Ossur Proprio, a variable-stiffness prosthesis (VSA), and a variable-angle prosthesis (VAA). These QP prostheses have the capability of providing active assistance or changing mechanical properties during walking. Controls will be adjusted either through a wireless link or hardwire connection depending on the device. Subjects will be given as much time as necessary to practice using the prostheses before the experiments begin.
Passive Prosthesis:
Subjects will be given 1-3 passive prostheses to attach in place of their customary prosthesis during a session. These include the Ossur Pro-Flex XC and a passive sliding-beam prosthesis based on the Variable Stiffness prosthesis above with the electronics and actuator removed. In the first arm, a passive prosthesis that can change ankle equilibrium angle manually will be used. Subjects will be given as much time as necessary to practice using the prosthesis before the experiments begin.
Data Collection:
Data collection is expected to take place in two segments. In the first segment, each subject will walk on a treadmill at three speeds between 0.5-1.5m/s (slow to fast walking), chosen based on their comfort. At each speed, all five prostheses will be tested, randomly selected, for 2mins each. Motion will be captured with a VICON motion capture system, and ground reaction forces will be measured using a Bertec force-sensitive treadmill. For each speed, once all prostheses have been tested, each subject will be given a questionnaire to ascertain how each prosthesis performed at heel strike (early stance), roll over (mid stance), and powered plantar flexion (late stance). In addition, each subject will be asked how each prosthesis generally performed, and their personal preference. This testing will occur across the three walking speeds, resulting in three completed questionnaires.
In addition, subjects will walk in a figure-8 pattern at a preferred gait speed around two cones placed on the level-ground walking surface and separated by up to 30 feet. Handrails and a harness will be available to the subject as needed. Subjects will perform the walking figure-8 for a minimum of 5 times for each randomly-selected prosthesis. Once all prostheses have been tested, each subject will be given a questionnaire to ascertain how each prosthesis generally performed, and their personal preference.
Each subject will ascend and descend stairs and a ramp inclined between 4°-8° from horizontal at their preferred speed, in a randomly selected order. This incline is akin to between an ADA-compliant wheelchair ramp and a moderately inclined hill. Motion will be captured with a VICON motion capture system, and ground reaction forces will be measured using a Bertec force-sensitive treadmill for slope ambulation, and a force-sensitive staircase for stair ambulation. All five prostheses will be tested, randomly selected. Subjects will perform each of stair ascent and stair descent for a minimum of 5 times per prosthesis. For slopes and stairs, subjects will be asked to test different stiffnesses and angles and pick a preferred setting for the VSA and VAA, respectively. Data will be collected for a total of 2mins for slope ascent and 2mins for slope descent with each prosthesis. If necessary, subjects will test up to 5 ankles on an ADA-compliant over-ground ramp for additional slope ascent and slope descent evaluation. This will provide additional evaluation of differences between treadmill and over-ground slope walking for both subject and researcher. Subjects will walk up and down the ramp a minimum of 5 times per prosthesis. Handrails are available along the entire ramp, and a researcher will be beside the subject for assistance. For each slope and stair ascent/descent, once all prostheses have been tested, each subject will be given a questionnaire to ascertain how each prosthesis generally performed, and their personal preference. This testing will occur across the slope terrain types, as well as after the stair ascent/descent trial, resulting in three completed questionnaires for each subject. If time allows, subjects may also be asked to test test up to 5 ankles a 30 ft. over-ground course consisting of level-ground, stairs, and slopes in order to evaluate transitions between terrains. Subjects will perform the course a minimum of 3 times. This will not be evaluated via questionnaire and is meant to provide information to the researcher on future prosthetic design. Handrails are available for all elements except an adjustable ramp, for which a researcher will be beside the subject for assistance.
- Conditions
- Transtibial Amputation - Unilateral
- Being tested
- MIT Variable Stiffness Prosthesis v1, MIT Variable Equilibrium Angle Prosthesis v1, MIT Sliding Beam Passive Prosthesis, Ossur Pro-Flex XC, Blatchford Elan Variable-Dampening Prosthesis
- Keywords
- Foot-ankle device, prosthesis, mobility
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MIT Variable Stiffness Prosthesis v1Device
Also called VS, VSA
Proprietary electronically-controlled prosthesis that can vary its effective stiffness.
MIT Variable Equilibrium Angle Prosthesis v1Device
Also called VA, VAA
Proprietary manually-controlled prosthesis that can vary its effective ankle equilibrium angle.
MIT Sliding Beam Passive ProsthesisDevice
Also called SB
Proprietary fixed-stiffness passive foot-ankle prosthesis.
Ossur Pro-Flex XCDevice
Also called Pro-Flex XC, XC, PF
Commercially-available passive fixed-stiffness foot-ankle prosthesis by Ossur.
Blatchford Elan Variable-Dampening ProsthesisDevice
Also called Elan, EL
Commercially-available electronically-controlled prosthesis that can vary its effective dampening.
Ossur Proprio Variable Angle ProsthesisDevice
Also called Proprio, PP
Commercially available variable ankle angle prosthesis by Ossur.
MIT Variable Stiffness Prosthesis v2Device
Also called Folia, VS, VSA
Second generation a proprietary electronically-controlled prosthesis that can vary its effective stiffness.
MIT Variable Equilibrium Angle Prosthesis v2Device
Also called VA, VAA
Second generation prototype prosthesis that can vary its effective ankle equilibrium angle.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of first generation prototype prostheses | Experimental | Clinical trial to evaluate efficacy of first generation of MIT prototype prosthetic ankle-foot devices on people with unilateral transtibial amputation over different walking speeds and terrains. Receives: Device: MIT Variable Stiffness Prosthesis v1; Device: MIT Variable Equilibrium Angle Prosthesis v1; Device: MIT Sliding Beam Passive Prosthesis; Device: Ossur Pro-Flex XC; Device: Blatchford Elan Variable-Dampening Prosthesis |
| Evaluation of second generation of prototype prostheses | Experimental | Clinical trial to evaluate efficacy of second generation of MIT prototype prosthetic ankle-foot devices on people with unilateral transtibial amputation over different walking speeds and terrains. Receives: Device: Ossur Pro-Flex XC; Device: Blatchford Elan Variable-Dampening Prosthesis; Device: Ossur Proprio Variable Angle Prosthesis; Device: MIT Variable Stiffness Prosthesis v2; Device: MIT Variable Equilibrium Angle Prosthesis v2 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
User device preference for level-ground walking
Determine which device the users prefer for level-ground walking by gauging user feedback through an evaluation questionnaire. Evaluation units will be a sliding scale ranging from "Very unfavorable" to "Very favorable" with neutral in the middle. Subjects will be asked to rank the 5 interventions from best to worst for the specific task.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)
User device preference for stair ascent & descent
Determine which device the users prefer for stair ascent \& descent by gauging user feedback through an evaluation questionnaire. Evaluation units will be a sliding scale ranging from "Very unfavorable" to "Very favorable" with neutral in the middle. Subjects will be asked to rank the 5 interventions from best to worst for the specific task.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)
User device preference for sloped ground ascent & descent
Determine which device the users prefer for 8-degree sloped ground ascent \& descent by gauging user feedback through an evaluation questionnaire. Evaluation units will be a sliding scale ranging from "Very unfavorable" to "Very favorable" with neutral in the middle. Subjects will be asked to rank the 5 interventions from best to worst for the specific task.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Effect of device on level-ground walking gait
Evaluate the effect of the device on level-ground walking gait patterns. Gait will be measured with a VICON motion capture system. Unit of measure is gait symmetry.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)
Effect of device on stair ascent & descent gait
Evaluate the effect of the device on stair ascent and descent gait patterns. Gait will be measured with a VICON motion capture system. Unit of measure is gait symmetry.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)
Effect of device on sloped ground walking gait
Evaluate the effect of the device on sloped ground walking gait patterns. Gait will be measured with a VICON motion capture system. Unit of measure is gait symmetry.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)
Effect of device on ground reaction force during ambulation
Evaluate the effect of the device on ground reaction forces during ambulation. Ground reaction forces will be measured with Bertec force plates. Unit of measure is ground reaction force in Newtons.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jul 2023
- Study start28 Jul 2023
- Primary completion1 Apr 2026
- Study completion1 Apr 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Transtibial Amputation - UnilateralStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05964855
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2306001029
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 20 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Various Prosthetic Foot-Ankle Mechanisms
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05964855
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2306001029
- Conditions
- Transtibial Amputation - Unilateral
- Keywords
- Foot-ankle device, prosthesis, mobility
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 28 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In summary, subjects will be asked to wear a number of sensors and use different ankle-foot prostheses in place of their customary prosthesis. Data will be collected from the wearable sensors, VICON motion capture system, video cameras, and force sensors in the ground as they walk on level-ground, on a treadmill, and on stairs. The controller of any powered prosthesis will be electronically adjusted between trials or while the subject walks to determine how their gait changes in response to these changes. Trials will also be conducted with a standard passive prosthesis that would be prescribed for a person of similar height and weight.
Detailed description
Subject Selection and Consent:
Subjects will be selected based on the following priority. Subjects who have previously participated in similar studies with the Biomechatronics lab and who have already been screened for health and mobility level will be contacted first. If additional subjects are needed, a recruitment flyer and screening questionnaire will be sent to potential candidates. Copies of both the flyer and questionnaire are included in the attachments section. Prior to the experimental sessions, subjects will be asked to read and sign a informed consent form and will explain the project to them and answer any questions that they may have. They will also be given time to become familiar with the equipment being used before beginning any trials. If needed, subjects will be aligned and fitted by a professional prosthetist at A Step Ahead Prosthetics in Burlington, MA. No personnel at A Step Ahead Prosthetics will conduct research or have any vested interest in research outcomes or publication.
Attire:
Subjects will be asked to wear tight-fitting clothes, such as a skin-tight shirt, running shorts and low-profile shoes. If this is not possible, clothes will be provided according to subject needs. The investigators will provide and may require subjects to wear a skin-tight Velcro outfit that allows us to place reflective balls for video camera capture.
Location(s) and Timeline:
Experimental sessions will be conducted in the MIT Biomechatronics Laboratory (E14-274), 75 Amherst St., Cambridge, MA 02139 and the basement connecting MIT Building 66, 68, and E19 (31 Ames St., Cambridge, MA 02139). The basement is a publicly accessible area, and visible signage will be posted to alert passerby. Any alignment and fitting of prosthetic devices will take place at either the aforementioned location or at A Step Ahead Prosthetics, 21 A. St., Burlington, MA 01803 by a trained prosthetist.
Total study duration is expected to be 8 hours per subject, likely over two 4-hour sessions. These sessions can be completed either in a single day or over two days.
Powered Prosthesis:
Subjects will be given three or four computer-controlled quasi-passive (QP) ankle-foot prostheses to attach in place of their customary prosthesis during a session, depending on the arm. These include the Blatchford Elan, Ossur Proprio, a variable-stiffness prosthesis (VSA), and a variable-angle prosthesis (VAA). These QP prostheses have the capability of providing active assistance or changing mechanical properties during walking. Controls will be adjusted either through a wireless link or hardwire connection depending on the device. Subjects will be given as much time as necessary to practice using the prostheses before the experiments begin.
Passive Prosthesis:
Subjects will be given 1-3 passive prostheses to attach in place of their customary prosthesis during a session. These include the Ossur Pro-Flex XC and a passive sliding-beam prosthesis based on the Variable Stiffness prosthesis above with the electronics and actuator removed. In the first arm, a passive prosthesis that can change ankle equilibrium angle manually will be used. Subjects will be given as much time as necessary to practice using the prosthesis before the experiments begin.
Data Collection:
Data collection is expected to take place in two segments. In the first segment, each subject will walk on a treadmill at three speeds between 0.5-1.5m/s (slow to fast walking), chosen based on their comfort. At each speed, all five prostheses will be tested, randomly selected, for 2mins each. Motion will be captured with a VICON motion capture system, and ground reaction forces will be measured using a Bertec force-sensitive treadmill. For each speed, once all prostheses have been tested, each subject will be given a questionnaire to ascertain how each prosthesis performed at heel strike (early stance), roll over (mid stance), and powered plantar flexion (late stance). In addition, each subject will be asked how each prosthesis generally performed, and their personal preference. This testing will occur across the three walking speeds, resulting in three completed questionnaires.
In addition, subjects will walk in a figure-8 pattern at a preferred gait speed around two cones placed on the level-ground walking surface and separated by up to 30 feet. Handrails and a harness will be available to the subject as needed. Subjects will perform the walking figure-8 for a minimum of 5 times for each randomly-selected prosthesis. Once all prostheses have been tested, each subject will be given a questionnaire to ascertain how each prosthesis generally performed, and their personal preference.
Each subject will ascend and descend stairs and a ramp inclined between 4°-8° from horizontal at their preferred speed, in a randomly selected order. This incline is akin to between an ADA-compliant wheelchair ramp and a moderately inclined hill. Motion will be captured with a VICON motion capture system, and ground reaction forces will be measured using a Bertec force-sensitive treadmill for slope ambulation, and a force-sensitive staircase for stair ambulation. All five prostheses will be tested, randomly selected. Subjects will perform each of stair ascent and stair descent for a minimum of 5 times per prosthesis. For slopes and stairs, subjects will be asked to test different stiffnesses and angles and pick a preferred setting for the VSA and VAA, respectively. Data will be collected for a total of 2mins for slope ascent and 2mins for slope descent with each prosthesis. If necessary, subjects will test up to 5 ankles on an ADA-compliant over-ground ramp for additional slope ascent and slope descent evaluation. This will provide additional evaluation of differences between treadmill and over-ground slope walking for both subject and researcher. Subjects will walk up and down the ramp a minimum of 5 times per prosthesis. Handrails are available along the entire ramp, and a researcher will be beside the subject for assistance. For each slope and stair ascent/descent, once all prostheses have been tested, each subject will be given a questionnaire to ascertain how each prosthesis generally performed, and their personal preference. This testing will occur across the slope terrain types, as well as after the stair ascent/descent trial, resulting in three completed questionnaires for each subject. If time allows, subjects may also be asked to test test up to 5 ankles a 30 ft. over-ground course consisting of level-ground, stairs, and slopes in order to evaluate transitions between terrains. Subjects will perform the course a minimum of 3 times. This will not be evaluated via questionnaire and is meant to provide information to the researcher on future prosthetic design. Handrails are available for all elements except an adjustable ramp, for which a researcher will be beside the subject for assistance.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of first generation prototype prostheses | Experimental | Device: MIT Variable Stiffness Prosthesis v1, Device: MIT Variable Equilibrium Angle Prosthesis v1, Device: MIT Sliding Beam Passive Prosthesis, Device: Ossur Pro-Flex XC, Device: Blatchford Elan Variable-Dampening ProsthesisClinical trial to evaluate efficacy of first generation of MIT prototype prosthetic ankle-foot devices on people with unilateral transtibial amputation over different walking speeds and terrains. |
| Evaluation of second generation of prototype prostheses | Experimental | Device: Ossur Pro-Flex XC, Device: Blatchford Elan Variable-Dampening Prosthesis, Device: Ossur Proprio Variable Angle Prosthesis, Device: MIT Variable Stiffness Prosthesis v2, Device: MIT Variable Equilibrium Angle Prosthesis v2Clinical trial to evaluate efficacy of second generation of MIT prototype prosthetic ankle-foot devices on people with unilateral transtibial amputation over different walking speeds and terrains. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Person with unilateral transtibial amputation
- K3 or K4 Medicare mobility rating
- Ages 18-65
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Below K3 Medicare mobility rating
- Outside of age range (liability and safety reasons)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MIT Variable Stiffness Prosthesis v1Also: VS, VSAProprietary electronically-controlled prosthesis that can vary its effective stiffness. | Device | Evaluation of first generation prototype prostheses |
| MIT Variable Equilibrium Angle Prosthesis v1Also: VA, VAAProprietary manually-controlled prosthesis that can vary its effective ankle equilibrium angle. | Device | Evaluation of first generation prototype prostheses |
| MIT Sliding Beam Passive ProsthesisAlso: SBProprietary fixed-stiffness passive foot-ankle prosthesis. | Device | Evaluation of first generation prototype prostheses |
| Ossur Pro-Flex XCAlso: Pro-Flex XC, XC, PFCommercially-available passive fixed-stiffness foot-ankle prosthesis by Ossur. | Device | Evaluation of first generation prototype prostheses, Evaluation of second generation of prototype prostheses |
| Blatchford Elan Variable-Dampening ProsthesisAlso: Elan, ELCommercially-available electronically-controlled prosthesis that can vary its effective dampening. | Device | Evaluation of first generation prototype prostheses, Evaluation of second generation of prototype prostheses |
| Ossur Proprio Variable Angle ProsthesisAlso: Proprio, PPCommercially available variable ankle angle prosthesis by Ossur. | Device | Evaluation of second generation of prototype prostheses |
| MIT Variable Stiffness Prosthesis v2Also: Folia, VS, VSASecond generation a proprietary electronically-controlled prosthesis that can vary its effective stiffness. | Device | Evaluation of second generation of prototype prostheses |
| MIT Variable Equilibrium Angle Prosthesis v2Also: VA, VAASecond generation prototype prosthesis that can vary its effective ankle equilibrium angle. | Device | Evaluation of second generation of prototype prostheses |
Primary outcome
User device preference for level-ground walking
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)
Determine which device the users prefer for level-ground walking by gauging user feedback through an evaluation questionnaire. Evaluation units will be a sliding scale ranging from "Very unfavorable" to "Very favorable" with neutral in the middle. Subjects will be asked to rank the 5 interventions from best to worst for the specific task.
User device preference for stair ascent & descent
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)
Determine which device the users prefer for stair ascent \& descent by gauging user feedback through an evaluation questionnaire. Evaluation units will be a sliding scale ranging from "Very unfavorable" to "Very favorable" with neutral in the middle. Subjects will be asked to rank the 5 interventions from best to worst for the specific task.
User device preference for sloped ground ascent & descent
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)
Determine which device the users prefer for 8-degree sloped ground ascent \& descent by gauging user feedback through an evaluation questionnaire. Evaluation units will be a sliding scale ranging from "Very unfavorable" to "Very favorable" with neutral in the middle. Subjects will be asked to rank the 5 interventions from best to worst for the specific task.
4 secondary outcomes
Effect of device on level-ground walking gait
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)
Effect of device on stair ascent & descent gait
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)
Effect of device on sloped ground walking gait
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)
Effect of device on ground reaction force during ambulation
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Transtibial Amputation - Unilateral
Recruiting
Impact of Footwear on Gait in Unilateral Transtibial Amputees
Transtibial Amputation, Lower Limb Amputation
RecruitingPhase 1
Influence of Prosthetic Foot Stiffness on Transtibial Osseointegrated Bone-Anchored Limb Outcomes
Amputation, Transtibial Amputation - Unilateral
Recruiting
REsistance and LOADing Exercise for Bone Health
Amputation of Lower Limb Below Knee, Amputation, Traumatic
Not yet recruiting
Socket-leg Interface Movements in Transtibial Amputees
Transtibial Amputation - Unilateral
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MIT Variable Stiffness Prosthesis v1, MIT Variable Equilibrium Angle Prosthesis v1 and MIT Sliding Beam Passive Prosthesis in people with Transtibial Amputation - Unilateral, run by Massachusetts Institute of Technology at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
User device preference for level-ground walking (time frame: From enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2026.