COVID-19NCT05957588
Non-ventilated Prone Positioning in the COVID-19 Population
A study testing Proning group in people with COVID-19 and Proning, run by Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
In the COVID-19 healthcare crisis, one possible treatment therapy that has generated the most discussion is that of proning, or the position in which the patient lays face down as opposed to face up for a period of time. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- COVID-19, Proning, Oxygenation
- What is being tested?
- Proning group
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 216 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2021to 1 Apr 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients that were confirmed COVID-19 positive on an acute-care, telemetry-monitored, non-ICU unit and were considered hypoxemic
- conscious, oriented and independently mobile patients
- subjects were patients 18 years and older
Who cannot join
- negative for COVID 19
- patients in ICU settings
- patients in acute respiratory distress
- patients in hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure below 90) or arrhythmia
- patients with altered mental status
- patients with unstable spine/thoracic injury
Show all 11Show fewer
- patients with recent abdominal surgery
- patients with significant pressure ulcers (above stage 1)
- pregnant patients past the 2nd trimester
- patients that have concerning neurological issues (such as seizures)
- Patients that are unable to change positions independently
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
About this study
In the COVID-19 healthcare crisis, one possible treatment therapy that has generated the most discussion is that of proning, or the position in which the patient lays face down as opposed to face up for a period of time. As the pandemic continues, this method has been more widely adopted to increase oxygen saturation in patients in respiratory distress. While proning research is both ongoing and extensive in the ICU population of COVID-19 patients, minimal research has been conducted with acute care patients. The researchers aim to address this gap with this study. The researchers used a systematic approach to educate patients and staff about patient self-proning, implementing self-proning every 2 hours, and monitoring escalation of oxygen levels, as well as length of stay in the acute care unit. The researchers hypothesized an improvement in oxygen saturation levels as evidenced by no escalation of respiratory care (i.e. higher levels of oxygen needed, transfer to higher level of care), resulting in shorter lengths of stay for the intervention population.
Read the detailed description
Background: In the COVID-19 healthcare crisis, one possible treatment therapy that has generated the most discussion is that of proning, or the position in which the patient lays face down as opposed to face up for a period of time. As the pandemic continues, this method has been more widely adopted to aid in increasing oxygen saturation levels in patients in respiratory distress. While proning research is both ongoing and extensive in the ICU population of COVID-19 patients, minimal research has been conducted using acute care patients. The researchers aim to address this gap with this treatment method.
Methods: This study was a randomized controlled trial with a sample size of 216 patients, with 36 self-proners, 104 standard of care patients, and 69 patients refused to participate in the intervention. The researchers also studied rates of attrition for self-proning. Patients were randomized using a randomization table per hospital admission. The researchers consented patients who were oriented, and able to self-prone safely without assistance on an acute care telemetry monitored unit. Patients were self-documenting their position per hour, and the researchers were using the electronic health record to collect vital signs and presence of pressure injuries. All data was entered in the secure REDCap database.
- Conditions
- COVID-19, Proning, Oxygenation, Length of Stay
- Being tested
- Proning group, Control group
- Keywords
- acute care, self-proning
- Medical subject headings
- COVID-19
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Proning groupOther
Patients were educated about self-proning, and instructed to self-prone every 2 hours. The patient documented their position on the checklists every 2 hours.
Upon initiation of the initial proning, the patient was monitored by the research team RN for adverse effects for 15 minutes (such as inability to tolerate position or signs of respiratory distress).
If the patient tolerated the proning well, the RN entered the patient's oxygen saturation into the EMR, and documented the initial position (prone or supine) on the checklist. O2 saturation was documented at least every 4 hours per unit protocol.
The checklists were placed in a binder at the nurses' station at the end of each shift and collected daily by a member of the research team.
This intervention for each proned patient continued until either of the following occurred: ei the patient was discharged to a lower level of care or 14 days had passed.
Control groupOther
A retrospective chart review was completed by the research team to ascertain length of stay, oxygenation, and pressure injuries for the control group on the acute care, telemetry monitored unit.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Proning group | Experimental | COVID-19 hypoxemic patients that receive standard of care AND participate in self-proning following the research protocol. Receives: Other: Proning group |
| Control group | Other | COVID-19 hypoxemic patients that receive standard of care. Receives: Other: Control group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Length of stay
amount of time patient was admitted to acute care unit
Measured: 7 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Oxygenation
Saturation of partial pressure of oxygen (in Litres)
Measured: 7 months
Pressure injuries
presence skin breakdown using clinically accepted wound staging tool
Measured: 7 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jul 2023
- Study start1 Oct 2021
- Primary completion1 Apr 2022
- Study completion1 Apr 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for COVID-19Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study was a prospective randomized cohort study in which data was collected for over 14 days or until discharged to a lower level of care from the telemetry-monitored, acute care unit. Data collected on study participants included the need for escalating respiratory care as well as length of stay in the acute care unit. Comparative analysis was conducted with data collected from hospitalized patients (the control group) with a diagnosis of COVID-19 on a non-ICU acute care, telemetry-monitored unit that met the hypoxemia criteria, but that did not receive the proning intervention. The data from the control group was collected by a retrospective chart analysis after 14 days.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marie Hodges, BSN, RN, Principal investigator, Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05957588
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BaylorSt.Lukes
- Status last verified
- Jul 2023
- First submitted
- 7 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 24 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Access to trial information can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). For more information or to submit a request, please contact geraldine.jones@commonspirit.org; marie.hodges@commonspirit.org; and nishant.varghese@commonspirit.org.
Publications
Alser O, Mokhtari A, Naar L, Langeveld K, Breen KA, El Moheb M, Kapoen C, Gaitanidis A, Christensen MA, Maurer LR, Mashbari H, Bankhead-Kendall B, Parks J, Fawley J, Saillant N, Mendoza A, Paranjape C, Fagenholz P, King D, Lee J, Farhat MR, Velmahos GC, Kaafarani HMA. Multisystem outcomes and predictors of mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19: Demographics and disease acuity matter more than comorbidities or treatment modalities. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 May 1;90(5):880-890. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003085.
PubMed 33891572Caputo ND, Strayer RJ, Levitan R. Early Self-Proning in Awake, Non-intubated Patients in the Emergency Department: A Single ED's Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 May;27(5):375-378. doi: 10.1111/acem.13994.
PubMed 32320506Cardona S, Downing J, Alfalasi R, Bzhilyanskaya V, Milzman D, Rehan M, Schwartz B, Yardi I, Yazdanpanah F, Tran QK. Intubation rate of patients with hypoxia due to COVID-19 treated with awake proning: A meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 May;43:88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.01.058. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
PubMed 33550104Ding L, Wang L, Ma W, He H. Efficacy and safety of early prone positioning combined with HFNC or NIV in moderate to severe ARDS: a multi-center prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2020 Jan 30;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2738-5.
PubMed 32000806Dubosh NM, Wong ML, Grossestreuer AV, Loo YK, Sanchez LD, Chiu D, Leventhal EL, Ilg A, Donnino MW. Early, awake proning in emergency department patients with COVID-19. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:640-645. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.11.074. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
PubMed 33309507Ehrmann S, Li J, Ibarra-Estrada M, Perez Y, Pavlov I, McNicholas B, Roca O, Mirza S, Vines D, Garcia-Salcido R, Aguirre-Avalos G, Trump MW, Nay MA, Dellamonica J, Nseir S, Mogri I, Cosgrave D, Jayaraman D, Masclans JR, Laffey JG, Tavernier E; Awake Prone Positioning Meta-Trial Group. Awake prone positioning for COVID-19 acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a randomised, controlled, multinational, open-label meta-trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Dec;9(12):1387-1395. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00356-8. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
PubMed 34425070Garg S, Patel K, Pham H, Whitaker M, O'Halloran A, Milucky J, Anglin O, Kirley PD, Reingold A, Kawasaki B, Herlihy R, Yousey-Hindes K, Maslar A, Anderson EJ, Openo KP, Weigel A, Teno K, Ryan PA, Monroe ML, Reeg L, Kim S, Como-Sabetti K, Bye E, Shrum Davis S, Eisenberg N, Muse A, Barney G, Bennett NM, Felsen CB, Billing L, Shiltz J, Sutton M, Abdullah N, Talbot HK, Schaffner W, Hill M, Chatelain R, Wortham J, Taylor C, Hall A, Fry AM, Kim L, Havers FP. Clinical Trends Among U.S. Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19, March to December 2020 : A Cross-Sectional Study. Ann Intern Med. 2021 Oct;174(10):1409-1419. doi: 10.7326/M21-1991. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
PubMed 34370517Kallet RH. A Comprehensive Review of Prone Position in ARDS. Respir Care. 2015 Nov;60(11):1660-87. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04271.
PubMed 26493592McNicholas B, Cosgrave D, Giacomini C, Brennan A, Laffey JG. Prone positioning in COVID-19 acute respiratory failure: just do it? Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):440-443. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 9. No abstract available.
PubMed 32571573Munshi L, Del Sorbo L, Adhikari NKJ, Hodgson CL, Wunsch H, Meade MO, Uleryk E, Mancebo J, Pesenti A, Ranieri VM, Fan E. Prone Position for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(Supplement_4):S280-S288. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-343OT.
PubMed 29068269Qian ET, Gatto CL, Amusina O, Dear ML, Hiser W, Buie R, Kripalani S, Harrell FE Jr, Freundlich RE, Gao Y, Gong W, Hennessy C, Grooms J, Mattingly M, Bellam SK, Burke J, Zakaria A, Vasilevskis EE, Billings FT 4th, Pulley JM, Bernard GR, Lindsell CJ, Rice TW; Vanderbilt Learning Healthcare System Platform Investigators. Assessment of Awake Prone Positioning in Hospitalized Adults With COVID-19: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Jun 1;182(6):612-621. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1070.
PubMed 35435937Rees EM, Nightingale ES, Jafari Y, Waterlow NR, Clifford S, B Pearson CA, Group CW, Jombart T, Procter SR, Knight GM. COVID-19 length of hospital stay: a systematic review and data synthesis. BMC Med. 2020 Sep 3;18(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01726-3.
PubMed 32878619Taylor SP, Bundy H, Smith WM, Skavroneck S, Taylor B, Kowalkowski MA. Awake Prone Positioning Strategy for Nonintubated Hypoxic Patients with COVID-19: A Pilot Trial with Embedded Implementation Evaluation. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Aug;18(8):1360-1368. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202009-1164OC.
PubMed 33356977Shearer SC, Parsa KM, Newark A, Peesay T, Walsh AR, Fernandez S, Gao WZ, Pierce ML. Facial Pressure Injuries from Prone Positioning in the COVID-19 Era. Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):E2139-E2142. doi: 10.1002/lary.29374. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
PubMed 33389768World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when novel coronavirus (nCoV) infection is suspected: Interim guidance. World Health Organization, 1-10. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/10665-332299
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Non-ventilated Prone Positioning in the COVID-19 Population
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05957588
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BaylorSt.Lukes
- Conditions
- COVID-19, Proning, Oxygenation, Length of Stay
- Keywords
- acute care, self-proning
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor St. Luke's Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the COVID-19 healthcare crisis, one possible treatment therapy that has generated the most discussion is that of proning, or the position in which the patient lays face down as opposed to face up for a period of time. As the pandemic continues, this method has been more widely adopted to increase oxygen saturation in patients in respiratory distress. While proning research is both ongoing and extensive in the ICU population of COVID-19 patients, minimal research has been conducted with acute care patients. The researchers aim to address this gap with this study. The researchers used a systematic approach to educate patients and staff about patient self-proning, implementing self-proning every 2 hours, and monitoring escalation of oxygen levels, as well as length of stay in the acute care unit. The researchers hypothesized an improvement in oxygen saturation levels as evidenced by no escalation of respiratory care (i.e. higher levels of oxygen needed, transfer to higher level of care), resulting in shorter lengths of stay for the intervention population.
Detailed description
Background: In the COVID-19 healthcare crisis, one possible treatment therapy that has generated the most discussion is that of proning, or the position in which the patient lays face down as opposed to face up for a period of time. As the pandemic continues, this method has been more widely adopted to aid in increasing oxygen saturation levels in patients in respiratory distress. While proning research is both ongoing and extensive in the ICU population of COVID-19 patients, minimal research has been conducted using acute care patients. The researchers aim to address this gap with this treatment method.
Methods: This study was a randomized controlled trial with a sample size of 216 patients, with 36 self-proners, 104 standard of care patients, and 69 patients refused to participate in the intervention. The researchers also studied rates of attrition for self-proning. Patients were randomized using a randomization table per hospital admission. The researchers consented patients who were oriented, and able to self-prone safely without assistance on an acute care telemetry monitored unit. Patients were self-documenting their position per hour, and the researchers were using the electronic health record to collect vital signs and presence of pressure injuries. All data was entered in the secure REDCap database.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study was a prospective randomized cohort study in which data was collected for over 14 days or until discharged to a lower level of care from the telemetry-monitored, acute care unit. Data collected on study participants included the need for escalating respiratory care as well as length of stay in the acute care unit. Comparative analysis was conducted with data collected from hospitalized patients (the control group) with a diagnosis of COVID-19 on a non-ICU acute care, telemetry-monitored unit that met the hypoxemia criteria, but that did not receive the proning intervention. The data from the control group was collected by a retrospective chart analysis after 14 days.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Proning group | Experimental | Other: Proning groupCOVID-19 hypoxemic patients that receive standard of care AND participate in self-proning following the research protocol. |
| Control group | Other | Other: Control groupCOVID-19 hypoxemic patients that receive standard of care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- patients that were confirmed COVID-19 positive on an acute-care, telemetry-monitored, non-ICU unit and were considered hypoxemic
- conscious, oriented and independently mobile patients
- subjects were patients 18 years and older
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- negative for COVID 19
- patients in ICU settings
- patients in acute respiratory distress
- patients in hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure below 90) or arrhythmia
- patients with altered mental status
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Proning groupPatients were educated about self-proning, and instructed to self-prone every 2 hours. The patient documented their position on the checklists every 2 hours. Upon initiation of the initial proning, the patient was monitored by the research team RN for adverse effects for 15 minutes (such as inability to tolerate position or signs of respiratory distress). If the patient tolerated the proning well, the RN entered the patient's oxygen saturation into the EMR, and documented the initial position (prone or supine) on the checklist. O2 saturation was documented at least every 4 hours per unit protocol. The checklists were placed in a binder at the nurses' station at the end of each shift and collected daily by a member of the research team. This intervention for each proned patient continued until either of the following occurred: ei the patient was discharged to a lower level of care or 14 days had passed. | Other | Proning group |
| Control groupA retrospective chart review was completed by the research team to ascertain length of stay, oxygenation, and pressure injuries for the control group on the acute care, telemetry monitored unit. | Other | Control group |
Primary outcome
Length of stay
Time frame: 7 months
amount of time patient was admitted to acute care unit
2 secondary outcomes
Oxygenation
Time frame: 7 months
Pressure injuries
Time frame: 7 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jul 2023.
- Background: PubMed 33891572Alser O, Mokhtari A, Naar L, Langeveld K, Breen KA, El Moheb M, Kapoen C, Gaitanidis A, Christensen MA, Maurer LR, Mashbari H, Bankhead-Kendall B, Parks J, Fawley J, Saillant N, Mendoza A, Paranjape C, Fagenholz P, King D, Lee J, Farhat MR, Velmahos GC, Kaafarani HMA. Multisystem outcomes and predictors of mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19: Demographics and disease acuity matter more than comorbidities or treatment modalities. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 May 1;90(5):880-890. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003085.
- Background: PubMed 32320506Caputo ND, Strayer RJ, Levitan R. Early Self-Proning in Awake, Non-intubated Patients in the Emergency Department: A Single ED's Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 May;27(5):375-378. doi: 10.1111/acem.13994.
- Background: PubMed 33550104Cardona S, Downing J, Alfalasi R, Bzhilyanskaya V, Milzman D, Rehan M, Schwartz B, Yardi I, Yazdanpanah F, Tran QK. Intubation rate of patients with hypoxia due to COVID-19 treated with awake proning: A meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 May;43:88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.01.058. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
- Background: PubMed 32000806Ding L, Wang L, Ma W, He H. Efficacy and safety of early prone positioning combined with HFNC or NIV in moderate to severe ARDS: a multi-center prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2020 Jan 30;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2738-5.
- Background: PubMed 33309507Dubosh NM, Wong ML, Grossestreuer AV, Loo YK, Sanchez LD, Chiu D, Leventhal EL, Ilg A, Donnino MW. Early, awake proning in emergency department patients with COVID-19. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:640-645. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.11.074. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
- Background: PubMed 34425070Ehrmann S, Li J, Ibarra-Estrada M, Perez Y, Pavlov I, McNicholas B, Roca O, Mirza S, Vines D, Garcia-Salcido R, Aguirre-Avalos G, Trump MW, Nay MA, Dellamonica J, Nseir S, Mogri I, Cosgrave D, Jayaraman D, Masclans JR, Laffey JG, Tavernier E; Awake Prone Positioning Meta-Trial Group. Awake prone positioning for COVID-19 acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a randomised, controlled, multinational, open-label meta-trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Dec;9(12):1387-1395. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00356-8. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
- Background: PubMed 34370517Garg S, Patel K, Pham H, Whitaker M, O'Halloran A, Milucky J, Anglin O, Kirley PD, Reingold A, Kawasaki B, Herlihy R, Yousey-Hindes K, Maslar A, Anderson EJ, Openo KP, Weigel A, Teno K, Ryan PA, Monroe ML, Reeg L, Kim S, Como-Sabetti K, Bye E, Shrum Davis S, Eisenberg N, Muse A, Barney G, Bennett NM, Felsen CB, Billing L, Shiltz J, Sutton M, Abdullah N, Talbot HK, Schaffner W, Hill M, Chatelain R, Wortham J, Taylor C, Hall A, Fry AM, Kim L, Havers FP. Clinical Trends Among U.S. Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19, March to December 2020 : A Cross-Sectional Study. Ann Intern Med. 2021 Oct;174(10):1409-1419. doi: 10.7326/M21-1991. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
- Background: PubMed 26493592Kallet RH. A Comprehensive Review of Prone Position in ARDS. Respir Care. 2015 Nov;60(11):1660-87. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04271.
- Background: PubMed 32571573McNicholas B, Cosgrave D, Giacomini C, Brennan A, Laffey JG. Prone positioning in COVID-19 acute respiratory failure: just do it? Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):440-443. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 9. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 29068269Munshi L, Del Sorbo L, Adhikari NKJ, Hodgson CL, Wunsch H, Meade MO, Uleryk E, Mancebo J, Pesenti A, Ranieri VM, Fan E. Prone Position for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(Supplement_4):S280-S288. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-343OT.
- Background: PubMed 35435937Qian ET, Gatto CL, Amusina O, Dear ML, Hiser W, Buie R, Kripalani S, Harrell FE Jr, Freundlich RE, Gao Y, Gong W, Hennessy C, Grooms J, Mattingly M, Bellam SK, Burke J, Zakaria A, Vasilevskis EE, Billings FT 4th, Pulley JM, Bernard GR, Lindsell CJ, Rice TW; Vanderbilt Learning Healthcare System Platform Investigators. Assessment of Awake Prone Positioning in Hospitalized Adults With COVID-19: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Jun 1;182(6):612-621. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1070.
- Background: PubMed 32878619Rees EM, Nightingale ES, Jafari Y, Waterlow NR, Clifford S, B Pearson CA, Group CW, Jombart T, Procter SR, Knight GM. COVID-19 length of hospital stay: a systematic review and data synthesis. BMC Med. 2020 Sep 3;18(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01726-3.
- Enterprise login to find out more about research and innovationLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Access to trial information can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). For more information or to submit a request, please contact geraldine.jones@commonspirit.org; marie.hodges@commonspirit.org; and nishant.varghese@commonspirit.org.
Related trials for COVID-19
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Active, not recruiting
Intervention to Address Disparate Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic on Latinx and African Newcomers
Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Disorder
Recruiting
Home-Based Exercise Tele-Rehabilitation After COVID-19
Post SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity Trial of RVX-sCPD9 Booster Intranasal COVID-19 Vaccine
COVID -19
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marie Hodges, BSN, RN principal investigator
Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Proning group in people with COVID-19 and Proning, run by Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Length of stay (time frame: 7 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05957588, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2023.