AzTrials
AzTrials

Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)DepVNSNCT05952674

Treatment Resistant Depression and Vagus Nerve Stimulation

A study testing Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) and Best Medical Treatment in people with Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD), run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 24 sites in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Depression is a common illness, affecting 17% of the population over the course of a lifetime. A third of depressions relapses and progresses to recurrence and resistance to treatments. Despite the optimization of antidepressant medical strategies, 20 to 40% of depressions do not respond to treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)
What is being tested?
Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) and Best Medical Treatment
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
166 participants
Where
24 sitesFrance
Study dates
19 Feb 2024to 19 Feb 2033
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged 18 years and older ;
  • Childbearing women must have an efficient contraception for the whole study period
  • Diagnosis of recurrent depressive trouble or persistent depressive disorder or bipolar disorder (according to DSM-5)
  • Start of disorder (defined by the occurrence of the first thymus episode: characterized depressive disorder or maniac episode with or without mixed characteristics) for 5 years or more
  • At least one of the following criteria:
  • Criterion A: current characterized depressive disorder and characterized depressive disorder for at least 12 months during the last 24 months despite at least four treatments lines at appropriate dosage and duration
  • Criterion B: current treatment by ECT/(Es)Ketamine/TMS and criteria A before the start treatment or ECT/(Es)Ketamine/TMS dependency
  • Patients who, after the nature of the study has been explained to them, have given written consent

Who cannot join

  • Know pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or persistent delusional disorder (DSM-5)
  • Characterized depressive disorder with psychotic characteristics within 3 months before the inclusion (DSM-5)
  • Concomitant participation to another interventional research not authorized by the coordinating investigator or the scientific lead. Participation to non-interventional researches is allowed.
  • Patients receiving enforced cares (ASPDT, ASPPI, ASPDRE, etc.)
  • Non-affiliation to a social security regimen or any other social protection regimen
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Disability, according to the investigator, to understand the study or refusal to sign the study consent form (non-francophone patient, cognitive disorders)
  • Anticipated disability to attend all the visits, treatments and measures planned by the protocol: severe personality disorder, severe substance addiction, severe intellectual development disorder. In any of those cases, the notion of severity is at the indiscretion of the investigator
  • Secondary Exclusion Criteria:
  • Surgical contraindication to the VNS
  • Positive β-HCG (results obtained after the informed consent is signed but before the randomization)

Trial locations and contacts

24 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

24 sites in 1 country

France24 sites, 19 recruiting
  • CHU Angers

    Angers, France, 49933

    Active, not recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier Charles Perrens

    Bordeaux, France, 33076

    Thomas BIENVENU, Dr, 06 49 92 02 45 ext. +33, tbienvenu@ch-perrens.fr

    Recruiting
  • CHU Brest

    Brest, 29200

    Florian STEPHAN, Dr, 02 98 34 77 34 ext. +33, florian.stephan@chu-brest.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • CHU Caen

    Caen, France, 14000

    Sonia DOLLFUS, Pr, 02 31 06 50 18 ext. +33, dollfus-s@chu-caen.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied

    Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63000

    Ludovic SAMALIN, Pr, 04 73 75 21 25 ext. +33, lsamalin@chu-clermontferrand.fr

    Recruiting
  • AP-HP. Nord - Université de Paris, Hôpital Louis Mourier

    Colombes, France, 92700

    Withdrawn
  • APHP. Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Hôpital Henri Mondor

    Créteil, France, 94000

    Charles LAIDI, Dr, 01 49 81 31 31 ext. +33, charles.laidi@aphp.fr

    Recruiting
  • CHU Dijon, Hôpital Le Bocage

    Dijon, France, 21000

    Jean-Christophe CHAUVET-GELINIER, Pr, 03 80 29 37 69 ext. +33, jean-christophe.chauvet-gelinier@chu-dijon.fr

    Recruiting
  • CHU Grenoble Alpes

    Grenoble, France, 38700

    Mircea POLOSAN, Pr, 04 76 76 53 83 ext. +33, mpolosan@chu-grenoble.fr

    Recruiting
  • AP-HP. Centre - Université de Paris, Hôpital Corentin-Celton

    Issy-les-Moulineaux

    Withdrawn
  • AP-HP. Université Paris Saclay, Hôpital Bicêtre

    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, 94270

    Withdrawn
  • CHU Lille

    Lille, France, 59037

    Ali AMAD, Pr, 03 20 44 45 84 ext. +33, ali.amad@chu-lille.fr

    Recruiting
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer

    Lyon, France, 69677

    Emmanuel POULET, Pr, 04 37 91 55 65 ext. +33, emmanuel.poulet@chu-lyon.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital de la Conception

    Marseille, France, 13005

    Raphaëlle RICHIERI, Dr, 07 83 08 21 72 ext. +33, raphaellemarie.richieri@ap-hm.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • CHU de Nantes, Hôtel Dieu

    Nantes, France, 44093

    Anne SAUVAGET, Pr, 02 40 08 47 95 ext. +33, anne.sauvaget@chu-nantes.fr

    Recruiting
  • CHU Nice, Hôpital Pasteur 1

    Nice, France, 06001

    Bruno GIORDANA, Dr, 06 16 56 33 62 ext. +33, giordana.b@chu-nice.fr

    Recruiting
  • AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital La Pitié Salpetrière

    Paris, France, 75013

    Active, not recruiting
  • GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neuroscience, site Saint Anne

    Paris, France, 75014

    Philippe DOMENECH, Pr, 01 45 65 76 65 ext. +33, philippe.domenech@ghu-paris.fr

    Recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit

    Poitiers, France, 86021

    Nematollah JAAFARI, Pr, 05 16 52 61 18 ext. +33, nemat.jaafari@ch-poitiers.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier Guillaume Regnier

    Rennes, France, 35703

    Dominique DRAPIER, Pr, 02 99 33 39 37 ext. +33, d.drapier@ch-guillaumeregnier.fr

    Recruiting
  • CHU Rouen, Centre Hospitalier du Rouvray

    Rouen, France, 76300

    Olivier GUILLIN, Pr, 02 32 95 10 30 ext. +33, olivier.guillin@ch-lerouvray.fr

    Recruiting
  • CHU Saint-Etienne

    Saint-Etienne, France, 42055

    Éric FAKRA, Pr, 04 77 82 88 52 ext. +33, eric.fakra@chu-st-etienne.fr

    Recruiting
  • CHU Toulouse, Hôpital de Psychiatrie

    Toulouse, France, 31059

    Antoine YRONDI, Dr, 06 75 13 08 06 ext. +33, yrondi.a@chu-toulouse.fr

    Recruiting
  • CHRU Tours, Clinique Psychiatrique Universitaire

    Tours, France, 37540

    Wissam EL HAGE, Pr, 02 47 47 80 43 ext. +33, wissam.elhage@univ-tours.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Resistant Depression and Vagus Nerve Stimulation : a Medico-economic, Multicenter, Randomized and Open Trial

Depression is a common illness, affecting 17% of the population over the course of a lifetime. A third of depressions relapses and progresses to recurrence and resistance to treatments. Despite the optimization of antidepressant medical strategies, 20 to 40% of depressions do not respond to treatment. This is particularly worrying as 6% of non-responder patients will die by committing suicide.

Depression has a major impact on quality of life, socio-professional functioning and healthcare consumption.

Read more

Sometimes, TRD is part of a bipolar illness. In this case, the challenge is even bigger because antidepressants are no well tolerated, further reducing the therapeutic options in case of resistance, the severity and duration of the depressive episodes are the main factors explaining the deterioration of the quality of life and the increasing cost of cares for these patients.

The standard treatment for TRD is electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), which results in a response in 60 to 70% of cases after a few weeks of treatment. However, the improvement is often transient and 40% of patients relapse within 6 months of the initial ECT session. Moreover, ECT is often not well tolerated. This therapeutic impasse therefore makes TRD a priority public health target to which it is urgent to provide a realistic medico-economical response.

The literature suggests that Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) has unique kinetics of efficacy in depression, particularly in preventing long-term recurrences, and therefore responding to the lack of effective maintenance treatment in TRD. In fact, the benefits of VNS gradually accumulate over 12-24 months, which makes it complementary to more incisive treatments like ECT. Finally, its efficacy-tolerance profile appears to be similar in uni and bipolar TRD, giving VNS a potentially unique place in the therapeutic arsenal in psychiatry.

The DepVNS hypothesis is that VNS is a medico-economically efficient therapeutic option to overcome the therapeutic impasse in which patients suffering from uni and bipolar DR currently find themselves due to the frequency of relapses under treatment.

The primary objective is to estimate, from a collective point of view, the incremental cost-utility ratio of VNS to treat patients suffering from RD.

Read the detailed description

Depression is a common illness, affecting 17% of the population over the course of a lifetime. A third of depressions relapses and progresses to recurrence and resistance to treatments. Despite the optimization of antidepressant medical strategies, 20 to 40% of depressions do not respond to treatment. This is particularly worrying as 6% of non-responder patients will die by committing suicide. The term treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is used when two or more (and often many more) well conducted antidepressant treatments from different classes have failed to achieve remission.

Depression has a major impact on quality of life, socio-professional functioning and healthcare consumption. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), depression will be the second cause of healthcare costs in the world by 2020. RD alone accounts for 30 to 40% of the annual cost of depression.

Sometimes, TRD is part of a bipolar illness, a psychiatric condition characterized by the alternation of depressive and maniac episodes that affects 4% of the population. In this case, the challenge is even bigger because (1) antidepressants are no well tolerated, further reducing the therapeutic options in case of resistance, (2) the severity and duration of the depressive episodes are the main factors explaining the deterioration of the quality of life and the increasing cost of cares for these patients. Bipolar RD currently accounts for 20% of all psychiatric spending.

The standard treatment for TRD is electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), which results in a response in 60 to 70% of cases after a few weeks of treatment. However, the improvement is often transient and 40% of patients relapse within 6 months of the initial ECT session. Moreover, ECT is often not well tolerated because of the frequency and the intensity of the memory disorders associated, the repetition of anesthesia and hospitalizations and its social stigma. Refusals and requests to stop ECT are therefore common even when it is effective, as these constraints are sometimes experienced as being unbearable in the long-term. This therapeutic impasse therefore makes TRD a priority public health target to which it is urgent to provide a realistic medico-economical response.

The literature suggests that Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) has unique kinetics of efficacy in depression, particularly in preventing the long-term recurrences, and therefore responding to the lack of effective maintenance treatment in TRD. In fact, the benefits of VNS gradually accumulate over 12-24 months, which makes it complementary to more incisive treatments like ECT. Finally, its efficacy-tolerance profile appears to be similar in uni and bipolar TRD, giving VNS a potentially unique place in the therapeutic arsenal in psychiatry. VNS has been approved for over 15 years as a treatment for RD in the Unites States and Great-Britain.

The hypothesis is that VNS is a medico-economically efficient therapeutic option to overcome the therapeutic impasse in which patients suffering from uni and bipolar DR currently find themselves due to the frequency of relapses under treatment.

The primary objective is to estimate, from a collective point of view, the incremental cost-utility ratio of VNS to treat patients suffering from RD.

The secondary objectives are evaluating the efficacy and the security of the VNS, as well as positioning the VNS in comparison with ECT that is currently the standard treatment for TRD.

This is a national multicenter comparative, open, randomized, controlled, two-parallel group clinical trial evaluating the medico-economic impact of VNS in resistant depression population. Patients (166) suffering from resistant depression will be enrolled over a 24-month period and will be randomized in a (1:1) ratio to receive either Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) along with the Best Medical Treatment (VNS+BMT arm) or the Optimal Medical Treatment only (BMT arm).

Patients meeting all eligibility criteria will be enrolled in the study.

All subjects will be followed by the investigators or designee of the investigator during the whole study period by visits on site.

Number of visits/participant: Both arms will attend: selection visit (VS), inclusion visit (VI) and randomization visit (R), M0, M2, M4, M6, M8, M10, M12, M14, M16, M18, M20, M22 and M24. After the inclusion visit, the experimental arm (VNS + BMT) will further attend a neurosurgical and anesthetic consultation before being hospitalized for the VNS system placement. The patient will finally be hospitalized in psychiatry for about 5 days for switching the device on. If the target intensity has not been reached during this hospitalization, an adjustment visit is planned every month for 6 months in order to progressively increase the stimulation intensity until the target or a therapeutic response. If the target or the therapeutic response is obtained, the settings adjustments rhythm will be at the indiscretion of the psychiatrist. If at the end of the 6 first visits (M1 to M6), the target intensity couldn't be reached or in absence of a satisfying clinical response, a visit will be planned every 3 months (consultation or hospitalization) to keep optimizing the VNS.

Being tested
Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS), Best Medical Treatment
Keywords
Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD), Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS), Best Medical Treatment (BMT)
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS)Device

    The surgical intervention for the implantation of the VNS medical device is performed by a neurosurgeon under general anesthesia and lasts about an hour. Two incisions are made on the left: one incision to implant an electrode wrapped around the vagus nerve, the other incision to implant the stimulator. The electrode and the stimulator are connected by a cable tunneled. The cardiac tolerance is usually tested at the end of the surgery by turning on the neurostimulator for a few minutes. The stimulator is turned on about two weeks after the implantation, and after the neurosurgeon has checked the quality of healing. The settings used in first intention are standardized and derived from the parameters usually used for the treatment of epilepsies: a pulse width of 250μs, a stimulation frequency of 30Hz, and a 30sec stimulation cycle (ON) every 5min (OFF). Intensity is progressively increased by steps of 0.25mA to reach the 1.5-2mA range, depending on stimulation-induced side effects.

  • Best Medical TreatmentOther

    Best Medical Treatment for resistant depression.

Study groups in NCT05952674
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) + Best Medical Treatment (BMT)ExperimentalAlong with the Optimal Medical Treatment for resistant depression, the VNS + BMT arm will be implanted a medical device of VNS.
Receives: Device: Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS)
Best Medical TreatmentActive comparatorThe BMT arm will only receive the Optimal Medical Treatment for resistant depression.
Receives: Other: Best Medical Treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cost-utility of VNS

    Incremental cost-utility ratio of the Vagus Nerve Stimulation (group VNS + optimal medical treatment) in comparison to the control group (optimal medical treatment only) within 24 months of VNS placement

    Measured: Month 24

Secondary outcomes (37)
  1. Efficacy of the VNS

    Response rate (< 50% amelioration of the QIDS-SR baseline score) cumulative and non-cumulative

    Measured: Month 24

  2. Efficacy of the VNS

    Remission rate (QIDS-SR score ≤ 5) cumulative and non cumulative

    Measured: Month 24

  3. Efficacy of the VNS

    CGI (Clinical Global Impression). Three scores: severity of the disease noted out of 7, overall improvement noted out of 7 and therapeutic index noted out of 16.

    Measured: Month 24

  4. Efficacy of the VNS

    EGF (Functioning Global Evaluation scale). Minimum: 0. Maximum: 100. The higher the score, the higher the level of psychological, social and occupational functioning.

    Measured: Month 24

  5. Efficacy of the VNS

    Number of weeks in depression, remission, (hypo)mania and number of major depressive episodes and (hypo)maniac episodes (DSM-5 criteria)

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  6. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average intensity of anxious symptoms : STAI-A (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory - Form A). Minimum: 20. Maximum: 80. A higher score indicates greater anxiety.

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  7. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average intensity of thymus symptoms : QIDS-SR (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report). Minimum: 0. Maximum: 27. The higher the score, the worse the symptoms.

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  8. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average intensity of thymus symptoms : YMRS (Young Mania Rating Scale). Minimum: 0. Maximum: 60. The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms.

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  9. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average intensity of thymus symptoms : VAS mood (Visual Analogue Scale Mood). Cursor to be positioned by the patient on a non-graduated figure in order to reflect his mood.

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  10. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average intensity of thymus symptoms : VAS motivation (Visual Analogue Scale Motivation). Cursor to be positioned by the patient on a non-graduated figure in order to reflect his motivation.

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  11. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average intensity of depressive episodes : QIDS-SR (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report). Minimum: 0. Maximum: 27. The higher the score, the worse the symptoms.

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  12. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average intensity of depressive episodes : VAS mood (Visual Analogue Scale Mood). Cursor to be positioned by the patient on a non-graduated figure in order to reflect his mood.

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  13. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average intensity of depressive episodes : VAS motivation (Visual Analogue Scale Motivation). Cursor to be positioned by the patient on a non-graduated figure in order to reflect his motivation.

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  14. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average duration of response periods (< 50% improvement in QIDS-SR baseline score).

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  15. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average intensity of symptoms during the response phases : QIDS-SR (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report). Minimum: 0. Maximum: 27. The higher the score, the worse the symptoms.

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  16. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average intensity of symptoms during the response phases : VAS mood (Visual Analogue Scale Mood). Cursor to be positioned by the patient on a non-graduated figure in order to reflect his mood.

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  17. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average intensity of symptoms during the response phases : VAS motivation (Visual Analogue Scale Motivation). Cursor to be positioned by the patient on a non-graduated figure in order to reflect his motivation.

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  18. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average intensity of (hypo)maniac episodes: YMRS (Young Mania Rating Scale). Minimum: 0. Maximum: 60. The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms.

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  19. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average intensity of (hypo)manic episodes: VAS mood (Visual Analogue Scale Mood ). Cursor to be positioned by the patient on a non-graduated figure in order to reflect his mood.

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  20. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average intensity of (hypo)manic episodes: VAS motivation (Visual Analogue Scale Motivation). Cursor to be positioned by the patient on a non-graduated figure in order to reflect his motivation.

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  21. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average duration of depressive episodes (DSM-5 criteria) and (hypo)manic episodes

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  22. Efficacy of the VNS

    Interval between the major depressive episodes and interval between the (hypo)maniac episodes (DSM-5 criteria)

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  23. Efficacy of the VNS

    Number of treatments/month

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  24. Efficacy of the VNS

    Total cost of cares

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  25. Efficacy of the VNS

    Quality of life : Q-LES-Q-SF (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form). Score out of 70 and percentage. The higher the score, the higher the quality of life.

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  26. Efficacy of the VNS

    Quality of life : SF-36 (Short Form 36 Health Survey). 8 dimensions each evaluated out of 100. The higher the score, the higher the quality of life.

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  27. Efficacy of the VNS

    Response rate (< 50% improvement in QIDS-C baseline score) cumulative and non-cumulative

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  28. Efficacy of the VNS

    Average C-SSRS scoring

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  29. Impact of the VNS on ECT (electroconvulsive therapy)

    Cumulative number of ECT session within 24 months

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  30. Impact of the VNS on ECT (electroconvulsive therapy)

    Number of maintenance ECT session within 24 months

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  31. Impact of the VNS on ECT (electroconvulsive therapy)

    Average duration to obtain a complete ECT withdrawal

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  32. Impact of the VNS on ECT (electroconvulsive therapy)

    Average time period between ECT during the maintenance phase

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  33. Impact of the VNS on ECT (electroconvulsive therapy)

    Proportion of patients withdraw from ECT

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  34. Impact of the VNS on ECT (electroconvulsive therapy)

    Number of treatments per year

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  35. Impact of the VNS on ECT (electroconvulsive therapy)

    Results of EVA memory disorders severity

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

  36. Impact of the VNS on ECT (electroconvulsive therapy)

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scoring

    Measured: Months: 0, 12, 24

  37. Security of the VNS

    1/ VNS failure rate with a subgroup analysis for patients concomitantly treated by ECT, 2/Reported serious and non-serious adverse events

    Measured: Months: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jul 2023
  2. Study start19 Feb 2024
  3. Primary completion26 Feb 2031 (estimated)
  4. Study completion19 Feb 2033 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patients (166) suffering from resistant depression will be enrolled over a 24-month period and will be randomized in a (1:1) ratio to receive either Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) along with the Best Medical Treatment (VNS+BMT arm) or the Best Medical Treatment only (BMT arm).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
166 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05952674
Sponsor's protocol ID
APHP200066
Acronym
DepVNS
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
27 May 2021
Last updated
23 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Datas are own by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, please contact sponsor for further information.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in