Solid Tumor, AdultNCT05947695
Clinical Nurse Specialist Led Early Palliative Survivorship Care for Patients With Advanced Cancer
A study testing Palliative and Survivorship Care Model in people with Solid Tumor, Adult and Metastasis, run by Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, New York at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the randomized control trial is to estimate the effect of an oncology clinical nurse specialist-led early intervention multidisciplinary approach to palliative and survivorship care within two previously identified and validated patient groups having metastatic solid tumor malignancy on patient-reported… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Solid Tumor, Adult, Metastasis
- What is being tested?
- Palliative and Survivorship Care Model
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Mar 2023to Mar 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult patients (21 yrs and over)
- metastatic solid tumor malignancy with very favorable and favorable prognostic curves
- under the care of GSUH oncology and radiation oncology clinicians
Who cannot join
- patients with metastatic solid tumor malignancy who are < 21 yrs of age
- adult patients with metastatic solid tumor malignancy who are in standard risk and unfavorable prognostic curves
- patients not under the care of GSUH oncology and radiation oncology clinicians
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Good Samaritan University Hospital
West Islip, New York, 11795
Johnny Kao, MD, 631-376-4047, johnny.kao@chsli.org
LuAnn Rowland, MS, RN, (631) 376-4047, luann.rowland@chsli.org
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Clinical Nurse Specialist Led Early Palliative Survivorship Care for Patients With Advanced Cancer
The purpose of the randomized control trial is to estimate the effect of an oncology clinical nurse specialist-led early intervention multidisciplinary approach to palliative and survivorship care within two previously identified and validated patient groups having metastatic solid tumor malignancy on patient-reported symptom burden, patient-reported overall quality of life (QOL), distress, and overall survival. The primary hypothesis is that the effect of an oncology clinical nurse specialist- led early intervention multidisciplinary palliative and survivorship care model will be significantly higher, as compared to the standard of care approach to palliative and survivorship care, on the primary endpoint of patient-reported symptom burden for patients with metastatic solid tumor malignancy within favorable and very favorable risk groups. Symptom burden includes pain, tiredness, drowsiness, nausea, lack of appetite, depression, anxiety, shortness of breath, and wellbeing.
Read the detailed description
OVERVIEW OF DESIGN SUMMARY This is an unblinded randomized control trial estimating the effect of an oncology clinical nurse specialist- led early intervention multidisciplinary approach to palliative and survivorship care within two previously identified and validated patient groups having metastatic solid tumor malignancy on patient-reported symptom burden, patient-reported quality of life (QOL), distress, and overall survival.
Randomization Method and Blinding Subjects will be randomized using a stratified approach consisting of two strata- subjects enrolled from inpatient recruitment and subjects enrolled from outpatient recruitment. Within each stratum a block randomization design (with varying block sizes of 4, 6, and 8). Block sizes will be masked to research team as patient allocation to treatment arm is not blinded. Stratified randomization with varying block sizes will reduce potential of nonequivalence in treatment arms secondary to the heterogeneity of the population being sampled.
Subject Recruitment Plans The researchers will recruit n= 100 patients from the favorable and very favorable NEAT Groups. Recruitment will occur upon admission for inpatients when diagnosed at stage 4 with metastatic disease (approximately 30% of total way of entry into our facility's radiation oncology patient population) and outpatient (mainly- approx. 70% of way of entry into our facility's radiation oncology patient population). All eligible adult patients with metastatic disease seen in radiation oncology will be offered enrollment in this trial.
Risks and Benefits The standard of care comparator arm is usual clinical care using NCCN guidelines and evidence-based practice for palliative and survivorship care. The usual practice (standard of care) for patients treated with distant metastases. Typically, there are physician and nursing visits at 3 months, 9 months, 15 months, and 24 months although this of course varies by diagnosis and whether patients require further treatment.
The risks associated with participation in the study involve:
The risk to confidentiality of data if there is a data breach when the data are being used for research purposes. For mitigation of this risk a robust data protection plan that includes de identification of the data with a randomly assigned code; double password protected files for all research data; encryption and transfer of files via secure firewall protected networks; storage of paper documents in locked file cabinet in locked office.
Survey fatigue is also a risk. The surveys chosen: Edmonton Symptom Assessment System- Revised (ESAS-r)- (patient burden- on average less than 5 minutes to complete), Updated NCCN Distress Thermometer and Problem List for Patients (patient burden- on average less than 5 minutes to complete), NCCN Survivorship Assessment is a 28-question assessment (patient burden- on average less than 5 minutes to complete).
Subjects can withdraw from the study at any time without risk to relationship with clinicians or alterations in medical care. There are no risks to early withdrawal. If subjects do withdraw and determine to not want their data used in the study, the subject's data will not be used in the analysis.
Subjects can withdraw from the study at any time by notifying the Principal Investigator in person, via telephone, or in writing.
Data Collection and Follow-up for Withdrawn Subjects Data will be collected at timepoints 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, \& 5. Data collection is using valid and reliable instruments for this population. Data will be collected via paper and pencil with nurse or oncology nurse-specialist supporting patient and family during survey completion. Each survey(n=2 for standard of care group and n=3 for the clinical nurse-led group) takes 6 minutes on average to complete and are used during assessment in usual clinical care.
Subjects who withdraw can determine if the data already collected can be used in the study. An intention-to treat approach will be used in the analysis of the data.
Block sizes will be masked to research team as patient allocation to treatment arm is not blinded. Subjects will be randomized using a stratified approach consisting of two strata- subjects enrolled from inpatient recruitment and subjects enrolled from outpatient recruitment. Within each stratum a block randomization design (with varying block sizes of 4, 6, and 8).
The oncology nurse-specialist led multidisciplinary early intervention arm also includes standard of care with additional coordination of services, patient education, and referral to treatment and other resources aligned with comprehensive best practice models for multidisciplinary care teams. The patients will see the oncology nurse-specialist in person in the visits specified . There is the assumption that there will be additional visits via scheduled telephone calls in response to the patient in-person visit assessments and when patients reach out directly to the oncology nurse-specialist. The oncology nurse-specialist and radiation oncologist will work together to facilitate interventions based on the patient response. For example, if the patient needs medications , the multidisciplinary team will ensure the patient is prescribed the medications with emphasis placed on follow-up care. The oncology nurse specialist will utilize resources and coordinate care for the individualized needs identified by the patient. This will include (but not limited to) empathetic process and coaching techniques to ensure adherence to prescribed therapeutics. Identified needs may also result in coordinated care with practitioners/specialists-this all depends on the identified needs. The main goal is to provide individualized personal care to the patient, ensure adherence to prescribed treatments, employ the therapeutic process to promote health and overall well-being.
The standard of care comparator arm is usual clinical care using NCCN guidelines and evidence-based practice for palliative and survivorship care. The usual practice (standard of care) for patients treated with distant metastases. Typically, there are physician and nursing visits at 3 months, 9 months, 15 months, and 24 months although this of course varies by diagnosis and whether patients require further treatment.
Data will be collected at timepoints 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 . Data collection is using valid and reliable instruments for this population . Data will be collected via paper and pencil with nurse or oncology nurse-specialist supporting patient and family during survey completion. The surveys (n=3) take < 5 minutes on average to complete for the first 2 instruments that both the standard of care and intervention arm will complete and are used during assessment in usual clinical care. Additionally, the intervention arm will complete the NCCN Survivorship Assessment (28-question assessment) at each visit timepoints 0-5. The total subject burden is 50 minutes (on average) over the 24-month study for the standard of care arm and 85 minutes (on average) for the intervention arm.
Adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and unanticipated problems (UPs) are not expected due to the interventions being compared. However, the treating clinician will monitor patient safety on an ongoing basis. Any AEs, SAEs, or Ups will be reviewed by the research and clinical team within 48 hours and a determination made as to required follow up and reporting. All events will be kept in a research record log for monthly aggregation and trending analysis by the research team. AEs and Ups will be classified by severity, relationship, and expectedness. These data will be collected with each timepoint assessment by the oncology CNS or co-investigator.
There will be no monetary stipends or payments to subjects.
- Conditions
- Solid Tumor, Adult, Metastasis
- Being tested
- Palliative and Survivorship Care Model
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasm Metastasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Palliative and Survivorship Care ModelBehavioural
The standard of care comparator arm is usual clinical care using NCCN guidelines and evidence-based practice for palliative and survivorship care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | The oncology nurse-specialist-led multidisciplinary early intervention arm includes standard of care with additional coordination of services, patient education, and referral to treatment and other resources aligned with comprehensive best practice models for multidisciplinary care teams. Receives: Behavioral: Palliative and Survivorship Care Model |
| Standard of Care | Active comparator | The standard of care comparator arm is usual clinical care using NCCN guidelines and evidence-based practice for palliative and survivorship care for patients treated with distant metastases. Receives: Behavioral: Palliative and Survivorship Care Model |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
participant reported symptom burden
The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System- Revised (ESAS-r) will be used to measure patient reported symptom burden
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
participant reported quality of life
Updated NCCN Distress Thermometer Problem List for Patients will be used to measure participant reported quality of life
Measured: 24 months
participant reported distress
Updated NCCN Distress Thermometer will be used to measure participant reported distress
Measured: 24 months
participant overall survival
Measured as survival at 60 months
Measured: 60 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2023
- Study start2 Mar 2023
- Primary completionMar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Solid Tumor, AdultStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, New York
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Patricia Eckardt, Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, New York
- Investigators
- Johnny Kao, MD, Study chair, Good Samaritan University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05947695
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB# 22-009
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 13 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: IPD will not be shared.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Clinical Nurse Specialist Led Early Palliative Survivorship Care for Patients With Advanced Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05947695
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB# 22-009
- Conditions
- Solid Tumor, Adult, Metastasis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, New YorkUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the randomized control trial is to estimate the effect of an oncology clinical nurse specialist-led early intervention multidisciplinary approach to palliative and survivorship care within two previously identified and validated patient groups having metastatic solid tumor malignancy on patient-reported symptom burden, patient-reported overall quality of life (QOL), distress, and overall survival. The primary hypothesis is that the effect of an oncology clinical nurse specialist- led early intervention multidisciplinary palliative and survivorship care model will be significantly higher, as compared to the standard of care approach to palliative and survivorship care, on the primary endpoint of patient-reported symptom burden for patients with metastatic solid tumor malignancy within favorable and very favorable risk groups. Symptom burden includes pain, tiredness, drowsiness, nausea, lack of appetite, depression, anxiety, shortness of breath, and wellbeing.
Detailed description
OVERVIEW OF DESIGN SUMMARY This is an unblinded randomized control trial estimating the effect of an oncology clinical nurse specialist- led early intervention multidisciplinary approach to palliative and survivorship care within two previously identified and validated patient groups having metastatic solid tumor malignancy on patient-reported symptom burden, patient-reported quality of life (QOL), distress, and overall survival.
Randomization Method and Blinding Subjects will be randomized using a stratified approach consisting of two strata- subjects enrolled from inpatient recruitment and subjects enrolled from outpatient recruitment. Within each stratum a block randomization design (with varying block sizes of 4, 6, and 8). Block sizes will be masked to research team as patient allocation to treatment arm is not blinded. Stratified randomization with varying block sizes will reduce potential of nonequivalence in treatment arms secondary to the heterogeneity of the population being sampled.
Subject Recruitment Plans The researchers will recruit n= 100 patients from the favorable and very favorable NEAT Groups. Recruitment will occur upon admission for inpatients when diagnosed at stage 4 with metastatic disease (approximately 30% of total way of entry into our facility's radiation oncology patient population) and outpatient (mainly- approx. 70% of way of entry into our facility's radiation oncology patient population). All eligible adult patients with metastatic disease seen in radiation oncology will be offered enrollment in this trial.
Risks and Benefits The standard of care comparator arm is usual clinical care using NCCN guidelines and evidence-based practice for palliative and survivorship care. The usual practice (standard of care) for patients treated with distant metastases. Typically, there are physician and nursing visits at 3 months, 9 months, 15 months, and 24 months although this of course varies by diagnosis and whether patients require further treatment.
The risks associated with participation in the study involve:
The risk to confidentiality of data if there is a data breach when the data are being used for research purposes. For mitigation of this risk a robust data protection plan that includes de identification of the data with a randomly assigned code; double password protected files for all research data; encryption and transfer of files via secure firewall protected networks; storage of paper documents in locked file cabinet in locked office.
Survey fatigue is also a risk. The surveys chosen: Edmonton Symptom Assessment System- Revised (ESAS-r)- (patient burden- on average less than 5 minutes to complete), Updated NCCN Distress Thermometer and Problem List for Patients (patient burden- on average less than 5 minutes to complete), NCCN Survivorship Assessment is a 28-question assessment (patient burden- on average less than 5 minutes to complete).
Subjects can withdraw from the study at any time without risk to relationship with clinicians or alterations in medical care. There are no risks to early withdrawal. If subjects do withdraw and determine to not want their data used in the study, the subject's data will not be used in the analysis.
Subjects can withdraw from the study at any time by notifying the Principal Investigator in person, via telephone, or in writing.
Data Collection and Follow-up for Withdrawn Subjects Data will be collected at timepoints 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, \& 5. Data collection is using valid and reliable instruments for this population. Data will be collected via paper and pencil with nurse or oncology nurse-specialist supporting patient and family during survey completion. Each survey(n=2 for standard of care group and n=3 for the clinical nurse-led group) takes 6 minutes on average to complete and are used during assessment in usual clinical care.
Subjects who withdraw can determine if the data already collected can be used in the study. An intention-to treat approach will be used in the analysis of the data.
Block sizes will be masked to research team as patient allocation to treatment arm is not blinded. Subjects will be randomized using a stratified approach consisting of two strata- subjects enrolled from inpatient recruitment and subjects enrolled from outpatient recruitment. Within each stratum a block randomization design (with varying block sizes of 4, 6, and 8).
The oncology nurse-specialist led multidisciplinary early intervention arm also includes standard of care with additional coordination of services, patient education, and referral to treatment and other resources aligned with comprehensive best practice models for multidisciplinary care teams. The patients will see the oncology nurse-specialist in person in the visits specified . There is the assumption that there will be additional visits via scheduled telephone calls in response to the patient in-person visit assessments and when patients reach out directly to the oncology nurse-specialist. The oncology nurse-specialist and radiation oncologist will work together to facilitate interventions based on the patient response. For example, if the patient needs medications , the multidisciplinary team will ensure the patient is prescribed the medications with emphasis placed on follow-up care. The oncology nurse specialist will utilize resources and coordinate care for the individualized needs identified by the patient. This will include (but not limited to) empathetic process and coaching techniques to ensure adherence to prescribed therapeutics. Identified needs may also result in coordinated care with practitioners/specialists-this all depends on the identified needs. The main goal is to provide individualized personal care to the patient, ensure adherence to prescribed treatments, employ the therapeutic process to promote health and overall well-being.
The standard of care comparator arm is usual clinical care using NCCN guidelines and evidence-based practice for palliative and survivorship care. The usual practice (standard of care) for patients treated with distant metastases. Typically, there are physician and nursing visits at 3 months, 9 months, 15 months, and 24 months although this of course varies by diagnosis and whether patients require further treatment.
Data will be collected at timepoints 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 . Data collection is using valid and reliable instruments for this population . Data will be collected via paper and pencil with nurse or oncology nurse-specialist supporting patient and family during survey completion. The surveys (n=3) take < 5 minutes on average to complete for the first 2 instruments that both the standard of care and intervention arm will complete and are used during assessment in usual clinical care. Additionally, the intervention arm will complete the NCCN Survivorship Assessment (28-question assessment) at each visit timepoints 0-5. The total subject burden is 50 minutes (on average) over the 24-month study for the standard of care arm and 85 minutes (on average) for the intervention arm.
Adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and unanticipated problems (UPs) are not expected due to the interventions being compared. However, the treating clinician will monitor patient safety on an ongoing basis. Any AEs, SAEs, or Ups will be reviewed by the research and clinical team within 48 hours and a determination made as to required follow up and reporting. All events will be kept in a research record log for monthly aggregation and trending analysis by the research team. AEs and Ups will be classified by severity, relationship, and expectedness. These data will be collected with each timepoint assessment by the oncology CNS or co-investigator.
There will be no monetary stipends or payments to subjects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Palliative and Survivorship Care ModelThe oncology nurse-specialist-led multidisciplinary early intervention arm includes standard of care with additional coordination of services, patient education, and referral to treatment and other resources aligned with comprehensive best practice models for multidisciplinary care teams. |
| Standard of Care | Active comparator | Behavioral: Palliative and Survivorship Care ModelThe standard of care comparator arm is usual clinical care using NCCN guidelines and evidence-based practice for palliative and survivorship care for patients treated with distant metastases. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- adult patients (21 yrs and over)
- metastatic solid tumor malignancy with very favorable and favorable prognostic curves
- under the care of GSUH oncology and radiation oncology clinicians
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- patients with metastatic solid tumor malignancy who are < 21 yrs of age
- adult patients with metastatic solid tumor malignancy who are in standard risk and unfavorable prognostic curves
- patients not under the care of GSUH oncology and radiation oncology clinicians
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Palliative and Survivorship Care ModelThe standard of care comparator arm is usual clinical care using NCCN guidelines and evidence-based practice for palliative and survivorship care. | Behavioural | Intervention, Standard of Care |
Primary outcome
participant reported symptom burden
Time frame: 24 months
The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System- Revised (ESAS-r) will be used to measure patient reported symptom burden
3 secondary outcomes
participant reported quality of life
Time frame: 24 months
participant reported distress
Time frame: 24 months
participant overall survival
Time frame: 60 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Sep 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. IPD will not be shared.
Related trials for Solid Tumor, Adult
Recruiting
An Exploratory Study to Evaluate Immune Determinants of the Response to Adoptive Cell Therapy (ACT) in Solid and Hematologic Tumors
Solid Tumor, Adult, Solid Tumor, Childhood
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Advanced or Recurrent Solid Tumors Treated With SHetA2
Solid Tumor, Adult
RecruitingObservational study
NCI Childhood Cancer Data Initiative (CCDI) Led Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Rare Cancer Registry for Very Rare Solid Tumors
Very Rare Tumors, Very Rare Cancers
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study With NKT3964 for Adults With Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors
Solid Tumor, Advanced Solid Tumor
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Johnny Kao, MD study chair
Good Samaritan University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Palliative and Survivorship Care Model in people with Solid Tumor, Adult and Metastasis, run by Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, New York at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Johnny Kao, MD (631-376-4047, Johnny.Kao@chsli.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
participant reported symptom burden (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2023.