AzTrials
AzTrials

EpilepsyNCT05944692

Epilepsy Seizure Detection With Innovative Tripolar EEG (tEEG)

An observational study of Epilepsy, run by CREmedical at 2 sites in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) and new tripolar EEG (tEEG) will be recorded from adult and pediatric patients. In some patients stereo EEG (sEEG) will also be recorded concurrently. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Epilepsy
What is being tested?
Tripolar electroencephalography
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
90 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Sep 2025to 31 Dec 2027
How long will I take part?
12 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Pediatric and adult patients either suspected of, or having epilepsy.

Who may be able to join

  • Pediatric (BCH): Age ≥ 6 years and < 18 years
  • Adult (BNI): Age ≥ 18 years
  • Able to provide written informed consent or have a legally authorized representative able to provide consent; pediatric patients to provide assent when appropriate
  • Scheduled for routine outpatient EEG for clinical diagnosis
  • Able to participate in a post-EEG telemedicine video visit
  • Clinical diagnosis of epilepsy with epileptiform discharges on prior routine EEG
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Scheduled for inpatient video-EEG monitoring for clinical diagnosis
  • MRI of brain available for co-registration
  • Confirmed diagnosis of focal epilepsy by prior video-EEG monitoring interpreted by board-certified epileptologist or clinical neurophysiologist
  • Scheduled for inpatient video-EEG monitoring with intracranial stereo-EEG electrodes for epilepsy presurgical evaluation
  • MRI of brain available for co-registration

Who cannot join

  • Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the subject or the integrity of the data
  • Any clinical suspicion of prion disease
  • History of allergy or adverse reaction to EEG electrode paste or gel
  • Scalp lesions or infections
  • Severe intellectual disability or behavioral disorders with inability to cooperate with EEG application or recording

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Walter Besio, PhD contact

4019326148

walt@cremedical.com

United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Boston Children's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

    Joanne Hall, MS, 617-919-2743, joanne.hall@childrens.harvard.edu

    Alexander Rotenberg, MD, PhD

    Recruiting
  • Barrow Neurological Institute Dignity Health dba St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85013

    Caitlin Goodman, MS, 602.406.6912, caitlin.goodman@commonspirit.org

    Susan Herman, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) and new tripolar EEG (tEEG) will be recorded from adult and pediatric patients. In some patients stereo EEG (sEEG) will also be recorded concurrently.

Read the detailed description

This study is a prospective observational study of the clinical utility (usability + accuracy) and safety of a novel EEG diagnostic device, the Tripolar Concentric Ring Electrode (TCE), that will be used to record the tripolar electroencephalogram (tEEG). The major objectives of the proposed studies will be to compare the recording qualities of the standard scalp EEG and intracranial stereo-EEG (sEEG), in preparation for obtaining FDA clearance for the TCRE and the tEEG technique. tEEG resolves the fundamental drawbacks of conventional EEG, providing significant improvement in signal fidelity, spatial resolution, and registering of higher frequency brain activities. In this project, a comparison of the safety, ease of use, and accuracy of the TCRE device to standard EEG and intracranial sEEG recordings in patients with epilepsy will be performed. An overview of the proposed studies are as follows:

Milestone 1: Simultaneous tEEG and EEG will be recorded in the outpatient clinical EEG lab. Per recording, tEEG and gold standard scalp EEG will be compared in 30-minute studies, examining a) usability (i.e., ease of application, time for electrode application, and subject ratings of comfort), b) EEG data quality, and c) accuracy of blinded analysis of common EEG patterns, including epileptiform activity.

Milestone 2: Data collected will be analyzed in Milestone 2, to assess the ability of tEEG to suppress commonly encountered EEG artifacts, by comparing blinded analysis of tEEG to the gold standard scalp EEG.

Milestone 3: Simultaneous tEEG and EEG will be collected in the inpatient epilepsy monitoring unit. It is anticipated that recordings will last 24-120 hours. From these data, a comparison of the sensitivity and accuracy of tEEG and scalp EEG for detection of seizures and high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) will be performed in long-term (24 hours to 120 hours) studies in subjects undergoing continuous video-EEG monitoring in the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit.

Milestone 4: A comparison of the accuracy of tEEG, to gold standard intracranial sEEG for seizure and high frequency oscillation (HFO) localization, will be performed in patients undergoing invasive diagnostic evaluation for epilepsy surgery.

In all instances, tEEG and EEG data will be interpreted by board-certified clinical neurophysiologists. This project is a collaborative project where data will be collected separately from pediatric and adult participants. The project leadership team are; study PI, Dr. Walter Besio from CREmedical, Boston Children's Hospital site PI, Dr. Alexander Rotenberg, and Barrow Neurological Institute (Phoenix, AZ) site PI, Dr. Susan Herman.

Conditions
Epilepsy
Being tested
Tripolar electroencephalography
Keywords
electroencephalography, tripolar electroencephalography (tEEG), diagnostic accuracy
Medical subject headings
Epilepsy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tripolar electroencephalographyDevice

    We will record physiological signals with the tripolar electroencephalography

Study groups in NCT05944692
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pediatric patientspediatric patients with epilepsy
Receives: Device: Tripolar electroencephalography
Adult patientsAdult patients with epilepsy
Receives: Device: Tripolar electroencephalography

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Technical and diagnostic accuracy

    1. Establish the technical accuracy of tEEG (ability to record waveforms accurately and reproducibly in clinical conditions in comparison to conventional EEG).
    2. Establish the diagnostic accuracy of tEEG compared to conventional EEG (combination of improved artifact reduction, better interrater agreement for interictal epileptiform activity, and earlier identification of ictal patterns), as determined by blinded expert EEG readers.

    Measured: up to 10 days

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Scalp integrity

    Post-EEG: Skin condition will be scored on a 0-6 point scale reflecting erythema and pressure ulcer presence/severity, where 0 = no erythema, 1 = minimal erythema, 2 = moderate erythema with sharply defined borders, 3 = intense erythema with or without edema, 4 = intense erythema with edema and blistering/erosion, 5 = full-thickness tissue loss with exposure of subcutaneous fat but no visible bone, tendon, or muscles, and 6 = full-thickness ulcers with exposure of muscle, tendons, or bones. Scores less than 4 will be considered safe.

    Measured: up to 10 days

  2. Tolerability of tripolar concentric ring electrode electroencephalography

    Subjects will complete a questionnaire rating their comfort with EEG placement, recording, and removal. The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale will be used for 6 questions:

    1. How much discomfort did you feel during placement or adjustment of the EEG electrodes?
    2. How much discomfort did you feel at the electrode sites during recording of the EEG?
    3. How much itching did you feel at the electrode sites during recording of the EEG?
    4. How much headache did you feel during recording of the EEG?
    5. How much neck discomfort did you feel during recording of the EEG?
    6. How much discomfort did you feel at the electrode sites after EEG electrodes were removed? 0 = no pain 1-3 = mild pain 4-6 = moderate to severe pain 7-9 = very severe pain 10 = worst pain possible Statistical analysis will be performed to determine if the tripolar concentric ring electrodes have a significantly higher pain than conventional electrodes. If so, they are not tolerable.

    Measured: up to 10 days

  3. Recording of high frequency oscillations

    Each HFO candidate event will be marked by an automated HFO detection algorithm. The Readers will then be asked to visually rate candidate HFO events. The Readers will determine "Morphology of Interictal Findings", the readers can select "Epileptiform interictal activity" or "Ictal EEG activity" and HFO if it is a valid event. For candidate events contaminated by artifacts, e.g. events co-occurring with muscle or electrode artifacts in the unfiltered EEG, they will be rated as "Recording is not interpretable", "Recording of reduced diagnostic value", or "Does not interfere with the interpretation of the recording". A statistical comparison will be made between standard EEG and tEEG results to determine which, if either, records HFOs.

    Measured: up to 10 days

  4. Seizure onset zone localization

    Readers will determine the onset and offset of all seizures as well as the maximal extent of seizure propagation: generalized (>8 channels), hemispheric (5-8 channels), or focal (≤4 channels). A seizure is defined as the first unequivocal ictal EEG change from background leading to a clear seizure discharge, without return to background activity. Readers will also mark any rhythmic or periodic patterns detected. A gold standard seizure will be defined as a seizure marked by >=4 readers with >=50% overlap in seizure duration

    Measured: up to 10 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jul 2023
  2. Study start1 Sep 2025
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
90 participants (estimated)
Target duration
12 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05944692
Sponsor's protocol ID
U44NS121559
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
22 Jun 2023
Last updated
27 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Once we publish our results we will make the data from the study available to other researchers.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Epilepsy, run by CREmedical at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Walter Besio, PhD (4019326148, walt@cremedical.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Technical and diagnostic accuracy (time frame: up to 10 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in