AzTrials
AzTrials

Marfan SyndromeTOWERNCT05944614

Towards Optimal Treatment of Marfan Syndrome

An observational study of Marfan Syndrome, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 4 sites in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether new magnetic resonance imaging techniques can be used as a biomarker of aortic disease severity in patients with Marfan syndrome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Marfan Syndrome
What is being tested?
Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) examination
How many people
148 participants
Where
4 sitesNetherlands
Study dates
23 Feb 2023to 16 Apr 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: All Marfan syndrome patients age 18-50 with a known FBN1 mutation are eligeble for participation. Only patients who are unable to undergo an MRI examination are excluded.

Who may be able to join

  • MFS patients with a known FBN1 mutation
  • Between 18-50 years of age

Who cannot join

  • Contraindication for MR imaging
  • Mental retardation
  • Pregnancy, or planned pregnancy during study period
  • Additional exclusion criteria healthy controls:
  • History of aorta disease

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

Netherlands4 sites
  • Amsterdam UMC, location AMC

    Amsterdam, 1105 AZ

  • University Medical Center Groningen

    Groningen, 9713 GZ

  • Leiden University Medical Center

    Leiden, North Holland, 2333 ZA

  • Radboud University Medical Center

    Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525 GA

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

The purpose of this study is to determine whether new magnetic resonance imaging techniques can be used as a biomarker of aortic disease severity in patients with Marfan syndrome.

Conditions
Marfan Syndrome
Being tested
Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) examination
Keywords
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Aortic disease
Medical subject headings
Marfan Syndrome, Aortic Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) examinationOther

    3D CINE and 4 dimensional (4D) flow MRI sequence

Study groups in NCT05944614
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Marfan Syndrome patientsMarfan Syndrome patients age 18-50 with a pathological FBN1 mutation
Receives: Other: Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) examination
Healthy volunteersAge and gender matched healthy control patients without a history of aortic disease.
Receives: Other: Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) examination

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference in 3D aortic displacement in millimeters between Marfan patients (MFS) and healthy volunteers.

    aortic displacement in the thoracic aorta. normal values unknown, but single paper: Marfan patients range: 1.77 to 10.03 millimeters, volunteers 7.34 ± 1.69 millimeters. lower is worse.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Difference in pulse wave velocity, in meters per second between Marfan patients and healthy volunteers.

    pulse wave velocity expressed in m/s in the thoracic aorta, normal values age dependent: but range +/- 4 - 30 m/s, higher is worse

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Difference in oscillatory shear index (dimensionless) expressed in m/s between Marfan patients and healthy volunteers

    oscillatory shear index (dimensionless) in the thoracic aorta, range between 0 - 0.5 (No normal values defined), higher is worse

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Change in aortic displacement expressed in millimeters , between MFS patient aortas prior to compared to after PEARS procedure or conventional aortic surgery.

    aortic displacement expressed in millimeters in the thoracic aorta. Pre-post change unknown, however operated 3.60 +/- 1.0 millimeter versus native aorta 7.01 +/- 3.09 millimeters. Lower is worse

    Measured: Change from baseline to 6 months after surgery

  5. Change in aortic pulse wave velocity (meters/second), between MFS patient aortas prior to compared to after PEARS procedure or conventional aortic surgery.

    pulse wave velocity in the thoracic aorta expressed in meters/second. Higher is worse. normal values for change unknown.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 6 months after surgery

  6. Change in oscillatory shear index (dimensionless) between MFS patient aortas prior to compared to after PEARS procedure or conventional aortic surgery.

    oscillatory shear index (dimensionless) in the thoracic aorta. Higher is worse range between 0 -5.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 6 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Difference in 3D aortic displacement expressed in mm between Marfan patients with and without a native aorta

    aortic displacement in the thoracic aorta, lower is worse. operated 3.60 +/- 1.0 millimeter versus native aorta 7.01 +/- 3.09 millimeters

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Difference in 3D aortic displacement expressed in mm between Marfan patients with aortic root diameter >4.5cm versus <4.5 cm

    aortic displacement in the thoracic aorta, lower is worse. Normal values unknown.

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Difference in 3D aortic displacement expressed in mm between Marfan patients with a haploinsufficient fibrillin 1 mutation versus dominant negative mutation

    aortic displacement in the thoracic aorta. Lower is worse. Normal values unknown.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Difference in 3D aortic displacement expressed in mm between male versus female Marfan patients

    aortic displacement in the thoracic aorta,Lower is worse. Normal values unknown.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Difference in 3D aortic displacement expressed in mm between Marfan patients based on antihypertensive medication used

    aortic displacement in the thoracic aorta, Lower is worse. Normal values unknown.

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Difference in pulse wave velocity, expressed in meters per second between Marfan patients with and without a native aorta

    pulse wave velocity expressed in m/s in the thoracic aorta, Lower is worse. Normal values unknown. Single study in general aneurysm population: pre surgery: 18.0 +/-4.0 meters per second post surgery 20.6 +/- 6.0 meters per second. higher is worse

    Measured: Baseline

  7. Difference in pulse wave velocity, expressed in m/s between Marfan patients with an aortic root diameter >4.5 cm versus <4.5 cm

    pulse wave velocity expressed in m/s in the thoracic aorta. Higher is worse. Normal values unknown.

    Measured: Baseline

  8. Difference in pulse wave velocity, expressed in m/s between Marfan patients with a haploinsufficient fibrillin-1 mutation versus a dominant negative mutation

    pulse wave velocity expressed in m/s in the thoracic aorta. Higher is worse. Normal values unknown.

    Measured: Baseline

  9. Difference in pulse wave velocity, expressed in m/s between male and female Marfan patients

    pulse wave velocity expressed in m/s in the thoracic aorta Higher is worse. Normal values unknown.

    Measured: Baseline

  10. Difference in pulse wave velocity, expressed in m/s between Marfan patients based on antihypertensive medication used

    pulse wave velocity expressed in m/s in the thoracic aorta

    Measured: Baseline

  11. Difference in oscillatory shear index (dimensionless) expressed in m/s between Marfan patients with and without a native aorta

    oscillatory shear index (dimensionless) in the thoracic aorta. Higher is worse. Normal values unknown.

    Measured: Baseline

  12. Difference in oscillatory shear index (dimensionless) expressed in m/s between Marfan patients with aortic root diameter >4.5cm versus <4.5 cm

    oscillatory shear index (dimensionless) in the thoracic aorta. Higher is worse. Normal values unknown.

    Measured: Baseline

  13. Difference in oscillatory shear index (dimensionless) expressed in m/s between Marfan patients with a haploinsufficient fibrillin 1 mutation versus dominant negative mutation

    oscillatory shear index (dimensionless) in the thoracic aorta. Higher is worse. Normal values unknown.

    Measured: Baseline

  14. Difference in oscillatory shear index (dimensionless) expressed in m/s between male versus female Marfan patients

    oscillatory shear index (dimensionless) in the thoracic aorta. Higher is worse. Normal values unknown.

    Measured: Baseline

  15. Difference in oscillatory shear index (dimensionless) expressed in m/s between Marfan patients based on antihypertensive medication used

    oscillatory shear index (dimensionless) in the thoracic aorta. Higher is worse. Normal values unknown.

    Measured: Baseline

  16. The correlation between regional wall shear stress and elastic fibre thickness in resected aorta tissue of MFS patients.

    Correlation of locally MRI measured wall shear stress and histologic findings in the thoracic aorta. Neither is worse. Normal values dependent on location of measurement, exploratory outcome. .

    Measured: Baseline MRI with aortic surgery tissue

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jul 2023
  2. Study start23 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion16 Apr 2025
  4. Study completion16 Apr 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
148 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05944614
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL82669.018.22
Acronym
TOWER
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
28 Jun 2023
Last updated
3 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be shared

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Marfan Syndrome, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 4 sites in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference in 3D aortic displacement in millimeters between Marfan patients (MFS) and healthy volunteers. (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in