RelapseOrthRe10tionNCT05926934
The Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Fixed Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession
A study testing Experimental: Single strand β-Ti fixed retainer, Experimental: SS fixed retainer and Experimental: Twisted fixed retainer in people with Relapse and Orthodontic Retention, run by University of Athens at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
There is high possibility of relapse of the lower anterior teeth after orthodontic treatment. Relapse is related with the initial orthodontic anomaly, pathology of surrounding tissues, patient's age and sex and compliance and the retention protocol applied. The options for the later are various. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 to 30 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Relapse, Orthodontic Retention
- What is being tested?
- Experimental: Single strand β-Ti fixed retainer, Experimental: SS fixed retainer and Experimental: Twisted fixed retainer
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- 16 Jan 2022to Nov 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 to 30 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliances (Roth 0.018'' slot at their final finishing stage)
- Patients with fixed orthodontic appliances at least between their lower first premolars
- No lower anterior teeth crowding (total irregularity index score = 0)
- Patients with no need of removable retention appliances on their lower teeth
Who cannot join
- Active caries on adjacent or lingual surfaces of lower anterior teeth
- Active periodontitis
- Supragingival calculus
- Gum bleeding during bonding of fixed retainer
- Gingival pocket depth greater than 3mm
- Syndromes or other anomalies of the craniofacial complex or other mental illness
Show all 15Show fewer
- Missing or impacted teeth or other dental anomalies
- Congenital anomalies/syndromes
- Allergies regarding the alloys of fixed retainers
- Need for chemoprevention before data collection of periodontal indexes
- Diabetes
- Smoking
- Usage of antibiotics
- Pregnancy
- Participation in other clinical trials
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Greece1 site
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Dentistry, Departments of Orthodontics
Athens, Attica, 11527
About this study
Official title: A Single-center, 3-arm, Parallel-group Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Bond Failures and the Effectiveness of Three Orthodontic Retention Schemes in Preventing Post-treatment Mandibular Arch Changes
There is high possibility of relapse of the lower anterior teeth after orthodontic treatment. Relapse is related with the initial orthodontic anomaly, pathology of surrounding tissues, patient's age and sex and compliance and the retention protocol applied. The options for the later are various. Permanent fixed retainers are considered of the most common ones and vastly vary based of composition. There are fixed retainers distinguished for their composition (SS, β-NiTi, fiber-reinforced composite retainers) or for their shape and dimensions (round or rectangular shape and single-strand or multi-strand respectively), and/or for the teeth they are placed on (canine and canine or canine to canine). Fixed retainers may require patient's cooperation , nevertheless debond failure rate varies between 0.1-53%.
The aim of this prospective randomized clinical study is to compare failure incidents and retention effect on lower anterior teeth after orthodontic finish between three different types of fixed retainers. There will be 3 arms studied in this research: a) single strand 0.016x0.022'' β-Ti canine to canine, b) 0.028'' SS canine to canine and c) 0.027'' multi-strand twistflex canine to canine. Variables such as repeatability of failures, and undesired tooth movements will be measured. Measurements will be repeated every 3 months after patient's recruitment in this study, for one year period (12 months in total). Intraoral scans will be collected during baseline (fixed retainer insertion) and after 12 months.
- Conditions
- Relapse, Orthodontic Retention
- Being tested
- Experimental: Single strand β-Ti fixed retainer, Experimental: SS fixed retainer, Experimental: Twisted fixed retainer
- Medical subject headings
- Recurrence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Experimental: Single strand β-Ti fixed retainerDevice
All 90 patients between 13-30 y.o. treated with fixed orthodontic appliances (Roth 0.018'' slot at their final finishing stage) on at least between their lower first premolars and with no lower anterior teeth crowding (total irregularity index score = 0) and no need of removable retention appliances on their lower teeth, were randomly assigned to one of the three experimental groups.
Experimental: SS fixed retainerDevice
All 90 patients between 13-30 y.o. treated with fixed orthodontic appliances (Roth 0.018'' slot at their final finishing stage) on at least between their lower first premolars and with no lower anterior teeth crowding (total irregularity index score = 0) and no need of removable retention appliances on their lower teeth, were randomly assigned to one of the three experimental groups.
Experimental: Twisted fixed retainerDevice
All 90 patients between 13-30 y.o. treated with fixed orthodontic appliances (Roth 0.018'' slot at their final finishing stage) on at least between their lower first premolars and with no lower anterior teeth crowding (total irregularity index score = 0) and no need of removable retention appliances on their lower teeth, were randomly assigned to one of the three experimental groups.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single strand β-Ti fixed retainer | Experimental | Single strand β-Ti fixed retainer 0.011in diameter, bonded on each tooth separately from #33-43 Receives: Device: Experimental: Single strand β-Ti fixed retainer |
| SS fixed retainer | Experimental | SS fixed retainer 0.028in diameter, bonded on each tooth separately from #33-43 Receives: Device: Experimental: SS fixed retainer |
| Twisted fixed retainer | Experimental | Twisted fixed retainer 0.027in diameter, bonded on each tooth separately from #33-43 Receives: Device: Experimental: Twisted fixed retainer |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of teeth that failed regarding the bonding strength
Measured: baseline-3 months
Number of teeth that failed regarding the bonding strength
Measured: 3 months-6 months
Number of teeth that failed regarding the bonding strength
Measured: 6 months-9 months
Number of teeth that failed regarding the bonding strength
Measured: 9 months-1 year
Repeatability of bonding strength failure per patient and per tooth
Measured: baseline-3 months
Repeatability of bonding strength failure per patient and per tooth
Measured: 3 months-6 months
Repeatability of bonding strength failure per patient and per tooth
Measured: 6 months-9months
Repeatability of bonding strength failure per patient and per tooth
Measured: 9months-1 year
Breakage of fixed retainer wires
Measured: baseline-3 months
Breakage of fixed retainer wires
Measured: 3 months-6 months
Breakage of fixed retainer wires
Measured: 6 months-9 months
Breakage of fixed retainer wires
Measured: 9 months-1 year
Space discrepancy (Little index)(in mm)
Measured: baseline-3 months
Space discrepancy (Little index)(in mm)
Measured: 3 months-6 months
Space discrepancy (Little index)(in mm)
Measured: 6 months-9 months
Space discrepancy (Little index)(in mm)
Measured: 9 months-1 year
Mandibular intercanine distance
Measured: baseline-3 months
Mandibular intercanine distance
Measured: 3 months-6 months
Mandibular intercanine distance
Measured: 6 months-9 months
Mandibular arch length (in mm)
Measured: 9 months-1 year
Secondary outcomes (12)
Tooth rotations in lower anterior teeth
Measured: baseline-3 months
Tooth rotations in lower anterior teeth
Measured: 3 months-6 months
Tooth rotations in lower anterior teeth
Measured: 6 months-9 months
Tooth rotations in lower anterior teeth
Measured: 9 months-1 year
Extrusion in lower anterior teeth
Measured: baseline-3 months
Extrusion in lower anterior teeth
Measured: 3 months-6 months
Extrusion in lower anterior teeth
Measured: 6 months-9 months
Extrusion in lower anterior teeth
Measured: 9 months-1 year
Tip inclinations anteroposteriorly
Measured: baseline-3 months
Tip inclinations anteroposteriorly
Measured: 3 months-6 months
Tip inclinations anteroposteriorly
Measured: 6 months-9 months
Tip inclinations anteroposteriorly
Measured: 9 months -1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jul 2023
- Study start16 Jan 2022
- Primary completionJun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for RelapseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Athens
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Iosif Sifakakis, University of Athens
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05926934
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 409/08.02.2022
- Acronym
- OrthRe10tion
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 31 May 2023
- Last updated
- 6 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Single-center, 3-arm, Parallel-group Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Bond Failures and the Effectiveness of Three Orthodontic Retention Schemes in Preventing Post-treatment Mandibular Arch Changes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05926934
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OrthRe10tion / 409/08.02.2022
- Conditions
- Relapse, Orthodontic Retention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AthensUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There is high possibility of relapse of the lower anterior teeth after orthodontic treatment. Relapse is related with the initial orthodontic anomaly, pathology of surrounding tissues, patient's age and sex and compliance and the retention protocol applied. The options for the later are various. Permanent fixed retainers are considered of the most common ones and vastly vary based of composition. There are fixed retainers distinguished for their composition (SS, β-NiTi, fiber-reinforced composite retainers) or for their shape and dimensions (round or rectangular shape and single-strand or multi-strand respectively), and/or for the teeth they are placed on (canine and canine or canine to canine). Fixed retainers may require patient's cooperation , nevertheless debond failure rate varies between 0.1-53%.
The aim of this prospective randomized clinical study is to compare failure incidents and retention effect on lower anterior teeth after orthodontic finish between three different types of fixed retainers. There will be 3 arms studied in this research: a) single strand 0.016x0.022'' β-Ti canine to canine, b) 0.028'' SS canine to canine and c) 0.027'' multi-strand twistflex canine to canine. Variables such as repeatability of failures, and undesired tooth movements will be measured. Measurements will be repeated every 3 months after patient's recruitment in this study, for one year period (12 months in total). Intraoral scans will be collected during baseline (fixed retainer insertion) and after 12 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single strand β-Ti fixed retainer | Experimental | Device: Experimental: Single strand β-Ti fixed retainerSingle strand β-Ti fixed retainer 0.011in diameter, bonded on each tooth separately from #33-43 |
| SS fixed retainer | Experimental | Device: Experimental: SS fixed retainerSS fixed retainer 0.028in diameter, bonded on each tooth separately from #33-43 |
| Twisted fixed retainer | Experimental | Device: Experimental: Twisted fixed retainerTwisted fixed retainer 0.027in diameter, bonded on each tooth separately from #33-43 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 to 30 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliances (Roth 0.018'' slot at their final finishing stage)
- Patients with fixed orthodontic appliances at least between their lower first premolars
- No lower anterior teeth crowding (total irregularity index score = 0)
- Patients with no need of removable retention appliances on their lower teeth
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Active caries on adjacent or lingual surfaces of lower anterior teeth
- Active periodontitis
- Supragingival calculus
- Gum bleeding during bonding of fixed retainer
- Gingival pocket depth greater than 3mm
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Single strand β-Ti fixed retainerAll 90 patients between 13-30 y.o. treated with fixed orthodontic appliances (Roth 0.018'' slot at their final finishing stage) on at least between their lower first premolars and with no lower anterior teeth crowding (total irregularity index score = 0) and no need of removable retention appliances on their lower teeth, were randomly assigned to one of the three experimental groups. | Device | Single strand β-Ti fixed retainer |
| Experimental: SS fixed retainerAll 90 patients between 13-30 y.o. treated with fixed orthodontic appliances (Roth 0.018'' slot at their final finishing stage) on at least between their lower first premolars and with no lower anterior teeth crowding (total irregularity index score = 0) and no need of removable retention appliances on their lower teeth, were randomly assigned to one of the three experimental groups. | Device | SS fixed retainer |
| Experimental: Twisted fixed retainerAll 90 patients between 13-30 y.o. treated with fixed orthodontic appliances (Roth 0.018'' slot at their final finishing stage) on at least between their lower first premolars and with no lower anterior teeth crowding (total irregularity index score = 0) and no need of removable retention appliances on their lower teeth, were randomly assigned to one of the three experimental groups. | Device | Twisted fixed retainer |
Primary outcome
Number of teeth that failed regarding the bonding strength
Time frame: baseline-3 months
Number of teeth that failed regarding the bonding strength
Time frame: 3 months-6 months
Number of teeth that failed regarding the bonding strength
Time frame: 6 months-9 months
Number of teeth that failed regarding the bonding strength
Time frame: 9 months-1 year
Repeatability of bonding strength failure per patient and per tooth
Time frame: baseline-3 months
Repeatability of bonding strength failure per patient and per tooth
Time frame: 3 months-6 months
Repeatability of bonding strength failure per patient and per tooth
Time frame: 6 months-9months
Repeatability of bonding strength failure per patient and per tooth
Time frame: 9months-1 year
Breakage of fixed retainer wires
Time frame: baseline-3 months
Breakage of fixed retainer wires
Time frame: 3 months-6 months
Breakage of fixed retainer wires
Time frame: 6 months-9 months
Breakage of fixed retainer wires
Time frame: 9 months-1 year
Space discrepancy (Little index)(in mm)
Time frame: baseline-3 months
Space discrepancy (Little index)(in mm)
Time frame: 3 months-6 months
Space discrepancy (Little index)(in mm)
Time frame: 6 months-9 months
Space discrepancy (Little index)(in mm)
Time frame: 9 months-1 year
Mandibular intercanine distance
Time frame: baseline-3 months
Mandibular intercanine distance
Time frame: 3 months-6 months
Mandibular intercanine distance
Time frame: 6 months-9 months
Mandibular arch length (in mm)
Time frame: 9 months-1 year
12 secondary outcomes
Tooth rotations in lower anterior teeth
Time frame: baseline-3 months
Tooth rotations in lower anterior teeth
Time frame: 3 months-6 months
Tooth rotations in lower anterior teeth
Time frame: 6 months-9 months
Tooth rotations in lower anterior teeth
Time frame: 9 months-1 year
Extrusion in lower anterior teeth
Time frame: baseline-3 months
Extrusion in lower anterior teeth
Time frame: 3 months-6 months
Extrusion in lower anterior teeth
Time frame: 6 months-9 months
Extrusion in lower anterior teeth
Time frame: 9 months-1 year
Tip inclinations anteroposteriorly
Time frame: baseline-3 months
Tip inclinations anteroposteriorly
Time frame: 3 months-6 months
Tip inclinations anteroposteriorly
Time frame: 6 months-9 months
Tip inclinations anteroposteriorly
Time frame: 9 months -1 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jan 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Relapse
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
The Safety and Efficacy of Daratumumab in Patients With Refractory Aplastic Anemia
Aplastic Anemia, Refractory
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study of YTS109 Cell Injection in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, Anti-CD19 STAR T-cell Therapy
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-12 Genetically Engineered Myeloid Cells in Participants With Relapsed, Refractory Solid Tumors
Relapsed Solid Tumor Malignancies, Refractory Solid Tumor Malignancies
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Experimental: Single strand β-Ti fixed retainer, Experimental: SS fixed retainer and Experimental: Twisted fixed retainer in people with Relapse and Orthodontic Retention, run by University of Athens at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of teeth that failed regarding the bonding strength (time frame: baseline-3 months). The study lists 20 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2025.