NursesNCT05921032
Comparison of Biomechanics, Function and Pain and Effects of Exercise Intervention Among Nurses
A study testing Exercise intervention in people with Nurses, run by Universiti Sains Malaysia at 1 site in Malaysia.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to compare the effects of exercise interventions (lumbar stabilisation exercise (LSE) versus lumbar muscles strengthening exercises (LMSE)) on full body mechanics, functional disability outcomes and pain score among female nurses with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 55 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Nurses
- What is being tested?
- Exercise intervention
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMalaysia
- Study dates
- 1 May 2023to 30 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 55 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Female nurses from Hospital USM
- Had chronic non specific LBP persisting for longer than three months.
- Treated as outpatients of HUSM
Who cannot join
- history of cerebrovascular disease
- chronic diseases that cause long-term immobilisation
- history of previous spine surgery
- diagnosed with spinal cord disease
- history of rheumatic disease
- diagnosed with cancer
Show all 14Show fewer
- history of neurological deficits
- history of infectious and systemic disease
- history of radicular pain due to nerve root involvement
- history of structural lesion such as spondylosis
- spondylolisthesis
- scoliosis
- kyphosis
- vertebral bone fracture
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Malaysia1 site
Universiti Sains Malaysia Kampus Kesihatan
Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, 16150
About this study
Official title: Low Back Pain Among Nurses: Comparison of Biomechanics, Function and Pain Across Subtypes and Effects of Exercise Intervention.
The goal of this study is to compare the effects of exercise interventions (lumbar stabilisation exercise (LSE) versus lumbar muscles strengthening exercises (LMSE)) on full body mechanics, functional disability outcomes and pain score among female nurses with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). The main questions are:
- What are the differences in full body mechanics, functional disability outcomes and pain score among female nurses with CNLBP?
- How exercise intervention affects full body mechanics, functional disability outcomes and pain score among female nurses with CNLBP?
Read more
Participants will be divided into three groups (lumbar stabilisation exercise (LSE), lumbar muscles strengthening exercises (LMSE) and control group). Exercise intervention group will be asked to perform 8 weeks of exercise intervention with :
- 3D kinematics and trunk spinal loads test
- Trunk muscle power (extensor) test
- Sit-and-reach test
- Functional disability (Roland-Morris Low Back Pain and Disability Questionnaire, RMQ)
- Pain intensity (Visual analogue scale, VAS)
- Endurance of trunk muscle test
Meanwhile control group will be given a diary to record their daily activities which consist of their 24 hours diet recall for 8 weeks and involvement of any physical activity throughout the 8 weeks.
Researchers will compare between two exercise groups to see if there is any differences in full body mechanics, functional disability outcomes and pain score across different among female nurses with CNLBP.
Read the detailed description
- All participants are female nurses with age range between 20 - 55 years old from Hospital USM and have chronic LBP persisting for longer than three months.
- Randomisation of participants' selection will be conducted using computer. The allocation numbers will be generated by the computer via excel formulas to get evenly distributed names into three groups.
- The sample size is calculated using GPower software (v.3.1.9.7, Universität Düsseldorf, German) of Repeated Measure ANOVA with p value set at 0.05 and effect size is 0.75. Based on effect size, it showed that 15 participants per group are sufficient to yield 0.8 power of the study with four times of assessments (i.e., pre-intervention assessment, mid- intervention assessment, post- intervention assessment, and 1 month after intervention). By inclusion of 20% drop out rate a total of 54 participants were recruited with 18 participants per group (n=18).
- Participants need to attend at least 75% of the training session and their data will not be evaluated if they do not meet this minimum adherence level.
- All statistical analyses will be performed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 26.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York, United States). The level of significance was set at p<0.05.All data will be tested for normal distribution via the Shapiro Wilk test. Repeated Measure ANOVA will be conducted to compare the lower extremity and trunk kinematics, endurance of trunk flexor and extensor muscles, functional disability, pain intensity values and anthropometric data across two groups at pre, middle, post and one month follow up after exercises intervention.
- All 3D kinematics and trunk spinal loads test, trunk muscle power (extensor) test, sit-and-reach test, functional disability (Roland-Morris Low Back Pain and Disability Questionnaire, RMQ), pain intensity (Visual analogue scale, VAS) and endurance of trunk muscle test will be assessed during pre assessment, middle assessment (during fourth week of exercise intervention), post assessment and after one month follow up assessment.
- Conditions
- Nurses
- Being tested
- Exercise intervention
- Keywords
- Kinematics, Kinetics, Human health, Spine
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
8 weeks of exercise with two session in a week
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lumbar stabilisation exercise (LSE) | Other | Lumbar stabilisation exercise (LSE) group will perform eight weeks exercise intervention for two sessions in a week. Each session took about 45 minutes to complete. The total exercise sessions were 16 sessions. LSE group will be focused on strengthening the deep trunk stabilising muscles (i.e., transverse abdominal, internal oblique and lumbar multifidus) and control pelvis muscles. Receives: Other: Exercise intervention |
| Lumbar muscle strengthening exercise (LMSE) | Other | Lumbar muscle strengthening exercise (LMSE) group will perform eight weeks exercise intervention for two sessions in a week. Each session took about 45 minutes to complete. The total exercise sessions were 16 sessions. LMSE group aims to strengthen the trunk flexor and extensor muscles. Receives: Other: Exercise intervention |
| Control group | No intervention | The control group will be given a diary to record their daily activities which consist of their 24 hours diet recall for 8 weeks and involvement of any physical activity throughout the 8 weeks. This diary will be collected during follow up (1 month after post-intervention). Upon completion of the trial, participants in the control group will receive either LSE or LMSE or combination of both exercises depending on their preference. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in lumbar angle from baseline to post-intervention
Biomechanical data measured during walking, sit-to-stand and carrying and transferring a standard load
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Change in pelvic tilt angle from baseline to post-intervention
Biomechanical data measured during walking, sit-to-stand and carrying and transferring a standard load
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Change in hip angle from baseline to post-intervention
Biomechanical data measured during walking, sit-to-stand and carrying and transferring a standard load
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Change in knee angle from baseline to post-intervention
Biomechanical data measured during walking, sit-to-stand and carrying and transferring a standard load
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Change in ankle angle from baseline to post-intervention
Biomechanical data measured during walking, sit-to-stand and carrying and transferring a standard load
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Change in back extensor muscle power from baseline to post-intervention
Grading of muscle strength (Oxford Scale) will be used to assess back extensor muscle power. 0/5 = no muscle movement, 1/5 = muscle movement without joint motion, 2/5 = movement with gravity eliminated, 3/5 = movement against gravity but not against resistance, 4/5 = movement against gravity and light resistance and 5/5 represents normal strength
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Change in functional disability from baseline to post-intervention
Functional disability will be assessed by using the Roland-Morris Low Back Pain and Disability Questionnaire. Greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers of 24-point scale which represented 24 questions. Through analysis of serial questionnaire scores, a clinical improvement over time can be graded. For example, at the beginning of test, a participant's score was 10, and after test, her score was 2 (8 points of improvement). Therefore, the improvement percentage was 80% (8/10 x 100).
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Change in pain intensity from baseline to post-intervention
Visual analogue scale (VAS) will be used to assess the pain intensity. The minimum values "0" referring to no pain and maximum values "10" referring to worst imaginable pain.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Change in endurance of trunk muscles from baseline to post-intervention
Trunk flexor muscle and extensor muscle will be tested according to the duration of the muscles contraction. Long time duration (more than 4 minutes) means the participant has no back pain.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Change in hamstrings flexibility from baseline to post-intervention
Flexibility of the lower back and hamstrings will be assessed by using sit and reach test. The scale will be referring to The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) which range from excellent to poor (in cm) according to their age.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Change in full body gravitational reaction force from baseline to post-intervention
Biomechanical data measured during walking, sit-to-stand and carrying and transferring a standard load
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Change in full body moment from baseline to post-intervention
Biomechanical data measured during walking, sit-to-stand and carrying and transferring a standard load
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Change in full body center of pressure from baseline to post-intervention
Biomechanical data measured during walking, sit-to-stand and carrying and transferring a standard load
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2023
- Study start1 May 2023
- Primary completion31 Aug 2023
- Study completion30 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for NursesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universiti Sains Malaysia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Shazlin Shaharudin, Universiti Sains Malaysia
- Investigators
- Shazlin Shaharudin, PhD, Principal investigator, Universiti Sains Malaysia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05921032
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- USM/JEPeM/19100637
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 3 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 24 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Moon HJ, Choi KH, Kim DH, Kim HJ, Cho YK, Lee KH, Kim JH, Choi YJ. Effect of lumbar stabilization and dynamic lumbar strengthening exercises in patients with chronic low back pain. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013 Feb;37(1):110-7. doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.1.110. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
PubMed 23525973Sipaviciene S, Kliziene I. Effect of different exercise programs on non-specific chronic low back pain and disability in people who perform sedentary work. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Mar;73:17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.12.028. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
PubMed 31923778
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Low Back Pain Among Nurses: Comparison of Biomechanics, Function and Pain Across Subtypes and Effects of Exercise Intervention.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05921032
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- USM/JEPeM/19100637
- Conditions
- Nurses
- Keywords
- Kinematics, Kinetics, Human health, Spine
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universiti Sains MalaysiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to compare the effects of exercise interventions (lumbar stabilisation exercise (LSE) versus lumbar muscles strengthening exercises (LMSE)) on full body mechanics, functional disability outcomes and pain score among female nurses with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). The main questions are:
- What are the differences in full body mechanics, functional disability outcomes and pain score among female nurses with CNLBP?
- How exercise intervention affects full body mechanics, functional disability outcomes and pain score among female nurses with CNLBP?
Participants will be divided into three groups (lumbar stabilisation exercise (LSE), lumbar muscles strengthening exercises (LMSE) and control group). Exercise intervention group will be asked to perform 8 weeks of exercise intervention with :
- 3D kinematics and trunk spinal loads test
- Trunk muscle power (extensor) test
- Sit-and-reach test
- Functional disability (Roland-Morris Low Back Pain and Disability Questionnaire, RMQ)
- Pain intensity (Visual analogue scale, VAS)
- Endurance of trunk muscle test
Meanwhile control group will be given a diary to record their daily activities which consist of their 24 hours diet recall for 8 weeks and involvement of any physical activity throughout the 8 weeks.
Researchers will compare between two exercise groups to see if there is any differences in full body mechanics, functional disability outcomes and pain score across different among female nurses with CNLBP.
Detailed description
- All participants are female nurses with age range between 20 - 55 years old from Hospital USM and have chronic LBP persisting for longer than three months.
- Randomisation of participants' selection will be conducted using computer. The allocation numbers will be generated by the computer via excel formulas to get evenly distributed names into three groups.
- The sample size is calculated using GPower software (v.3.1.9.7, Universität Düsseldorf, German) of Repeated Measure ANOVA with p value set at 0.05 and effect size is 0.75. Based on effect size, it showed that 15 participants per group are sufficient to yield 0.8 power of the study with four times of assessments (i.e., pre-intervention assessment, mid- intervention assessment, post- intervention assessment, and 1 month after intervention). By inclusion of 20% drop out rate a total of 54 participants were recruited with 18 participants per group (n=18).
- Participants need to attend at least 75% of the training session and their data will not be evaluated if they do not meet this minimum adherence level.
- All statistical analyses will be performed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 26.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York, United States). The level of significance was set at p<0.05.All data will be tested for normal distribution via the Shapiro Wilk test. Repeated Measure ANOVA will be conducted to compare the lower extremity and trunk kinematics, endurance of trunk flexor and extensor muscles, functional disability, pain intensity values and anthropometric data across two groups at pre, middle, post and one month follow up after exercises intervention.
- All 3D kinematics and trunk spinal loads test, trunk muscle power (extensor) test, sit-and-reach test, functional disability (Roland-Morris Low Back Pain and Disability Questionnaire, RMQ), pain intensity (Visual analogue scale, VAS) and endurance of trunk muscle test will be assessed during pre assessment, middle assessment (during fourth week of exercise intervention), post assessment and after one month follow up assessment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lumbar stabilisation exercise (LSE) | Other | Other: Exercise interventionLumbar stabilisation exercise (LSE) group will perform eight weeks exercise intervention for two sessions in a week. Each session took about 45 minutes to complete. The total exercise sessions were 16 sessions. LSE group will be focused on strengthening the deep trunk stabilising muscles (i.e., transverse abdominal, internal oblique and lumbar multifidus) and control pelvis muscles. |
| Lumbar muscle strengthening exercise (LMSE) | Other | Other: Exercise interventionLumbar muscle strengthening exercise (LMSE) group will perform eight weeks exercise intervention for two sessions in a week. Each session took about 45 minutes to complete. The total exercise sessions were 16 sessions. LMSE group aims to strengthen the trunk flexor and extensor muscles. |
| Control group | No intervention | –The control group will be given a diary to record their daily activities which consist of their 24 hours diet recall for 8 weeks and involvement of any physical activity throughout the 8 weeks. This diary will be collected during follow up (1 month after post-intervention). Upon completion of the trial, participants in the control group will receive either LSE or LMSE or combination of both exercises depending on their preference. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 55 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Female nurses from Hospital USM
- Had chronic non specific LBP persisting for longer than three months.
- Treated as outpatients of HUSM
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- history of cerebrovascular disease
- chronic diseases that cause long-term immobilisation
- history of previous spine surgery
- diagnosed with spinal cord disease
- history of rheumatic disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Exercise intervention8 weeks of exercise with two session in a week | Other | Lumbar muscle strengthening exercise (LMSE), Lumbar stabilisation exercise (LSE) |
Primary outcome
Change in lumbar angle from baseline to post-intervention
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Biomechanical data measured during walking, sit-to-stand and carrying and transferring a standard load
Change in pelvic tilt angle from baseline to post-intervention
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Biomechanical data measured during walking, sit-to-stand and carrying and transferring a standard load
Change in hip angle from baseline to post-intervention
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Biomechanical data measured during walking, sit-to-stand and carrying and transferring a standard load
Change in knee angle from baseline to post-intervention
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Biomechanical data measured during walking, sit-to-stand and carrying and transferring a standard load
Change in ankle angle from baseline to post-intervention
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Biomechanical data measured during walking, sit-to-stand and carrying and transferring a standard load
Change in back extensor muscle power from baseline to post-intervention
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Grading of muscle strength (Oxford Scale) will be used to assess back extensor muscle power. 0/5 = no muscle movement, 1/5 = muscle movement without joint motion, 2/5 = movement with gravity eliminated, 3/5 = movement against gravity but not against resistance, 4/5 = movement against gravity and light resistance and 5/5 represents normal strength
Change in functional disability from baseline to post-intervention
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Functional disability will be assessed by using the Roland-Morris Low Back Pain and Disability Questionnaire. Greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers of 24-point scale which represented 24 questions. Through analysis of serial questionnaire scores, a clinical improvement over time can be graded. For example, at the beginning of test, a participant's score was 10, and after test, her score was 2 (8 points of improvement). Therefore, the improvement percentage was 80% (8/10 x 100).
Change in pain intensity from baseline to post-intervention
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Visual analogue scale (VAS) will be used to assess the pain intensity. The minimum values "0" referring to no pain and maximum values "10" referring to worst imaginable pain.
Change in endurance of trunk muscles from baseline to post-intervention
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Trunk flexor muscle and extensor muscle will be tested according to the duration of the muscles contraction. Long time duration (more than 4 minutes) means the participant has no back pain.
Change in hamstrings flexibility from baseline to post-intervention
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Flexibility of the lower back and hamstrings will be assessed by using sit and reach test. The scale will be referring to The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) which range from excellent to poor (in cm) according to their age.
Change in full body gravitational reaction force from baseline to post-intervention
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Biomechanical data measured during walking, sit-to-stand and carrying and transferring a standard load
Change in full body moment from baseline to post-intervention
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Biomechanical data measured during walking, sit-to-stand and carrying and transferring a standard load
Change in full body center of pressure from baseline to post-intervention
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
Biomechanical data measured during walking, sit-to-stand and carrying and transferring a standard load
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Dec 2024.
- Background: PubMed 23525973Moon HJ, Choi KH, Kim DH, Kim HJ, Cho YK, Lee KH, Kim JH, Choi YJ. Effect of lumbar stabilization and dynamic lumbar strengthening exercises in patients with chronic low back pain. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013 Feb;37(1):110-7. doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.1.110. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
- Background: PubMed 31923778Sipaviciene S, Kliziene I. Effect of different exercise programs on non-specific chronic low back pain and disability in people who perform sedentary work. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Mar;73:17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.12.028. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Nurses
Recruiting
Evaluation of a French Hospital Discharge Therapeutic Education Program by Nurses for Heart Failure Patient (EduSor)
Heart Failure
Not yet recruiting
Nurse-Led Prehabilitation Before Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery
Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Pilot Testing ACCOMPANI: A Nurse-Targeted Intervention to Promote Psychosocial Equity in Pediatric Oncology
Pediatric Oncology, Childhood Cancers
Not yet recruiting
A Nurse-Led Personalized Self-Management Counseling Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence and Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Medication Adherence, Glycemic Control for Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of an Early Postoperative Nurse-Led, Individualized Counseling Program on Lifestyle Adherence After Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Lifestyle Adherence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Shazlin Shaharudin, PhD principal investigator
Universiti Sains Malaysia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Exercise intervention in people with Nurses, run by Universiti Sains Malaysia at 1 site in Malaysia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in lumbar angle from baseline to post-intervention (time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months). The study lists 13 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05921032, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2024.