Cervical PainNCT05914129
Efficacy of Osteopathic Visceral Treatment in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
A study testing Diaphragm, Stomach and Liver techniques and Stomach and Liver techniques in people with Cervical Pain, run by Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde do Porto at 1 site in Portugal.
Trial summary
This study aims to analyze the effects of visceral osteopathic treatment of the diaphragm, stomach and liver in the treatment of chronic neck pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Pain
- What is being tested?
- Diaphragm, Stomach and Liver techniques and Stomach and Liver techniques
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 45 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePortugal
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2024to 8 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Pain in the posterior cervical region for more than 3 months;
- Knowing how to read and write;
Who cannot join
- Recent Cervicothoracic or Thoracoabdominal trauma (less than 6 months);
- Surgical procedure in the cervical region less than 6 months ago
- Surgical procedure in the abdominal region less than 6 months ago;
- Diagnosis of disc disease/radiculopathy;
- Rheumatic and/or neurological disease;
- Pregnancy status
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Osteopathic Visceral Treatment on the Diaphragm, Stomach and Liver in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
This study aims to analyze the effects of visceral osteopathic treatment of the diaphragm, stomach and liver in the treatment of chronic neck pain.
Read the detailed description
Cervical pain is a very common condition, whom can originate from bad posture, cervical tension, anxiety, depression and occupational or sportive activities. The influence of mobility and function changes of the abdominal viscera in the cervical region is a mechanism that is still poorly described in literature.
It is expected to find, through mechanical and neural pathways, that the visceral osteopathy treatment will have some effect on chronic neck pain.
This study intends to check the effects of the diaphragm stretching, inferior mobilization of the stomach and liver pump techniques (restoring mobility and normalizing function of the viscera) on the neck region, by employing some questionnaires/instruments.
During the present study, the effects of the visceral techniques will be analyzed in the following variables: Neck Disability Index (NDI), Numeric Pain Scale (NPS or END) and Global Pain Scale (GPS or EPGM).
- Conditions
- Cervical Pain
- Being tested
- Diaphragm, Stomach and Liver techniques, Stomach and Liver techniques, Sham technique
- Keywords
- Chronic Neck Pain, Diaphragm, Manual Therapy, Osteopathy, Visceral Techniques
- Medical subject headings
- Neck Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Diaphragm, Stomach and Liver techniquesOther
Diaphragm Stretching:
The participant is seating down and the researcher will be behind, placing their hands on the inferior costal border. Cephalic traction is performed during inhalation, remaining during exhalation. Procedure is repeated 2 times, for 10 respiratory cycles, with 1-minute intervals.
Inferior Mobilization of the Stomach:
The participant is seating down with slight flexion of the torso, while the investigator stands behind them, placing the thumbs on the epigastric region. The volunteer will extend their body while the researcher performs a caudal traction. This procedure lasts 5 minutes.
Liver Pump:
Participant is laying on their back, and the investigator is standing on the participants side. The researcher places one hand on the right side inferior costal border posteriorly and the other one bellow the costal border anteriorly. Researcher compresses during exhalation and releases their hands abruptly during inhalation. This procedure lasts 5 minutes.
Stomach and Liver techniquesOther
In this group, techniques are the exact same as described previously but only liver and stomach ones will be performed.
Sham techniqueOther
In the sham group, manual contact without any therapeutic intention will be performed in the same regions as the experimental groups. This contact will be maintained during the same amount of time as for the experimental group A.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group (GC) | Sham comparator | To each volunteer, after 2 questionnaires, sham techniques will be performed to this group. The investigator will mimic the technique contacts without actually performing any type of tissue traction or compression, maintaining contact for the same amount of time described in the refered techniques. Following the technique, volunteers will answer the same 2 questionnaires shown previously. Receives: Other: Sham technique |
| Experimental Group A (GEA) | Experimental | To each volunteer, after 2 questionnaires, Diaphragm Stretching, Lower stomach mobilization and Liver pump techniques will be performed to this group. The diaphragm technique is performed 2 times with 1 minute interval, with the duration of 10 respiratory cycles. The lower stomach mobilization and liver pump techniques are performed one time, for 5 minutes each. Following the technique, volunteers will answer the same 2 questionnaires shown previously. Receives: Other: Diaphragm, Stomach and Liver techniques |
| Experimental Group B (GEB) | Experimental | To each volunteer, after 2 questionnaires, Lower stomach mobilization and Liver pump techniques will be performed to this group. These 2 techniques are the same ones as described for the experimental group A. Following the technique, volunteers will answer the same 2 questionnaires shown previously. Receives: Other: Stomach and Liver techniques |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in level of incapacity derived from neck pain 7 days after the intervention
The Neck Disability Index questionnaire (NDI) will be the instrument used to evaluate the level of incapacity caused by neck pain. The questionnaire has 10 questions about the volunteers everyday life activities. There are 6 options to each question and the participant must choose the one that applies the most to their experience. The options selected will account for a score that goes from 0 to 50. The higher the number of the option, the more incapacity is felt and reported by the participant, meaning a worse outcome.
This data will be collected by asking the volunteer their preferred option and writing it down.
Measured: 7 days after the intervention
Change in level of pain throughout the 7 days following the intervention
The pain outcome will be measured according to the volunteers perception of pain in the cervical region by using the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS). This scale ranges from 0 to 10 and the participant must choose one number that best suits their level of current pain, 0 corresponding to "no pain" and 10 being "the worst pain imaginable to that participant". The higher the number, the worse the outcome.
This data will be collected by asking the volunteer for the corresponding number and writing it down.
Measured: Once a day for the 7 days after the intervention
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change in perception of the global conditions throughout the 7 days following the intervention
One week after the intervention, the participants must answer the Global Perception of Change Scale (GPCS), which presents 7 options (from 1 to 7). The higher the number of the option, the more change was perceived and reported by the participant, meaning a better outcome. This instrument will guide the researcher to better understand if the intervention resulted in any kind of change to their initial condition.
This data will be collected by asking the volunteer their preferred option and writing it down.
Measured: Once a day for the 7 days after the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jun 2023
- Study start1 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion8 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde do Porto
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Natália Maria Oliveira Campelo, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde do Porto
- Investigators
- Natália MO Campelo, Principal investigator, Escola Superior de Saúde do Politécnico do Porto
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05914129
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OST1-008
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Dal Farra F, Buffone F, Risio RG, Tarantino AG, Vismara L, Bergna A. Effectiveness of osteopathic interventions in patients with non-specific neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2022 Nov;49:101655. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101655. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
PubMed 35986986Franke H, Franke JD, Fryer G. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Aug 30;15:286. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-286.
PubMed 25175885Galaasen Bakken A, Eklund A, Hallman DM, Axen I. The effect of spinal manipulative therapy and home stretching exercises on heart rate variability in patients with persistent or recurrent neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Chiropr Man Therap. 2021 Nov 29;29(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12998-021-00406-0.
PubMed 34844625Gomez F, Escriba P, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca J, Mendez-Sanchez R, Puente-Gonzalez AS. Immediate and Short-Term Effects of Upper Cervical High-Velocity, Low-Amplitude Manipulation on Standing Postural Control and Cervical Mobility in Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 10;9(8):2580. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082580.
PubMed 32784959Groisman S, Malysz T, de Souza da Silva L, Rocha Ribeiro Sanches T, Camargo Bragante K, Locatelli F, Pontel Vigolo C, Vaccari S, Homercher Rosa Francisco C, Monteiro Steigleder S, Jotz GP. Osteopathic manipulative treatment combined with exercise improves pain and disability in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020 Apr;24(2):189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
PubMed 32507144McCoss CA, Johnston R, Edwards DJ, Millward C. Preliminary evidence of Regional Interdependent Inhibition, using a 'Diaphragm Release' to specifically induce an immediate hypoalgesic effect in the cervical spine. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017 Apr;21(2):362-374. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.08.015. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
PubMed 28532881Melo TM, Cunha FLL, Bezerra LMR, Salemi M, de Albuquerque VA, de Alencar GG, de Siqueira GR. Abdominal and Diaphragmatic Mobility in Adults With Chronic Gastritis: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Chiropr Med. 2023 Mar;22(1):11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
PubMed 36844992Oliva-Pascual-Vaca A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez C, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca J, Pina-Pozo F, Ferragut-Garcias A, Fernandez-Dominguez JC, Heredia-Rizo AM. Visceral Origin: An Underestimated Source of Neck Pain. A Systematic Scoping Review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Nov 12;9(4):186. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics9040186.
PubMed 31726685Rotter G, Fernholz I, Binting S, Keller T, Roll S, Kass B, Reinhold T, Willich SN, Schmidt A, Brinkhaus B. The effect of osteopathic medicine on pain in musicians with nonspecific chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2020 Dec 10;12:1759720X20979853. doi: 10.1177/1759720X20979853. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 33354233Silva ACO, Biasotto-Gonzalez DA, Oliveira FHM, Andrade AO, Gomes CAFP, Lanza FC, Amorim CF, Politti F. Effect of Osteopathic Visceral Manipulation on Pain, Cervical Range of Motion, and Upper Trapezius Muscle Activity in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain and Functional Dyspepsia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Nov 11;2018:4929271. doi: 10.1155/2018/4929271. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30534176Silva ACO, Oliveira CS, Biasotto-Gonzalez DA, Fumagalli MA, Politti F. Visceral Manipulation Decreases Pain, Increases Cervical Mobility and Electromyographic Activity of the Upper Trapezius Muscle in Non-Specific Neck Pain Subjects with Functional Dyspepsia: Two Case Reports. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2019 Jun 1;12(2):25-30. eCollection 2019 Jun.
PubMed 31191786
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Osteopathic Visceral Treatment on the Diaphragm, Stomach and Liver in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05914129
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OST1-008
- Conditions
- Cervical Pain
- Keywords
- Chronic Neck Pain, Diaphragm, Manual Therapy, Osteopathy, Visceral Techniques
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde do PortoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 8 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to analyze the effects of visceral osteopathic treatment of the diaphragm, stomach and liver in the treatment of chronic neck pain.
Detailed description
Cervical pain is a very common condition, whom can originate from bad posture, cervical tension, anxiety, depression and occupational or sportive activities. The influence of mobility and function changes of the abdominal viscera in the cervical region is a mechanism that is still poorly described in literature.
It is expected to find, through mechanical and neural pathways, that the visceral osteopathy treatment will have some effect on chronic neck pain.
This study intends to check the effects of the diaphragm stretching, inferior mobilization of the stomach and liver pump techniques (restoring mobility and normalizing function of the viscera) on the neck region, by employing some questionnaires/instruments.
During the present study, the effects of the visceral techniques will be analyzed in the following variables: Neck Disability Index (NDI), Numeric Pain Scale (NPS or END) and Global Pain Scale (GPS or EPGM).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group (GC) | Sham comparator | Other: Sham techniqueTo each volunteer, after 2 questionnaires, sham techniques will be performed to this group. The investigator will mimic the technique contacts without actually performing any type of tissue traction or compression, maintaining contact for the same amount of time described in the refered techniques. Following the technique, volunteers will answer the same 2 questionnaires shown previously. |
| Experimental Group A (GEA) | Experimental | Other: Diaphragm, Stomach and Liver techniquesTo each volunteer, after 2 questionnaires, Diaphragm Stretching, Lower stomach mobilization and Liver pump techniques will be performed to this group. The diaphragm technique is performed 2 times with 1 minute interval, with the duration of 10 respiratory cycles. The lower stomach mobilization and liver pump techniques are performed one time, for 5 minutes each. Following the technique, volunteers will answer the same 2 questionnaires shown previously. |
| Experimental Group B (GEB) | Experimental | Other: Stomach and Liver techniquesTo each volunteer, after 2 questionnaires, Lower stomach mobilization and Liver pump techniques will be performed to this group. These 2 techniques are the same ones as described for the experimental group A. Following the technique, volunteers will answer the same 2 questionnaires shown previously. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pain in the posterior cervical region for more than 3 months;
- Knowing how to read and write;
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Recent Cervicothoracic or Thoracoabdominal trauma (less than 6 months);
- Surgical procedure in the cervical region less than 6 months ago
- Surgical procedure in the abdominal region less than 6 months ago;
- Diagnosis of disc disease/radiculopathy;
- Rheumatic and/or neurological disease;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Diaphragm, Stomach and Liver techniquesDiaphragm Stretching: The participant is seating down and the researcher will be behind, placing their hands on the inferior costal border. Cephalic traction is performed during inhalation, remaining during exhalation. Procedure is repeated 2 times, for 10 respiratory cycles, with 1-minute intervals. Inferior Mobilization of the Stomach: The participant is seating down with slight flexion of the torso, while the investigator stands behind them, placing the thumbs on the epigastric region. The volunteer will extend their body while the researcher performs a caudal traction. This procedure lasts 5 minutes. Liver Pump: Participant is laying on their back, and the investigator is standing on the participants side. The researcher places one hand on the right side inferior costal border posteriorly and the other one bellow the costal border anteriorly. Researcher compresses during exhalation and releases their hands abruptly during inhalation. This procedure lasts 5 minutes. | Other | Experimental Group A (GEA) |
| Stomach and Liver techniquesIn this group, techniques are the exact same as described previously but only liver and stomach ones will be performed. | Other | Experimental Group B (GEB) |
| Sham techniqueIn the sham group, manual contact without any therapeutic intention will be performed in the same regions as the experimental groups. This contact will be maintained during the same amount of time as for the experimental group A. | Other | Control Group (GC) |
Primary outcome
Change in level of incapacity derived from neck pain 7 days after the intervention
Time frame: 7 days after the intervention
The Neck Disability Index questionnaire (NDI) will be the instrument used to evaluate the level of incapacity caused by neck pain. The questionnaire has 10 questions about the volunteers everyday life activities. There are 6 options to each question and the participant must choose the one that applies the most to their experience. The options selected will account for a score that goes from 0 to 50. The higher the number of the option, the more incapacity is felt and reported by the participant, meaning a worse outcome. This data will be collected by asking the volunteer their preferred option and writing it down.
Change in level of pain throughout the 7 days following the intervention
Time frame: Once a day for the 7 days after the intervention
The pain outcome will be measured according to the volunteers perception of pain in the cervical region by using the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS). This scale ranges from 0 to 10 and the participant must choose one number that best suits their level of current pain, 0 corresponding to "no pain" and 10 being "the worst pain imaginable to that participant". The higher the number, the worse the outcome. This data will be collected by asking the volunteer for the corresponding number and writing it down.
1 secondary outcome
Change in perception of the global conditions throughout the 7 days following the intervention
Time frame: Once a day for the 7 days after the intervention
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2024.
- Background: PubMed 35986986Dal Farra F, Buffone F, Risio RG, Tarantino AG, Vismara L, Bergna A. Effectiveness of osteopathic interventions in patients with non-specific neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2022 Nov;49:101655. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101655. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
- Background: PubMed 25175885Franke H, Franke JD, Fryer G. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Aug 30;15:286. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-286.
- Background: PubMed 34844625Galaasen Bakken A, Eklund A, Hallman DM, Axen I. The effect of spinal manipulative therapy and home stretching exercises on heart rate variability in patients with persistent or recurrent neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Chiropr Man Therap. 2021 Nov 29;29(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12998-021-00406-0.
- Background: PubMed 32784959Gomez F, Escriba P, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca J, Mendez-Sanchez R, Puente-Gonzalez AS. Immediate and Short-Term Effects of Upper Cervical High-Velocity, Low-Amplitude Manipulation on Standing Postural Control and Cervical Mobility in Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 10;9(8):2580. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082580.
- Background: PubMed 32507144Groisman S, Malysz T, de Souza da Silva L, Rocha Ribeiro Sanches T, Camargo Bragante K, Locatelli F, Pontel Vigolo C, Vaccari S, Homercher Rosa Francisco C, Monteiro Steigleder S, Jotz GP. Osteopathic manipulative treatment combined with exercise improves pain and disability in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020 Apr;24(2):189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
- Background: PubMed 28532881McCoss CA, Johnston R, Edwards DJ, Millward C. Preliminary evidence of Regional Interdependent Inhibition, using a 'Diaphragm Release' to specifically induce an immediate hypoalgesic effect in the cervical spine. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017 Apr;21(2):362-374. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.08.015. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
- Background: PubMed 36844992Melo TM, Cunha FLL, Bezerra LMR, Salemi M, de Albuquerque VA, de Alencar GG, de Siqueira GR. Abdominal and Diaphragmatic Mobility in Adults With Chronic Gastritis: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Chiropr Med. 2023 Mar;22(1):11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
- Background: PubMed 31726685Oliva-Pascual-Vaca A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez C, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca J, Pina-Pozo F, Ferragut-Garcias A, Fernandez-Dominguez JC, Heredia-Rizo AM. Visceral Origin: An Underestimated Source of Neck Pain. A Systematic Scoping Review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Nov 12;9(4):186. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics9040186.
- Background: PubMed 33354233Rotter G, Fernholz I, Binting S, Keller T, Roll S, Kass B, Reinhold T, Willich SN, Schmidt A, Brinkhaus B. The effect of osteopathic medicine on pain in musicians with nonspecific chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2020 Dec 10;12:1759720X20979853. doi: 10.1177/1759720X20979853. eCollection 2020.
- Background: PubMed 30534176Silva ACO, Biasotto-Gonzalez DA, Oliveira FHM, Andrade AO, Gomes CAFP, Lanza FC, Amorim CF, Politti F. Effect of Osteopathic Visceral Manipulation on Pain, Cervical Range of Motion, and Upper Trapezius Muscle Activity in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain and Functional Dyspepsia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Nov 11;2018:4929271. doi: 10.1155/2018/4929271. eCollection 2018.
- Background: PubMed 31191786Silva ACO, Oliveira CS, Biasotto-Gonzalez DA, Fumagalli MA, Politti F. Visceral Manipulation Decreases Pain, Increases Cervical Mobility and Electromyographic Activity of the Upper Trapezius Muscle in Non-Specific Neck Pain Subjects with Functional Dyspepsia: Two Case Reports. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2019 Jun 1;12(2):25-30. eCollection 2019 Jun.
Related trials for Cervical Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Recruiting
Strain Counter Strain and Conventional Stretching in School-aged Children With Mechanical Neck Pain Due to Prolong Screen Use
Mechanical Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Alexander Technique Versus Feldenkrais Somatic Training in Patients With Text Neck Syndrome
Text Neck Syndrome
Recruiting
Longitudinal Stripping Massage vs. Percussion Device for Neck Pain: Ultrasound Study.
Chronic Neck Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Natália MO Campelo principal investigator
Escola Superior de Saúde do Politécnico do Porto
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Diaphragm, Stomach and Liver techniques and Stomach and Liver techniques in people with Cervical Pain, run by Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde do Porto at 1 site in Portugal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Natália MO Campelo, PhD (938674365 ext. +351, ncampelo.estsp.ipp.pt@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in level of incapacity derived from neck pain 7 days after the intervention (time frame: 7 days after the intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05914129, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2024.