SelfVRtrainingNCT05899257
Immersive Training on Metacognitive Capacities of Young People
A study testing Immersive Training using EYME in people with Self and Self-Perception, run by University of Barcelona at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Metacognitive abilities and self-knowledge are necessary for psychological maturation and good mental functioning of individuals. It is generally agreed that an adequate representation of oneself and others is essential to establish functional interpersonal relationships. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 29 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Self, Self-Perception, Self Esteem
- What is being tested?
- Immersive Training using EYME
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 55 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 30 Jun 2023to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 29 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Volunteers between 18 and 29 years of age
Who cannot join
- Diagnosis of a mental disorder (current or in the last year)
- Current psychological or psychiatric treatment
- Suicidal ideation
- Insufficient level of competence to communicate in Spanish or English
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Barcelona
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035
Guillem Feixas, Ph.D., +34933125809, gfeixas@ub.edu
Guillem Feixas, Ph.D.
About this study
Official title: Effects of Brief Immersive Training on the Metacognitive Capacities and Self-knowledge of Young People
Metacognitive abilities and self-knowledge are necessary for psychological maturation and good mental functioning of individuals. It is generally agreed that an adequate representation of oneself and others is essential to establish functional interpersonal relationships. These metacognitive abilities are not adequately developed in patients with various mental health problems, such as personality disorders, eating disorders, psychosis, and depression, and are associated with the severity of the pathology.
Self-awareness is a central element that begins to consolidate during adolescence. For that reason, the investigators aim to evaluate the effects of immersive training on the metacognitive abilities and self-knowledge of young people. Based on the repertory grid technique (RGT), our research team has developed a brief immersive training to enhance metacognitive abilities. This intervention facilitates the exploration of personal identity in a safe environment. Specifically, it is an immersion in the person's own world of meanings using Virtual Reality (VR), with the Explore Your Meanings (EYME) tool, a technological platform created to help mental health professionals to enhance the personal development and therapeutic change of their clients. Expected results include an increase in participants' self-concept clarity, metacognition, and reflective function as well as a deeper knowledge about their relationship with various aspects of self-knowledge and self-esteem.
Read the detailed description
INTRODUCTION
Metacognitive abilities and self-knowledge are necessary for psychological maturation and good mental functioning of individuals. Self-knowledge is a central element in cognitive and personality development that begins to be structured during adolescence and evolves during youth and even later stages. It can be considered as the "mental map" or theory people use to construe themselves, and others based on their personal experiences. Self-knowledge consists of the schemas or constructs people use to interpret events, organize their responses and actions, and for anticipating the future. The variables that reflect metacognitive abilities and self-knowledge are diverse in the scientific literature. The investigators highlight the following:
- Self-concept clarity is understood as the degree to which the contents of the person's self-concept are clearly defined, with certainty, with consistency, and are experienced as internally and temporally stable (Campbell et al., 1996).
- Metacognition refers to the ability to identify, understand and reflect on one's own and others' mental states (e.g., thoughts, desires, emotions) (Pedone et al, 2017).
- Reflective Function (RF) refers to the operationalization of the mental processes underlying mentalizing (Katznelson, 2014), which is defined as the ability to understand or interpret one's own and others' mental states, either implicitly or explicitly (Fonagy \& Bateman, 2008).
- Self-knowledge is a broad term used in several studies (e.g., Carapeto \& Feixas, 2020) and is understood as the construction of one's personality characteristics in relation to the constructs they perceive in others and to their own "ideal self".
- Self-esteem is a classic concept, often related to the previous terms, referring to the person's evaluation of their self and their capabilities.
Given that a good development of metacognitive capacities and self-knowledge is considered fundamental for the optimal functioning of individuals and society, the investigators consider the need to generate tools and/or interventions that can improve and enhance their development to be essential. In accordance, several approaches are considered. Personal Construct Theory (Kelly, 1955) focuses on the study of personal identity, understood as the core constructs of a person, and offers valid instruments to enhance metacognitive abilities and transformative self-knowledge. Based on the repertory grid technique (RGT), our research team has developed a brief immersive training to enhance the described metacognitive capacities.
This intervention allows participants to explore their personal identity in a safe environment. Specifically, it is an immersion in the person's own world of meanings through Virtual Reality (VR), with the Explore Your Meanings (EYME) tool, a technological platform created to help mental health professionals to enhance the personal development and therapeutic change of their clients.
OBJECTIVES
The general objective of this research is to evaluate the effects of immersive training based on RGT and EYME on the metacognitive abilities and self-knowledge of young participants. The specific objectives are:
- To verify the hypothesis that such training increases participants' self-concept clarity, metacognition, reflective function, and self-esteem.
- To identify the relationships between these variables and their relationship with indicators of self-knowledge (e.g., current self/ideal self-discrepancy; cognitive conflicts) derived from the RGT.
- To explore the general characteristics of the contents and structure of self-knowledge in young participants.
- To examine the relationship of gender and other sociodemographic variables with the level of metacognitive capacities and self-knowledge in young participants.
PROCEDURE. Participants will be contacted by posting an announcement on Internet forums and social networks, asking to those interested in participating to access an online survey. The survey will begin with the informed consent form. After reading and accepting the informed consent, participants will be presented with sociodemographic questions, such as age, sex, country, employment, and marital status as well as whether they have a record of severe mental illness or substance misuse in the last year. As part of this initial assessment, the following questionnaires will be administered: LS, SCC, MSAS, RFQ-8, RSE, CORE-OM, and DASS-21 (see Outcome Measures Section).
Among those completing the survey, eligible participants will be invited to attend in person the three-session intervention. In all these sessions, the CORE-SFB will be administered at the beginning of the session to detect possible suicidal ideation. If so, the researcher in charge will deal with this problem (proposing referral, contact with family, or call to specialized services) instead of continuing with the investigation.
First session: The researcher will explain to the participant the purpose of the three sessions, which consists of increasing self-knowledge to promote personal development and growth. The family and relational context of the participant and possible difficulties or issues of concern will be explored as well as the areas that he/she believes can be improved by increasing his/her self-knowledge. A self-characterization (Kelly, 1955; Feixas \& Villegas, 2000) will be requested as a homework assignment (minimum one paragraph, maximum one page) to be handed in during the following session.
Second session: As part of the intervention, self-characterization will be briefly discussed and the RGT applied using the digital platform EYME. It begins with a computer-assisted interview where the constructs of the participant are elicited and applied by means of a 7-point visual scale to the most significant people in their interpersonal world, in addition to the "self now" and the "ideal self" (Feixas, Alabèrnia-Segura \& García-Gutiérrez, 2022). Other elements of the self or other constructs that appear relevant from the first session or in the self-characterization can be included.
Third session: The results of the data analysis provided by EYME will be discussed in terms of self-definition, possible areas for improvement, and discrepancies between the current self, the ideal self, and others, as well as possible internal conflicts. The constructs and significant people are visualized in a 3D space visible on a computer screen, in which the participant has an immersive exploration using VR, offering a powerful and clarifying experience about the person's schemas and perceptions of self and others, also with respect to their ideal image. The dialogue with the researcher during and after the immersive experience is oriented towards facilitating the assimilation of the information provided and its analysis, which may include upward laddering from one of the relevant constructs of the person (Neimeyer, 1993). At the end of the session, the LS, SCC, MSAS, RFQ-8, RSE, and DASS-21 questionnaires will be administered.
Follow-up assessment: One month after the third session (placed two weeks after baseline), the CORE-OM, SCC, MSAS, RFQ-8, RSE, LS, and CRES-4 instruments will be administered online.
DATA ANALYSES. The statistical analysis will be carried out with Stata 16.1 (StataCorp LLC), and the reporting will be in accordance with the Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature (SAMPL) guidelines. Multivariate data normality distribution will be tested by the Mardia´s coefficients of skewness and kurtosis, and the univariate data normality distribution will be tested by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Overlap among variables will be examined with bivariate Spearman's correlations, and the collinearity by with the variance inflation factor (VIF).
A descriptive analysis of the sociodemographic and psychological variables will be performed. Multilevel linear mixed models of repeated measures will be conducted to assess the effect of the intervention, analyzing the pre- and post-scores of the outcome variables of SCC, MSAS, RFQ-8, and RSE, adjusted with the covariates of age, gender, and other sociodemographic variables. The method of estimation will be the Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML), which is robust for moderate deviations of normality of continuous outcome variables. The adjustment of the model will be assessed with the Likelihood-Ratio test, the R2, the R2 adjusted, and the Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC). For all analyses, the significance level will be taken as 0.05, the confidence intervals will be calculated, and the effect size (Cohen's d) will be reported.
To achieve the second specific objective, correlations will be calculated between the variables related to the metacognitive abilities assessed with the SCC, MSAS, RFQ-8, RSE instruments, and the self-knowledge measures derived from the RGT. The inclusion of the CORE-OM will make it possible to assess the degree of change achieved with respect to psychological distress. Likewise, the application of CORE-SFB in each session will make it possible to evaluate the suicide risk and percentage of change session by session. With the DASS it will be possible to observe if there have been variations in the levels of anxiety, depression, and stress, although they are not expected to be high at the onset because it is a non-clinical sample.
A secondary analysis will be performed considering LSS as an outcome variable, in order to assess the evolution of a positive result, and its relationship with the other results will also be examined by means of a correlational analysis.
For the exploratory content analysis, two raters will code the constructs collected through the RGT, discuss disagreements found (if any), and perform a descriptive analysis. Inter-rater agreement will be calculated using the Kappa index.
- Conditions
- Self, Self-Perception, Self Esteem
- Being tested
- Immersive Training using EYME
- Keywords
- mentalization, self-knowledge, reflective function, virtual reality, self-identity, mental map, sense of identity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Immersive Training using EYMEBehavioural
Psychological assessment based on the RGT with EYME-Explore Your Meanings, a digital platform to explore the structure and content of personal identity with Virtual Reality.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Immersive Training using EYME-Explore Your Meanings | Experimental | Immersive training based on the RGT and EYME to improve the metacognitive abilities and self-knowledge of young people. Receives: Behavioral: Immersive Training using EYME |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline Self Concept Clarity after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
Self-concept clarity is assessed with the Self-Concept Clarity Scale (SCCS) created by Campbell et al. (1996) and adapted to Spanish by Feixas, et al (2023).
Measured: SCCS will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Change from baseline Metacognition after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
Metacognition will be assessed with the Metacognition Self-Assessment Scale (MSAS) created by Semerari et al. (2003) and adapted to Spanish by Feixas, et al. (2023).
Measured: MSAS will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Change from baseline Reflective Functioning after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
Reflective Functioning or mentalization will be assessed using the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ-8) created by Fonagy et al. (2016) and adapted to Spanish by Ruiz-Parra et al (2023).
Measured: Frame: RF will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change from baseline Self-esteem after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
Self-esteem will be assessed using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE), a scale created by Rosenberg (1965) and adapted to Spanish by Martín-Albo et al. (2007) and Morejón et al. (2004).
Measured: RSE will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Change from baseline Psychological distress, after one and two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM; Evans et al, 2002), a 34-item self-report questionnaire, will be used for the assessment of subjective wellbeing, symptoms or problems, life functioning and risk. It has good psychometric properties (Trujillo et al, 2016) and it has been adapted into Spanish for free distribution (www.ub.edu/terdep/core). The short version (CORE-SFB) of 18 items will be used for session-to-session monitoring of the intervention process.
Measured: CORE-OM will be administered at baseline, after one and two weeks (using short forms version CORE-SFB), and at one-month follow-up.
Change from baseline Depression, Anxiety and Stress, after two weeks and at one-month follow-up
Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS-21; Lovibond \& Lovibond, 1995) is a 21-item version of the DASS and comprises 7 items for its three scales (depression, anxiety and stress), which are moderately correlated with each other. For Spanish speaking participants we will the Spanish adaptation (Bados, Solanas, \& Andrés, 2005).
Measured: DASS-21 will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Change from Life Satisfaction after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
The level of global satisfaction with life will be assessed with the Life Satisfaction Scale (LSS), which consists of a single item with a 10-point Likert scale response line.
Measured: LSS will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Satisfaction with intervention
The degree of satisfaction with the intervention received is assessed with the Consumer Reports Effectiveness Scale (CRES-4; Feixas et al, 2012), which consists of four items.
Measured: CRES-4 will be administered at the one-month follow-up.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2023
- Study start30 Jun 2023
- Primary completion30 Jun 2026
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (24)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SelfStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Single-group pre-post design with a one-month follow-up
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Barcelona
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- European Union, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Guillem Feixas, University of Barcelona
- Investigators
- Guillem Feixas, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Barcelona
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05899257
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VRT001
- Acronym
- VRtraining
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 14 May 2023
- Last updated
- 7 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcomes, after deidentification
Publications
Bados, A., Solanas, A. y Andrés, R. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales. Psicothema, 17, 679-683.
Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavellee, L. F., y Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141-156
Carapeto MJ, Feixas G. The Organization of Self-Knowledge in Adolescence: Some Contributions Using the Repertory Grid Technique. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2020 Feb 5;10(1):408-423. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10010031.
PubMed 34542494Evans C, Connell J, Barkham M, Margison F, McGrath G, Mellor-Clark J, Audin K. Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;180:51-60. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.1.51.
PubMed 11772852Feixas, G., Alabèrnia-Segura, M. & García-Gutiérrez, A. (July, 2022). Using Virtual Reality to investigate self-identity: A case illustration of EYME-Explore Your Meanings. Paper presented in the panel Applied Personality Psychology (Chair: M. Cordero). 20th European Conference of Personality. Madrid
Feixas, G., Carulla-Flix, A. et al (2023). Adaptación al español y propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Autoevaluación de la Metacognición. Manuscript in preparation.
Feixas, G. y Cornejo, J. M. (1996). Manual de la técnica de rejilla mediante el programa RECORD ver. 2.0. Barcelona: Paidós.
Feixas, G., Fernández-Espejo, M., et al (2023). Adaptación al español y propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Claridad de Autoconcepto. Manuscript in preparation..
Feixas, G., Geldschläger, H., Carmona, M. y Garzón, B. (2002). Sistema de categorías de contenido para codificar constructos personales. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 55, 337-348.
Feixas, G., Pucurull, O., Roca, C., Paz, C., García-Grau, E., Bados, A. (2012). Escala de Satisfacción con el tratamiento recibido (CRES-4): La versión en español. Revista de Psicoterapia, 89(23), 51-58.
Fonagy P, Luyten P, Moulton-Perkins A, Lee YW, Warren F, Howard S, Ghinai R, Fearon P, Lowyck B. Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Mentalizing: The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158678. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27392018Fransella, F., Bell, R. y Bannister, D. (2004). A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique (2nd. ed.). Wiley.
Garcia-Gutierrez, A. y Feixas, G. (2018). GRIDCOR: A Repertory Grid Analysis Tool (Version 6.0) [Web application]. Retrieved from http://www.repertorygrid.net/en
Katznelson H. Reflective functioning: a review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Mar;34(2):107-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 29.
PubMed 24486522Kelly, G. A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs (2 vols). Norton.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Brief Immersive Training on the Metacognitive Capacities and Self-knowledge of Young People
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05899257
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VRtraining / VRT001
- Conditions
- Self, Self-Perception, Self Esteem
- Keywords
- mentalization, self-knowledge, reflective function, virtual reality, self-identity, mental map, sense of identity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of BarcelonaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- European Union, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
- Study start
- 30 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Metacognitive abilities and self-knowledge are necessary for psychological maturation and good mental functioning of individuals. It is generally agreed that an adequate representation of oneself and others is essential to establish functional interpersonal relationships. These metacognitive abilities are not adequately developed in patients with various mental health problems, such as personality disorders, eating disorders, psychosis, and depression, and are associated with the severity of the pathology.
Self-awareness is a central element that begins to consolidate during adolescence. For that reason, the investigators aim to evaluate the effects of immersive training on the metacognitive abilities and self-knowledge of young people. Based on the repertory grid technique (RGT), our research team has developed a brief immersive training to enhance metacognitive abilities. This intervention facilitates the exploration of personal identity in a safe environment. Specifically, it is an immersion in the person's own world of meanings using Virtual Reality (VR), with the Explore Your Meanings (EYME) tool, a technological platform created to help mental health professionals to enhance the personal development and therapeutic change of their clients. Expected results include an increase in participants' self-concept clarity, metacognition, and reflective function as well as a deeper knowledge about their relationship with various aspects of self-knowledge and self-esteem.
Detailed description
INTRODUCTION
Metacognitive abilities and self-knowledge are necessary for psychological maturation and good mental functioning of individuals. Self-knowledge is a central element in cognitive and personality development that begins to be structured during adolescence and evolves during youth and even later stages. It can be considered as the "mental map" or theory people use to construe themselves, and others based on their personal experiences. Self-knowledge consists of the schemas or constructs people use to interpret events, organize their responses and actions, and for anticipating the future. The variables that reflect metacognitive abilities and self-knowledge are diverse in the scientific literature. The investigators highlight the following:
- Self-concept clarity is understood as the degree to which the contents of the person's self-concept are clearly defined, with certainty, with consistency, and are experienced as internally and temporally stable (Campbell et al., 1996).
- Metacognition refers to the ability to identify, understand and reflect on one's own and others' mental states (e.g., thoughts, desires, emotions) (Pedone et al, 2017).
- Reflective Function (RF) refers to the operationalization of the mental processes underlying mentalizing (Katznelson, 2014), which is defined as the ability to understand or interpret one's own and others' mental states, either implicitly or explicitly (Fonagy \& Bateman, 2008).
- Self-knowledge is a broad term used in several studies (e.g., Carapeto \& Feixas, 2020) and is understood as the construction of one's personality characteristics in relation to the constructs they perceive in others and to their own "ideal self".
- Self-esteem is a classic concept, often related to the previous terms, referring to the person's evaluation of their self and their capabilities.
Given that a good development of metacognitive capacities and self-knowledge is considered fundamental for the optimal functioning of individuals and society, the investigators consider the need to generate tools and/or interventions that can improve and enhance their development to be essential. In accordance, several approaches are considered. Personal Construct Theory (Kelly, 1955) focuses on the study of personal identity, understood as the core constructs of a person, and offers valid instruments to enhance metacognitive abilities and transformative self-knowledge. Based on the repertory grid technique (RGT), our research team has developed a brief immersive training to enhance the described metacognitive capacities.
This intervention allows participants to explore their personal identity in a safe environment. Specifically, it is an immersion in the person's own world of meanings through Virtual Reality (VR), with the Explore Your Meanings (EYME) tool, a technological platform created to help mental health professionals to enhance the personal development and therapeutic change of their clients.
OBJECTIVES
The general objective of this research is to evaluate the effects of immersive training based on RGT and EYME on the metacognitive abilities and self-knowledge of young participants. The specific objectives are:
- To verify the hypothesis that such training increases participants' self-concept clarity, metacognition, reflective function, and self-esteem.
- To identify the relationships between these variables and their relationship with indicators of self-knowledge (e.g., current self/ideal self-discrepancy; cognitive conflicts) derived from the RGT.
- To explore the general characteristics of the contents and structure of self-knowledge in young participants.
- To examine the relationship of gender and other sociodemographic variables with the level of metacognitive capacities and self-knowledge in young participants.
PROCEDURE. Participants will be contacted by posting an announcement on Internet forums and social networks, asking to those interested in participating to access an online survey. The survey will begin with the informed consent form. After reading and accepting the informed consent, participants will be presented with sociodemographic questions, such as age, sex, country, employment, and marital status as well as whether they have a record of severe mental illness or substance misuse in the last year. As part of this initial assessment, the following questionnaires will be administered: LS, SCC, MSAS, RFQ-8, RSE, CORE-OM, and DASS-21 (see Outcome Measures Section).
Among those completing the survey, eligible participants will be invited to attend in person the three-session intervention. In all these sessions, the CORE-SFB will be administered at the beginning of the session to detect possible suicidal ideation. If so, the researcher in charge will deal with this problem (proposing referral, contact with family, or call to specialized services) instead of continuing with the investigation.
First session: The researcher will explain to the participant the purpose of the three sessions, which consists of increasing self-knowledge to promote personal development and growth. The family and relational context of the participant and possible difficulties or issues of concern will be explored as well as the areas that he/she believes can be improved by increasing his/her self-knowledge. A self-characterization (Kelly, 1955; Feixas \& Villegas, 2000) will be requested as a homework assignment (minimum one paragraph, maximum one page) to be handed in during the following session.
Second session: As part of the intervention, self-characterization will be briefly discussed and the RGT applied using the digital platform EYME. It begins with a computer-assisted interview where the constructs of the participant are elicited and applied by means of a 7-point visual scale to the most significant people in their interpersonal world, in addition to the "self now" and the "ideal self" (Feixas, Alabèrnia-Segura \& García-Gutiérrez, 2022). Other elements of the self or other constructs that appear relevant from the first session or in the self-characterization can be included.
Third session: The results of the data analysis provided by EYME will be discussed in terms of self-definition, possible areas for improvement, and discrepancies between the current self, the ideal self, and others, as well as possible internal conflicts. The constructs and significant people are visualized in a 3D space visible on a computer screen, in which the participant has an immersive exploration using VR, offering a powerful and clarifying experience about the person's schemas and perceptions of self and others, also with respect to their ideal image. The dialogue with the researcher during and after the immersive experience is oriented towards facilitating the assimilation of the information provided and its analysis, which may include upward laddering from one of the relevant constructs of the person (Neimeyer, 1993). At the end of the session, the LS, SCC, MSAS, RFQ-8, RSE, and DASS-21 questionnaires will be administered.
Follow-up assessment: One month after the third session (placed two weeks after baseline), the CORE-OM, SCC, MSAS, RFQ-8, RSE, LS, and CRES-4 instruments will be administered online.
DATA ANALYSES. The statistical analysis will be carried out with Stata 16.1 (StataCorp LLC), and the reporting will be in accordance with the Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature (SAMPL) guidelines. Multivariate data normality distribution will be tested by the Mardia´s coefficients of skewness and kurtosis, and the univariate data normality distribution will be tested by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Overlap among variables will be examined with bivariate Spearman's correlations, and the collinearity by with the variance inflation factor (VIF).
A descriptive analysis of the sociodemographic and psychological variables will be performed. Multilevel linear mixed models of repeated measures will be conducted to assess the effect of the intervention, analyzing the pre- and post-scores of the outcome variables of SCC, MSAS, RFQ-8, and RSE, adjusted with the covariates of age, gender, and other sociodemographic variables. The method of estimation will be the Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML), which is robust for moderate deviations of normality of continuous outcome variables. The adjustment of the model will be assessed with the Likelihood-Ratio test, the R2, the R2 adjusted, and the Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC). For all analyses, the significance level will be taken as 0.05, the confidence intervals will be calculated, and the effect size (Cohen's d) will be reported.
To achieve the second specific objective, correlations will be calculated between the variables related to the metacognitive abilities assessed with the SCC, MSAS, RFQ-8, RSE instruments, and the self-knowledge measures derived from the RGT. The inclusion of the CORE-OM will make it possible to assess the degree of change achieved with respect to psychological distress. Likewise, the application of CORE-SFB in each session will make it possible to evaluate the suicide risk and percentage of change session by session. With the DASS it will be possible to observe if there have been variations in the levels of anxiety, depression, and stress, although they are not expected to be high at the onset because it is a non-clinical sample.
A secondary analysis will be performed considering LSS as an outcome variable, in order to assess the evolution of a positive result, and its relationship with the other results will also be examined by means of a correlational analysis.
For the exploratory content analysis, two raters will code the constructs collected through the RGT, discuss disagreements found (if any), and perform a descriptive analysis. Inter-rater agreement will be calculated using the Kappa index.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Single-group pre-post design with a one-month follow-up
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Immersive Training using EYME-Explore Your Meanings | Experimental | Behavioral: Immersive Training using EYMEImmersive training based on the RGT and EYME to improve the metacognitive abilities and self-knowledge of young people. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 29 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Volunteers between 18 and 29 years of age
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diagnosis of a mental disorder (current or in the last year)
- Current psychological or psychiatric treatment
- Suicidal ideation
- Insufficient level of competence to communicate in Spanish or English
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Immersive Training using EYMEPsychological assessment based on the RGT with EYME-Explore Your Meanings, a digital platform to explore the structure and content of personal identity with Virtual Reality. | Behavioural | Immersive Training using EYME-Explore Your Meanings |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline Self Concept Clarity after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
Time frame: SCCS will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Self-concept clarity is assessed with the Self-Concept Clarity Scale (SCCS) created by Campbell et al. (1996) and adapted to Spanish by Feixas, et al (2023).
Change from baseline Metacognition after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
Time frame: MSAS will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Metacognition will be assessed with the Metacognition Self-Assessment Scale (MSAS) created by Semerari et al. (2003) and adapted to Spanish by Feixas, et al. (2023).
Change from baseline Reflective Functioning after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
Time frame: Frame: RF will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Reflective Functioning or mentalization will be assessed using the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ-8) created by Fonagy et al. (2016) and adapted to Spanish by Ruiz-Parra et al (2023).
5 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline Self-esteem after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
Time frame: RSE will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Change from baseline Psychological distress, after one and two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
Time frame: CORE-OM will be administered at baseline, after one and two weeks (using short forms version CORE-SFB), and at one-month follow-up.
Change from baseline Depression, Anxiety and Stress, after two weeks and at one-month follow-up
Time frame: DASS-21 will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Change from Life Satisfaction after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up
Time frame: LSS will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.
Satisfaction with intervention
Time frame: CRES-4 will be administered at the one-month follow-up.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jul 2026.
- BackgroundBados, A., Solanas, A. y Andrés, R. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales. Psicothema, 17, 679-683.
- BackgroundCampbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavellee, L. F., y Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141-156
- Background: PubMed 34542494Carapeto MJ, Feixas G. The Organization of Self-Knowledge in Adolescence: Some Contributions Using the Repertory Grid Technique. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2020 Feb 5;10(1):408-423. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10010031.
- Background: PubMed 11772852Evans C, Connell J, Barkham M, Margison F, McGrath G, Mellor-Clark J, Audin K. Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;180:51-60. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.1.51.
- BackgroundFeixas, G., Alabèrnia-Segura, M. & García-Gutiérrez, A. (July, 2022). Using Virtual Reality to investigate self-identity: A case illustration of EYME-Explore Your Meanings. Paper presented in the panel Applied Personality Psychology (Chair: M. Cordero). 20th European Conference of Personality. Madrid
- BackgroundFeixas, G., Carulla-Flix, A. et al (2023). Adaptación al español y propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Autoevaluación de la Metacognición. Manuscript in preparation.
- BackgroundFeixas, G. y Cornejo, J. M. (1996). Manual de la técnica de rejilla mediante el programa RECORD ver. 2.0. Barcelona: Paidós.
- BackgroundFeixas, G., Fernández-Espejo, M., et al (2023). Adaptación al español y propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Claridad de Autoconcepto. Manuscript in preparation..
- BackgroundFeixas, G., Geldschläger, H., Carmona, M. y Garzón, B. (2002). Sistema de categorías de contenido para codificar constructos personales. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 55, 337-348.
- BackgroundFeixas, G., Pucurull, O., Roca, C., Paz, C., García-Grau, E., Bados, A. (2012). Escala de Satisfacción con el tratamiento recibido (CRES-4): La versión en español. Revista de Psicoterapia, 89(23), 51-58.
- Background: PubMed 27392018Fonagy P, Luyten P, Moulton-Perkins A, Lee YW, Warren F, Howard S, Ghinai R, Fearon P, Lowyck B. Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Mentalizing: The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158678. eCollection 2016.
- BackgroundFransella, F., Bell, R. y Bannister, D. (2004). A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique (2nd. ed.). Wiley.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcomes, after deidentification
Related trials for Self
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruiting
A Pre-post Study of a Lethal Means Safety Planning Intervention for Youth at Elevated Suicide Risk in the Emergency Department
Suicidal Ideas, Suicidal Ideation
Not yet recruiting
REM Enhancement Sleep Technology for Well-being, Emotion, and Life Lift
Healthy Adult Participants
RecruitingObservational study
Psychological Benefits of a Normalized Camping Experience for Children With Cancer
Pediatric Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Guillem Feixas, PhD principal investigator
University of Barcelona
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Immersive Training using EYME in people with Self and Self-Perception, run by University of Barcelona at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Guillem Feixas, PhD (+34933125100, gfeixas@ub.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline Self Concept Clarity after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up (time frame: SCCS will be administered at baseline, after two weeks, and at one-month follow-up.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05899257, which also lists 24 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2026.