Acute Necrotizing PancreatitisNCT05898048
CMV Reactivation in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
An observational study of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis, run by Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
Patients with the diagnosis of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) present with a wide spectrum of severity. These patients frequently require intensive care management. According to the revised Atlanta classification (2012), acute pancreatitis is divided into distinct subtypes, based on the presence or absence of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
- How many people
- 41 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- 5 Jun 2023to 30 Nov 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Acute necrotizing pancreatitis patients who require ICU admission
Who may be able to join
- Acute necrotizing pancreatitis patients who require ICU admission, with at least a two-week duration of illness and the presence of CMV seropositivity (Anti CMV IgG antibodies).
Who cannot join
- Age < 18 years
- Expected survival < 72 hours
- Duration of pancreatitis more than 10 weeks
- Use of antiviral agents within the last 7 days
- Known or suspected underlying immune deficiency (history of solid organ or stem cell transplantation, infection with the human immunodeficiency virus, hematological malignancy, use of immunosuppressive medication (more than 0.1mg/kg prednisone for >3 months, more than 75mg/day prednisone for >3 weeks or equivalent), chemotherapy /radiotherapy in the year before ICU admission and any known humeral or cellular immune deficiency
- Pregnancy
- Patients who do not consent to the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
India1 site
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS)
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226014
About this study
Official title: Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
Patients with the diagnosis of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) present with a wide spectrum of severity. These patients frequently require intensive care management. According to the revised Atlanta classification (2012), acute pancreatitis is divided into distinct subtypes, based on the presence or absence of necrosis. The mortality rates for sterile necrosis though comparatively low (5%-10%), but superinfection of the necrotic pancreas and peri-pancreatic tissue/ fluid collections increases the mortality rate considerably (up to one-third). The most common organisms isolated from the infected pancreatic necrosum are gram-negative bacteria mainly Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae followed by gram-positive bacteria; however, with the increased use of antibiotic therapies in the ICU, the incidence of pancreatic fungal infections is also on a rise. Traditionally, critically ill patients have been considered immunocompetent but the immunomodulatory effects of sepsis may lead to reactivation of dormant viral infections. In recent years, Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in critically ill patients has been recognized with as high as 71% incidence with associated higher mortality, organ failure rates, duration of mechanical ventilation, nosocomial infections, and ICU length of stay. CMV reactivation had been studied in various cohorts in the ICU population, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and septic shock exhibiting their impact on mortality. However, currently, no study is available investigating the role of CMV reactivation in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Therefore, the investigators aimed to study the prevalence of CMV reactivation and its viral load kinetics in critically ill patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis.
Read the detailed description
Background and Rationale for the Study Acute pancreatitis is one of the frequently encountered systemic diseases presenting with a wide spectrum of presentation ranging from mild disease which has a better outcome compared to severe disease which usually leads to admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and is associated with high mortality. According to the revised Atlanta classification (2012), acute pancreatitis is now divided into two distinct subtypes, necrotizing pancreatitis and interstitial edematous pancreatitis (IEP), based on the presence or absence of necrosis. In severe acute pancreatitis, inflammation leads to peri-pancreatic fluid collections of which four distinct subtypes are identified. Acute necrotic collections (ANC) and walled-off necrosis (WON) which occur in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis, contain variable amounts of fluid and necrotic debris which can either be sterile or infective. The mortality rates for sterile necrosis remain comparatively low (5%-10%), but superinfection of the necrotic pancreas and peri-pancreatic tissue/ fluid collections increases the mortality rate considerably (20%-30%).
The infected pancreatic necrosum when cultured, usually demonstrates mono-microbial flora in 60-87% of patients and poly-microbial flora in 13-40% of patients. The most common organisms isolated are gram-negative bacteria, mainly Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia followed by gram-positive bacteria. With the increased use of antibiotic therapies in the ICU the incidence of pancreatic fungal infections is also on the rise. Fungal pancreatic infections, predominantly caused by Candida species, have been identified in up to one-half with a longer hospital stay and a lower one-year survival than patients with bacterial pancreatic infections only.
Traditionally, critically ill patients have been considered immunocompetent but the presence of sepsis and its immunomodulatory effects may lead to reactivation of dormant viral infections. In recent years, Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in critically ill patients has been recognized with as high as 71% incidence. Sepsis due to its immunomodulatory effects may lead to the reactivation of CMV due to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-alpha and IL-1beta which has the ability to activate several transcription factors contributing to CMV reactivation. Studies showed that CMV infection in critically ill patients was consistently associated with undetectable IFN-γ T cell responses within the first 2 days of admission to the ICU and that viral load was inversely related to IFN-γ T cell responses. Similar results were found in septic patients who display immune system paralysis, reduced Th1 cell function, increased IL-10 production (anti-inflammatory), and global lymphopenia affecting natural killer cells (NK) quantitatively and qualitatively related to their interferon production.
Studies have documented significantly higher organ failure rates and mortality in critically ill patients with CMV reactivation. In a systematic review to investigate the association between CMV reactivation and clinical outcomes in immunocompetent critically ill patients, including Itwenty-two studies, CMV reactivation was associated with increased ICU mortality, overall mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, nosocomial infections, and ICU length of stay. CMV reactivation has also been studied in specific critically ill cohorts, exhibiting their impact on mortality. The effect of CMV reactivation on mortality in immunocompetent acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients has also been studied. Of 399 ARDS patients, 68 % were CMV seropositive and reactivation occurred in 27 % of them which was associated with overall increased ICU mortality. In another study among the septic shock cohort (329 patients), herpesvirus reactivations were documented in 68% of patients without prior immunodeficiency, and concluded that reactivations could be independently associated with mortality.
However, no studies are currently available investigating CMV reactivation in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP). The investigators aimed to study the prevalence of CMV reactivation and its viral load kinetics in critically ill patients with ANP
Objectives To study the prevalence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and its viral load kinetics in critically ill adult patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis
Methodology Study design This prospective observational study will be conducted at the Department of Critical Care Medicine in collaboration with the Department of Gastroenterology and Microbiology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC).
Study protocol During the study period, all adult ICU patients with the diagnosis of acute necrotizing pancreatitis will be considered for inclusion. As per inclusion and exclusion criteria, these patients will be screened for the presence of Anti CMV IgG antibodies in their blood. If the patient is IgG seropositive and meets inclusion/exclusion criteria then they will be included in the study and followed up for CMV reactivation during their ICU stay. In patients having CMV reactivation, viral load kinetics will be further followed-up for the next 2 weeks.
Sample collection Blood samples: 1.0 ml blood will be collected in an EDTA vial from an existing venous catheter, on a weekly basis to find CMV reactivation during their ICU stay or 10th week of illness (whichever comes first).
Percutaneous drain: If the patient had an abdominal drain in the proximity of the pancreas, 2.0 ml will be collected in a sterile container on a weekly basis to find CMV reactivation during their ICU stay or the 10th week of illness (whichever comes first).
Pancreatic necrosum: If the patient underwent for necrosectomy, then pancreatic necrosum will be collected in a sterile container (single time)
Laboratory analysis ELISA for IgG antibody detection: The serum collected will be tested for IgG antibodies by ELISA as per manufacturer recommendations. (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL). The cut-off of will be set at 0.5 WHO IU/ml (Calibrator 2) by the kit's manufacturer. Samples with a concentration higher than 0.5 WHO IU/ml will be considered positive for CMV IgG. All samples will be tested in duplicate.
CMV quantitative real-time PCR:
DNA Extraction: DNA extraction will be performed on 200 μl of a sample using a QIAamp DNA kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, Calif.). Then, 60 μl of Tris (10 mM, pH 8.0) will be used to elute the DNA, and 10 μl of the DNA will be used for each PCR. The extracted DNA will be stored at -800 C for further work.
Quantitative Real-time PCR for virus detection: A 25 μL reaction will be prepared for the detection of CMV by RTPCR utilizing 10 μL of extracted DNA, 12.5 μL of 2X PCR buffer, and 1.5 μL of AgPath RT-PCR Reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts USA) and 1 μL Primer and probe sequences described elsewhere. All oligonucleotides will be synthesized and procured from Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA, and thermal cycling will be performed at 95 °C for 3 min and then 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 58 °C for the 30s using Applied bio system 7500 Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts USA). Each test will consist of 5 quantitative control and results will be interpreted accordingly.
Definitions Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: This will be diagnosed on the basis of clinical sign-symptoms / laboratory parameters and the presence of non-enhancing areas of the pancreas on a contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scan.
CMV reactivation: The cut-off for diagnosing CMV reactivation will be taken as a value of >1000 copies/ml.
Data collections Demographic and relevant clinical characteristics of included patients will be collected on a structured case report form.
Sample size and statistical analysis Among screened acute necrotizing pancreatitis, 95% of patients are expected to have seropositive for IgG. Assuming 50% seropositive (IgG) patients will develop Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation during the ICU stay. Taking a 15% margin of error in the assumed prevalence (i.e. expected range of 35 to 65%), at a two-sided 95% Confidence interval, the estimated sample size is 43. This study is time limited is 18 months and so during the study period all eligible patients will be screened and considered for inclusion in this study. The investigators are expecting about 50 patients.
Descriptive statistics of the continuous variables are to be presented as mean± standard deviation/median (inter-quartile range) while categorical variables in frequency (%) as appropriate. Student's t-test (independent as well as paired-samples t-test as appropriate) or its non-parametric methods to be used to compare the means/medians between the two groups whereas the Chi-square test or Fisher exact test will be used to compare the proportions. The incidences of CMV reactivations will be calculated and this association with demographic and clinical factors to be assessed using univariate as well as multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Statistical package for social sciences, version-23 (SPSS-23, IBM, Chicago, USA), and MedCalc Software will be used for data analysis.
- Conditions
- Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
- Keywords
- Critically ill, Cytomegalovirus, Reactivation, Intensive care unit
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing, Critical Illness
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prevalence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in critically ill adult patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis
Percentage of included patients (CMV seropositive IgG) who had viral load >1000/cc
Measured: From the date of inclusion in the study until the day of discharge from the ICU or up to 10 weeks of illness, whichever came first
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load kinetics in critically ill adult patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis
Changes in CMV viral load count during their clinical course
Measured: From the date of CMV reactivation until 2 weeks thereafter or the day of discharge from the ICU, whichever came first
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2023
- Study start5 Jun 2023
- Primary completion30 Nov 2024
- Study completion30 Nov 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (30)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Necrotizing PancreatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 41 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mohan Gurjar, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences
- Investigators
- Mohan Gurjar, MD, PDCC, Principal investigator, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS)Atul Garg, MD, Principal investigator, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05898048
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023-51-DM-130
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 27 May 2023
- Last updated
- 24 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Beger HG, Rau BM. Severe acute pancreatitis: Clinical course and management. World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Oct 14;13(38):5043-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i38.5043.
PubMed 17876868Thoeni RF. The revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis: its importance for the radiologist and its effect on treatment. Radiology. 2012 Mar;262(3):751-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110947.
PubMed 22357880Beger HG, Rau B, Isenmann R. Natural history of necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2003;3(2):93-101. doi: 10.1159/000070076. No abstract available.
PubMed 12774801Banks PA, Freeman ML; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct;101(10):2379-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00856.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 17032204Frossard JL, Steer ML, Pastor CM. Acute pancreatitis. Lancet. 2008 Jan 12;371(9607):143-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60107-5.
PubMed 18191686Petrov MS, Shanbhag S, Chakraborty M, Phillips AR, Windsor JA. Organ failure and infection of pancreatic necrosis as determinants of mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2010 Sep;139(3):813-20. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.010. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
PubMed 20540942Reber HA. Pathogenesis of infection in pancreatic inflammatory disease. Pancreatology. 2001;1(3):207-9. doi: 10.1159/000055811. No abstract available.
PubMed 12120195Jain S, Mahapatra SJ, Gupta S, Shalimar, Garg PK. Infected Pancreatic Necrosis due to Multidrug-Resistant Organisms and Persistent Organ failure Predict Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 5;9(10):190. doi: 10.1038/s41424-018-0056-x.
PubMed 30287818Trikudanathan G, Navaneethan U, Vege SS. Intra-abdominal fungal infections complicating acute pancreatitis: a review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;106(7):1188-92. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.497.
PubMed 21731015Schmidt PN, Roug S, Hansen EF, Knudsen JD, Novovic S. Spectrum of microorganisms in infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis - impact on organ failure and mortality. Pancreatology. 2014 Nov-Dec;14(6):444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
PubMed 25266641Moka P, Goswami P, Kapil A, Xess I, Sreenivas V, Saraya A. Impact of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacterial and Fungal Infections in Outcome of Acute Pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2018 Apr;47(4):489-494. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001019.
PubMed 29517630Reuken PA, Albig H, Rodel J, Hocke M, Will U, Stallmach A, Bruns T. Fungal Infections in Patients With Infected Pancreatic Necrosis and Pseudocysts: Risk Factors and Outcome. Pancreas. 2018 Jan;47(1):92-98. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000965.
PubMed 29215543Rasch S, Mayr U, Phillip V, Schmid RM, Huber W, Algul H, Lahmer T. Increased risk of candidemia in patients with necrotising pancreatitis infected with candida species. Pancreatology. 2018 Sep;18(6):630-634. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
PubMed 30017450Werge M, Roug S, Novovic S, Schmidt PN, Hansen EF, Knudsen JD. Fungal Infections in Patients With Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis. Pancreas. 2016 Nov;45(10):1447-1451. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000675.
PubMed 27518465Papazian L, Hraiech S, Lehingue S, Roch A, Chiche L, Wiramus S, Forel JM. Cytomegalovirus reactivation in ICU patients. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jan;42(1):28-37. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4066-9. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
PubMed 26424680
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05898048
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2023-51-DM-130
- Conditions
- Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
- Keywords
- Critically ill, Cytomegalovirus, Reactivation, Intensive care unit
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 41 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical SciencesOther government
- Study start
- 5 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with the diagnosis of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) present with a wide spectrum of severity. These patients frequently require intensive care management. According to the revised Atlanta classification (2012), acute pancreatitis is divided into distinct subtypes, based on the presence or absence of necrosis. The mortality rates for sterile necrosis though comparatively low (5%-10%), but superinfection of the necrotic pancreas and peri-pancreatic tissue/ fluid collections increases the mortality rate considerably (up to one-third). The most common organisms isolated from the infected pancreatic necrosum are gram-negative bacteria mainly Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae followed by gram-positive bacteria; however, with the increased use of antibiotic therapies in the ICU, the incidence of pancreatic fungal infections is also on a rise. Traditionally, critically ill patients have been considered immunocompetent but the immunomodulatory effects of sepsis may lead to reactivation of dormant viral infections. In recent years, Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in critically ill patients has been recognized with as high as 71% incidence with associated higher mortality, organ failure rates, duration of mechanical ventilation, nosocomial infections, and ICU length of stay. CMV reactivation had been studied in various cohorts in the ICU population, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and septic shock exhibiting their impact on mortality. However, currently, no study is available investigating the role of CMV reactivation in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Therefore, the investigators aimed to study the prevalence of CMV reactivation and its viral load kinetics in critically ill patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis.
Detailed description
Background and Rationale for the Study Acute pancreatitis is one of the frequently encountered systemic diseases presenting with a wide spectrum of presentation ranging from mild disease which has a better outcome compared to severe disease which usually leads to admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and is associated with high mortality. According to the revised Atlanta classification (2012), acute pancreatitis is now divided into two distinct subtypes, necrotizing pancreatitis and interstitial edematous pancreatitis (IEP), based on the presence or absence of necrosis. In severe acute pancreatitis, inflammation leads to peri-pancreatic fluid collections of which four distinct subtypes are identified. Acute necrotic collections (ANC) and walled-off necrosis (WON) which occur in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis, contain variable amounts of fluid and necrotic debris which can either be sterile or infective. The mortality rates for sterile necrosis remain comparatively low (5%-10%), but superinfection of the necrotic pancreas and peri-pancreatic tissue/ fluid collections increases the mortality rate considerably (20%-30%).
The infected pancreatic necrosum when cultured, usually demonstrates mono-microbial flora in 60-87% of patients and poly-microbial flora in 13-40% of patients. The most common organisms isolated are gram-negative bacteria, mainly Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia followed by gram-positive bacteria. With the increased use of antibiotic therapies in the ICU the incidence of pancreatic fungal infections is also on the rise. Fungal pancreatic infections, predominantly caused by Candida species, have been identified in up to one-half with a longer hospital stay and a lower one-year survival than patients with bacterial pancreatic infections only.
Traditionally, critically ill patients have been considered immunocompetent but the presence of sepsis and its immunomodulatory effects may lead to reactivation of dormant viral infections. In recent years, Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in critically ill patients has been recognized with as high as 71% incidence. Sepsis due to its immunomodulatory effects may lead to the reactivation of CMV due to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-alpha and IL-1beta which has the ability to activate several transcription factors contributing to CMV reactivation. Studies showed that CMV infection in critically ill patients was consistently associated with undetectable IFN-γ T cell responses within the first 2 days of admission to the ICU and that viral load was inversely related to IFN-γ T cell responses. Similar results were found in septic patients who display immune system paralysis, reduced Th1 cell function, increased IL-10 production (anti-inflammatory), and global lymphopenia affecting natural killer cells (NK) quantitatively and qualitatively related to their interferon production.
Studies have documented significantly higher organ failure rates and mortality in critically ill patients with CMV reactivation. In a systematic review to investigate the association between CMV reactivation and clinical outcomes in immunocompetent critically ill patients, including Itwenty-two studies, CMV reactivation was associated with increased ICU mortality, overall mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, nosocomial infections, and ICU length of stay. CMV reactivation has also been studied in specific critically ill cohorts, exhibiting their impact on mortality. The effect of CMV reactivation on mortality in immunocompetent acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients has also been studied. Of 399 ARDS patients, 68 % were CMV seropositive and reactivation occurred in 27 % of them which was associated with overall increased ICU mortality. In another study among the septic shock cohort (329 patients), herpesvirus reactivations were documented in 68% of patients without prior immunodeficiency, and concluded that reactivations could be independently associated with mortality.
However, no studies are currently available investigating CMV reactivation in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP). The investigators aimed to study the prevalence of CMV reactivation and its viral load kinetics in critically ill patients with ANP
Objectives To study the prevalence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and its viral load kinetics in critically ill adult patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis
Methodology Study design This prospective observational study will be conducted at the Department of Critical Care Medicine in collaboration with the Department of Gastroenterology and Microbiology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC).
Study protocol During the study period, all adult ICU patients with the diagnosis of acute necrotizing pancreatitis will be considered for inclusion. As per inclusion and exclusion criteria, these patients will be screened for the presence of Anti CMV IgG antibodies in their blood. If the patient is IgG seropositive and meets inclusion/exclusion criteria then they will be included in the study and followed up for CMV reactivation during their ICU stay. In patients having CMV reactivation, viral load kinetics will be further followed-up for the next 2 weeks.
Sample collection Blood samples: 1.0 ml blood will be collected in an EDTA vial from an existing venous catheter, on a weekly basis to find CMV reactivation during their ICU stay or 10th week of illness (whichever comes first).
Percutaneous drain: If the patient had an abdominal drain in the proximity of the pancreas, 2.0 ml will be collected in a sterile container on a weekly basis to find CMV reactivation during their ICU stay or the 10th week of illness (whichever comes first).
Pancreatic necrosum: If the patient underwent for necrosectomy, then pancreatic necrosum will be collected in a sterile container (single time)
Laboratory analysis ELISA for IgG antibody detection: The serum collected will be tested for IgG antibodies by ELISA as per manufacturer recommendations. (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL). The cut-off of will be set at 0.5 WHO IU/ml (Calibrator 2) by the kit's manufacturer. Samples with a concentration higher than 0.5 WHO IU/ml will be considered positive for CMV IgG. All samples will be tested in duplicate.
CMV quantitative real-time PCR:
DNA Extraction: DNA extraction will be performed on 200 μl of a sample using a QIAamp DNA kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, Calif.). Then, 60 μl of Tris (10 mM, pH 8.0) will be used to elute the DNA, and 10 μl of the DNA will be used for each PCR. The extracted DNA will be stored at -800 C for further work.
Quantitative Real-time PCR for virus detection: A 25 μL reaction will be prepared for the detection of CMV by RTPCR utilizing 10 μL of extracted DNA, 12.5 μL of 2X PCR buffer, and 1.5 μL of AgPath RT-PCR Reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts USA) and 1 μL Primer and probe sequences described elsewhere. All oligonucleotides will be synthesized and procured from Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA, and thermal cycling will be performed at 95 °C for 3 min and then 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 58 °C for the 30s using Applied bio system 7500 Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts USA). Each test will consist of 5 quantitative control and results will be interpreted accordingly.
Definitions Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: This will be diagnosed on the basis of clinical sign-symptoms / laboratory parameters and the presence of non-enhancing areas of the pancreas on a contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scan.
CMV reactivation: The cut-off for diagnosing CMV reactivation will be taken as a value of >1000 copies/ml.
Data collections Demographic and relevant clinical characteristics of included patients will be collected on a structured case report form.
Sample size and statistical analysis Among screened acute necrotizing pancreatitis, 95% of patients are expected to have seropositive for IgG. Assuming 50% seropositive (IgG) patients will develop Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation during the ICU stay. Taking a 15% margin of error in the assumed prevalence (i.e. expected range of 35 to 65%), at a two-sided 95% Confidence interval, the estimated sample size is 43. This study is time limited is 18 months and so during the study period all eligible patients will be screened and considered for inclusion in this study. The investigators are expecting about 50 patients.
Descriptive statistics of the continuous variables are to be presented as mean± standard deviation/median (inter-quartile range) while categorical variables in frequency (%) as appropriate. Student's t-test (independent as well as paired-samples t-test as appropriate) or its non-parametric methods to be used to compare the means/medians between the two groups whereas the Chi-square test or Fisher exact test will be used to compare the proportions. The incidences of CMV reactivations will be calculated and this association with demographic and clinical factors to be assessed using univariate as well as multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Statistical package for social sciences, version-23 (SPSS-23, IBM, Chicago, USA), and MedCalc Software will be used for data analysis.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Acute necrotizing pancreatitis patients who require ICU admission
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Acute necrotizing pancreatitis patients who require ICU admission, with at least a two-week duration of illness and the presence of CMV seropositivity (Anti CMV IgG antibodies).
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age < 18 years
- Expected survival < 72 hours
- Duration of pancreatitis more than 10 weeks
- Use of antiviral agents within the last 7 days
- Known or suspected underlying immune deficiency (history of solid organ or stem cell transplantation, infection with the human immunodeficiency virus, hematological malignancy, use of immunosuppressive medication (more than 0.1mg/kg prednisone for >3 months, more than 75mg/day prednisone for >3 weeks or equivalent), chemotherapy /radiotherapy in the year before ICU admission and any known humeral or cellular immune deficiency
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Prevalence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in critically ill adult patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis
Time frame: From the date of inclusion in the study until the day of discharge from the ICU or up to 10 weeks of illness, whichever came first
Percentage of included patients (CMV seropositive IgG) who had viral load >1000/cc
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load kinetics in critically ill adult patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis
Time frame: From the date of CMV reactivation until 2 weeks thereafter or the day of discharge from the ICU, whichever came first
Changes in CMV viral load count during their clinical course
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Apr 2025.
- Background: PubMed 17876868Beger HG, Rau BM. Severe acute pancreatitis: Clinical course and management. World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Oct 14;13(38):5043-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i38.5043.
- Background: PubMed 22357880Thoeni RF. The revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis: its importance for the radiologist and its effect on treatment. Radiology. 2012 Mar;262(3):751-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110947.
- Background: PubMed 12774801Beger HG, Rau B, Isenmann R. Natural history of necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2003;3(2):93-101. doi: 10.1159/000070076. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17032204Banks PA, Freeman ML; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct;101(10):2379-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00856.x. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 18191686Frossard JL, Steer ML, Pastor CM. Acute pancreatitis. Lancet. 2008 Jan 12;371(9607):143-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60107-5.
- Background: PubMed 20540942Petrov MS, Shanbhag S, Chakraborty M, Phillips AR, Windsor JA. Organ failure and infection of pancreatic necrosis as determinants of mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2010 Sep;139(3):813-20. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.010. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
- Background: PubMed 12120195Reber HA. Pathogenesis of infection in pancreatic inflammatory disease. Pancreatology. 2001;1(3):207-9. doi: 10.1159/000055811. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30287818Jain S, Mahapatra SJ, Gupta S, Shalimar, Garg PK. Infected Pancreatic Necrosis due to Multidrug-Resistant Organisms and Persistent Organ failure Predict Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 5;9(10):190. doi: 10.1038/s41424-018-0056-x.
- Background: PubMed 21731015Trikudanathan G, Navaneethan U, Vege SS. Intra-abdominal fungal infections complicating acute pancreatitis: a review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;106(7):1188-92. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.497.
- Background: PubMed 25266641Schmidt PN, Roug S, Hansen EF, Knudsen JD, Novovic S. Spectrum of microorganisms in infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis - impact on organ failure and mortality. Pancreatology. 2014 Nov-Dec;14(6):444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
- Background: PubMed 29517630Moka P, Goswami P, Kapil A, Xess I, Sreenivas V, Saraya A. Impact of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacterial and Fungal Infections in Outcome of Acute Pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2018 Apr;47(4):489-494. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001019.
- Background: PubMed 29215543Reuken PA, Albig H, Rodel J, Hocke M, Will U, Stallmach A, Bruns T. Fungal Infections in Patients With Infected Pancreatic Necrosis and Pseudocysts: Risk Factors and Outcome. Pancreas. 2018 Jan;47(1):92-98. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000965.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
RecruitingObservational study
DEciphering CIrculating SIgnatures Of Infected Pancreatic Necrosis
Acute Pancreatitis
RecruitingObservational study
Organ Dysfunction Change in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis Patients With Sepsis After Open Necrosectomy
Necrotizing Pancreatitis
RecruitingObservational study
Registry of Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections
Acute Pancreatitis, Pancreatic Pseudocyst
Recruiting
Necrosectomy With Cryotechnology for Accelerated Removal
Pancreatic Necrosis, Acute Pancreatitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis, Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mohan Gurjar, MD, PDCC principal investigator
Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS)
Atul Garg, MD principal investigator
Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis, run by Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prevalence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in critically ill adult patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis (time frame: From the date of inclusion in the study until the day of discharge from the ICU or up to 10 weeks of illness, whichever came first). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05898048, which also lists 30 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2025.