AzTrials
AzTrials

Epidural Analgesia for Labour and DeliveryETEMERCNCT05897814

M-mode Ultrasonography for Epidural Catheter Identification and Confirmation of Correct Catheter Position

A study testing Location of the epidural analgesia catheter in people with Epidural Analgesia for Labour and Delivery, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In France, 80% of women choose epidural analgesia for delivery and birth. The localization of the epidural space is classically achieved by loss of resistance to saline. This blind technique means the passage of the needle through the ligamentum flavum. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
Location of the epidural analgesia catheter
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
9 Sep 2023to 26 May 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult women admitted to the delivery room for a vaginal delivery with an epidural analgesia.
  • Written informed consent.
  • French speaking patient.

Who cannot join

  • Patient with a contraindication to neuraxial analgesia.
  • Visual Analogue Scale score >7 at epidural analgesia pose.
  • No health insurance.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades

    Paris, 75015

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of M-mode Ultrasonography for Epidural Catheter Identification, and Correct Placement, in Obstetric Anesthesia

In France, 80% of women choose epidural analgesia for delivery and birth. The localization of the epidural space is classically achieved by loss of resistance to saline. This blind technique means the passage of the needle through the ligamentum flavum. However, epidural analgesia failure has been reported in 27-32% of cases.

Currently, lumbar neuraxial ultrasound has become a valuable tool facilitating the placement of an epidural catheter. Although lumbar neuraxial ultrasound has been the source of many studies, few have focused on its use to confirm the exact location of the epidural catheter in the epidural space.

Read more

In the Pediatric and Obstetric Anesthesia-Resuscitation Department of the Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, pre procedural lumbar neuraxial ultrasound for epidural anesthesia is a regular practice.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the ability of M-mode (M-m) and color Doppler (cD) ultrasonography to identify the epidural catheter position for parturients in the delivery room.

Read the detailed description

In France, 80% of women choose epidural analgesia for delivery and birth. The localization of the epidural space is classically achieved by loss of resistance to saline. This blind technique means the passage of the needle through the ligamentum flavum. However, epidural analgesia failure has been reported in 27-32% of cases.

Currently, lumbar neuraxial ultrasound has become a valuable tool facilitating the placement of an epidural catheter. Although lumbar neuraxial ultrasound has been the source of many studies, few have focused on its use to confirm the exact location of the epidural catheter in the epidural space.

Indeed, only 2 retrospective studies have described this strategy on cohorts with small numbers of adult patients. One demonstrated in a mixed population the possible localization of the epidural analgesia catheter using color Doppler (cD) mode (67.5% of cases) and M-mode (M-m) ultrasonography (M-m) (75%). Only one study identified the position of the epidural catheter in the obstetric context due to the cD mode ; with a low rate of visualization (37.1% of cases).

In the Pediatric and Obstetric Anesthesia-Resuscitation Department of the Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, pre procedural lumbar neuraxial ultrasound for epidural anesthesia is a regular practice.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the ability of the M-m and cD mode to identify proper catheter placement in parturients in the delivery room.

Being tested
Location of the epidural analgesia catheter
Keywords
Epidural anesthesia, Localization of the epidural analgesia catheter, Lumbar neuraxial ultrasound, Color Doppler mode, M-mode ultrasonography, Obstetric

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Location of the epidural analgesia catheterOther

    Research of the location of the epidural analgesia catheter using M-mode and color Doppler (cD) ultrasonography.

Study groups in NCT05897814
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ParturientsExperimentalAdult patients admitted to the delivery room of Necker-Enfants Malades hospital maternity with an epidural catheter.
Receives: Other: Location of the epidural analgesia catheter

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Success rate of epidural catheter localisation in M-mode (M-m) ultrasonography

    The location of the epidural catheter is based on the visualization of the "beach and sea" sign with injection of the analgesic solution through the epidural catheter into the epidural space.

    Measured: Day 0

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Success rate of epidural catheter localisation in color Doppler (cD) ultrasonography

    The localization of the epidural catheter is based on the visualization of a blue and red mosaic with the injection of the analgesic solution through the epidural catheter in the epidural space.

    Measured: Day 0

  2. Risk factors associated with location failure in M-m et cD mode

    Description of the risk factors associated with catheter localization failure using M-mode (M-m) and color Doppler (cD) mode.

    Measured: 14 months

  3. Best neuraxial ultrasound view to locate the epidural analgesia catheter with M-mode (M-m) and color Doppler (cD) mode

    Determine the best neuraxial ultrasound view to locate the epidural catheter with M-mode (M-m) and color Doppler (cD) mode.

    Measured: 14 months

  4. Evaluate the effectiveness of epidural analgesia when the catheter is considered in the epidural space by lumbar neuraxial ultrasound

    Evaluate the percentage of epidurals having had a symmetrical sensory level > D10 when the epidural catheter is considered in the epidural space by lumbar neuraxial ultrasound.

    The epidural analgesia rate with a sensory level >D10 is determined 30 min after epidural analgesia application thanks to a sensitive test.

    Measured: Day 0

  5. Duration of neuraxial ultrasound's research to determine the localization of epidural analgesia catheter

    Evaluate the time required in minutes to confirm the correct positioning of the epidural analgesia catheter using M-m and cD mode.

    Measured: Day 0

  6. Assess operator satisfaction with M-mode (M-m) and color Doppler (cD) to locate the epidural catheter

    Operator satisfaction score with M-mode (M-m) and color Doppler (cD) to locate the epidural analgesia catheter with a numerical scale from 0 to 10.

    Measured: Day 0

  7. Evaluate the satisfaction of parturients in terms of comfort during the lumbar neuraxial ultrasound to identify the epidural catheter

    Evaluate the satisfaction of parturients in terms of comfort during the lumbar neuraxial ultrasound to identify the epidural catheter with a numerical scale from 0 to 10

    Measured: Day 0

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jun 2023
  2. Study start9 Sep 2023
  3. Primary completion26 May 2024
  4. Study completion26 May 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05897814
Sponsor's protocol ID
APHP230314
Other IDs
2023-A00076-39
Acronym
ETEMERC
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
11 May 2023
Last updated
22 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Vanhaesebrouck A, Vilain A, Rey S, Fresson J. Les maternités en 2016: résultats de l'enquête nationale périnatale (ENP). Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique. 2018;66:S54

  • Sicard JA, Forestier J. Radiographic method for exploration of the extradural space using lipidol. Rev Neurol. 1921;28:1264

  • Perlas A, Chaparro LE, Chin KJ. Lumbar Neuraxial Ultrasound for Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):251-60. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000184.

    PubMed 25493689
  • Elsharkawy H, Sonny A, Govindarajan SR, Chan V. Use of colour Doppler and M-mode ultrasonography to confirm the location of an epidural catheter - a retrospective case series. Can J Anaesth. 2017 May;64(5):489-496. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0819-y. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

    PubMed 28074426
  • Riveros-Perez E, Albo C, Jimenez E, Cheriyan T, Rocuts A. Color your epidural: color flow Doppler to confirm labor epidural needle position. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019 Apr;85(4):376-383. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.13175-0. Epub 2018 Nov 22.

    PubMed 30482003
  • Osse L, Myriam B, Dahan S, Xavier R, Saumtally H, Orliaguet G, Bouvet L, Keita H. Performance of M-mode and Color Doppler Ultrasound for Confirming Epidural Catheter Placement in Laboring women: A Prospective Cohort Study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2026 Apr 14:101850. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2026.101850. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 41990952

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Location of the epidural analgesia catheter in people with Epidural Analgesia for Labour and Delivery, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Success rate of epidural catheter localisation in M-mode (M-m) ultrasonography (time frame: Day 0). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05897814, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in