Neck PainNCT05889039
Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment and Bio Electro-Magnetic Regulation Therapy on Neck Pain in Adults
A study testing BEMER and OMT in people with Neck Pain, run by Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Neck pain is a common ailment in the United States. Although there are several different treatments and approaches to help individuals with neck pain, the number affected by this condition has been steadily increasing. OMT has been shown to be helpful in the treatment of neck pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Neck Pain
- What is being tested?
- BEMER and OMT
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Sep 2019to 16 Feb 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- LECOM-Bradenton faculty, staff and Students currently enrolled in LECOM- Bradenton's osteopathic medical program, pharmacy program, dental program, and master's program who are currently experiencing neck pain for at least two weeks will be approached for recruitment.
Who cannot join
- Subjects will be excluded if they have previously participated in the study, are unable to provide informed consent, are currently pregnant, or have a known medical history of any of the following:
- Psychiatric conditions
- Skin disorders or open wounds precluding skin contact
- Fasciitis or fascial tears
- Myositis
- Neurological symptoms such as numbness, tingling, weakness in upper extremities
Show all 28Show fewer
- Neoplasia
- Bone fracture, osteomyelitis, or osteoporosis
- Coagulation problem
- Deep vein thrombosis
- Adrenal diseases/syndromes
- Acute upper or lower respiratory infection
- Immunosuppressive syndromes
- Radiation or chemotherapy within the past 3 years
- Lupus
- Osteopenia
- Congestive heart failure
- BMI greater than 30
- Any other autoimmune disease not stated above
- Medication changes within the last 4 weeks
- Asthma exacerbations within the last 4 weeks
- Immunosuppressive therapy as a consequence of organ transplantation
- Immunosuppressive therapy as a consequence of allogeneic cellular transplantations or bone marrow stem cell transplantation
- Other conditions often requiring immunosuppressive therapy
- Anticoagulant therapy
- Known sensitivity to the carotid sinus reflex
- Advanced carotid disease
- Down syndrome
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine
Bradenton, Florida, 34211
About this study
Official title: Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) and Bio Electro-Magnetic Regulation (BEMER) Therapy on Neck Pain in Adults
Neck pain is a common ailment in the United States. Although there are several different treatments and approaches to help individuals with neck pain, the number affected by this condition has been steadily increasing.
OMT has been shown to be helpful in the treatment of neck pain. In fact, the use of OMT has been shown to increase mobility of the myofascial tissues, visceral motion and decrease pain in patients with neck pain. Bio Electro-Magnetic Regulation (BEMER) Therapy is a therapeutic modality that deploys a biorhythmically defined stimulus through a Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF), which leads to an increase in blood flow. The positive effects of BEMER on the circulation has been shown to result in significant increases in arteriovenous oxygen difference, number of open capillaries, arteriolar and venular flow volume, and flow rate of red blood cells in the microvasculature. Therefore, BEMER can potentially be used in the treatment of neck pain by improving microcirculation in muscular tissue. Therefore, it is possible that the combination of OMT and BEMER therapy may provide additive effects in reducing neck pain. The purpose of this study is to investigate the individual and combined effects of OMT and BEMER therapy on neck pain in adults.
Read the detailed description
Neck Pain is defined as "pain in the neck with or without pain referred to one or both upper limbs that lasts for at least one day". It has been estimated that 66% of the population will suffer from neck pain at some point during their lifetime and has been reported as the fourth leading cause of disability worldwide. There is considerable variation in the reported prevalence rates of neck pain, most likely because of differences in the definition of neck pain and the lack of homogeneity in the studies. Current available studies suggest the one-year estimated incidence of neck pain to range between 10.4% and 21.3%, with a higher incidence noted in computer and office workers. The prevalence of neck pain ranges from 10% to 20%, and the most common cause of neck pain in adults stems from degenerative changes in the cervical spine. Most cases of neck pain tend to run an episodic course over one's lifetime, thus relapses are relatively common.
The differential diagnosis for neck pain is extensive, and a methodical approach is essential to rule out potentially life-threatening conditions. The vast majority of neck pain is not due to organic pathology, and thus, has been termed "non-specific" or "mechanical". Interventions available to manage neck pain include analgesics, physiotherapy, educational modalities, exercise, and manual therapy. While useful in acute, short-term reduction of pain, analgesic therapy such as NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) produce significant side effects of gastrointestinal bleeding and cardiovascular events. Use of opioids, while also useful for acute, short-term pain relief, should produce hesitation in prescription due to risk of opioid dependence and hyperalgesia syndromes.
Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is a fundamental skill set that osteopathic physicians acquire early during their medical training and is widely utilized among practicing osteopathic physicians to treat neck pain and other musculoskeletal complaints. OMT is a unique, hands-on treatment modality used by osteopathic physicians to augment the conventional management of neck pain and has been studied to demonstrate favorable outcomes in the treatment of neck pain.
In addition to conventional treatment modalities, Bio-Electro-Magnetic Energy Regulation (BEMER) therapy (BEMER International AG) has emerged as a proposed therapeutic option. BEMER therapy utilizes a biorhythmically defined stimulus through a pulsed electromagnetic field. BEMER devices operate with unique parameters and are postulated to have a primary effect of improving tissue microcirculation. BEMER therapy leads to an increase in the number of open capillaries, vasomotion of micro vessels, arteriovenous oxygen difference, arteriolar and venular flow volume, and flow rate of red blood cells in a specific microcirculatory area. Multiple studies have demonstrated positive results in musculoskeletal pain management with the utilization of BEMER therapy. One study in particular demonstrated a potential additive, subjective decrease in reported back pain and improved functional ability after treatment with both OMT and BEMER therapy.
The musculoskeletal, lymphatic, and fascial concepts of OMT have long been comprehensively and collectively proposed as the mechanisms by which the therapy provides alleviation of common musculoskeletal ailments. Existing literature suggests benefit from OMT, however, the need for further exploration of manual therapy remains. As previously discussed, BEMER therapy can reduce musculoskeletal pain via enhanced microcirculation. Therefore, it is plausible that the combination of OMT and BEMER therapy may potentially enhance circulation to the vascular beds in myofascial tissue and could substantially reduce neck pain. The objective of this study was to assess the individual and combined effects of OMT and BEMER therapy in patients with non-specific neck pain.
- Conditions
- Neck Pain
- Being tested
- BEMER, OMT, Sham OMT + Sham BEMER
- Keywords
- Neck Pain, Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT), BEMER
- Medical subject headings
- Neck Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BEMERDevice
Bio-Electro-Magnetic Energy Regulation (BEMER) is an emerging therapeutic modality that deploys a biorhythmically defined stimulus through a pulsed electromagnetic field and has been shown to reduce musculoskeletal pain.
OMTProcedure or surgery
Osteopathic manipulative therapy (OMT) is a form of manual therapy utilized by osteopathic physicians and some allopathic physicians to treat a broad variety of musculoskeletal ailments, including neck pain.
Sham OMT + Sham BEMERProcedure or surgery
Participants in the CONTROL group received light touch and BEMER sham treatments. Researchers placed their hands lightly on the subject's cervical paraspinal muscles in the supine position and on the upper thoracic paraspinal muscles in the prone position for approximately 5 minutes. This was done to mimic myofascial release techniques; however, no pressure or action was done. In addition, the subject's laid supine on the BEMER mat (as they would do during a BEMER session), but the device was not activated.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OMT + BEMER PLACEBO | Sham comparator | Participants in the CONTROL group received light touch and BEMER sham treatments. Researchers placed their hands lightly on the subject's cervical paraspinal muscles in the supine position and on the upper thoracic paraspinal muscles in the prone position for approximately 5 minutes. This was done to mimic myofascial release techniques; however, no pressure or action was done. In addition, the subject's laid supine on the BEMER mat (as they would do during a BEMER session), but the device was not activated. Receives: Procedure: Sham OMT + Sham BEMER |
| Experimental: Bio Electro-Magnetic Regulation (BEMER) Therapy | Active comparator | Participants receiving BEMER therapy laid supine on the BEMER mat (BEMER International AG). The BEMER was set at intensity 3 for week 1, intensity 4 for week 2, and intensity 5 for week 3. The B.Pad (BEMER International AG) was placed under their cervical region. B.Pad® settings were set at Program 1 (8 minutes long) in week 1 through week 3. These settings were selected based on the manufacturer's recommendations. Receives: Device: BEMER |
| OMT (Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment) | Active comparator | Participants receiving OMT were treated with a standardized sequence to the areas where somatic dysfunctions were found. Receives: Procedure: OMT |
| OMT+BEMER | Experimental | Participants receiving BEMER therapy laid supine on the BEMER mat (BEMER International AG). The BEMER was set at intensity 3 for week 1, intensity 4 for week 2, and intensity 5 for week 3. The B.Pad (BEMER International AG) was placed under their cervical region. B.Pad® settings were set at Program 1 (8 minutes long) in week 1 through week 3. These settings were selected based on the manufacturer's recommendations. OMT was performed prior to BEMER therapy for those in the combined group. Participants were treated with a standardized sequence to the areas where somatic dysfunctions were found. Receives: Device: BEMER; Procedure: OMT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Neck Pain Rating Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Assessed by questionnaire rating, compared with pre-intervention rating Neck Disability Index (NDI). Score ranges 0-50. Minimum score=0 (no activity limitation), Maximum score=50 (complete activity limitation). Lower scores is better as it reflect lower activity limitation
Measured: Within 1 week of completion of 3-week intervention period
Neck Pain Rating Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Assessed by questionnaire rating, compared with pre-intervention rating Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Score ranges 0-100. Minimum score=0 (no pain), Maximum score=100 (worst pain ever felt). Lower scores is better as it reflect lower pain
Measured: Within 1 week of completion of 3-week intervention period
Quality of Life Rating Short Form 12-item (SF-12) Health Survey
Assessed by questionnaire rating, compared with pre-intervention rating Short form 12-item (SF-12) health survey. Scores range 0%-100%. Score of 0 (minimum) no pain. Score of 100 (maximum) lot of pain. Lower scores is better as it reflect lower pain
Measured: Within 1 week of completion of 3-week intervention period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jun 2023
- Study start17 Sep 2019
- Primary completion16 Feb 2022
- Study completion16 Feb 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neck PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Santiago Lorenzo, PhD, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine
- Investigators
- Santiago Lorenzo, PhD, MS, Principal investigator, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05889039
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 26-164
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 10 May 2023
- Last updated
- 15 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Publications
Palmer GM, Dominick N, Kane M, Bawek S, Burch B, Sanders T, Phrathep D, Myers N, Lorenzo S. Effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment and Bio-Electro-Magnetic Energy Regulation (BEMER) therapy on generalized musculoskeletal neck pain in adults. J Osteopath Med. 2023 Dec 1;124(4):153-161. doi: 10.1515/jom-2023-0128. eCollection 2024 Apr 1.
PubMed 38033194
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) and Bio Electro-Magnetic Regulation (BEMER) Therapy on Neck Pain in Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05889039
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 26-164
- Conditions
- Neck Pain
- Keywords
- Neck Pain, Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT), BEMER
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Lake Erie College of Osteopathic MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Feb 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 15 Nov 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Neck pain is a common ailment in the United States. Although there are several different treatments and approaches to help individuals with neck pain, the number affected by this condition has been steadily increasing.
OMT has been shown to be helpful in the treatment of neck pain. In fact, the use of OMT has been shown to increase mobility of the myofascial tissues, visceral motion and decrease pain in patients with neck pain. Bio Electro-Magnetic Regulation (BEMER) Therapy is a therapeutic modality that deploys a biorhythmically defined stimulus through a Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF), which leads to an increase in blood flow. The positive effects of BEMER on the circulation has been shown to result in significant increases in arteriovenous oxygen difference, number of open capillaries, arteriolar and venular flow volume, and flow rate of red blood cells in the microvasculature. Therefore, BEMER can potentially be used in the treatment of neck pain by improving microcirculation in muscular tissue. Therefore, it is possible that the combination of OMT and BEMER therapy may provide additive effects in reducing neck pain. The purpose of this study is to investigate the individual and combined effects of OMT and BEMER therapy on neck pain in adults.
Detailed description
Neck Pain is defined as "pain in the neck with or without pain referred to one or both upper limbs that lasts for at least one day". It has been estimated that 66% of the population will suffer from neck pain at some point during their lifetime and has been reported as the fourth leading cause of disability worldwide. There is considerable variation in the reported prevalence rates of neck pain, most likely because of differences in the definition of neck pain and the lack of homogeneity in the studies. Current available studies suggest the one-year estimated incidence of neck pain to range between 10.4% and 21.3%, with a higher incidence noted in computer and office workers. The prevalence of neck pain ranges from 10% to 20%, and the most common cause of neck pain in adults stems from degenerative changes in the cervical spine. Most cases of neck pain tend to run an episodic course over one's lifetime, thus relapses are relatively common.
The differential diagnosis for neck pain is extensive, and a methodical approach is essential to rule out potentially life-threatening conditions. The vast majority of neck pain is not due to organic pathology, and thus, has been termed "non-specific" or "mechanical". Interventions available to manage neck pain include analgesics, physiotherapy, educational modalities, exercise, and manual therapy. While useful in acute, short-term reduction of pain, analgesic therapy such as NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) produce significant side effects of gastrointestinal bleeding and cardiovascular events. Use of opioids, while also useful for acute, short-term pain relief, should produce hesitation in prescription due to risk of opioid dependence and hyperalgesia syndromes.
Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is a fundamental skill set that osteopathic physicians acquire early during their medical training and is widely utilized among practicing osteopathic physicians to treat neck pain and other musculoskeletal complaints. OMT is a unique, hands-on treatment modality used by osteopathic physicians to augment the conventional management of neck pain and has been studied to demonstrate favorable outcomes in the treatment of neck pain.
In addition to conventional treatment modalities, Bio-Electro-Magnetic Energy Regulation (BEMER) therapy (BEMER International AG) has emerged as a proposed therapeutic option. BEMER therapy utilizes a biorhythmically defined stimulus through a pulsed electromagnetic field. BEMER devices operate with unique parameters and are postulated to have a primary effect of improving tissue microcirculation. BEMER therapy leads to an increase in the number of open capillaries, vasomotion of micro vessels, arteriovenous oxygen difference, arteriolar and venular flow volume, and flow rate of red blood cells in a specific microcirculatory area. Multiple studies have demonstrated positive results in musculoskeletal pain management with the utilization of BEMER therapy. One study in particular demonstrated a potential additive, subjective decrease in reported back pain and improved functional ability after treatment with both OMT and BEMER therapy.
The musculoskeletal, lymphatic, and fascial concepts of OMT have long been comprehensively and collectively proposed as the mechanisms by which the therapy provides alleviation of common musculoskeletal ailments. Existing literature suggests benefit from OMT, however, the need for further exploration of manual therapy remains. As previously discussed, BEMER therapy can reduce musculoskeletal pain via enhanced microcirculation. Therefore, it is plausible that the combination of OMT and BEMER therapy may potentially enhance circulation to the vascular beds in myofascial tissue and could substantially reduce neck pain. The objective of this study was to assess the individual and combined effects of OMT and BEMER therapy in patients with non-specific neck pain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OMT + BEMER PLACEBO | Sham comparator | Procedure: Sham OMT + Sham BEMERParticipants in the CONTROL group received light touch and BEMER sham treatments. Researchers placed their hands lightly on the subject's cervical paraspinal muscles in the supine position and on the upper thoracic paraspinal muscles in the prone position for approximately 5 minutes. This was done to mimic myofascial release techniques; however, no pressure or action was done. In addition, the subject's laid supine on the BEMER mat (as they would do during a BEMER session), but the device was not activated. |
| Experimental: Bio Electro-Magnetic Regulation (BEMER) Therapy | Active comparator | Device: BEMERParticipants receiving BEMER therapy laid supine on the BEMER mat (BEMER International AG). The BEMER was set at intensity 3 for week 1, intensity 4 for week 2, and intensity 5 for week 3. The B.Pad (BEMER International AG) was placed under their cervical region. B.Pad® settings were set at Program 1 (8 minutes long) in week 1 through week 3. These settings were selected based on the manufacturer's recommendations. |
| OMT (Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment) | Active comparator | Procedure: OMTParticipants receiving OMT were treated with a standardized sequence to the areas where somatic dysfunctions were found. |
| OMT+BEMER | Experimental | Device: BEMER, Procedure: OMTParticipants receiving BEMER therapy laid supine on the BEMER mat (BEMER International AG). The BEMER was set at intensity 3 for week 1, intensity 4 for week 2, and intensity 5 for week 3. The B.Pad (BEMER International AG) was placed under their cervical region. B.Pad® settings were set at Program 1 (8 minutes long) in week 1 through week 3. These settings were selected based on the manufacturer's recommendations. OMT was performed prior to BEMER therapy for those in the combined group. Participants were treated with a standardized sequence to the areas where somatic dysfunctions were found. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- LECOM-Bradenton faculty, staff and Students currently enrolled in LECOM- Bradenton's osteopathic medical program, pharmacy program, dental program, and master's program who are currently experiencing neck pain for at least two weeks will be approached for recruitment.
Key exclusion criteria (28 listed)
- Subjects will be excluded if they have previously participated in the study, are unable to provide informed consent, are currently pregnant, or have a known medical history of any of the following:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BEMERBio-Electro-Magnetic Energy Regulation (BEMER) is an emerging therapeutic modality that deploys a biorhythmically defined stimulus through a pulsed electromagnetic field and has been shown to reduce musculoskeletal pain. | Device | Experimental: Bio Electro-Magnetic Regulation (BEMER) Therapy, OMT+BEMER |
| OMTOsteopathic manipulative therapy (OMT) is a form of manual therapy utilized by osteopathic physicians and some allopathic physicians to treat a broad variety of musculoskeletal ailments, including neck pain. | Procedure or surgery | OMT (Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment), OMT+BEMER |
| Sham OMT + Sham BEMERParticipants in the CONTROL group received light touch and BEMER sham treatments. Researchers placed their hands lightly on the subject's cervical paraspinal muscles in the supine position and on the upper thoracic paraspinal muscles in the prone position for approximately 5 minutes. This was done to mimic myofascial release techniques; however, no pressure or action was done. In addition, the subject's laid supine on the BEMER mat (as they would do during a BEMER session), but the device was not activated. | Procedure or surgery | OMT + BEMER PLACEBO |
Primary outcome
Neck Pain Rating Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time frame: Within 1 week of completion of 3-week intervention period
Assessed by questionnaire rating, compared with pre-intervention rating Neck Disability Index (NDI). Score ranges 0-50. Minimum score=0 (no activity limitation), Maximum score=50 (complete activity limitation). Lower scores is better as it reflect lower activity limitation
Neck Pain Rating Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Within 1 week of completion of 3-week intervention period
Assessed by questionnaire rating, compared with pre-intervention rating Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Score ranges 0-100. Minimum score=0 (no pain), Maximum score=100 (worst pain ever felt). Lower scores is better as it reflect lower pain
Quality of Life Rating Short Form 12-item (SF-12) Health Survey
Time frame: Within 1 week of completion of 3-week intervention period
Assessed by questionnaire rating, compared with pre-intervention rating Short form 12-item (SF-12) health survey. Scores range 0%-100%. Score of 0 (minimum) no pain. Score of 100 (maximum) lot of pain. Lower scores is better as it reflect lower pain
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Nov 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38033194Palmer GM, Dominick N, Kane M, Bawek S, Burch B, Sanders T, Phrathep D, Myers N, Lorenzo S. Effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment and Bio-Electro-Magnetic Energy Regulation (BEMER) therapy on generalized musculoskeletal neck pain in adults. J Osteopath Med. 2023 Dec 1;124(4):153-161. doi: 10.1515/jom-2023-0128. eCollection 2024 Apr 1.
Related trials for Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Recruiting
Strain Counter Strain and Conventional Stretching in School-aged Children With Mechanical Neck Pain Due to Prolong Screen Use
Mechanical Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Alexander Technique Versus Feldenkrais Somatic Training in Patients With Text Neck Syndrome
Text Neck Syndrome
Recruiting
Longitudinal Stripping Massage vs. Percussion Device for Neck Pain: Ultrasound Study.
Chronic Neck Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Santiago Lorenzo, PhD, MS principal investigator
Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing BEMER and OMT in people with Neck Pain, run by Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 28 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Nov 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Neck Pain Rating Neck Disability Index (NDI) (time frame: Within 1 week of completion of 3-week intervention period). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05889039, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2023.