AzTrials
AzTrials

Cognitive DisordersMAPEG 2NCT05888961

Single-center Prospective Longitudinal Study of Taste in Patients With Cognitive Disorders at Different Stages of Severity (Isolated Cognitive Complaint, Minor or Major Neurocognitive Alzheimer-type Disorders) by Analysis of Gustatory Evoked Potentials

A study testing Blood samples, Interviewing the subject and scales and Neurocognitive evaluation in people with Cognitive Disorders, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon at 1 site in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the MAPEG 2 study is to explore gustatory function and to follow its evolution in the 4 following groups of participants: Healthy subjects Participants with isolated cognitive complaint Participants with minor neurocognitive disorder Participants with mild and moderate Alzheimer-type major neurocognitive… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cognitive Disorders
What is being tested?
Blood samples, Interviewing the subject and scales and Neurocognitive evaluation
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
74 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
12 Jun 2023to Dec 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Person who has given oral consent.
  • For patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer\'s disease, the primary caregiver and the patient will be asked to provide oral consent
  • Person of legal age
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) \< 30 kg/m².
  • For the healthy group: absence of cognitive complaints and normal neurological assessment
  • Patients meeting the criteria for isolated cognitive complaint: presence of cognitive complaint but normal neuropsychological evaluation
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patients meeting diagnostic criteria for minor cognitive impairment: imaging (brain MRI) and neuropsychological assessment with a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of 0.5
  • Patients meeting diagnostic criteria for mild to moderate Alzheimer\'s disease: imaging (brain MRI), neuropsychobiological criteria (consultation with neuropsychological assessment, CSF biomarkers), MMSE score ≥ 20 and CDR score of 1 or 1.5
  • Fasting for at least 2 hours before GEP measurement

Who cannot join

  • MMSE score\<15
  • Known COVID-19 infection within 6 months prior to inclusion
  • Person not affiliated to national health insurance system
  • Person under a legal protection measure (curatorship, guardianship)
  • Person subject to a measure of legal protection
  • Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding women
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Subjects with a pacemaker (contraindication to bioelectrical impedance measurement)
  • Adult unable to express consent or to perform cognitive tests.
  • Active smoker (\> 4 cigarettes per day on a regular basis)
  • Diabetic subject (type 1 or type 2)
  • Subject with acute or chronic ENT disease
  • Treatment interfering with gustation
  • Brain MRI showing another cause of neurocognitive disorder (except for vascular lesions Fazekas 1 accepted)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Chu Dijon Bourgogne

    Dijon

    Agnès JACQUIN-PIQUES, 03.80.29.37.54, agnes.jacquin-piques@chu-dijon.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

The aim of the MAPEG 2 study is to explore gustatory function and to follow its evolution in the 4 following groups of participants:

  • Healthy subjects
  • Participants with isolated cognitive complaint
  • Participants with minor neurocognitive disorder
  • Participants with mild and moderate Alzheimer-type major neurocognitive disorders
Read more

For this purpose, we want to compare the results of the following tests:

  • Subjective taste tests (tasting solutions, answering food preference questionnaires),
  • Gustatory evoked potential (GEP) parameters, recorded by electrodes placed on the scalp,
  • And nutritional parameters (hormones of food intake by blood test, measurement of the global body composition).

Identifying and following the evolution of early taste disorders in case of cognitive disorders could improve the diagnosis of Alzheimer\'s disease in two ways:

  • To allow an early diagnosis of Alzheimer\'s disease, and thus improve its management,
  • To define groups of subjects at risk of developing Alzheimer\'s disease in later years.
Being tested
Blood samples, Interviewing the subject and scales, Neurocognitive evaluation, Taste tests, Computerized food preference questionnaires
Medical subject headings
Cognitive Dysfunction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blood samplesBiological

    Fasting at the first session for hormonal measurements of leptin, insulin, acylated and non-acylated ghrelin, serotonin, albumin, protidemia and blood glucose.

    Repeated at 6 and 12 months for follow-up

  • Interviewing the subject and scalesOther

    Collection of sociodemographic data, personal and family neurological history, treatments, MADRS depression scale and CDR autonomy scale.

    Carried out at the 1st session

  • Neurocognitive evaluationOther

    cognitive complaint questionnaire (CCQ), taste, smell, MoCA and MMSE (if not performed in the previous 6 months) Carried out at the 1st session. Repeated at 6 and 12 months for follow-up.

  • Taste testsOther

    Sweet and salty flavors at the 1st session and acid and umami flavors at the 2nd session. Repeated at 6 and 12 months for follow-up.

    Placement of electrodes on the scalp, recording of gustatory evoked potentials, subjective gustatory evaluation by means of visual analogue scales rated from 0 to 10, identification and naming of each of the primary flavors

  • Computerized food preference questionnairesOther

    Performed at the 1st session on a tactile tablet. Repeated at 6 and 12 months for follow-up.

  • Nutritional status - body compositionOther

    Measurement of anthropometric data, bioelectrical impedancemetry (measurement of fat mass, lean mass, water mass and bone mass in kg), measurement of blood pressure and heart rate Performed at the 2nd session Repeated at 6 and 12 months for follow-up.

Study groups in NCT05888961
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control subjectsActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Biological: Blood samples; Other: Interviewing the subject and scales; Other: Neurocognitive evaluation; Other: Taste tests; Other: Computerized food preference questionnaires; Other: Nutritional status - body composition
Subjects with an isolated cognitive complaintExperimentalNot described
Receives: Biological: Blood samples; Other: Interviewing the subject and scales; Other: Neurocognitive evaluation; Other: Taste tests; Other: Computerized food preference questionnaires; Other: Nutritional status - body composition
Subjects with minor neurocognitive disordersExperimentalNot described
Receives: Biological: Blood samples; Other: Interviewing the subject and scales; Other: Neurocognitive evaluation; Other: Taste tests; Other: Computerized food preference questionnaires; Other: Nutritional status - body composition
Subjects with major neurocognitive disorders of the mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease typeExperimentalNot described
Receives: Biological: Blood samples; Other: Interviewing the subject and scales; Other: Neurocognitive evaluation; Other: Taste tests; Other: Computerized food preference questionnaires; Other: Nutritional status - body composition

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Amplitude of the gustatory evoked potentials

    Measured: After a 2-hour fasting period

  2. Gustatory evoked potentials latency

    Measured: After a 2-hour fasting period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jun 2023
  2. Study start12 Jun 2023
  3. Primary completionDec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
74 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05888961
Sponsor's protocol ID
JACQUIN 2023
Acronym
MAPEG 2
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
25 May 2023
Last updated
25 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Blood samples, Interviewing the subject and scales and Neurocognitive evaluation in people with Cognitive Disorders, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Agnès JACQUIN-PIQUES (03.80.29.37.54, agnes.jacquin-piques@chu-dijon.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Amplitude of the gustatory evoked potentials (time frame: After a 2-hour fasting period). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in