AzTrials
AzTrials

Spinal DeformityNCT05884593

Analysis of Pedicle Screw Accuracy to Plan Using Medtronic Mazor Robotic System

A study testing Pedicle screw instrumentation using Mazor X robotic system in people with Spinal Deformity and Spinal Infection, run by Ohio State University at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to assess screw deviation from pre-planned trajectory using the Mazor X robotic system in patients undergoing posterior thoracolumbar arthrodesis procedures between T2-S1. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Spinal Deformity, Spinal Infection, Trauma
What is being tested?
Pedicle screw instrumentation using Mazor X robotic system
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
5 Mar 2021to 23 Feb 2026
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ≥ 18 years old
  • Degenerative conditions, spinal deformity, spinal infection, traumatic injuries, or neoplastic processes between T2-S1 necessitating placement of pedicle screw instrumentation.
  • Surgery performed at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC) via one of the study investigators

Who cannot join

  • Current or previous spinal tumor
  • Severe co-morbidities (e.g., heart, respiratory, or renal disease)
  • Concurrent involvement in another investigational drug or device study that could confound study data
  • Subjects who are pregnant
  • Prisoner
  • Subjects who do not speak English Relative Exclusion Criteria
  • Prior pedicle screw instrumentation at that level (i.e. prior L4-5 instrumentation, now undergoing an L4-S1 fusion, only new S1 screw accuracy would be evaluated in this patient)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Neurological Surgery

    Columbus, Ohio, 43219

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of the study is to assess screw deviation from pre-planned trajectory using the Mazor X robotic system in patients undergoing posterior thoracolumbar arthrodesis procedures between T2-S1.

Read the detailed description

This trial will prospectively evaluate screw deviation from pre-planned trajectory using the standard of care Mazor X robotic system. Patients undergoing posterior thoracolumbar arthrodesis procedures utilizing pedicle screw instrumentation at previously uninstrumented levels for degenerative conditions, spinal deformity, spinal infection, trauma, or neoplastic processes between T2-S1 will be asked to participate in this prospective cohort study.

This single centered study will enroll up to 50 patients to achieve a total number of 250 screws for assessment. Subjects will be followed till discharge following surgery. All subjects enrolled in the study will be recruited from a pool of subjects eligible for posterior thoracolumbar arthrodesis surgery.

Being tested
Pedicle screw instrumentation using Mazor X robotic system
Medical subject headings
Wounds and Injuries, Neoplastic Processes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pedicle screw instrumentation using Mazor X robotic systemDevice

    Pedicle screw instrumentation using Mazor X robotic system

Study groups in NCT05884593
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1OtherSingle Arm. All participants undergoing posterior thoracolumbar arthrodesis procedures betweenT2-S1 in which preplanning is done using the Mazor X robotic system.
Receives: Device: Pedicle screw instrumentation using Mazor X robotic system

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total deviation (mm) from the pre-planned screw entry point

    Total deviation (mm) from the pre-planned screw entry point includes: deviation in angle of insertion in the axial plane (degrees), and deviation in angle of insertion in the sagittal plane (degrees) from an O-arm spin after screw placement.

    Measured: study completion average 2years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Accuracy assessment for degree of pedicle breach

    The secondary outcome will include traditional accuracy assessment for degree of pedicle breach utilizing the Gertzbein and Robbins classification system.

    Measured: 6 weeks post surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jun 2023
  2. Study start5 Mar 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion23 Feb 2026

Why it stopped: The study was prematurely terminated despite completion of study activities, as final data analysis could not be conducted due to operational disruptions caused by the war in Gaza. These circumstances were beyond the sponsor's and site's control.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
All subjects will undergoing posterior thoracolumbar arthrodesis procedures utilizing pedicle screw instrumentation.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05884593
Sponsor's protocol ID
2020H0434
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
15 Mar 2023
Last updated
16 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Carl AL, Tromanhauser SG, Roger DJ. Pedicle screw instrumentation for thoracolumbar burst fractures and fracture-dislocations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Aug;17(8 Suppl):S317-24. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199208001-00018.

    PubMed 1523519
  • Rose PS, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Mulconrey DS, Cronen GA, Buchowski JM, Schwend RM, Sides BA. Pedicle screw instrumentation for adult idiopathic scoliosis: an improvement over hook/hybrid fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 15;34(8):852-7; discussion 858. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818e5962.

    PubMed 19365256
  • Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, Kim HJ. Minimally Invasive Robotic Versus Open Fluoroscopic-guided Spinal Instrumented Fusions: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Mar 15;42(6):353-358. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001778.

    PubMed 27398897
  • Jiang B, Pennington Z, Zhu A, Matsoukas S, Ahmed AK, Ehresman J, Mahapatra S, Cottrill E, Sheppell H, Manbachi A, Crawford N, Theodore N. Three-dimensional assessment of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement accuracy and instrumentation reliability based on a preplanned trajectory. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 May 29;33(4):519-528. doi: 10.3171/2020.3.SPINE20208. Print 2020 Oct 1.

    PubMed 32470927
  • Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Jan;15(1):11-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199001000-00004.

    PubMed 2326693
  • Heary RF, Bono CM, Black M. Thoracic pedicle screws: postoperative computerized tomography scanning assessment. J Neurosurg. 2004 Apr;100(4 Suppl Spine):325-31. doi: 10.3171/spi.2004.100.4.0325.

    PubMed 15070139
  • Wiesner L, Kothe R, Ruther W. Anatomic evaluation of two different techniques for the percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Aug 1;24(15):1599-603. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199908010-00015.

    PubMed 10457581
  • Rampersaud YR, Pik JH, Salonen D, Farooq S. Clinical accuracy of fluoroscopic computer-assisted pedicle screw fixation: a CT analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Apr 1;30(7):E183-90. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000157490.65706.38.

    PubMed 15803068
  • van Dijk JD, van den Ende RP, Stramigioli S, Kochling M, Hoss N. Clinical pedicle screw accuracy and deviation from planning in robot-guided spine surgery: robot-guided pedicle screw accuracy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Sep 1;40(17):E986-91. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000960.

    PubMed 25943084

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in