Metabolic SyndromeMETNCT05884437
The Effects of Chiropractic in Adults With Metabolic Syndrome
A study testing Chiropractic adjustment in people with Metabolic Syndrome, run by Life University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of our study procedures/protocols and to look at the potential effects of chiropractic care on people with metabolic syndrome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Metabolic Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Chiropractic adjustment
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2025to 16 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Individuals over the age of 18
- Individuals who can wear an EEG net for 30 minutes
- Individuals who can sit quietly for at least 15 minutes
- Individuals who can walk unassisted for up to 10 minutes
- Individuals who can provide informed consent
- Individuals who meet 3 of the 5 following criteria:
Show all 11Show fewer
- Elevated waist circumference (>40 in/102 cm if male and >35 in/88cm if female)
- Elevated triglycerides (>150 mg/dL) or drug treatment for elevated triglycerides
- Reduced HDL-cholesterol (<40mg/dL if male and <50 mg/dL if female) or drug treatment to increase HDL-C
- Elevated blood pressure (>130 mm Hg systolic BP or >85 mm Hg diastolic BP) or drug treatment to reduce blood pressure
- Elevated fasting glucose (>100 mg/dL) or drug treatment to reduce blood glucose
Who cannot join
- Individuals with a known disorder resulting in syncope/fainting during postural changes (e.g., POTS, orthostatic hypotension)
- Individuals with impaired function of the dominant hand
- Individuals with malignant hypertension
- Individuals with a known heart condition such as arrhythmia that results in an aberrant ECG recording
- Individuals with any implanted devices (i.e., pacemakers)
- Individuals with brain aneurysms
Show all 16Show fewer
- Individuals with a history of epilepsy or stroke that would influence EEG readings
- Individuals with a diagnosed externalizing or thought disorder (i.e., anti-social disorder, any major personality disorder such as borderline personality disorder, or schizophrenia)
- Individuals who are on short-acting benzodiazepines which include midazolam \& triazolam
- Individuals with any serious injury or surgery to the head or torso, or lower body in the last 6 months
- Individuals with a hearing impairment or hearing aids (due to the auditory stimulus recording being performed)
- Individuals who are currently pregnant
- Individuals with current litigation related to a physical, health-related injury
- Individuals who have been diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis or instability of the neck.
- Individuals with moderate to severe pain on a daily basis
- Pain on the day of testing rated greater than 3/10 on a visual analog scale (VAS)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Dr. Sid E. Williams Center for Chiropractic Research
Marietta, Georgia, 30067
About this study
Official title: The Effects of Chiropractic Care on the Brain, Autonomic Nervous System, Gait, and Patient Reported Outcomes in Adults With Diagnosed or Suspected Metabolic Syndrome: a Proof-of-concept Trial
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of our study procedures/protocols and to look at the potential effects of chiropractic care on people with metabolic syndrome.
Read the detailed description
After providing informed consent, individuals will undergo 6 weeks of chiropractic care. Throughout these 6 weeks there will be three assessments (Day 0, Week 2, and Week 6) that each include the following:
- Seated resting recording
- Auditory oddball task
- Isometric hand grip
- Postural challenge
- Treadmill walking
- Patient-reported outcome surveys
Each assessment will consist of the following recordings:
- Electroencephalography [EEG]
- Electrodermal activity [EDA]
- Impedance cardiography [ICG]
- Electrocardiogram [ECG]
- Conditions
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Being tested
- Chiropractic adjustment
- Keywords
- Chiropractic, Metabolic syndrome, Spinal manipulation, autonomic nervous system, EEG, patient reported outcomes
- Medical subject headings
- Metabolic Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Chiropractic adjustmentProcedure or surgery
Participants will receive 6 weeks of chiropractic care. The frequency of care will be determined by the field clinician. Participants will have their spine assessed for the presence of vertebral subluxations per their clinician's normal and customary procedures. The adjustment technique(s) utilized by the field clinician will be at their discretion.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Chiropractic | Experimental | Chiropractic adjustment Receives: Procedure: Chiropractic adjustment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recruitment rate
Length of time needed to recruit target number of participants
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Participant adherence rate
Proportion of participants able to adhere to the testing \& treatment schedule
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Participant tolerability rate
Proportion of participants able to perform all aspects of the testing regimen
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Participant retention rate
Proportion of enrolled participants who complete the full testing regimen
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Acceptability of treatment regimen for participants
9-item acceptability questionnaire
Measured: Week 6
Secondary outcomes (48)
EEG resting state broadband power
64-channel hydronet cap
Measured: Day 1
EEG resting state broadband power
64-channel hydronet cap
Measured: Week 2
EEG resting state broadband power
64-channel hydronet cap
Measured: Week 6
EEG resting state functional connectivity
64-channel hydronet cap
Measured: Day 1
EEG resting state functional connectivity
64-channel hydronet cap
Measured: Week 2
EEG resting state functional connectivity
64-channel hydronet cap
Measured: Week 6
EEG evoked latency
64-channel hydronet cap during auditory oddball task
Measured: Day 1
EEG evoked latency
64-channel hydronet cap during auditory oddball task
Measured: Week 2
EEG evoked latency
64-channel hydronet cap during auditory oddball task
Measured: Week 6
EEG evoked amplitude
64-channel hydronet cap during auditory oddball task
Measured: Day 1
EEG evoked amplitude
64-channel hydronet cap during auditory oddball task
Measured: Week 2
EEG evoked amplitude
64-channel hydronet cap during auditory oddball task
Measured: Week 6
skin conductance level (SCL)
2 electrodermal activity (EDA) sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
Measured: Day 1
skin conductance level (SCL)
2 electrodermal activity (EDA) sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
Measured: Week 2
skin conductance level (SCL)
2 electrodermal activity (EDA) sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
Measured: Week 6
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) pre-ejection period (PEP)
2 sensors on chest and 2 sensors on back
Measured: Day 1
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) pre-ejection period (PEP)
2 sensors on chest and 2 sensors on back
Measured: Week 2
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) pre-ejection period (PEP)
2 sensors on chest and 2 sensors on back
Measured: Week 6
ECG mean interbeat interval
3 sensors on torso
Measured: Day 1
ECG mean interbeat interval
3 sensors on torso
Measured: Week 2
ECG mean interbeat interval
3 sensors on torso
Measured: Week 6
ECG respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)
3 sensors on torso
Measured: Day 1
ECG respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)
3 sensors on torso
Measured: Week 2
ECG respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)
3 sensors on torso
Measured: Week 6
ECG de-trended fluctuation analysis
3 sensors on torso
Measured: Day 1
ECG de-trended fluctuation analysis
3 sensors on torso
Measured: Week 2
ECG de-trended fluctuation analysis
3 sensors on torso
Measured: Week 6
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) initial systolic time interval (ISTI)
2 sensors on chest and 2 sensors on back
Measured: Day 1
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) initial systolic time interval (ISTI)
2 sensors on chest and 2 sensors on back
Measured: Week 2
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) initial systolic time interval (ISTI)
2 sensors on chest and 2 sensors on back
Measured: Week 6
Electrodermal activity (EDA) non-specific skin conductance responses (SCR)
2 sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
Measured: Day 1
Electrodermal activity (EDA) non-specific skin conductance responses (SCR)
2 sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
Measured: Week 2
Electrodermal activity (EDA) non-specific skin conductance responses (SCR)
2 sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
Measured: Week 6
Electrodermal activity (EDA) power spectral density (PSD)
2 sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
Measured: Day 1
Electrodermal activity (EDA) power spectral density (PSD)
2 sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
Measured: Week 2
Electrodermal activity (EDA) power spectral density (PSD)
2 sensors on first and second digits of non-dominant hand
Measured: Week 6
Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS-31)
31-item questionnaire
Measured: Day 0
Composite Autonomic Symptom Score COMPASS-31)
31-item questionnaire
Measured: Day 1
Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS-31)
31-item questionnaire
Measured: Week 2
Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS-31)
31-item questionnaire
Measured: Week 6
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Cognitive Abilities and Cognitive Concerns Scale (PROMIS-Cog)
8-item questionnaire
Measured: Day 0
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Cognitive Abilities and Cognitive Concerns Scale (PROMIS-Cog)
8-item questionnaire
Measured: Day 1
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Cognitive Abilities and Cognitive Concerns Scale (PROMIS-Cog)
8-item questionnaire
Measured: Week 2
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Cognitive Abilities and Cognitive Concerns Scale (PROMIS-Cog)
8-item questionnaire
Measured: Week 6
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
10-item questionnaire
Measured: Day 0
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
10-item questionnaire
Measured: Day 1
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
10-item questionnaire
Measured: Week 2
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
10-item questionnaire
Measured: Week 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jun 2023
- Study start1 Jan 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion16 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Prioritizing other studies
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Metabolic SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Single-arm pilot
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Life University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tyson Perez, DC, PhD, Principal investigator, Life University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05884437
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- I-0023
- Acronym
- MET
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 16 Feb 2023
- Last updated
- 27 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effects of Chiropractic Care on the Brain, Autonomic Nervous System, Gait, and Patient Reported Outcomes in Adults With Diagnosed or Suspected Metabolic Syndrome: a Proof-of-concept Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05884437
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MET / I-0023
- Conditions
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Keywords
- Chiropractic, Metabolic syndrome, Spinal manipulation, autonomic nervous system, EEG, patient reported outcomes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- SuspendedReason stopped: Prioritizing other studies
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Life UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 16 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of our study procedures/protocols and to look at the potential effects of chiropractic care on people with metabolic syndrome.
Detailed description
After providing informed consent, individuals will undergo 6 weeks of chiropractic care. Throughout these 6 weeks there will be three assessments (Day 0, Week 2, and Week 6) that each include the following:
- Seated resting recording
- Auditory oddball task
- Isometric hand grip
- Postural challenge
- Treadmill walking
- Patient-reported outcome surveys
Each assessment will consist of the following recordings:
- Electroencephalography [EEG]
- Electrodermal activity [EDA]
- Impedance cardiography [ICG]
- Electrocardiogram [ECG]
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Single-arm pilot
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Chiropractic | Experimental | Procedure: Chiropractic adjustmentChiropractic adjustment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Individuals over the age of 18
- Individuals who can wear an EEG net for 30 minutes
- Individuals who can sit quietly for at least 15 minutes
- Individuals who can walk unassisted for up to 10 minutes
- Individuals who can provide informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Individuals with a known disorder resulting in syncope/fainting during postural changes (e.g., POTS, orthostatic hypotension)
- Individuals with impaired function of the dominant hand
- Individuals with malignant hypertension
- Individuals with a known heart condition such as arrhythmia that results in an aberrant ECG recording
- Individuals with any implanted devices (i.e., pacemakers)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Chiropractic adjustmentParticipants will receive 6 weeks of chiropractic care. The frequency of care will be determined by the field clinician. Participants will have their spine assessed for the presence of vertebral subluxations per their clinician's normal and customary procedures. The adjustment technique(s) utilized by the field clinician will be at their discretion. | Procedure or surgery | Chiropractic |
Primary outcome
Recruitment rate
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Length of time needed to recruit target number of participants
Participant adherence rate
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Proportion of participants able to adhere to the testing \& treatment schedule
Participant tolerability rate
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Proportion of participants able to perform all aspects of the testing regimen
Participant retention rate
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Proportion of enrolled participants who complete the full testing regimen
Acceptability of treatment regimen for participants
Time frame: Week 6
9-item acceptability questionnaire
48 secondary outcomes
EEG resting state broadband power
Time frame: Day 1
EEG resting state broadband power
Time frame: Week 2
EEG resting state broadband power
Time frame: Week 6
EEG resting state functional connectivity
Time frame: Day 1
EEG resting state functional connectivity
Time frame: Week 2
EEG resting state functional connectivity
Time frame: Week 6
EEG evoked latency
Time frame: Day 1
EEG evoked latency
Time frame: Week 2
EEG evoked latency
Time frame: Week 6
EEG evoked amplitude
Time frame: Day 1
EEG evoked amplitude
Time frame: Week 2
EEG evoked amplitude
Time frame: Week 6
skin conductance level (SCL)
Time frame: Day 1
skin conductance level (SCL)
Time frame: Week 2
skin conductance level (SCL)
Time frame: Week 6
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) pre-ejection period (PEP)
Time frame: Day 1
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) pre-ejection period (PEP)
Time frame: Week 2
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) pre-ejection period (PEP)
Time frame: Week 6
ECG mean interbeat interval
Time frame: Day 1
ECG mean interbeat interval
Time frame: Week 2
ECG mean interbeat interval
Time frame: Week 6
ECG respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)
Time frame: Day 1
ECG respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)
Time frame: Week 2
ECG respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)
Time frame: Week 6
ECG de-trended fluctuation analysis
Time frame: Day 1
ECG de-trended fluctuation analysis
Time frame: Week 2
ECG de-trended fluctuation analysis
Time frame: Week 6
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) initial systolic time interval (ISTI)
Time frame: Day 1
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) initial systolic time interval (ISTI)
Time frame: Week 2
Impedance cardiogram (ICG) initial systolic time interval (ISTI)
Time frame: Week 6
Electrodermal activity (EDA) non-specific skin conductance responses (SCR)
Time frame: Day 1
Electrodermal activity (EDA) non-specific skin conductance responses (SCR)
Time frame: Week 2
Electrodermal activity (EDA) non-specific skin conductance responses (SCR)
Time frame: Week 6
Electrodermal activity (EDA) power spectral density (PSD)
Time frame: Day 1
Electrodermal activity (EDA) power spectral density (PSD)
Time frame: Week 2
Electrodermal activity (EDA) power spectral density (PSD)
Time frame: Week 6
Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS-31)
Time frame: Day 0
Composite Autonomic Symptom Score COMPASS-31)
Time frame: Day 1
Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS-31)
Time frame: Week 2
Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS-31)
Time frame: Week 6
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Aug 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Metabolic Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Natural History of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Fanconi Anemia
Fanconi Anemia, Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Osilodrostat for Glycemic Control in Mild Autonomous Cortisol Secretion (MACS) With Difficult-To-Control Type 2 Diabetes - A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Study
Mild Autonomous Cortisol Secretion (MACS), Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2)
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Whole-body Electrical Muscle Stimulation Exercise on Adults With Neuromuscular Disease
Neuromuscular Diseases (NMD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Genetics Branch Eligibility Screening Survey
Melanoma, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Effects of Meal Macronutrients on Postprandial Lipids
Nephrotic Syndrome, Lipodystrophy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tyson Perez, DC, PhD principal investigator
Life University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Chiropractic adjustment in people with Metabolic Syndrome, run by Life University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recruitment rate (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Aug 2024.