StrokeEarly Phase 1NCT05881096
Effectiveness of START (Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy) in Enhancing Arm Function Post-Stroke
A Early Phase 1 study testing START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy in people with Stroke, run by Arizona State University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of START (Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy) in improving arm function after a stroke. The main questions it aims to answer are 1) Does startle rehabilitation therapy improve functional arm performance after training on a specific task and 2) Can… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Jun 2022to Dec 2023
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- >18 years old
- Capacity to provide informed consent
- Cerebral stroke at least 6 months prior to testing
- Presence of severe-to-mild upper extremity impairment
- Corrected pure tone threshold (octave frequencies 250- 4000 Hz) norms for their age and gender. NOTE: Audiometry data will be collected for all participants by lab personnel trained by an audiologist in a sound-attenuated booth. The investigators expect that ~30% of participants will use hearing aids; the investigators will not exclude these individuals but rather include hearing aid use as a covariate in analyses.
Who cannot join
- Severe concurrent medical problems (e.g. uncontrolled cardiorespiratory impairment)
- Acute/painful condition/injury of upper extremity/spine that interfere with ability to participate.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Arizona State University
Tempe, Arizona, 85287
Claire F Honeycutt, PhD, 480-965-8453, claire.honeycutt@asu.edu
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of START (Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy) in Enhancing Upper Extremity Function Post-Stroke
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of START (Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy) in improving arm function after a stroke. The main questions it aims to answer are 1) Does startle rehabilitation therapy improve functional arm performance after training on a specific task and 2) Can training benefits, if any, be seen in other untrained tasks? Researchers will enroll participants across a wide range of upper extremity impairments post-stroke. Participants will be enrolled in three consecutive days of in-person training on an upper extremity task followed by a single-day follow-up session one month after training is completed. Each training session will last for approximately 3 hours per day. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups; 1) Arm training with START and 2) Arm training without START. Study participants and assessors will be blinded to the type of training received. Before the training, participants will be clinically assessed to determine impairment level. During training, participants will be asked to perform; 1) a simulated feed task which involves transferring kidney beans using a spoon from one cup (start position) to another cup (end position) in front of them OR 2) A functional reaching task where participants will maintain a tool (spoon) in their hand while extending their arm forward towards an end position based on the severity of arm impairment as determined by the clinical assessment. Researchers will compare the % change in trained task scores, muscle activity, and arm movement outcome measures at three-time points; baseline on day 1, at the end of training on day 3, and one month after training.
Read the detailed description
A patient's socioeconomic status (SES) should not predict their post-stroke disability but individuals with low SES are more disabled and have higher mortality rates compared to individuals with high SES. These inequities are not isolated to low- and middle-income countries. In the United States, individuals with low SES are more disabled at 3 months and less likely to be independently ambulatory or discharged to their own homes. There are many factors contributing to these outcomes; however, one critical feature is access to affordable care. Many newly developed rehabilitation therapies and technologies require expensive equipment (e.g. instrumented treadmills, transcranial magnetic stimulation) and extensive training for clinical staff. The extra costs (financial and training) ensure that these state-of-the-art options are only available at metropolitan, well-funded institutions or to individuals who can afford additional healthcare costs. There is an urgent need for accessible, low-cost solutions capable of being delivered at underfunded hospitals and to individuals with no or low insurance coverage.
Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy (START) represents an accessible and low-cost solution that can be delivered to rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. START is the application of a startling, acoustic stimulus alongside traditional therapy. Distinct from other auditory treatments (e.g. metronome, music), administration of a START represents an endogenous activation of the brainstem (i.e. reticular formation) a phenomenon referred to as startReact. Rather than being a standalone treatment, START is adjuvant. An adjuvant is considered the introduction of an agent (traditionally pharmacological) that contributes to or enhances an existing medical regimen. Similarly, START is applied within a standard clinical practice to enhance and accelerate skill re-learning through activation of the brainstem.
START has been advanced as an adjuvant therapy tool because of the profound way it enhances training outcomes in individuals with stroke, in particular severe stroke. This is particularly compelling given the high degree of difficulty in generating functional changes in individuals with chronic, severe stroke. There is emerging evidence that individuals with stroke strengthen ipsilateral reticulospinal connections during the process of recovery. Thus, START may represent a priming of the nervous system to engage the reticular formation, which is nearly always spared post-stroke, during therapy to enhance both training and long-term outcomes. Though provocative, there are critical gaps in the literature that are required before START can be deployed in the clinic. Here, the investigators propose to 1) perform a rigorous randomized controlled trial during tasks of functional significance (Aim 1), and 2) assess the capacity of START training to generalize to untrained tasks (Aim 2).
Aim 1: Evaluate the capacity of START to enhance training outcomes in individuals with stroke (iwS). The objective of this aim is to demonstrate that START can enhance tasks of clinical and functional significance like those performed during therapy. The investigators propose a randomized, single-blind, parallel, controlled trial evaluating the impact of START on training outcomes of a functional reaching task in iwS. Hypothesis 1: The rate of learning and retention will be larger during training with START compared to control (training without START).
Aim 2: Evaluate the generalizability of START training to untrained tasks. To be viable as an adjuvant clinical tool to enhance activities of daily living, training benefits attributable to START must translate beyond the specific tasks trained during therapy. The investigators propose to evaluate skill transference using sorting and dressing tasks. Hypothesis 2: Training with START will show higher skill transfer (e.g. time to complete sorting/dressing task) compared to training without START.
SIGNIFICANCE \& IMPACT Imagine the transformative impact of an inexpensive tool that could be implemented not only in well-funded, metropolitan hospitals but also in small, rural, and socioeconomically disadvantaged hospitals enhancing recovery for iwS regardless of disability severity, socioeconomic status, or location. Every year, $43,000,000,000 is paid for care and therapy of the 7,000,000 stroke survivors living in the US but six months post-stroke 65% of patients cannot use their impaired hand during activities of daily living (e.g. feeding, toileting) and 63.5% of stroke survivors will never achieve a total Fugl-Meyer score greater than 90/226 - i.e. severe disability. These statistics are worse for individuals with low SES. A recent, 2018 study demonstrated that patients from low SES backgrounds received less in-patient and out-patient care and were discharged more quickly leading to higher levels of disability and mortality.
If successful, this study will revolutionize treatment for stroke survivors because START is non-invasive, inexpensive, and mobile making it accessible to rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. START's application is a loud, acoustic stimulus timed with planned motor activity and can be administered via headphones. Unlike many new rehabilitation devices/techniques, START represents an extremely safe intervention (the application is a loud sound well beneath OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) regulations with no reported adverse reactions since its discovery. Thus, clinical staff training and safety protocols are minimal further decreasing application costs. Finally, it is mobile and easily packaged, so it can be administered via the increasing number of telemedicine programs designed for rural populations. Finally, START allows severe stroke survivors to participate in and benefit from therapy. The benefits of START are not contained to severe stroke survivors (e.g. improvement of hand extension in mildly disabled patients) but the capacity of START to work in severe patients significantly increases the potential of this tool to assist patients across all levels of disability.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy, Sham Control
- Keywords
- Hemiplegia, Upper extremity impairment
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Hemiplegia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation TherapyOther
Application of startling acoustic stimuli during practice of movement task
Sham ControlOther
Practice of movement task without START
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| START (Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy) | Experimental | Participants in this group practice a functional reaching task with the START condition (startling acoustic stimuli applied during 33% of trials). Receives: Other: START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy |
| Control | Sham comparator | Participants in this group will practice a functional reaching task without the START (Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy) intervention Receives: Other: Sham Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in EMG (electromyography) onset (in ms) during functional reaching task
Evaluation of EMG onset measured in milliseconds (ms) for different muscles of the affected / most affected arm. EMG activity will be recorded using Ag/Cl surface electrodes and onset will be detected using a custom MATLAB code.
Measured: Change in EMG onset from baseline (before training on day 1) to post (after training on day 3)
Change in EMG (electromyography) amplitude (in mV) during the functional reaching task
Evaluation of EMG amplitude measured in millivolts(mV) for different muscles of the affected / most affected arm. EMG activity will be recorded using Ag/Cl surface electrodes and amplitude will be detected using a custom MATLAB code.
Measured: Change in EMG amplitude from baseline (before training on day 1) to post (after training on day 3)
Change in movement onset (in ms) on functional reaching task
Evaluation of movement onset in milliseconds(ms). Movement activity will be measured using Infrared(IR) markers placed at fixed joint locations on the arm. Movement onset will be detected using a custom MATLAB code.
Measured: Change in movement onset from baseline (before training on day 1) to post (after training on day 3)
Change in movement linearity (in mm) on functional reaching task
Evaluation of movement linearity in millimeters (mm). Movement activity using Infrared(IR) markers placed at fixed joint locations on the arm. Movement linearity will be evaluated using a custom MATLAB code.
Measured: Change in movement linearity from baseline (before training on day 1) to post (after training on day 3)
Change in functional reaching task scores during training
The functional reaching task (simulated feeding task) is scored based on the number of successful repetitions i.e. the total number of kidney beans successfully transferred or dropped.
Measured: Change in functional reaching task scores from on day 1 of training compared to day 3 of training
Change in functional reaching task scores
The functional reaching task (simulated feeding task) is scored based on the number of successful repetitions i.e. the total number of kidney beans successfully transferred or dropped.
Measured: Change in functional reaching task scores from baseline (before training on day 1) to post (after training on day 3)
Change in sorting task scores
The change in sorting task scores will be used to evaluate skill transfer. The sorting evaluates an untrained task with spatiotemporally similar characteristics to the trained task. A higher score indicates a better performance.
Measured: Change in sorting task scores from baseline (before training on day 1) to post (after training on day 3)
Change in dressing task scores
The change in dressing task scores will be used to evaluate skill transfer. The dressing task evaluates an untrained task with spatiotemporally dissimilar characteristics to the trained task. A higher score indicates a better performance.
Measured: Change in dressing task scores from baseline (before training on day 1) to post (after training on day 3)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Retention in functional reaching task scores
Functional reaching task (Trained task - simulated feeding task). Functional reaching task scores is computed as the number of beans transferred and dropped within a given time frame.
Measured: Retention of functional reaching task comparing immediately after training on day 3 to one-month post
Retention in skill transfer 1 : sorting task scores
sorting task (untrained task) scores will be calculated as the number of blocks successfully transferred. The higher the number of blocks transferred (higher score), the better the performance.
Measured: Retention of sorting task comparing immediately after training on day 3 to one-month post
Retention in skill transfer 2: dressing task
dressing task (untrained task) scores will be computed as the number of buttons/velcro successfully fastened within a given time frame. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Measured: Retention of sorting task comparing immediately after training on day 3 to one-month post
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 May 2023
- Study start7 Jun 2022
- Primary completionJul 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Arizona State UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Arizona State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Claire Honeycutt, Arizona State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05881096
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00002440b
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 21 Feb 2023
- Last updated
- 1 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of START (Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy) in Enhancing Upper Extremity Function Post-Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05881096
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00002440b
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- Hemiplegia, Upper extremity impairment
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Arizona State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of START (Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy) in improving arm function after a stroke. The main questions it aims to answer are 1) Does startle rehabilitation therapy improve functional arm performance after training on a specific task and 2) Can training benefits, if any, be seen in other untrained tasks? Researchers will enroll participants across a wide range of upper extremity impairments post-stroke. Participants will be enrolled in three consecutive days of in-person training on an upper extremity task followed by a single-day follow-up session one month after training is completed. Each training session will last for approximately 3 hours per day. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups; 1) Arm training with START and 2) Arm training without START. Study participants and assessors will be blinded to the type of training received. Before the training, participants will be clinically assessed to determine impairment level. During training, participants will be asked to perform; 1) a simulated feed task which involves transferring kidney beans using a spoon from one cup (start position) to another cup (end position) in front of them OR 2) A functional reaching task where participants will maintain a tool (spoon) in their hand while extending their arm forward towards an end position based on the severity of arm impairment as determined by the clinical assessment. Researchers will compare the % change in trained task scores, muscle activity, and arm movement outcome measures at three-time points; baseline on day 1, at the end of training on day 3, and one month after training.
Detailed description
A patient's socioeconomic status (SES) should not predict their post-stroke disability but individuals with low SES are more disabled and have higher mortality rates compared to individuals with high SES. These inequities are not isolated to low- and middle-income countries. In the United States, individuals with low SES are more disabled at 3 months and less likely to be independently ambulatory or discharged to their own homes. There are many factors contributing to these outcomes; however, one critical feature is access to affordable care. Many newly developed rehabilitation therapies and technologies require expensive equipment (e.g. instrumented treadmills, transcranial magnetic stimulation) and extensive training for clinical staff. The extra costs (financial and training) ensure that these state-of-the-art options are only available at metropolitan, well-funded institutions or to individuals who can afford additional healthcare costs. There is an urgent need for accessible, low-cost solutions capable of being delivered at underfunded hospitals and to individuals with no or low insurance coverage.
Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy (START) represents an accessible and low-cost solution that can be delivered to rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. START is the application of a startling, acoustic stimulus alongside traditional therapy. Distinct from other auditory treatments (e.g. metronome, music), administration of a START represents an endogenous activation of the brainstem (i.e. reticular formation) a phenomenon referred to as startReact. Rather than being a standalone treatment, START is adjuvant. An adjuvant is considered the introduction of an agent (traditionally pharmacological) that contributes to or enhances an existing medical regimen. Similarly, START is applied within a standard clinical practice to enhance and accelerate skill re-learning through activation of the brainstem.
START has been advanced as an adjuvant therapy tool because of the profound way it enhances training outcomes in individuals with stroke, in particular severe stroke. This is particularly compelling given the high degree of difficulty in generating functional changes in individuals with chronic, severe stroke. There is emerging evidence that individuals with stroke strengthen ipsilateral reticulospinal connections during the process of recovery. Thus, START may represent a priming of the nervous system to engage the reticular formation, which is nearly always spared post-stroke, during therapy to enhance both training and long-term outcomes. Though provocative, there are critical gaps in the literature that are required before START can be deployed in the clinic. Here, the investigators propose to 1) perform a rigorous randomized controlled trial during tasks of functional significance (Aim 1), and 2) assess the capacity of START training to generalize to untrained tasks (Aim 2).
Aim 1: Evaluate the capacity of START to enhance training outcomes in individuals with stroke (iwS). The objective of this aim is to demonstrate that START can enhance tasks of clinical and functional significance like those performed during therapy. The investigators propose a randomized, single-blind, parallel, controlled trial evaluating the impact of START on training outcomes of a functional reaching task in iwS. Hypothesis 1: The rate of learning and retention will be larger during training with START compared to control (training without START).
Aim 2: Evaluate the generalizability of START training to untrained tasks. To be viable as an adjuvant clinical tool to enhance activities of daily living, training benefits attributable to START must translate beyond the specific tasks trained during therapy. The investigators propose to evaluate skill transference using sorting and dressing tasks. Hypothesis 2: Training with START will show higher skill transfer (e.g. time to complete sorting/dressing task) compared to training without START.
SIGNIFICANCE \& IMPACT Imagine the transformative impact of an inexpensive tool that could be implemented not only in well-funded, metropolitan hospitals but also in small, rural, and socioeconomically disadvantaged hospitals enhancing recovery for iwS regardless of disability severity, socioeconomic status, or location. Every year, $43,000,000,000 is paid for care and therapy of the 7,000,000 stroke survivors living in the US but six months post-stroke 65% of patients cannot use their impaired hand during activities of daily living (e.g. feeding, toileting) and 63.5% of stroke survivors will never achieve a total Fugl-Meyer score greater than 90/226 - i.e. severe disability. These statistics are worse for individuals with low SES. A recent, 2018 study demonstrated that patients from low SES backgrounds received less in-patient and out-patient care and were discharged more quickly leading to higher levels of disability and mortality.
If successful, this study will revolutionize treatment for stroke survivors because START is non-invasive, inexpensive, and mobile making it accessible to rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. START's application is a loud, acoustic stimulus timed with planned motor activity and can be administered via headphones. Unlike many new rehabilitation devices/techniques, START represents an extremely safe intervention (the application is a loud sound well beneath OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) regulations with no reported adverse reactions since its discovery. Thus, clinical staff training and safety protocols are minimal further decreasing application costs. Finally, it is mobile and easily packaged, so it can be administered via the increasing number of telemedicine programs designed for rural populations. Finally, START allows severe stroke survivors to participate in and benefit from therapy. The benefits of START are not contained to severe stroke survivors (e.g. improvement of hand extension in mildly disabled patients) but the capacity of START to work in severe patients significantly increases the potential of this tool to assist patients across all levels of disability.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| START (Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy) | Experimental | Other: START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation TherapyParticipants in this group practice a functional reaching task with the START condition (startling acoustic stimuli applied during 33% of trials). |
| Control | Sham comparator | Other: Sham ControlParticipants in this group will practice a functional reaching task without the START (Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy) intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- >18 years old
- Capacity to provide informed consent
- Cerebral stroke at least 6 months prior to testing
- Presence of severe-to-mild upper extremity impairment
- Corrected pure tone threshold (octave frequencies 250- 4000 Hz) norms for their age and gender. NOTE: Audiometry data will be collected for all participants by lab personnel trained by an audiologist in a sound-attenuated booth. The investigators expect that ~30% of participants will use hearing aids; the investigators will not exclude these individuals but rather include hearing aid use as a covariate in analyses.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Severe concurrent medical problems (e.g. uncontrolled cardiorespiratory impairment)
- Acute/painful condition/injury of upper extremity/spine that interfere with ability to participate.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation TherapyApplication of startling acoustic stimuli during practice of movement task | Other | START (Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy) |
| Sham ControlPractice of movement task without START | Other | Control |
Primary outcome
Change in EMG (electromyography) onset (in ms) during functional reaching task
Time frame: Change in EMG onset from baseline (before training on day 1) to post (after training on day 3)
Evaluation of EMG onset measured in milliseconds (ms) for different muscles of the affected / most affected arm. EMG activity will be recorded using Ag/Cl surface electrodes and onset will be detected using a custom MATLAB code.
Change in EMG (electromyography) amplitude (in mV) during the functional reaching task
Time frame: Change in EMG amplitude from baseline (before training on day 1) to post (after training on day 3)
Evaluation of EMG amplitude measured in millivolts(mV) for different muscles of the affected / most affected arm. EMG activity will be recorded using Ag/Cl surface electrodes and amplitude will be detected using a custom MATLAB code.
Change in movement onset (in ms) on functional reaching task
Time frame: Change in movement onset from baseline (before training on day 1) to post (after training on day 3)
Evaluation of movement onset in milliseconds(ms). Movement activity will be measured using Infrared(IR) markers placed at fixed joint locations on the arm. Movement onset will be detected using a custom MATLAB code.
Change in movement linearity (in mm) on functional reaching task
Time frame: Change in movement linearity from baseline (before training on day 1) to post (after training on day 3)
Evaluation of movement linearity in millimeters (mm). Movement activity using Infrared(IR) markers placed at fixed joint locations on the arm. Movement linearity will be evaluated using a custom MATLAB code.
Change in functional reaching task scores during training
Time frame: Change in functional reaching task scores from on day 1 of training compared to day 3 of training
The functional reaching task (simulated feeding task) is scored based on the number of successful repetitions i.e. the total number of kidney beans successfully transferred or dropped.
Change in functional reaching task scores
Time frame: Change in functional reaching task scores from baseline (before training on day 1) to post (after training on day 3)
The functional reaching task (simulated feeding task) is scored based on the number of successful repetitions i.e. the total number of kidney beans successfully transferred or dropped.
Change in sorting task scores
Time frame: Change in sorting task scores from baseline (before training on day 1) to post (after training on day 3)
The change in sorting task scores will be used to evaluate skill transfer. The sorting evaluates an untrained task with spatiotemporally similar characteristics to the trained task. A higher score indicates a better performance.
Change in dressing task scores
Time frame: Change in dressing task scores from baseline (before training on day 1) to post (after training on day 3)
The change in dressing task scores will be used to evaluate skill transfer. The dressing task evaluates an untrained task with spatiotemporally dissimilar characteristics to the trained task. A higher score indicates a better performance.
3 secondary outcomes
Retention in functional reaching task scores
Time frame: Retention of functional reaching task comparing immediately after training on day 3 to one-month post
Retention in skill transfer 1 : sorting task scores
Time frame: Retention of sorting task comparing immediately after training on day 3 to one-month post
Retention in skill transfer 2: dressing task
Time frame: Retention of sorting task comparing immediately after training on day 3 to one-month post
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jun 2023.
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy in people with Stroke, run by Arizona State University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Claire F Honeycutt, Ph.D (480- 965-8453, cfhoneyc@asu.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in EMG (electromyography) onset (in ms) during functional reaching task (time frame: Change in EMG onset from baseline (before training on day 1) to post (after training on day 3)). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2023.