Enteral NutritionENINCONCT05879263
"Efficacy of Intermittent Enteral Nutrition Versus Continuous Administration in Intensive Care"
A study testing INTERMITTENT ENTERAL NUTRITITION (IEN) and CONTINUOS ENTERAL NUTRITITION (CEN) in people with Enteral Nutrition and Critical Care, run by Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to Determine efficacy of intermittent enteral nutrition vs continuous enteral nutrition in adults patients with a nasogastric tube in a intensive care unit. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Enteral Nutrition, Critical Care, Feeding Methods
- What is being tested?
- INTERMITTENT ENTERAL NUTRITITION (IEN) and CONTINUOS ENTERAL NUTRITITION (CEN)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 190 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 10 Feb 2022to 30 Apr 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients admitted to ICU of University General Hospital of Albacete
- Need for enteral nutrition by nasogastric tube in the first 48 hours
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Insulin dependent diabetic patients
- Abdominal surgery
- Dire prognosis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Maria Dolores Saiz Vinuesa
Albacete, 02008
MARIA DOLORES MD SAIZ VINUESA, NURSE, 629167321, tebisama@hotmail.com
FRANCISCA F CALERO YÁNEZ, NURSE
About this study
Official title: "Efficacy of Intermittent Enteral Nutrition Versus Continuous Administration in Intensive Care Patients for the Reduction of Complications. Randomized Clinical Trial"
The goal of this clinical trial is to Determine efficacy of intermittent enteral nutrition vs continuous enteral nutrition in adults patients with a nasogastric tube in a intensive care unit.
The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Reduction of gastrointestinal and respiratory complications
- Evaluate the achievement of the caloric objective Informed consent will be requested from participants who meet the inclusion criteria.
The participants will be randomized into two groups: control group (continuous enteral nutrition) or experimental group (intermittent enteral nutrition) Researchers will compare intermittent enteral nutrition vs continuous to see if there is a reduction in gastrointestinal and respiratory complications.
- Being tested
- INTERMITTENT ENTERAL NUTRITITION (IEN), CONTINUOS ENTERAL NUTRITITION (CEN)
- Keywords
- Gastric Emptying, Diarrea, Vomiting, Respiratory Aspiration of Gastric Content, Caloric Intake, Enteral nutrition, Critical care
- Medical subject headings
- Vomiting
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
INTERMITTENT ENTERAL NUTRITITION (IEN)Other
Administration of Enteral Nutriton (EN) by nasogastric tube in 4 bolus (24h): Duration of the infusion 1hour each shot, using an infusion pump.
CONTINUOS ENTERAL NUTRITITION (CEN)Other
Administration of Enteral Nutriton (EN) by nasogastric tube during 24 hours, using an infusion pump.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| INTERMITTENT ENTERAL NUTRITITION (IEN) | Experimental | Administration of Enteral Nutriton (EN) by nasogastric tube in 4 bolus (24h): Duration of the infusion 1hour each shot, using an infusion pump. Receives: Other: INTERMITTENT ENTERAL NUTRITITION (IEN) |
| CONTINUOUS ENTERAL NUTRITION (CEN) | Active comparator | Administration of Enteral Nutriton (EN) by nasogastric tube during 24 hours, using an infusion pump. Receives: Other: CONTINUOS ENTERAL NUTRITITION (CEN) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Respiratory Complications
Respiratory aspiration of gastric content
Measured: during ICU stay (maximum 15 days)
Gastrointestinal Complications
Digestive intolerance: Diarrhea, vomiting, increased gastric residual volume(GRV)
Measured: during ICU stay (maximum 15 days)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Achievement of the caloric objective
Time in hours to reach caloric goal
Measured: during ICU stay (up to 15 days)
Nutritional status: MNA
Measure with:Mini Nutritional Assessment,(MNA) 12-14 points: Normal nutritional status 8-11 points: risk of malnutrition 0-7 points: Malnutrition
Measured: up to two days after admission to the ICU
Changes in blood glucose
Episodes of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia
Measured: during ICU stay (maximum 15 days)
ICU Stay
Days of stay in ICU
Measured: From date of randomization until 100 months
Mortality
Percentage of deaths in ICU
Measured: until the date of death from any cause until 100 months
Change of type of EN administration
Change of EN administration modality
Measured: during ICU stay (maximum 15 days)
Nutritional status:Glim Criteria
Measure with: Glim criteria: Phenotypic criteria:Non-volitional weight loss (%) Low BMI (kg/m2)Reduced muscle mass(calf circumference (cm)) Etiologic criteria: Reduced food intake or assimilation. Inflammation
*Requires at least one phenotypic criterion and one etiologic criterion for the diagnosis of malnutrition
Measured: up to two days after admission to the ICU
Nutritional status: Biochemical values
Measure with:biochemical values: albumin, prealbumin, total protein
Measured: up to two days after admission to the ICU
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 May 2023
- Study start10 Feb 2022
- Primary completion29 Feb 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Apr 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Enteral NutritionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The patients wil be allocated to expriemental group or control group using a simple randomization sequence. There is an allocation concealment using sealed opaque envelopes Duration: From February 2022 to complete sample number.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 190 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Castilla-La Mancha
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Maria Dolores Saiz Vinuesa, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete
- Investigators
- M.Dolores Saiz-Vinuesa, NURSE, Principal investigator, Gerencia de Atención Integrada de Albacete
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05879263
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHUA_59_07_2021
- Acronym
- ENINCO
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 3 May 2023
- Last updated
- 30 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Chen YC. Critical analysis of the factors associated with enteral feeding in preventing VAP: a systematic review. J Chin Med Assoc. 2009 Apr;72(4):171-8. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70049-8.
PubMed 19372071Lewis SR, Schofield-Robinson OJ, Alderson P, Smith AF. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition and enteral versus a combination of enteral and parenteral nutrition for adults in the intensive care unit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 8;6(6):CD012276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012276.pub2.
PubMed 29883514Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, Alhazzani W, Calder PC, Casaer MP, Hiesmayr M, Mayer K, Montejo JC, Pichard C, Preiser JC, van Zanten ARH, Oczkowski S, Szczeklik W, Bischoff SC. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2019 Feb;38(1):48-79. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.037. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
PubMed 30348463Patel JJ, Rosenthal MD, Heyland DK. Intermittent versus continuous feeding in critically ill adults. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2018 Mar;21(2):116-120. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000447.
PubMed 29232262Tavares de Araujo VM, Gomes PC, Caporossi C. Enteral nutrition in critical patients; should the administration be continuous or intermittent? Nutr Hosp. 2014 Mar 1;29(3):563-7. doi: 10.3305/nh.2014.29.3.7169.
PubMed 24559000Serpa LF, Kimura M, Faintuch J, Ceconello I. Effects of continuous versus bolus infusion of enteral nutrition in critical patients. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2003 Jan-Feb;58(1):9-14. doi: 10.1590/s0041-87812003000100003. Epub 2003 Apr 30.
PubMed 12754584Ichimaru S. Methods of Enteral Nutrition Administration in Critically Ill Patients: Continuous, Cyclic, Intermittent, and Bolus Feeding. Nutr Clin Pract. 2018 Dec;33(6):790-795. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10105. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
PubMed 29924423Thong D, Halim Z, Chia J, Chua F, Wong A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of continuous vs intermittent enteral nutrition in critically ill adults. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022 Aug;46(6):1243-1257. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2324. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
PubMed 34965317Heffernan AJ, Talekar C, Henain M, Purcell L, Palmer M, White H. Comparison of continuous versus intermittent enteral feeding in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2022 Oct 25;26(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04140-8.
PubMed 36284334
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- "Efficacy of Intermittent Enteral Nutrition Versus Continuous Administration in Intensive Care Patients for the Reduction of Complications. Randomized Clinical Trial"
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05879263
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ENINCO / CHUA_59_07_2021
- Keywords
- Gastric Emptying, Diarrea, Vomiting, Respiratory Aspiration of Gastric Content, Caloric Intake, Enteral nutrition, Critical care
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 190 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de AlbaceteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Castilla-La Mancha
- Study start
- 10 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Feb 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to Determine efficacy of intermittent enteral nutrition vs continuous enteral nutrition in adults patients with a nasogastric tube in a intensive care unit.
The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
- Reduction of gastrointestinal and respiratory complications
- Evaluate the achievement of the caloric objective Informed consent will be requested from participants who meet the inclusion criteria.
The participants will be randomized into two groups: control group (continuous enteral nutrition) or experimental group (intermittent enteral nutrition) Researchers will compare intermittent enteral nutrition vs continuous to see if there is a reduction in gastrointestinal and respiratory complications.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The patients wil be allocated to expriemental group or control group using a simple randomization sequence. There is an allocation concealment using sealed opaque envelopes Duration: From February 2022 to complete sample number.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| INTERMITTENT ENTERAL NUTRITITION (IEN) | Experimental | Other: INTERMITTENT ENTERAL NUTRITITION (IEN)Administration of Enteral Nutriton (EN) by nasogastric tube in 4 bolus (24h): Duration of the infusion 1hour each shot, using an infusion pump. |
| CONTINUOUS ENTERAL NUTRITION (CEN) | Active comparator | Other: CONTINUOS ENTERAL NUTRITITION (CEN)Administration of Enteral Nutriton (EN) by nasogastric tube during 24 hours, using an infusion pump. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients admitted to ICU of University General Hospital of Albacete
- Need for enteral nutrition by nasogastric tube in the first 48 hours
- Signed informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Insulin dependent diabetic patients
- Abdominal surgery
- Dire prognosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| INTERMITTENT ENTERAL NUTRITITION (IEN)Administration of Enteral Nutriton (EN) by nasogastric tube in 4 bolus (24h): Duration of the infusion 1hour each shot, using an infusion pump. | Other | INTERMITTENT ENTERAL NUTRITITION (IEN) |
| CONTINUOS ENTERAL NUTRITITION (CEN)Administration of Enteral Nutriton (EN) by nasogastric tube during 24 hours, using an infusion pump. | Other | CONTINUOUS ENTERAL NUTRITION (CEN) |
Primary outcome
Respiratory Complications
Time frame: during ICU stay (maximum 15 days)
Respiratory aspiration of gastric content
Gastrointestinal Complications
Time frame: during ICU stay (maximum 15 days)
Digestive intolerance: Diarrhea, vomiting, increased gastric residual volume(GRV)
8 secondary outcomes
Achievement of the caloric objective
Time frame: during ICU stay (up to 15 days)
Nutritional status: MNA
Time frame: up to two days after admission to the ICU
Changes in blood glucose
Time frame: during ICU stay (maximum 15 days)
ICU Stay
Time frame: From date of randomization until 100 months
Mortality
Time frame: until the date of death from any cause until 100 months
Change of type of EN administration
Time frame: during ICU stay (maximum 15 days)
Nutritional status:Glim Criteria
Time frame: up to two days after admission to the ICU
Nutritional status: Biochemical values
Time frame: up to two days after admission to the ICU
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 May 2023.
- Background: PubMed 19372071Chen YC. Critical analysis of the factors associated with enteral feeding in preventing VAP: a systematic review. J Chin Med Assoc. 2009 Apr;72(4):171-8. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70049-8.
- Results publication: PubMed 29883514Lewis SR, Schofield-Robinson OJ, Alderson P, Smith AF. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition and enteral versus a combination of enteral and parenteral nutrition for adults in the intensive care unit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 8;6(6):CD012276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012276.pub2.
- Results publication: PubMed 30348463Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, Alhazzani W, Calder PC, Casaer MP, Hiesmayr M, Mayer K, Montejo JC, Pichard C, Preiser JC, van Zanten ARH, Oczkowski S, Szczeklik W, Bischoff SC. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2019 Feb;38(1):48-79. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.037. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
- Results publication: PubMed 29232262Patel JJ, Rosenthal MD, Heyland DK. Intermittent versus continuous feeding in critically ill adults. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2018 Mar;21(2):116-120. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000447.
- Results publication: PubMed 24559000Tavares de Araujo VM, Gomes PC, Caporossi C. Enteral nutrition in critical patients; should the administration be continuous or intermittent? Nutr Hosp. 2014 Mar 1;29(3):563-7. doi: 10.3305/nh.2014.29.3.7169.
- Results publication: PubMed 12754584Serpa LF, Kimura M, Faintuch J, Ceconello I. Effects of continuous versus bolus infusion of enteral nutrition in critical patients. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2003 Jan-Feb;58(1):9-14. doi: 10.1590/s0041-87812003000100003. Epub 2003 Apr 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 29924423Ichimaru S. Methods of Enteral Nutrition Administration in Critically Ill Patients: Continuous, Cyclic, Intermittent, and Bolus Feeding. Nutr Clin Pract. 2018 Dec;33(6):790-795. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10105. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
- Results publication: PubMed 34965317Thong D, Halim Z, Chia J, Chua F, Wong A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of continuous vs intermittent enteral nutrition in critically ill adults. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022 Aug;46(6):1243-1257. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2324. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 36284334Heffernan AJ, Talekar C, Henain M, Purcell L, Palmer M, White H. Comparison of continuous versus intermittent enteral feeding in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2022 Oct 25;26(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04140-8.
- Effectiveness of continuous enteral nutrition versus intermittent enteral nutrition in intensive care patients: a systematic review.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Enteral Nutrition
RecruitingPhase 3
Canadian Critical Care Comparative Effectiveness Platform
Intensive Care Unit ICU, Vasopressor
Not yet recruitingObservational study
FACTORS AFFECTİNG ENTERAL FEEDİNG INTOLERANCE İN INTENSİVE CARE UNİT PATİENTS
Patients Who Receive Enteral Nutrition for at Least 72 Hours in the Intensive Care Unit Will be Included in the Study
Enrolling by invitation
Partial Enteral Nutrition as Therapeutic Augmentation of Advanced Pharmacological Therapy in Patients With Active Crohn's Disease
Crohn's Disease, Active
Not yet recruiting
Short-Term Enteral Nutrition for Infants With Bronchiolitis in Pediatric Emergency Departments
Bronchiolitis, Clinical Phenotype
Recruiting
Effects of Enteral Feeding Regimens on NEC, Mortality, and Neurodevelopment in Very Preterm Infants
Very Preterm Infant, Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
M.Dolores Saiz-Vinuesa, NURSE principal investigator
Gerencia de Atención Integrada de Albacete
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing INTERMITTENT ENTERAL NUTRITITION (IEN) and CONTINUOS ENTERAL NUTRITITION (CEN) in people with Enteral Nutrition and Critical Care, run by Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact M.Dolores Saiz-Vinuesa, NURSE (0034967597100 ext. 21686, tebisama@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Respiratory Complications (time frame: during ICU stay (maximum 15 days)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05879263, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2023.