Voice Disorders in ChildrenNCT05878197
Effect of Semi-occluded Vocal Tract Therapy on the Phonation of Children With Vocal Fold Nodules
A study testing Straw phonation, Resonant voice therapy and Vocal Hygiene in people with Voice Disorders in Children and Vocal Nodules in Children, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine and compare the effects of different voice therapy programs in children with vocal fold nodules. Vocal fold nodules are non-cancerous growths on the vocal folds which cause hoarseness. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 12 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Voice Disorders in Children, Vocal Nodules in Children, Hoarseness
- What is being tested?
- Straw phonation, Resonant voice therapy and Vocal Hygiene
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 29 Jul 2019to 3 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 12 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- children aged between 6 and 12 years (primary school)
- diagnosed with vocal fold nodules by an otorhinolaryngologist and speech-language pathologist experienced in voice diagnostics.
Who cannot join
- nasal or ear diseases
- neurological disorders
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Semi-occluded Vocal Tract Therapy on the Phonation of Children With Vocal Fold Nodules.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine and compare the effects of different voice therapy programs in children with vocal fold nodules. Vocal fold nodules are non-cancerous growths on the vocal folds which cause hoarseness. The main questions this trial aims to answer are:
- What are the short-term effects of the new voice therapy program 'straw phonation' and a more traditional 'resonant voice therapy' program on (a) the vocal quality, (b) the size of the growths on the vocal folds, and (c) the overall functioning in children with vocal fold nodules? During straw phonation exercises, you make sound through a drinking straw. During resonant voice therapy exercises or 'humming', you make an 'm' sound as you breathe out.
- What are the long-term effects of these voice therapy programs?
Read more
Participants will receive a short-term intensive voice therapy program of four days. The researchers will compare the straw phonation group, resonant voice therapy group and control group to see if voice therapy works well in treating children with vocal fold nodules.
The researchers hypothesize that straw phonation will have better results than resonant voice therapy. Straw phonation exercises are easier for children because they use an external tool (the straw) and less self-correction is needed.
Read the detailed description
Background:
The main goal of voice therapy in children with vocal fold nodules is to improve their communication, vocal quality and wellbeing. However, in this population, efficacy or effectiveness studies of voice therapy are extremely limited and show methodological shortcomings. There is an urgent need to understand the impact of different semi-occluded vocal tract (SOVT) techniques on the multidimensional facets of voice, as these SOVT exercises are frequently used in clinical practice. The common feature of these exercises is a reduction in the cross-sectional area of the vocal tract while voicing. Results of this project will have an impact on evidence-based voice therapy in children and consequently on reimbursement agreements of the health care system in the future. This fundamental research regarding the impact of SOVT techniques on the voice can also lead to the development and improvement of SOVT techniques.
Purposes:
- The first purpose of this project is to determine and compare the short-term effect of a "non-intuitive" SOVT therapy program (straw phonation) with a more traditional "intuitive" resonant voice therapy program of one week on (a) the vocal quality, (b) the laryngeal anatomy and function, and (c) the psychosocial wellbeing in children (aged between 6 and 12 years) with vocal fold nodules using a randomized sham-controlled trial.
- The second purpose of this project is to determine and compare the long-term effect of these voice therapy programs on (a) the vocal quality, (b) the laryngeal anatomy and function, and (c) the psychosocial wellbeing of the children.
Hypotheses:
Giving the promising physics of an SOVT, a positive short-term effect of straw phonation and resonant voice therapy is hypothesized. However, the non-intuitive technique straw phonation is expected to be in favor for a pediatric population. For these exercises, semi-occlusions are created by an external tool and instructions, feedback, and self-corrections can be reduced to a minimum. These factors might lead to faster results, which might in turn reduce feelings of frustration and demotivation by the children.
Study design:
A longitudinal randomized sham-controlled trial will be used. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the 2 treatment groups "straw phonation", "resonant voice therapy", or the control group receiving a "sham treatment".
Innovativity:
This research will be innovative because of (a) the topic and study population (SOVT in children between 6 and 12 years) which is an underexposed domain in literature; (b) the methods investigating multidimensional facets of voice (c) the randomized sham-controlled study design using a large study group, a control group receiving sham treatment, random allocation of participants and blinded assessors and (d) the combination of short-term and long-term outcome.
Participants:
Inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria are described further in the application.
Voice assessment:
A standardized and multidimensional voice assessment including both objective and subjective vocal outcomes will be performed to evaluate the participants' voice pre and post-therapy, and at 3 months and 6 months follow-up. The multidimensional voice assessment will consist of the following outcomes: (a) vocal quality, (b) laryngeal anatomy and function, and c) psychosocial wellbeing. Assessments (a) and (c) will be performed in a sound-treated room at Ghent University Hospital by speech-language pathologists experienced in voice diagnostics. Assessments (b) will be performed by experienced otorhinolaryngologist. All assessors will be blinded to group allocation and study evolution. A detailed overview of the outcome characteristics is described further in the application.
Voice therapy:
The content of the different therapy arms / interventions is described further in the application.
Statistical analysis:
Linear mixed model analyses (LMM) will be used to determine whether there is a difference in evolution between the groups over time. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni corrections will uncover specific within and between group differences. Intraclass correlation coefficients models and Cohen's κ will be used to determine inter- ant intrarater reliability.
- Being tested
- Straw phonation, Resonant voice therapy, Vocal Hygiene
- Keywords
- semi-occluded vocal tract therapy, straw phonation, resonant voice therapy, vocal hygiene
- Medical subject headings
- Hoarseness, Dysphonia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Straw phonationBehavioural
The two experimental groups will receive either straw phonation therapy or resonant voice therapy. The hierarchical structure of the therapy sessions will be equal for the three programs. In each session, vocal rest pauses will be foreseen by playing games, performing drawing assignments, etc. This will make the therapy more pleasant and less intensive. All voice therapy programs will be guided by the same experienced voice therapist.
Content:
Day 1: counseling (anatomy and physiology of the voice and vocal fold nodules), vocal hygiene recommendations (water intake, avoiding vocal misuse and abuse) Day 2: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations, straw phonation on vowel and syllable level, pitch variations Day 3: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations, straw phonation on word and sentence level, pitch variations Day 4: straw phonation in spontaneous speech, combination exercises
Resonant voice therapyBehavioural
The two experimental groups will receive either straw phonation therapy or resonant voice therapy. The hierarchical structure of the therapy sessions will be equal for the three programs. In each session, vocal rest pauses will be foreseen by playing games, performing drawing assignments, etc. This will make the therapy more pleasant and less intensive. All voice therapy programs will be guided by the same experienced voice therapist.
Content:
Day 1: counseling (anatomy and physiology of the voice and vocal fold nodules), vocal hygiene recommendations (water intake, avoiding vocal misuse and abuse) Day 2: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations, resonant voice therapy on vowel and syllable level, pitch variations Day 3: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations, resonant voice therapy on word and sentence level, pitch variations Day 4: resonant voice therapy in spontaneous speech, combination exercises
Vocal HygieneBehavioural
Participants of the control group will receive a sham treatment, including the exact same games, drawing assignments, etc. as in the experimental groups. However, no SOVT or other active vocal techniques will be practiced. Vocal hygiene guidelines (e.g. avoid screaming, imitating voices, sufficient hydration etc.) will be kept equally in the four groups. All voice therapy programs will be guided by the same experienced voice therapist.
Content:
Day 1: counseling (anatomy and physiology of the voice and vocal fold nodules), vocal hygiene recommendations (water intake, avoiding vocal misuse and abuse) Day 2: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations Day 3: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations Day 4: combination exercises
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group 1 - Straw Phonation | Experimental | Short-term intensive voice therapy program of one week (3 hours a day for 4 consecutive days): straw phonation and vocal hygiene recommendations Receives: Behavioral: Straw phonation |
| Experimental group 2 - Resonant Voice Therapy | Experimental | Short-term intensive voice therapy program of one week (3 hours a day for 4 consecutive days): resonant voice therapy and vocal hygiene recommendations Receives: Behavioral: Resonant voice therapy |
| Control group | Sham comparator | Short-term intensive voice therapy program of one week (3 hours a day for 4 consecutive days): vocal hygiene recommendations Receives: Behavioral: Vocal Hygiene |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Dysphonia Severity Index
The dysphonia severity index (DSI) is a multiparametric score to quantify vocal capabilities. It is based on a weighted combination of 4 voice parameters: maximum phonation time (MPT, s), highest frequency (F-high, Hz), lowest intensity (I-low, dB) and jitter (%). The DSI is constructed as 0.13 MPT + 0.0053 F-high - 0.26 I-low - 1.18 jitter +12.4. The index ranges from -5 to +5. A score above +1.6 is considered normal. A higher score corresponds with better voice quality / vocal capacities.
Measured: pre: one day before therapy, day 0; post: immediately after last therapy session, day 4
Change in Acoustic Voice Quality Index
The acoustic voice quality index (AVQI) is a multiparametric score to quantify vocal quality. It is based on a weighted combination of 6 voice parameters: smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS), harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), shimmer local (SL), shimmer local dB (SLdB), general slope of the spectrum (slope) and tilt of the regression line through the spectrum (tilt). The formula is constructed as 9.072 - 0.245 × CPPs - 0.161 × HNR - 0.470 × SL + 6.158 × SLdB - 0.071 × Slope - 0.170 × Tilt and ranges from 0 to 10. A lower score correlates with a better vocal quality.
Measured: pre: one day before therapy, day 0; post: immediately after last therapy session, day 4
Change in Pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI)
The pediatric voice handicap index (pVHI) is a questionnaire to investigate children's voice-related quality of life, completed by the parents. The index ranges from 0 to 92. A higher score correlates with more psychosocial impact of the voice disorder.
Measured: pre: one day before therapy, day 0; post: immediately after last therapy session, day 4
Change in Overall Severity From Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice
This tool is designed to describe the severity of dysphonia by rating six parameters (overall severity, roughness, breathiness, strain, pitch, and loudness) on a visual-analog scale from 0 to 100, where 0 is considered within normal limits. A higher score corresponds with worse voice quality.
Measured: pre: one day before therapy, day 0; post: immediately after last therapy session, day 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2023
- Study start29 Jul 2019
- Primary completion3 Apr 2023
- Study completion3 Apr 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Voice Disorders in ChildrenStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, GhentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Ghent
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kristiane Van Lierde, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Ghent
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05878197
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B670201936069 (BC-04563)
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 18 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 10 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hartnick C, Ballif C, De Guzman V, Sataloff R, Campisi P, Kerschner J, Shembel A, Reda D, Shi H, Sheryka Zacny E, Bunting G. Indirect vs Direct Voice Therapy for Children With Vocal Nodules: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Feb 1;144(2):156-163. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.2618.
PubMed 29270612Kapsner-Smith MR, Hunter EJ, Kirkham K, Cox K, Titze IR. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Semi-Occluded Vocal Tract Voice Therapy Protocols. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun;58(3):535-49. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-13-0231.
PubMed 25675335Carding PN, Roulstone S, Northstone K; ALSPAC Study Team. The prevalence of childhood dysphonia: a cross-sectional study. J Voice. 2006 Dec;20(4):623-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
PubMed 16360302Meerschman I, Van Lierde K, Van Puyvelde C, Bostyn A, Claeys S, D'haeseleer E. Massed versus spaced practice in vocology: effect of a short-term intensive voice training versus a longer-term traditional voice training. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Mar;53(2):393-404. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12358. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
PubMed 29205707
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Semi-occluded Vocal Tract Therapy on the Phonation of Children With Vocal Fold Nodules.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05878197
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B670201936069 (BC-04563)
- Keywords
- semi-occluded vocal tract therapy, straw phonation, resonant voice therapy, vocal hygiene
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, GhentUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 29 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Apr 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 10 Oct 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine and compare the effects of different voice therapy programs in children with vocal fold nodules. Vocal fold nodules are non-cancerous growths on the vocal folds which cause hoarseness. The main questions this trial aims to answer are:
- What are the short-term effects of the new voice therapy program 'straw phonation' and a more traditional 'resonant voice therapy' program on (a) the vocal quality, (b) the size of the growths on the vocal folds, and (c) the overall functioning in children with vocal fold nodules? During straw phonation exercises, you make sound through a drinking straw. During resonant voice therapy exercises or 'humming', you make an 'm' sound as you breathe out.
- What are the long-term effects of these voice therapy programs?
Participants will receive a short-term intensive voice therapy program of four days. The researchers will compare the straw phonation group, resonant voice therapy group and control group to see if voice therapy works well in treating children with vocal fold nodules.
The researchers hypothesize that straw phonation will have better results than resonant voice therapy. Straw phonation exercises are easier for children because they use an external tool (the straw) and less self-correction is needed.
Detailed description
Background:
The main goal of voice therapy in children with vocal fold nodules is to improve their communication, vocal quality and wellbeing. However, in this population, efficacy or effectiveness studies of voice therapy are extremely limited and show methodological shortcomings. There is an urgent need to understand the impact of different semi-occluded vocal tract (SOVT) techniques on the multidimensional facets of voice, as these SOVT exercises are frequently used in clinical practice. The common feature of these exercises is a reduction in the cross-sectional area of the vocal tract while voicing. Results of this project will have an impact on evidence-based voice therapy in children and consequently on reimbursement agreements of the health care system in the future. This fundamental research regarding the impact of SOVT techniques on the voice can also lead to the development and improvement of SOVT techniques.
Purposes:
- The first purpose of this project is to determine and compare the short-term effect of a "non-intuitive" SOVT therapy program (straw phonation) with a more traditional "intuitive" resonant voice therapy program of one week on (a) the vocal quality, (b) the laryngeal anatomy and function, and (c) the psychosocial wellbeing in children (aged between 6 and 12 years) with vocal fold nodules using a randomized sham-controlled trial.
- The second purpose of this project is to determine and compare the long-term effect of these voice therapy programs on (a) the vocal quality, (b) the laryngeal anatomy and function, and (c) the psychosocial wellbeing of the children.
Hypotheses:
Giving the promising physics of an SOVT, a positive short-term effect of straw phonation and resonant voice therapy is hypothesized. However, the non-intuitive technique straw phonation is expected to be in favor for a pediatric population. For these exercises, semi-occlusions are created by an external tool and instructions, feedback, and self-corrections can be reduced to a minimum. These factors might lead to faster results, which might in turn reduce feelings of frustration and demotivation by the children.
Study design:
A longitudinal randomized sham-controlled trial will be used. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the 2 treatment groups "straw phonation", "resonant voice therapy", or the control group receiving a "sham treatment".
Innovativity:
This research will be innovative because of (a) the topic and study population (SOVT in children between 6 and 12 years) which is an underexposed domain in literature; (b) the methods investigating multidimensional facets of voice (c) the randomized sham-controlled study design using a large study group, a control group receiving sham treatment, random allocation of participants and blinded assessors and (d) the combination of short-term and long-term outcome.
Participants:
Inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria are described further in the application.
Voice assessment:
A standardized and multidimensional voice assessment including both objective and subjective vocal outcomes will be performed to evaluate the participants' voice pre and post-therapy, and at 3 months and 6 months follow-up. The multidimensional voice assessment will consist of the following outcomes: (a) vocal quality, (b) laryngeal anatomy and function, and c) psychosocial wellbeing. Assessments (a) and (c) will be performed in a sound-treated room at Ghent University Hospital by speech-language pathologists experienced in voice diagnostics. Assessments (b) will be performed by experienced otorhinolaryngologist. All assessors will be blinded to group allocation and study evolution. A detailed overview of the outcome characteristics is described further in the application.
Voice therapy:
The content of the different therapy arms / interventions is described further in the application.
Statistical analysis:
Linear mixed model analyses (LMM) will be used to determine whether there is a difference in evolution between the groups over time. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni corrections will uncover specific within and between group differences. Intraclass correlation coefficients models and Cohen's κ will be used to determine inter- ant intrarater reliability.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group 1 - Straw Phonation | Experimental | Behavioral: Straw phonationShort-term intensive voice therapy program of one week (3 hours a day for 4 consecutive days): straw phonation and vocal hygiene recommendations |
| Experimental group 2 - Resonant Voice Therapy | Experimental | Behavioral: Resonant voice therapyShort-term intensive voice therapy program of one week (3 hours a day for 4 consecutive days): resonant voice therapy and vocal hygiene recommendations |
| Control group | Sham comparator | Behavioral: Vocal HygieneShort-term intensive voice therapy program of one week (3 hours a day for 4 consecutive days): vocal hygiene recommendations |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- children aged between 6 and 12 years (primary school)
- diagnosed with vocal fold nodules by an otorhinolaryngologist and speech-language pathologist experienced in voice diagnostics.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- nasal or ear diseases
- neurological disorders
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Straw phonationThe two experimental groups will receive either straw phonation therapy or resonant voice therapy. The hierarchical structure of the therapy sessions will be equal for the three programs. In each session, vocal rest pauses will be foreseen by playing games, performing drawing assignments, etc. This will make the therapy more pleasant and less intensive. All voice therapy programs will be guided by the same experienced voice therapist. Content: Day 1: counseling (anatomy and physiology of the voice and vocal fold nodules), vocal hygiene recommendations (water intake, avoiding vocal misuse and abuse) Day 2: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations, straw phonation on vowel and syllable level, pitch variations Day 3: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations, straw phonation on word and sentence level, pitch variations Day 4: straw phonation in spontaneous speech, combination exercises | Behavioural | Experimental group 1 - Straw Phonation |
| Resonant voice therapyThe two experimental groups will receive either straw phonation therapy or resonant voice therapy. The hierarchical structure of the therapy sessions will be equal for the three programs. In each session, vocal rest pauses will be foreseen by playing games, performing drawing assignments, etc. This will make the therapy more pleasant and less intensive. All voice therapy programs will be guided by the same experienced voice therapist. Content: Day 1: counseling (anatomy and physiology of the voice and vocal fold nodules), vocal hygiene recommendations (water intake, avoiding vocal misuse and abuse) Day 2: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations, resonant voice therapy on vowel and syllable level, pitch variations Day 3: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations, resonant voice therapy on word and sentence level, pitch variations Day 4: resonant voice therapy in spontaneous speech, combination exercises | Behavioural | Experimental group 2 - Resonant Voice Therapy |
| Vocal HygieneParticipants of the control group will receive a sham treatment, including the exact same games, drawing assignments, etc. as in the experimental groups. However, no SOVT or other active vocal techniques will be practiced. Vocal hygiene guidelines (e.g. avoid screaming, imitating voices, sufficient hydration etc.) will be kept equally in the four groups. All voice therapy programs will be guided by the same experienced voice therapist. Content: Day 1: counseling (anatomy and physiology of the voice and vocal fold nodules), vocal hygiene recommendations (water intake, avoiding vocal misuse and abuse) Day 2: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations Day 3: breathing exercises, vocal hygiene recommendations Day 4: combination exercises | Behavioural | Control group |
Primary outcome
Change in Dysphonia Severity Index
Time frame: pre: one day before therapy, day 0; post: immediately after last therapy session, day 4
The dysphonia severity index (DSI) is a multiparametric score to quantify vocal capabilities. It is based on a weighted combination of 4 voice parameters: maximum phonation time (MPT, s), highest frequency (F-high, Hz), lowest intensity (I-low, dB) and jitter (%). The DSI is constructed as 0.13 MPT + 0.0053 F-high - 0.26 I-low - 1.18 jitter +12.4. The index ranges from -5 to +5. A score above +1.6 is considered normal. A higher score corresponds with better voice quality / vocal capacities.
Change in Acoustic Voice Quality Index
Time frame: pre: one day before therapy, day 0; post: immediately after last therapy session, day 4
The acoustic voice quality index (AVQI) is a multiparametric score to quantify vocal quality. It is based on a weighted combination of 6 voice parameters: smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS), harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), shimmer local (SL), shimmer local dB (SLdB), general slope of the spectrum (slope) and tilt of the regression line through the spectrum (tilt). The formula is constructed as 9.072 - 0.245 × CPPs - 0.161 × HNR - 0.470 × SL + 6.158 × SLdB - 0.071 × Slope - 0.170 × Tilt and ranges from 0 to 10. A lower score correlates with a better vocal quality.
Change in Pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI)
Time frame: pre: one day before therapy, day 0; post: immediately after last therapy session, day 4
The pediatric voice handicap index (pVHI) is a questionnaire to investigate children's voice-related quality of life, completed by the parents. The index ranges from 0 to 92. A higher score correlates with more psychosocial impact of the voice disorder.
Change in Overall Severity From Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice
Time frame: pre: one day before therapy, day 0; post: immediately after last therapy session, day 4
This tool is designed to describe the severity of dysphonia by rating six parameters (overall severity, roughness, breathiness, strain, pitch, and loudness) on a visual-analog scale from 0 to 100, where 0 is considered within normal limits. A higher score corresponds with worse voice quality.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Oct 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 29270612Hartnick C, Ballif C, De Guzman V, Sataloff R, Campisi P, Kerschner J, Shembel A, Reda D, Shi H, Sheryka Zacny E, Bunting G. Indirect vs Direct Voice Therapy for Children With Vocal Nodules: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Feb 1;144(2):156-163. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.2618.
- Background: PubMed 25675335Kapsner-Smith MR, Hunter EJ, Kirkham K, Cox K, Titze IR. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Semi-Occluded Vocal Tract Voice Therapy Protocols. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun;58(3):535-49. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-13-0231.
- Background: PubMed 16360302Carding PN, Roulstone S, Northstone K; ALSPAC Study Team. The prevalence of childhood dysphonia: a cross-sectional study. J Voice. 2006 Dec;20(4):623-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
- Background: PubMed 29205707Meerschman I, Van Lierde K, Van Puyvelde C, Bostyn A, Claeys S, D'haeseleer E. Massed versus spaced practice in vocology: effect of a short-term intensive voice training versus a longer-term traditional voice training. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Mar;53(2):393-404. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12358. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Voice Disorders in Children
Not yet recruiting
Starry-Sky Projection and Maternal Voice for Sleep After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
Congenital Heart Disease (CHD), Postoperative Sleep
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Effect of Velopharyngeal Gap Size on Laryngeal Morphology and Vocal Function in Children With VPI
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency
Not yet recruiting
Heart Voice: Starry Journey - A Digital ACT Intervention for ASD Caregivers
Autism Spectrum Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Giving Children a Voice in Paediatric Anaesthesia
Perioperative Care, Pediatric Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting
AI-Generated Maternal Voice Storytelling During Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy
Pediatric, Adenotonsillectomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kristiane Van Lierde principal investigator
University Hospital, Ghent
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Straw phonation, Resonant voice therapy and Vocal Hygiene in people with Voice Disorders in Children and Vocal Nodules in Children, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Dysphonia Severity Index (time frame: pre: one day before therapy, day 0; post: immediately after last therapy session, day 4). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05878197, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2024.