AzTrials
AzTrials

Nasal PolypsNCT05869071

Assessment of Oral and Nasal Breathing With Sensors Analyzing Algorithm

An observational study of Nasal Polyps and Asthma, run by Oulu University Hospital at 1 site in Finland.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the agreement between sensors analyzing algorithm and body plethysmography in measuring oral and nasal breathing in healthy adults, and in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Nasal Polyps, Asthma, COPD
What is being tested?
Sensor analyzing software (own development) and Body plethysmograph
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteFinland
Study dates
23 May 2023to 30 Jun 2024
How long will I take part?
1 Day
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The healthy volunteers are selected from the personnel or students of Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu. The patients with allergic rhinitis and nasal polyps, asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease are selected from the Oulu University Hospital.

Who may be able to join

  • 5 healthy and asymptomatic volunteers with regard to lungs and nose
  • 5 patients with allergic rhinitis or nasal polyps (diagnosis of allergic rhinitis confirmed by a PRICK test or specific Ig E antibody tests and Nasal polyposis diagnosed by an ENT specialist, with endoscopy)
  • 5 patients with asthma (diagnosis of asthma based on peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring, spirometry, or other appropriate objective measurement methods performed by a pulmonologist
  • 5 patients with Chronic Obstructive Pumonary Disease (diagnosis of COPD based on spirometry (post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume/ Forced Vital Capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio below 0.70)

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy.
  • History of surgical procedures in the chest, larynx, throat (excluding tonsillectomy), or nasal area.
  • Recent illnesses or surgeries that pose a risk to the patient or prevent proper measurement (common contraindications for spirometry):
  • Recent (<1 month) myocardial infarction.
  • Severe coronary artery disease with easily triggered symptoms.
  • Cerebral artery aneurysm.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Recent brain (<4 weeks) or eye (<1 week) surgery.
  • Severe cardiac arrhythmias.
  • Pulmonary tuberculosis.
  • Pneumothorax
  • Immediate postoperative period of lung surgery (<1 day).
  • Dementia or confusion.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Paulus Tokola, MD contact

+35883152011

paulus.tokola@ppshp.fi

Olli-Pekka Alho, Prof contact

+35883152011

olli-pekka.alho@oulu.fi

Finland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Oulu University Hospital

    Oulu, FIN-90029

    Paulus Tokola, MD, +358-8-315 2011, Paulus.Tokola@ppshp.fi

    Olli-Pekka Alho, +35883152011, olli-pekka.alho@oulu.fi

    Recruiting

Other trials in Finland

About this study

Official title: Agreement Between Accelerometric and Acoustic Signals Utilizing Algorithm and Body Plethysmograph in Detecting Nasal and Oral Specific Airway Resistance

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the agreement between sensors analyzing algorithm and body plethysmography in measuring oral and nasal breathing in healthy adults, and in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The main question it aims to answer is: • Is the algorithm-based method accurate enough in analyzing respiratory obstruction as compared to body plethysmography (reference method)? Participants will perform a short breathing protocol (oral and nasal breathing with different masks) during which time their breathing is monitored with both methods.

Read the detailed description

The data collected in the Patient Registry include: Parameters on general health, like previous illnesses, medications, height, weight, answers to symptoms queries and queries on quality of life (Asthma test, COPD test, Sinonasal Outcome Test 22) as well as results from the examined medical devices (body plethysmography, spirometry, sensors analyzing algorithm).

Being tested
Sensor analyzing software (own development), Body plethysmograph
Medical subject headings
Nasal Polyps, Asthma, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Rhinitis, Allergic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sensor analyzing software (own development)Device

    A software the research group developed. Analyzes acoustic and accelerator signals to measure airway obstruction.

  • Body plethysmographDevice

    Also called Ganshorn PowerCube body+ plethysmograph

    Body plethysmograph measures specific airway resistance

Study groups in NCT05869071
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Healthy volunteersParticipants with no chronic disease and no acute symptoms
Receives: Device: Sensor analyzing software (own development); Device: Body plethysmograph
Patients with Allergic rhinitis or Nasal PolypsParticipants with allergic rhinitis or nasal polyps
Receives: Device: Sensor analyzing software (own development); Device: Body plethysmograph
Patients with asthmaParticipants with asthma
Receives: Device: Sensor analyzing software (own development); Device: Body plethysmograph
Patients with COPDParticipants with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Receives: Device: Sensor analyzing software (own development); Device: Body plethysmograph

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Bias for oral breathing (estimate and 95% confidence intervals)

    Bias between specific airway resistances given by analyzing software and plethysmograph

    Measured: 5 minutes

  2. Bias for nasal breathing (estimate and 95% confidence intervals)

    Bias between specific airway resistance given by analyzing software and plethysmograph

    Measured: 5 minutes

  3. Limits of agreement for oral breathing

    Limits of agreement between specific airway resistance given by analyzing software and plethysmograph

    Measured: 5 minutes

  4. Limits of agreement for nasal breathing

    Limits of agreement between specific airway resistance given by analyzing software and plethysmograph

    Measured: 5 minutes

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Mean error for oral breathing (estimate and 95% confidence intervals)

    Mean error between specific airway resistance given by analyzing software and plethysmograph

    Measured: 5 minutes

  2. Mean error for nasal breathing (estimate and 95% confidence intervals)

    Mean error between specific airway resistance given by analyzing software and plethysmograph

    Measured: 5 minutes

  3. Correlation between analyzing software and subjective sensation of oral breathing obstruction

    Correlation between specific airway resistance and graded (6 steps) subjective sensation

    Measured: 5 minutes

  4. Correlation between analyzing software and subjective sensation of nasal breathing obstruction

    Correlation between specific airway resistance and graded (6 steps) subjective sensation

    Measured: 5 minutes

  5. Correlation between plethysmograph and subjective sensation of oral breathing obstruction

    Correlation between specific airway resistance and graded (6 steps) subjective sensation

    Measured: 5 minutes

  6. Correlation between plethysmograph and subjective sensation of nasal breathing obstruction

    Correlation between specific airway resistance and graded (6 steps) subjective sensation

    Measured: 5 minutes

  7. Reliability of analyzing software measurement

    Measurer's opinion of the reliability of the measurement (4 steps)

    Measured: 5 minutes

  8. Reliability of plethysmograph

    Measurer's opinion of the reliability of the measurement (4 steps)

    Measured: 5 minutes

  9. Convenience of analyzing software method

    Metrizable's opinion of the convenience (6 steps)

    Measured: 5 minutes

  10. Convenience of plethysmography

    Metrizable's opinion of the convenience (6 steps)

    Measured: 5 minutes

  11. Harms of analyzing software method

    Frequency of harmful events related to measurement

    Measured: 5 minutes

  12. Harms of plethysmography

    Frequency of harmful events related to measurement

    Measured: 5 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 May 2023
  2. Study start23 May 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
Target duration
1 Day
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05869071
Sponsor's protocol ID
126/2021
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
11 May 2023
Last updated
7 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Nasal Polyps and Asthma, run by Oulu University Hospital at 1 site in Finland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Paulus Tokola, MD (+35883152011, paulus.tokola@ppshp.fi), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Bias for oral breathing (estimate and 95% confidence intervals) (time frame: 5 minutes). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in