AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic Valve StenosisNCT05864625

Comparison of Hemodynamic Stability During Anesthesia Using Remimazolam and Sevoflurane in Minimally Invasive AVR

A study testing Remimazolam besylate and Propofol/ Sevoflurane in people with Aortic Valve Stenosis and Remimazolam, run by Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Anesthetic agents can cause hypotension, and be especially dangerous in patients with severe aortic stenosis, which can lead to even circulatory collapse. Remimazolam is known for its hemodynamic stability compared to propofol. This study is designed to compare effects of remimazolam vs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aortic Valve Stenosis, Remimazolam
What is being tested?
Remimazolam besylate and Propofol/ Sevoflurane
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
64 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
29 Jun 2023to 10 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients over 19 years old
  • Patients with severe aortic stenosis, undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery

Who cannot join

  • Patients with known allergy to benzodiazepine, flumazenil, propofol
  • Patients with galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency, glucose-galactose malabsorption
  • Patients with hypersensitivity to Dextran40
  • Patients who have been taking benzodiazepine for long term
  • Patients with whom heart rate assessment is not accurate, such as atrial fibrillation
  • Patients with end stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patients with history of acute angle glaucoma
  • Patients with valve disease severity of grade III or higher, other than aortic valve
  • Emergency operation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

    Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Hemodynamic Stability During Anesthesia Using Remimazolam and Sevoflurane in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery : A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Anesthetic agents can cause hypotension, and be especially dangerous in patients with severe aortic stenosis, which can lead to even circulatory collapse. Remimazolam is known for its hemodynamic stability compared to propofol. This study is designed to compare effects of remimazolam vs. sevoflurane anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Read the detailed description

Anesthetic agents can cause hypotension due to reduced cardiac contractility and vasodilation. This can be especially dangerous in patients with severe aortic stenosis, which can lead to even circulatory collapse in extreme cases. Remimazolam is a relatively new anesthetic agent and it is a ultra-short acting benzodiazepine with a context sensitive half time of 7.5 minutes. Remimazolam is known for its hemodynamic stability compared to propofol. Previous studies have also shown that remimazolam can be safely used in patients with severe aortic stenosis and in cardiac anesthesia induction and during cardiopulmonary bypass. However, there is no definite data on comparison of hemodynamic variables between remimazolam based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and conventional propofol induction and sevoflurane maintenance anesthesia. Therefore, this study is designed to compare effects of remimazolam vs. sevoflurane anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery.

Being tested
Remimazolam besylate, Propofol/ Sevoflurane
Keywords
Aortic Valve Stenosis, Remimazolam
Medical subject headings
Aortic Valve Stenosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Remimazolam besylateDrug

    Also called Remimazolam besylate, Byfavo Inj., Hana Pharm Col, Ltd., Seoul, Korea

    During induction, patients allocated to the remimazolam group will receive remimazolam 6mg/kg/h with remifentanil TCI 1~4 nanogram/mL. After patient loses consciousness, anesthesia will be maintained with remimazolam 1-2mg/kg/h combied with remifetanil.

  • Propofol/ SevofluraneDrug

    Also called Fresofol 1% TM, Fresenius

    During induction, patients allocated to the P/S group will receive propofol 1% 1-2mg/kg with remifentanil TCI 1~4 nanogram/mL. After patient loses consciousness, anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil.

Study groups in NCT05864625
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RemimazolamExperimentalInduction dose of 6 mg/kg/h of remimazolam with remifentanil TCI 1~4 nanogram/mL are injected together. When patient loses consciousness, rocuronium 0.8 mg/kg is given and endotracheal intubation is performed after confirming that TOF count is less than one. Anesthesia is maintained by using remimazolam dose of 1mg/kg/h~2mg/kg/h with remifentanil to maintain optimal depth of anesthesia, which will checked by Sedline value between 25 to 50.
Receives: Drug: Remimazolam besylate
Propofol/sevofluraneActive comparator1% propofol 1-2mg/kg is injected with remifentanil TCI 1~4, and when patient loses consciousness, sevoflurane is started and rocuronium 0.8mg/kg is given. After confirming that TOF count is less than one, intubation is performed and anesthesia is maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil to keep the Sedline value between 25 and 50.
Receives: Drug: Propofol/ Sevoflurane

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total dose of vasopressors and inotropics used.

    Total dose of vasopressors and inotropics used during anesthesia will be compared between two groups.

    Measured: Start of anesthesia to end of anesthesia

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Hypotension and bradycardia event duration

    Hypotension and bradycardia event duration will be compared

    Measured: Start of anesthesia to end of anesthesia

  2. Extubation time

    Extubation time between the two groups will be compared

    Measured: End of anesthesia to extubation

  3. Emergence agitation

    Emergence agitation will be compared between the two groups using Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale upon arrival at ICU. The Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale uses a numeric score from 1 (unarousable) to 7 (dangerous agitation)to assess the level of patient sedation and identifies seven levels of sedation and agitation, which range from deep sedation (unarousable) to dangerous agitation.

    Measured: Arrival of patient at ICU

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 May 2023
  2. Study start29 Jun 2023
  3. Primary completion10 Jun 2025
  4. Study completion10 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
64 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05864625
Sponsor's protocol ID
05-2023-105
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
9 May 2023
Last updated
1 Aug 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Lee J, Shin SW, Yoon JU, Kim HJ, Yoon JP, Shon HS, Lee DE, Kim HY. Vasopressor requirements and hemodynamic stability during anesthesia using remimazolam and sevoflurane in patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Thorac Dis. 2026 Apr 30;18(4):342. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2026-1-0072. Epub 2026 Mar 27.

    PubMed 42182779

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Remimazolam besylate and Propofol/ Sevoflurane in people with Aortic Valve Stenosis and Remimazolam, run by Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total dose of vasopressors and inotropics used. (time frame: Start of anesthesia to end of anesthesia). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05864625, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in