Squamous Cell CarcinomaNCT05843032
3D Ultrasound, Specimen Examination by Surgeon, and MRI in Surgical Margin Assessment
A study testing 3D ultrasound, MRI, resected specimen examination by surgeon in people with Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Tongue SCC, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
In the current protocol, application of 3D ex-vivo ultrasound, MRI, and clinical evaluation (palpation and examination) by the surgeon is proposed to analyze the margin status in tongue squamous cell carcinoma and correlate the results to the histopathology findings. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Tongue SCC, Head and Neck Cancer
- What is being tested?
- 3D ultrasound, MRI, resected specimen examination by surgeon
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 27 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 15 May 2023to 15 Feb 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with biopsy-proven oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma scheduled for surgical treatment
- T1-T3 staging on cross-sectional imaging
Who cannot join
- T4 staging
- Unable to understand the verbal or written information
- Prior radiotherapy treatment of oral cavity cancer
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Capital Region, 2100
Tobias Todsen, MD, PhD, +4535452071, tobias.todsen@regionh.dk
About this study
Official title: 3D Ultrasound in the Assessment of Resection Margins During Surgery for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tongue: a Comparison With Clinical Evaluation, MRI, and Histopathology
In the current protocol, application of 3D ex-vivo ultrasound, MRI, and clinical evaluation (palpation and examination) by the surgeon is proposed to analyze the margin status in tongue squamous cell carcinoma and correlate the results to the histopathology findings.
Read the detailed description
Cancer surgery is the primary treatment in the early stages of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and the goal is the complete resection of the tumor with an adequate margin of healthy tissue around to ensure proper cancer removal. Inadequate margins lead to a high risk of local cancer recurrence and the patient will need re-surgery or adjuvant therapies. Ex-vivo imaging of the resected surgical specimen has been suggested to provide information for margin assessment and thus improve cancer surgery. In this manuscript, a protocol to investigate the clinical benefit of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging of the surgical margins and comparing the results to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the clinical examination of the surgical specimen by surgeon (palpation to inspect the resected tissue) has been designed. Tumor segmentation and margin measurement (Anterior towards apex of tongue, posterior towards base of tongue, medial towards back of tongue, lateral towards floor of mouth, and profound/deep margins) will be performed by head and neck surgeons on 3D ultrasound images and by two consultant radiologists on MRI of the ex-vivo specimen. Accuracy of each method will be evaluated by computing the proportion of correctly classified margins (positive, close, and free) by each technique with respect to the gold standard histopathology.
- Conditions
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Tongue SCC, Head and Neck Cancer
- Being tested
- 3D ultrasound, MRI, resected specimen examination by surgeon
- Keywords
- Ultrasound, 3D ultrasound, Ultrasonography, Three dimensional imaging, cancer diagnosis, surgical margin assessment, magnetic resonance imaging, MRI, ex-vivo surgical specimen imaging, squamous cell carcinoma, histopathology, SCC, oral cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Mouth Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
3D ultrasound, MRI, resected specimen examination by surgeonDiagnostic test
3D ultrasound and MR scanning of the resected tongue tumor will be performed. The resected surgical specimen will also be examined by the surgeon to assess the margins. The accuracy of the margin assessment by 3D ultrasound, MRI, and surgeon examination will be evaluated by correlating the results to the final histopathology findings.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tongue tumor resection | Experimental | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: 3D ultrasound, MRI, resected specimen examination by surgeon |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Accuracy of the 3D ultrasound and MRI compared to the conventional method in measurements of the surgical margins in the resected tongue SCC specimens.
Measured: 2 weeks
Diagnostic accuracy - number of margins correctly classified as free (> 5 mm), close (1- 5 mm) or positive (<1 mm) margin by 3D ultrasound and MRI using histopathology findings as the reference
Measured: 2 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of cases requiring adjuvant treatments (surgery or chemo/radiotherapy)
Measured: 2 weeks
Shrinkage of the surgical specimen due to formalin fixation based on the specimen volume measurements on 3D ultrasound images before and after formalin fixation
Measured: 2 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2023
- Study start15 May 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Feb 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Squamous Cell CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fatemeh Makouei, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05843032
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 21017915
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 24 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 9 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Chinn SB, Myers JN. Oral Cavity Carcinoma: Current Management, Controversies, and Future Directions. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 10;33(29):3269-76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2929. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
PubMed 26351335Pagedar NA. Better Visualization of Oral Cancer Margins-A Struggle of Cancer and Technology. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Dec 1;146(12):1156-1157. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.3262. No abstract available.
PubMed 33030524Schmidt Jensen J, Jakobsen KK, Mirian C, Christensen JT, Schneider K, Nahavandipour A, Wingstrand VL, Wessel I, Tvedskov JF, Frisch T, Christensen A, Specht L, Andersen E, Lelkaitis G, Gronhoj C, von Buchwald C. The Copenhagen Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma database: protocol and report on establishing a comprehensive oral cavity cancer database. Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 19;11:733-741. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S215399. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31695503de Koning KJ, Koppes SA, de Bree R, Dankbaar JW, Willems SM, van Es RJJ, Noorlag R. Feasibility study of ultrasound-guided resection of tongue cancer with immediate specimen examination to improve margin control - Comparison with conventional treatment. Oral Oncol. 2021 May;116:105249. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105249. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
PubMed 33774501Narayana HM, Panda NK, Mann SB, Katariya S, Vasishta RK. Ultrasound versus physical examination in staging carcinoma of the mobile tongue. J Laryngol Otol. 1996 Jan;110(1):43-7. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100132682.
PubMed 8745780Klein Nulent TJW, Noorlag R, Van Cann EM, Pameijer FA, Willems SM, Yesuratnam A, Rosenberg AJWP, de Bree R, van Es RJJ. Intraoral ultrasonography to measure tumor thickness of oral cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 2018 Feb;77:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.12.007. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
PubMed 29362123Tarabichi O, Bulbul MG, Kanumuri VV, Faquin WC, Juliano AF, Cunnane ME, Varvares MA. Utility of intraoral ultrasound in managing oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2019 Mar;129(3):662-670. doi: 10.1002/lary.27403. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
PubMed 30151976de Koning KJ, van Es RJJ, Klijn RJ, Breimer GE, Willem Dankbaar J, Braunius WW, van Cann EM, Dieleman FJ, Rijken JA, Tijink BM, de Bree R, Noorlag R. Application and accuracy of ultrasound-guided resections of tongue cancer. Oral Oncol. 2022 Oct;133:106023. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106023. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
PubMed 35901543Makouei F, Ewertsen C, Agander TK, Olesen MV, Pakkenberg B, Todsen T. 3D Ultrasound versus Computed Tomography for Tumor Volume Measurement Compared to Gross Pathology-A Pilot Study on an Animal Model. J Imaging. 2022 Dec 19;8(12):329. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8120329.
PubMed 36547494
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- 3D Ultrasound in the Assessment of Resection Margins During Surgery for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tongue: a Comparison With Clinical Evaluation, MRI, and Histopathology
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05843032
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 21017915
- Conditions
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Tongue SCC, Head and Neck Cancer
- Keywords
- Ultrasound, 3D ultrasound, Ultrasonography, Three dimensional imaging, cancer diagnosis, surgical margin assessment, magnetic resonance imaging, MRI
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 May 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Feb 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the current protocol, application of 3D ex-vivo ultrasound, MRI, and clinical evaluation (palpation and examination) by the surgeon is proposed to analyze the margin status in tongue squamous cell carcinoma and correlate the results to the histopathology findings.
Detailed description
Cancer surgery is the primary treatment in the early stages of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and the goal is the complete resection of the tumor with an adequate margin of healthy tissue around to ensure proper cancer removal. Inadequate margins lead to a high risk of local cancer recurrence and the patient will need re-surgery or adjuvant therapies. Ex-vivo imaging of the resected surgical specimen has been suggested to provide information for margin assessment and thus improve cancer surgery. In this manuscript, a protocol to investigate the clinical benefit of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging of the surgical margins and comparing the results to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the clinical examination of the surgical specimen by surgeon (palpation to inspect the resected tissue) has been designed. Tumor segmentation and margin measurement (Anterior towards apex of tongue, posterior towards base of tongue, medial towards back of tongue, lateral towards floor of mouth, and profound/deep margins) will be performed by head and neck surgeons on 3D ultrasound images and by two consultant radiologists on MRI of the ex-vivo specimen. Accuracy of each method will be evaluated by computing the proportion of correctly classified margins (positive, close, and free) by each technique with respect to the gold standard histopathology.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tongue tumor resection | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: 3D ultrasound, MRI, resected specimen examination by surgeon |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with biopsy-proven oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma scheduled for surgical treatment
- T1-T3 staging on cross-sectional imaging
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- T4 staging
- Unable to understand the verbal or written information
- Prior radiotherapy treatment of oral cavity cancer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 3D ultrasound, MRI, resected specimen examination by surgeon3D ultrasound and MR scanning of the resected tongue tumor will be performed. The resected surgical specimen will also be examined by the surgeon to assess the margins. The accuracy of the margin assessment by 3D ultrasound, MRI, and surgeon examination will be evaluated by correlating the results to the final histopathology findings. | Diagnostic test | Tongue tumor resection |
Primary outcome
Accuracy of the 3D ultrasound and MRI compared to the conventional method in measurements of the surgical margins in the resected tongue SCC specimens.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Diagnostic accuracy - number of margins correctly classified as free (> 5 mm), close (1- 5 mm) or positive (<1 mm) margin by 3D ultrasound and MRI using histopathology findings as the reference
Time frame: 2 weeks
2 secondary outcomes
Number of cases requiring adjuvant treatments (surgery or chemo/radiotherapy)
Time frame: 2 weeks
Shrinkage of the surgical specimen due to formalin fixation based on the specimen volume measurements on 3D ultrasound images before and after formalin fixation
Time frame: 2 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 May 2023.
- Background: PubMed 26351335Chinn SB, Myers JN. Oral Cavity Carcinoma: Current Management, Controversies, and Future Directions. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 10;33(29):3269-76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2929. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
- Background: PubMed 33030524Pagedar NA. Better Visualization of Oral Cancer Margins-A Struggle of Cancer and Technology. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Dec 1;146(12):1156-1157. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.3262. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 31695503Schmidt Jensen J, Jakobsen KK, Mirian C, Christensen JT, Schneider K, Nahavandipour A, Wingstrand VL, Wessel I, Tvedskov JF, Frisch T, Christensen A, Specht L, Andersen E, Lelkaitis G, Gronhoj C, von Buchwald C. The Copenhagen Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma database: protocol and report on establishing a comprehensive oral cavity cancer database. Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 19;11:733-741. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S215399. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 33774501de Koning KJ, Koppes SA, de Bree R, Dankbaar JW, Willems SM, van Es RJJ, Noorlag R. Feasibility study of ultrasound-guided resection of tongue cancer with immediate specimen examination to improve margin control - Comparison with conventional treatment. Oral Oncol. 2021 May;116:105249. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105249. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
- Background: PubMed 8745780Narayana HM, Panda NK, Mann SB, Katariya S, Vasishta RK. Ultrasound versus physical examination in staging carcinoma of the mobile tongue. J Laryngol Otol. 1996 Jan;110(1):43-7. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100132682.
- Background: PubMed 29362123Klein Nulent TJW, Noorlag R, Van Cann EM, Pameijer FA, Willems SM, Yesuratnam A, Rosenberg AJWP, de Bree R, van Es RJJ. Intraoral ultrasonography to measure tumor thickness of oral cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 2018 Feb;77:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.12.007. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
- Background: PubMed 30151976Tarabichi O, Bulbul MG, Kanumuri VV, Faquin WC, Juliano AF, Cunnane ME, Varvares MA. Utility of intraoral ultrasound in managing oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2019 Mar;129(3):662-670. doi: 10.1002/lary.27403. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
- Background: PubMed 35901543de Koning KJ, van Es RJJ, Klijn RJ, Breimer GE, Willem Dankbaar J, Braunius WW, van Cann EM, Dieleman FJ, Rijken JA, Tijink BM, de Bree R, Noorlag R. Application and accuracy of ultrasound-guided resections of tongue cancer. Oral Oncol. 2022 Oct;133:106023. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106023. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
- Background: PubMed 36547494Makouei F, Ewertsen C, Agander TK, Olesen MV, Pakkenberg B, Todsen T. 3D Ultrasound versus Computed Tomography for Tumor Volume Measurement Compared to Gross Pathology-A Pilot Study on an Animal Model. J Imaging. 2022 Dec 19;8(12):329. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8120329.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Natural History of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Fanconi Anemia
Fanconi Anemia, Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 3D ultrasound, MRI, resected specimen examination by surgeon in people with Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Tongue SCC, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Fatemeh Makouei, PhD (+4550243760, fatemeh.makouei@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Accuracy of the 3D ultrasound and MRI compared to the conventional method in measurements of the surgical margins in the resected tongue SCC specimens. (time frame: 2 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05843032, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2023.