AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreas CancerPhase 2NCT05841420

Gemcitabine Versus Reduced-dose Combination Chemotherapy in Fragile Patients with Non-resectable Pancreatic Cancer

A Phase 2 study testing Gemcitabine and Nab paclitaxel in people with Pancreas Cancer and Non-Resectable Pancreas Carcinoma, run by Morten Ladekarl at 1 site in Denmark.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and toxicity of full-dose Gemcitabine and reduced-dose combination chemotherapy in patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer, who are unfit for full-dose combination chemotherapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Gemcitabine and Nab paclitaxel
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
98 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
12 Jun 2023to Jun 2025
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, histopathologically or cytologically verified
  • Non-resectable (locally advanced or metastatic) PC
  • Patients unfit or not candidate for full-dose combination chemotherapy
  • Patients eligible for full dose gemcitabine or reduced dose combination chemotherapy
  • Performance status (PS) ≤2
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Measurable or non-measurable disease
  • Adequate hematologic function defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1.5 x 10^9/l and platelets count ≥100x10^9/l within 2 weeks prior to enrollment
  • Adequate organ function (bilirubin ≤1.5 x UNL (Upper Normal Limit) and eGFR (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate) >50ml/min within 2 weeks prior to enrollment
  • Toxicity of prior chemotherapy, including neurotoxicity, resolved to CTCAE <grade 2
  • Oral and written informed consent must be obtained according to the local Ethics committee requirements
  • Fertile patients must use adequate contraceptives

Who cannot join

  • Patients eligible for downstaging/preoperative chemotherapy followed by resection or local ablation or irradiation
  • Prior chemotherapy for PC (However, patients treated with adjuvant therapy with recurrence occurring more than 6 months after end of this treatment are eligible)
  • Concurrent, non-curatively treated malignant neoplasm other than pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  • Concurrent treatment with any other anti-cancer therapy
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding patients
  • Patients clearly intending to withdraw from the study if not randomized in the willing arm or patients who cannot be regularly followed up for psychological, social, familiar, or geographic reasons.
  • Other condition or therapy, which in the investigator's opinion may pose a risk to the patient or interfere with the study objectives.
  • Known allergy or intolerance to any of the drugs used in DPCG-01 (Gemcitabine, S1 or Nab-Paclitaxel)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Morten Ladekarl, Professor contact

0045+61399326

morten.ladekarl@rn.dk

Louise Rasmussen, PhD contact

0045+30226432

loskr@rn.dk

Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital

    Aalborg, 9000

    Morten Ladekarl, MD, DMSci, +45 97660545, morten.ladekarl@rn.dk

    Anja Pagh, MD, PhD, +45 97661417, a.pagh@rn.dk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Versus Reduced-dose Combination Chemotherapy in Fragile Patients with Non-resectable Pancreatic Cancer

The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and toxicity of full-dose Gemcitabine and reduced-dose combination chemotherapy in patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer, who are unfit for full-dose combination chemotherapy.

The patients will be equally randomized to arm A or arm B:

Read more

Arm A: Full-dose single agent treatment with Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly on days 1, 8,and 15 every 4 weeks.

Arm B: Reduced-dose (80%) combination-treatment with Gemcitabine plus Nab-Paclitaxel (Gemcitabine: 800 mg/m2 plus Nab-Paclitaxel: 100 mg/m2 on day 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks)

Progression-free survival, overall survival and response rate will be estimated for each group, as well as toxicity and quality of life will be prospectively registered.

Read the detailed description

According to guidelines the recommended treatment for patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (PC) is combination chemotherapy, whereas old and/or fragile patients can be offered Gemcitabine monotherapy, if they are fit for treatment. Phase III trials show improved effect of combination chemotherapy compared to Gemcitabine, but these trials were restricted to fit patients younger than 75 years of age, as full-dose combination chemotherapy is more toxic.

Studies in colorectal cancer and a post-hoc analysis of Gemcitabine plus Nab-Paclitaxel in PC suggest that reduced-dose of combination chemotherapy may be more efficient in terms of progression-free survival and less toxic as compared to monotherapy in elderly and/or frail patients, but reduced start-dosing of GemNab is not currently labelled.

Moreover, a recent Danish register-based study showed that more use of combination chemotherapy at oncological departments was associated with improved outcome of patients with PC.

Elderly and frail patients with PC are in great need of better treatment results. Hence, a comparative study of reduced-dose combination chemotherapy is warranted and may be practice changing.

The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and toxicity of full-dose Gemcitabine and reduced-dose combination chemotherapy in patients with non-resectable PC, who are unfit for full-dose combination chemotherapy.

The study is a national multicenter prospective randomized phase II trial, endorsed by the Danish Pancreas Cancer Group (DPCG). 98 patients with non-resectable PC, unfit for full-dose combination chemotherapy, but eligible for first-line chemotherapy, will be included.

The patients will be equally randomized to arm A or arm B:

Arm A: Full-dose single agent treatment with Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks.

Arm B: Reduced-dose (80%) combination-treatment with GemNab (Gemcitabine: 800 mg/m2 plus Nab-Paclitaxel: 100 mg/m2 on day 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks).

Progression-free survival, overall survival and response rate will be estimated for each group, as well as toxicity and quality of life will be prospectively registered.

Keywords
Fragile, Elderly, Palliative
Medical subject headings
Pancreatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GemcitabineDrug

    Also called Gemzar

    Gemcitabine monotherapy, 1000 mg/m2 weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks or gemcitabine: 800 mg/m2 on day 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks

  • Nab paclitaxelDrug

    Also called Abraxane

    Nab-Paclitaxel: 100mg/m2 on day 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks

Study groups in NCT05841420
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
A: "Full dose single agent strategy"Active comparatorGemcitabine monotherapy, 1000 mg/m2 weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks
Receives: Drug: Gemcitabine
B: "Reduced dose (80%) combination-therapy strategy"ExperimentalNab-Paclitaxel: 100mg/m2 plus gemcitabine: 800 mg/m2 on day 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks
Receives: Drug: Gemcitabine; Drug: Nab paclitaxel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. PFS (Progression Free Survival)

    PFS is defined in the ITT population as the date of the randomization to the date of disease progression or date of death, whichever comes first. The date of PD is the date of scan, if progression is found on a CT scan, or date of visit at which clinical progression is found. PD at CT is defined according to RECIST version 1.1.

    Measured: 1 year from end of study accrual.

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. OS (Overall Survival)

    OS is defined in the ITT population as the date of randomization to date of death of all causes.

    Measured: 1 year from end of study accrual.

  2. RR (Response rate)

    In patients with measurable disease at baseline, RECIST version 1.1 will be used for evaluation of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or PD. ORR will be calculated as the percentage of patients with CR+PR of all patients with measurable disease, who received at least one treatment and were evaluated by at least one diagnostic CT scan.

    Measured: 1 year from end of study accrual.

  3. Hospitalizations

    The total number of hospital admissions in a stationary unit with overnight stay from the start of treatment to the date of end of treatment will be assessed in the treated population. If the patient is readmitted for the same reason within 3 days (e.g., after weekend leave), this is not counted as a separate admission. The reasons for admission are registered as toxicity due to treatment or symptoms due to PC. The sum of hospitalizations is calculated for each randomization arm for comparison.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months.

  4. Quality of Life (QOL) assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline and after 8, 16, and 24weeks

    QoL scores collected will be linearly transformed to a scale of 0 to 100. Items will be grouped in health status scale (range 0 - 100, high is better), functional scales (range 0 - 100, high is better) and symptom scales (range 0 - 100, low is better). Each scale is summarized by its mean, and standard deviation for the patients in the two treatment groups. The difference in mean at 8, 16 and 24 weeks are compared with the baseline mean within in each treatment groups. The difference in mean between the treatment groups are compared at baseline, 8, 16 and 12 weeks.

    Measured: At baseline and at 8, 16, and 24 weeks.

  5. Cumulative worst toxicity during treatment

    (Adverse events ≥ grade 3 according to CTCAE version 5.0). All patients who have received 1 dose of chemotherapy will be calculated in the safety analyses. Cumulative worst toxicities ≥CTC grade 3 in the treated population are registered for each arm separately for comparison.

    Measured: From date of first treatment until 1 year from end of study treatment.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 May 2023
  2. Study start12 Jun 2023
  3. Primary completionJun 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
98 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05841420
Sponsor's protocol ID
DPCG-01
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
16 Mar 2023
Last updated
29 Jan 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Rasmussen LS, Winther SB, Chen IM, Weber B, Ventzel L, Liposits G, Johansen JS, Detlefsen S, Egendal I, Shim S, Christensen S, Pfeiffer P, Ladekarl M. A randomized phase II study of full dose gemcitabine versus reduced dose gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in vulnerable patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (DPCG-01). BMC Cancer. 2023 Jun 16;23(1):552. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11035-6.

    PubMed 37328835

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Gemcitabine and Nab paclitaxel in people with Pancreas Cancer and Non-Resectable Pancreas Carcinoma, run by Morten Ladekarl at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Morten Ladekarl, Professor (0045+61399326, morten.ladekarl@rn.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

PFS (Progression Free Survival) (time frame: 1 year from end of study accrual.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05841420, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in