Prolapse; FemaleAPASNCT05836844
Pragmatic Evaluation of Performance and Safety of the Anchorsure® Transvaginal Device for Surgical Treatment of Apical Prolapse in Women
An observational study of Prolapse; Female and Prolapse Uterovaginal, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 4 sites in France.
Trial summary
Pelvic Organ Prolapse affects 50% of parous women, and apical prolapse is one of the most common types of prolapse. Treatment for apical prolapse ranges from observation, non-surgical treatment or surgical repair. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prolapse; Female, Prolapse Uterovaginal, Prolapse; Cervix
- What is being tested?
- The Anchorsure System®
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 11 May 2023to 1 Jun 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- Women only
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The target population is the population of adult women, undergoing a surgical treatment of The target population is the population of adult women, undergoing a surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse using Anchorsure System® in the participating centres: Nîmes University Hospital, Lille University Hospital, Sainte-Anne Clinic in Strasbourg, La Rochelle Hospital and Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital.
Who may be able to join
- Women with pelvic organ prolapse with leading edge at or beyond the hymen as confirmed by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q), i.e. Ba ≥ -1 cm for the anterior compartment, and/or Bp ≥ -1 cm for the posterior compartment, and/or C ≥ -1 cm for the apical compartment including recurrence.
- Women due for POP surgery using the Anchorsure System® for apical prolapse suspension with or without concomitant native tissue repair, with or without concomitant hysterectomy and with or without concomitant sling for stress urinary incontinence.
- All women who have not indicated any objection to participating in the study.
- All women who have been correctly informed.
Who cannot join
- Patient taking part or having taken part in a device or drug interventional study within the last three months (except for VIGI-MESH national registry).
- Patients due for pelvic organ prolapse repair without apical suspension or with anything other than native tissue repair and the Anchorsure System®.
- Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
- Patients with active non-controlled or chronic gynaecologic or urinary tract infection and/or local tissue necrosis.
- Patients with ongoing pelvic organ cancer (e.g. uterine, ovarian, bladder, cervix …).
- Patients with a history of radiotherapy in the pelvic area.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patients on therapy with immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment within the previous month.
- patients under ongoing oral anticoagulant therapy.
- Patients with stage 0 and 1 pelvic organ prolapse at the time of surgery
- Patients with a preoperative infection contraindicating the surgery
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Recruiting
La Rochelle General Hospital
La Rochelle, 17000
Philippe Ferry, Doctor
- Recruiting
Lille University Hospital
Lille, 59000
Michel Cosson, Professor
- Recruiting
Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital
Paris, 94270
Hervé Pr H Fernandez, Professor
- Recruiting
Clinique Sainte-Anne
Strasbourg, 67000
David Hamid, Dr.
About this study
Official title: APAS Study: Pragmatic Evaluation of the Performance and Safety of the Anchorsure System® Transvaginal Device for Surgical Treatment of Apical Prolapse in Women. A Post-market Multicentre Prospective Observational Cohort Study.
Pelvic Organ Prolapse affects 50% of parous women, and apical prolapse is one of the most common types of prolapse. Treatment for apical prolapse ranges from observation, non-surgical treatment or surgical repair. An anchoring device can reduce dissection and operative time and is meant to provide strong fixation whilst minimizing potential postoperative pain by avoiding neurovascular injuries. These potential advantages must be evaluated in terms of performance and safety. This cohort study will be on patients undergoing sacrospinous fixation with the Anchorsure® system with a follow-up of 36 months.
Read the detailed description
Pelvic Organ Prolapse affects 50% of parous women, and apical prolapse is one of the most frequent. Treatment options for women with apical prolapse range from observation, non-surgical treatment or surgical repair. The use of an anchoring device reduces dissection and operative time and is supposed to provide a strong fixation while minimizing potential postoperative pain by avoiding neurovascular injuries. These potential advantages have to be evaluated in terms of performance and safety. This is a cohort study on patients undergoing sacrospinous fixation with the Anchorsure® system with a follow-up of 36 months.The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of the Anchorsure System® for sacrospinous suspension 12 months after surgical treatment of women with apical prolapse in real-life settings.
- Conditions
- Prolapse; Female, Prolapse Uterovaginal, Prolapse; Cervix
- Being tested
- The Anchorsure System®
- Keywords
- pelvic organ prolapse
- Medical subject headings
- Prolapse, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
The Anchorsure System®Device
Sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Anchorsure Device
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Successful performance after sacrospinous fixation of the Anchorsure System®.
YES /NO
Measured: 12 months after fixation
Secondary outcomes (31)
Device or procedure-related adverse events: Daily Pain score
All procedure-related adverse events and complications will be recorded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system with a one-month pain diary (filled in once a day using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 for buttock pain;
Measured: Day 0 to Day 30
Device or procedure-related adverse events: Anchor palpability
The anchor palpability score will be recorded regularly for up to 36 months after surgery.
Measured: 36 months after surgery
Device or procedure-related adverse events: Abnormal findings on clinical examination
All abnormal findings on clinical examination will be reported including suture exposure, anchor extrusion into another organ, perforation, organ or vascular or nerve injury/damage, fistula, bleeding including hematoma (requiring transfusion or not), thrombotic event, neuromuscular problems (including pain), pelvic discomfort or pain, de novo dyspareunia, infection (e.g. vaginal, urinary tract infection), urinary tract complications including ureteric disorders, urinary retention requiring drainage > 48h, urge symptoms or incontinence (worsening or de novo), de novo constipation or faecal incontinence. Incidences of adverse events will be determined overall, by type of adverse event, severity, compartment and type of sacrospinous suspension (uni versus bilateral and anterior versus posterior).
Measured: 36 months after surgery
Type of sacrospinous fixation technique used
The type of sacrospinous fixation technique used: uni/bilateral, anterior/posterior will be recorded
Measured: Day 0
Success of the intervention
Success is defined as per primary objective and assessed at 36 months after surgery; compartments treated: anterior, apical, posterior, total; type of prolapse: primary or recurrent prolapse.
Measured: 36 months after surgery
Complications/adverse events
Collection of all complications/adverse events up to 36 months after surgery.
Measured: 36 months after surgery
Severity of adverse events
Determination of the level of severity of the adverse event: mild, moderate, severe.
Measured: 36 months after surgery
Compartments treated
Compartments treated: anterior, apical, posterior, total; type of sacrospinous suspension: uni/bilateral, anterior/posterior.
Measured: 36 months after surgery
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Age
Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: The patient's age will be recorded
Measured: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Body Mass Index
Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: the patient's Body Mass Index will be recorded.
Measured: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Previous history of pelvic surgery
Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Any history of pelvic surgery will be recorded.
Measured: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Chronic constipation
Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Any history of chronic constipation will be recorded.
Measured: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Chronic pulmonary conditions
Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Any history of chronic pulmonary conditions will be recorded.
Measured: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Vaginal compartment
Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Details of the patient's vaginal compartment will be recorded.
Measured: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Type of prolapse
Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: The type of prolapse (recurrent or primary) will be recorded.
Measured: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Pelvic organ Prolapse Q grade
Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: the patient's Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POPQ) grade will be recorded as follows :
Stage 0 no prolapse is demonstrated Stage 1 the most distal portion of the prolapse is more than 1 cm above the level of the hymen Stage 2 the most distal portion of the prolapse is 1 cm or less proximal or distal to the hymenal plane Stage 3 the most distal portion of the prolapse protrudes more than 1 cm below the hymen but protrudes no farther than 2 cm less than the total vaginal length (for example., not all of the vagina has prolapsed) Stage 4 vaginal eversion is essentially complete
Measured: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Concomitant surgery
Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: details of any concomitant surgery will be recorded.
Measured: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: Age
The patient's age will be recorded in years
Measured: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: Body Mass Index
The patient's body mass index (BMI) will be calculated and recorded. The formula is BMI = kg/m2 where kg is a person's weight in kilograms and m2 is their height in metres squared.
Measured: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: Smoking.
The patient's smoking status will be recorded (Regular smoker/Weaned/Number of cigarettes per day/week).
Measured: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: Sexual intercourse.
The frequency of the patient's sexual intercourse will be recorded.
Measured: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: concomitant surgery
All details of any concomitant surgery in non-target compartment, other concomitant surgery i.e. hysterectomy, mid uretral sling for SUI, etc…will be recorded.
Measured: Day 0
Evolution of the PFDI-20 quality of life score
The Pelvic Floor Distress inventory (PFDI) includes 20 questions. Each question begins with a "yes" or "no" response. If "yes," the patient must indicate how much bowl, bladder, or pelvic symptoms have been bothering them in the past 3 months on a 4-point scale that ranges from "not at all" (0) to "quite a bit" (4). The scale scores are found individually by calculating the mean value of their corresponding questions and then multiplying by 25 to obtain a value that ranges from 0 to 100. The sum of the 3 scales are added together to get the PFDI-20 summary score, which ranges from 0 to 300.
Measured: Day 0
Evolution of the PFDI-20 quality of life score
The Pelvic Floor Distress inventory (PFDI) includes 20 questions. Each question begins with a "yes" or "no" response. If "yes," the patient must indicate how much bowl, bladder, or pelvic symptoms have been bothering them in the past 3 months on a 4-point scale that ranges from "not at all" (0) to "quite a bit" (4). The scale scores are found individually by calculating the mean value of their corresponding questions and then multiplying by 25 to obtain a value that ranges from 0 to 100. The sum of the 3 scales are added together to get the PFDI-20 summary score, which ranges from 0 to 300.
Measured: Up to 36 months after surgery.
Evolution of quality of life scores : PFIQ-7
The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7), a shortened, less comprehensive version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), is a questionnaire about the social impact of the patient's pelvic floor disorders. It consistś of 7 questions and 3 columns, with each question addressing the impact of urinary symptoms, digestive symptoms, and symptoms directly related to prolapse.
Measured: Day 0
Evolution of quality of life scores : PFIQ-7
The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7), a shortened, less comprehensive version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), is a questionnaire about the social impact of the patient's pelvic floor disorders. It consistś of 7 questions and 3 columns, with each question addressing the impact of urinary symptoms, digestive symptoms, and symptoms directly related to prolapse.
Measured: Up to 36 months after surgery.
Evolution of quality of life scores : PISQ-IR
The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, Revised by the International UroGynocological Association (PISQ-IR) is a disease-specific tool for evaluating the sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders. It is useful in screening for sexual disorders in women with Urinary Incontinence (UI), pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and anal incontinence. It is used to assess the impact of pelvic floor disorders on female sexual activity and inactivity.
Measured: Day 0
Evolution of quality of life scores : PISQ-IR
The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, Revised by the International UroGynocological Association (PISQ-IR) is a disease-specific tool for evaluating the sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders. It is useful in screening for sexual disorders in women with Urinary Incontinence (UI), pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and anal incontinence. It is used to assess the impact of pelvic floor disorders on female sexual activity and inactivity.
Measured: Up to 36 months after surgery.
Patient satisfaction
Patient satisfaction will be recorded on a Visual Analog Scale with scores ranging from 0= Extremely Dissatisfied to 6= Extremely Satisfied.
Measured: Up to 36 months after surgery.
Global impression of improvement (PGI-I)
The Patient Global impression of improvement (PGI-I) is a scale to describes how the patient's post-operative condition is compared with how it was before surgery:
Very much better = 1, Much better = 2, A little better = 3, No change = 4, A little worse = 5, Much worse = 6, Very much worse = 7
Measured: Up to 36 months after surgery
Frequency of revision and/or surgical re-intervention
The frequency of revision and/or surgical re-intervention including anti-incontinence surgery after sacrospinous suspension will be recorded
Measured: Up to 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 May 2023
- Study start11 May 2023
- Primary completion1 Oct 2024
- Study completion1 Jun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Prolapse; FemaleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Lille, Kremlin-Bicetre Hospital, Paris, Clinique Sainte-Anne, Strasbourg, Centre Hospitalier de La Rochelle
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05836844
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IDIL/2022/RdT01 2023-A00289-36
- Acronym
- APAS
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 17 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- APAS Study: Pragmatic Evaluation of the Performance and Safety of the Anchorsure System® Transvaginal Device for Surgical Treatment of Apical Prolapse in Women. A Post-market Multicentre Prospective Observational Cohort Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05836844
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- APAS / IDIL/2022/RdT01 2023-A00289-36
- Conditions
- Prolapse; Female, Prolapse Uterovaginal, Prolapse; Cervix
- Keywords
- pelvic organ prolapse
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Lille, Kremlin-Bicetre Hospital, Paris, Clinique Sainte-Anne, Strasbourg, Centre Hospitalier de La Rochelle
- Study start
- 11 May 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pelvic Organ Prolapse affects 50% of parous women, and apical prolapse is one of the most common types of prolapse. Treatment for apical prolapse ranges from observation, non-surgical treatment or surgical repair. An anchoring device can reduce dissection and operative time and is meant to provide strong fixation whilst minimizing potential postoperative pain by avoiding neurovascular injuries. These potential advantages must be evaluated in terms of performance and safety. This cohort study will be on patients undergoing sacrospinous fixation with the Anchorsure® system with a follow-up of 36 months.
Detailed description
Pelvic Organ Prolapse affects 50% of parous women, and apical prolapse is one of the most frequent. Treatment options for women with apical prolapse range from observation, non-surgical treatment or surgical repair. The use of an anchoring device reduces dissection and operative time and is supposed to provide a strong fixation while minimizing potential postoperative pain by avoiding neurovascular injuries. These potential advantages have to be evaluated in terms of performance and safety. This is a cohort study on patients undergoing sacrospinous fixation with the Anchorsure® system with a follow-up of 36 months.The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of the Anchorsure System® for sacrospinous suspension 12 months after surgical treatment of women with apical prolapse in real-life settings.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The target population is the population of adult women, undergoing a surgical treatment of The target population is the population of adult women, undergoing a surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse using Anchorsure System® in the participating centres: Nîmes University Hospital, Lille University Hospital, Sainte-Anne Clinic in Strasbourg, La Rochelle Hospital and Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Women with pelvic organ prolapse with leading edge at or beyond the hymen as confirmed by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q), i.e. Ba ≥ -1 cm for the anterior compartment, and/or Bp ≥ -1 cm for the posterior compartment, and/or C ≥ -1 cm for the apical compartment including recurrence.
- Women due for POP surgery using the Anchorsure System® for apical prolapse suspension with or without concomitant native tissue repair, with or without concomitant hysterectomy and with or without concomitant sling for stress urinary incontinence.
- All women who have not indicated any objection to participating in the study.
- All women who have been correctly informed.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patient taking part or having taken part in a device or drug interventional study within the last three months (except for VIGI-MESH national registry).
- Patients due for pelvic organ prolapse repair without apical suspension or with anything other than native tissue repair and the Anchorsure System®.
- Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
- Patients with active non-controlled or chronic gynaecologic or urinary tract infection and/or local tissue necrosis.
- Patients with ongoing pelvic organ cancer (e.g. uterine, ovarian, bladder, cervix …).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| The Anchorsure System®Sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Anchorsure Device | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Successful performance after sacrospinous fixation of the Anchorsure System®.
Time frame: 12 months after fixation
YES /NO
31 secondary outcomes
Device or procedure-related adverse events: Daily Pain score
Time frame: Day 0 to Day 30
Device or procedure-related adverse events: Anchor palpability
Time frame: 36 months after surgery
Device or procedure-related adverse events: Abnormal findings on clinical examination
Time frame: 36 months after surgery
Type of sacrospinous fixation technique used
Time frame: Day 0
Success of the intervention
Time frame: 36 months after surgery
Complications/adverse events
Time frame: 36 months after surgery
Severity of adverse events
Time frame: 36 months after surgery
Compartments treated
Time frame: 36 months after surgery
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Age
Time frame: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Body Mass Index
Time frame: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Previous history of pelvic surgery
Time frame: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Chronic constipation
Time frame: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Chronic pulmonary conditions
Time frame: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Vaginal compartment
Time frame: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Type of prolapse
Time frame: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Pelvic organ Prolapse Q grade
Time frame: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Concomitant surgery
Time frame: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: Age
Time frame: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: Body Mass Index
Time frame: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: Smoking.
Time frame: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: Sexual intercourse.
Time frame: Day 0
Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: concomitant surgery
Time frame: Day 0
Evolution of the PFDI-20 quality of life score
Time frame: Day 0
Evolution of the PFDI-20 quality of life score
Time frame: Up to 36 months after surgery.
Evolution of quality of life scores : PFIQ-7
Time frame: Day 0
Evolution of quality of life scores : PFIQ-7
Time frame: Up to 36 months after surgery.
Evolution of quality of life scores : PISQ-IR
Time frame: Day 0
Evolution of quality of life scores : PISQ-IR
Time frame: Up to 36 months after surgery.
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: Up to 36 months after surgery.
Global impression of improvement (PGI-I)
Time frame: Up to 36 months after surgery
Frequency of revision and/or surgical re-intervention
Time frame: Up to 36 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Nov 2025.
Related trials for Prolapse; Female
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Return to Physical Activity After Retropublic Transvaginal Sling and Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
Stress Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Recruiting
Pelvic Floor Muscle Training During Pregnancy
Urinary Incontinence, Anal Incontinence
Active, not recruiting
Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
Uterine Prolapse
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Pessary Experience Study
Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Stress Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Prolapse; Female and Prolapse Uterovaginal, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 4 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Renaud de TAYRAC, Professor (+334 66 68 32 16, renaud.detayrac@chu-nimes.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Successful performance after sacrospinous fixation of the Anchorsure System®. (time frame: 12 months after fixation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2025.