AzTrials
AzTrials

Prolapse; FemaleAPASNCT05836844

Pragmatic Evaluation of Performance and Safety of the Anchorsure® Transvaginal Device for Surgical Treatment of Apical Prolapse in Women

An observational study of Prolapse; Female and Prolapse Uterovaginal, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 4 sites in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pelvic Organ Prolapse affects 50% of parous women, and apical prolapse is one of the most common types of prolapse. Treatment for apical prolapse ranges from observation, non-surgical treatment or surgical repair. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
The Anchorsure System®
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
120 participants
Where
4 sitesFrance
Study dates
11 May 2023to 1 Jun 2028
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • Women only
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The target population is the population of adult women, undergoing a surgical treatment of The target population is the population of adult women, undergoing a surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse using Anchorsure System® in the participating centres: Nîmes University Hospital, Lille University Hospital, Sainte-Anne Clinic in Strasbourg, La Rochelle Hospital and Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital.

Who may be able to join

  • Women with pelvic organ prolapse with leading edge at or beyond the hymen as confirmed by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q), i.e. Ba ≥ -1 cm for the anterior compartment, and/or Bp ≥ -1 cm for the posterior compartment, and/or C ≥ -1 cm for the apical compartment including recurrence.
  • Women due for POP surgery using the Anchorsure System® for apical prolapse suspension with or without concomitant native tissue repair, with or without concomitant hysterectomy and with or without concomitant sling for stress urinary incontinence.
  • All women who have not indicated any objection to participating in the study.
  • All women who have been correctly informed.

Who cannot join

  • Patient taking part or having taken part in a device or drug interventional study within the last three months (except for VIGI-MESH national registry).
  • Patients due for pelvic organ prolapse repair without apical suspension or with anything other than native tissue repair and the Anchorsure System®.
  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
  • Patients with active non-controlled or chronic gynaecologic or urinary tract infection and/or local tissue necrosis.
  • Patients with ongoing pelvic organ cancer (e.g. uterine, ovarian, bladder, cervix …).
  • Patients with a history of radiotherapy in the pelvic area.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patients on therapy with immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment within the previous month.
  • patients under ongoing oral anticoagulant therapy.
  • Patients with stage 0 and 1 pelvic organ prolapse at the time of surgery
  • Patients with a preoperative infection contraindicating the surgery

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Renaud de TAYRAC, Professor contact

+334 66 68 32 16

renaud.detayrac@chu-nimes.fr

Anissa MEGZARI contact

+334 66 68 42 36

drc@chu-nimes.fr

France4 sites, 4 recruiting
  • La Rochelle General Hospital

    La Rochelle, 17000

    Philippe Ferry, Doctor

    Recruiting
  • Lille University Hospital

    Lille, 59000

    Michel Cosson, Professor

    Recruiting
  • Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital

    Paris, 94270

    Hervé Pr H Fernandez, Professor

    Recruiting
  • Clinique Sainte-Anne

    Strasbourg, 67000

    David Hamid, Dr.

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: APAS Study: Pragmatic Evaluation of the Performance and Safety of the Anchorsure System® Transvaginal Device for Surgical Treatment of Apical Prolapse in Women. A Post-market Multicentre Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse affects 50% of parous women, and apical prolapse is one of the most common types of prolapse. Treatment for apical prolapse ranges from observation, non-surgical treatment or surgical repair. An anchoring device can reduce dissection and operative time and is meant to provide strong fixation whilst minimizing potential postoperative pain by avoiding neurovascular injuries. These potential advantages must be evaluated in terms of performance and safety. This cohort study will be on patients undergoing sacrospinous fixation with the Anchorsure® system with a follow-up of 36 months.

Read the detailed description

Pelvic Organ Prolapse affects 50% of parous women, and apical prolapse is one of the most frequent. Treatment options for women with apical prolapse range from observation, non-surgical treatment or surgical repair. The use of an anchoring device reduces dissection and operative time and is supposed to provide a strong fixation while minimizing potential postoperative pain by avoiding neurovascular injuries. These potential advantages have to be evaluated in terms of performance and safety. This is a cohort study on patients undergoing sacrospinous fixation with the Anchorsure® system with a follow-up of 36 months.The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of the Anchorsure System® for sacrospinous suspension 12 months after surgical treatment of women with apical prolapse in real-life settings.

Being tested
The Anchorsure System®
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse
Medical subject headings
Prolapse, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • The Anchorsure System®Device

    Sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Anchorsure Device

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Successful performance after sacrospinous fixation of the Anchorsure System®.

    YES /NO

    Measured: 12 months after fixation

Secondary outcomes (31)
  1. Device or procedure-related adverse events: Daily Pain score

    All procedure-related adverse events and complications will be recorded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system with a one-month pain diary (filled in once a day using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 for buttock pain;

    Measured: Day 0 to Day 30

  2. Device or procedure-related adverse events: Anchor palpability

    The anchor palpability score will be recorded regularly for up to 36 months after surgery.

    Measured: 36 months after surgery

  3. Device or procedure-related adverse events: Abnormal findings on clinical examination

    All abnormal findings on clinical examination will be reported including suture exposure, anchor extrusion into another organ, perforation, organ or vascular or nerve injury/damage, fistula, bleeding including hematoma (requiring transfusion or not), thrombotic event, neuromuscular problems (including pain), pelvic discomfort or pain, de novo dyspareunia, infection (e.g. vaginal, urinary tract infection), urinary tract complications including ureteric disorders, urinary retention requiring drainage > 48h, urge symptoms or incontinence (worsening or de novo), de novo constipation or faecal incontinence. Incidences of adverse events will be determined overall, by type of adverse event, severity, compartment and type of sacrospinous suspension (uni versus bilateral and anterior versus posterior).

    Measured: 36 months after surgery

  4. Type of sacrospinous fixation technique used

    The type of sacrospinous fixation technique used: uni/bilateral, anterior/posterior will be recorded

    Measured: Day 0

  5. Success of the intervention

    Success is defined as per primary objective and assessed at 36 months after surgery; compartments treated: anterior, apical, posterior, total; type of prolapse: primary or recurrent prolapse.

    Measured: 36 months after surgery

  6. Complications/adverse events

    Collection of all complications/adverse events up to 36 months after surgery.

    Measured: 36 months after surgery

  7. Severity of adverse events

    Determination of the level of severity of the adverse event: mild, moderate, severe.

    Measured: 36 months after surgery

  8. Compartments treated

    Compartments treated: anterior, apical, posterior, total; type of sacrospinous suspension: uni/bilateral, anterior/posterior.

    Measured: 36 months after surgery

  9. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Age

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: The patient's age will be recorded

    Measured: Day 0

  10. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Body Mass Index

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: the patient's Body Mass Index will be recorded.

    Measured: Day 0

  11. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Previous history of pelvic surgery

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Any history of pelvic surgery will be recorded.

    Measured: Day 0

  12. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Chronic constipation

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Any history of chronic constipation will be recorded.

    Measured: Day 0

  13. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Chronic pulmonary conditions

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Any history of chronic pulmonary conditions will be recorded.

    Measured: Day 0

  14. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Vaginal compartment

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Details of the patient's vaginal compartment will be recorded.

    Measured: Day 0

  15. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Type of prolapse

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: The type of prolapse (recurrent or primary) will be recorded.

    Measured: Day 0

  16. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Pelvic organ Prolapse Q grade

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: the patient's Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POPQ) grade will be recorded as follows :

    Stage 0 no prolapse is demonstrated Stage 1 the most distal portion of the prolapse is more than 1 cm above the level of the hymen Stage 2 the most distal portion of the prolapse is 1 cm or less proximal or distal to the hymenal plane Stage 3 the most distal portion of the prolapse protrudes more than 1 cm below the hymen but protrudes no farther than 2 cm less than the total vaginal length (for example., not all of the vagina has prolapsed) Stage 4 vaginal eversion is essentially complete

    Measured: Day 0

  17. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Concomitant surgery

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: details of any concomitant surgery will be recorded.

    Measured: Day 0

  18. Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: Age

    The patient's age will be recorded in years

    Measured: Day 0

  19. Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: Body Mass Index

    The patient's body mass index (BMI) will be calculated and recorded. The formula is BMI = kg/m2 where kg is a person's weight in kilograms and m2 is their height in metres squared.

    Measured: Day 0

  20. Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: Smoking.

    The patient's smoking status will be recorded (Regular smoker/Weaned/Number of cigarettes per day/week).

    Measured: Day 0

  21. Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: Sexual intercourse.

    The frequency of the patient's sexual intercourse will be recorded.

    Measured: Day 0

  22. Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: concomitant surgery

    All details of any concomitant surgery in non-target compartment, other concomitant surgery i.e. hysterectomy, mid uretral sling for SUI, etc…will be recorded.

    Measured: Day 0

  23. Evolution of the PFDI-20 quality of life score

    The Pelvic Floor Distress inventory (PFDI) includes 20 questions. Each question begins with a "yes" or "no" response. If "yes," the patient must indicate how much bowl, bladder, or pelvic symptoms have been bothering them in the past 3 months on a 4-point scale that ranges from "not at all" (0) to "quite a bit" (4). The scale scores are found individually by calculating the mean value of their corresponding questions and then multiplying by 25 to obtain a value that ranges from 0 to 100. The sum of the 3 scales are added together to get the PFDI-20 summary score, which ranges from 0 to 300.

    Measured: Day 0

  24. Evolution of the PFDI-20 quality of life score

    The Pelvic Floor Distress inventory (PFDI) includes 20 questions. Each question begins with a "yes" or "no" response. If "yes," the patient must indicate how much bowl, bladder, or pelvic symptoms have been bothering them in the past 3 months on a 4-point scale that ranges from "not at all" (0) to "quite a bit" (4). The scale scores are found individually by calculating the mean value of their corresponding questions and then multiplying by 25 to obtain a value that ranges from 0 to 100. The sum of the 3 scales are added together to get the PFDI-20 summary score, which ranges from 0 to 300.

    Measured: Up to 36 months after surgery.

  25. Evolution of quality of life scores : PFIQ-7

    The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7), a shortened, less comprehensive version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), is a questionnaire about the social impact of the patient's pelvic floor disorders. It consistś of 7 questions and 3 columns, with each question addressing the impact of urinary symptoms, digestive symptoms, and symptoms directly related to prolapse.

    Measured: Day 0

  26. Evolution of quality of life scores : PFIQ-7

    The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7), a shortened, less comprehensive version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), is a questionnaire about the social impact of the patient's pelvic floor disorders. It consistś of 7 questions and 3 columns, with each question addressing the impact of urinary symptoms, digestive symptoms, and symptoms directly related to prolapse.

    Measured: Up to 36 months after surgery.

  27. Evolution of quality of life scores : PISQ-IR

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, Revised by the International UroGynocological Association (PISQ-IR) is a disease-specific tool for evaluating the sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders. It is useful in screening for sexual disorders in women with Urinary Incontinence (UI), pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and anal incontinence. It is used to assess the impact of pelvic floor disorders on female sexual activity and inactivity.

    Measured: Day 0

  28. Evolution of quality of life scores : PISQ-IR

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, Revised by the International UroGynocological Association (PISQ-IR) is a disease-specific tool for evaluating the sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders. It is useful in screening for sexual disorders in women with Urinary Incontinence (UI), pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and anal incontinence. It is used to assess the impact of pelvic floor disorders on female sexual activity and inactivity.

    Measured: Up to 36 months after surgery.

  29. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction will be recorded on a Visual Analog Scale with scores ranging from 0= Extremely Dissatisfied to 6= Extremely Satisfied.

    Measured: Up to 36 months after surgery.

  30. Global impression of improvement (PGI-I)

    The Patient Global impression of improvement (PGI-I) is a scale to describes how the patient's post-operative condition is compared with how it was before surgery:

    Very much better = 1, Much better = 2, A little better = 3, No change = 4, A little worse = 5, Much worse = 6, Very much worse = 7

    Measured: Up to 36 months after surgery

  31. Frequency of revision and/or surgical re-intervention

    The frequency of revision and/or surgical re-intervention including anti-incontinence surgery after sacrospinous suspension will be recorded

    Measured: Up to 36 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 May 2023
  2. Study start11 May 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05836844
Sponsor's protocol ID
IDIL/2022/RdT01 2023-A00289-36
Acronym
APAS
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
19 Apr 2023
Last updated
17 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Prolapse; Female and Prolapse Uterovaginal, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 4 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Renaud de TAYRAC, Professor (+334 66 68 32 16, renaud.detayrac@chu-nimes.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Successful performance after sacrospinous fixation of the Anchorsure System®. (time frame: 12 months after fixation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in