Coronary Artery StenosisDEFINE-DMNCT05831085
Diabetes-Centered Evaluation of Revascularization Strategy of Functional and Imaging-CombiNEd State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
A study testing State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and standard CABG in people with Coronary Artery Stenosis, run by Duk-Woo Park, MD at 39 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
The objective of this randomized study was to compare outcomes of imaging-and physiology-guided state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with diabetes and three-vessel CAD (not involving left main). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Stenosis
- What is being tested?
- State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and standard CABG
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,500 participants
- Where
- 39 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- 14 Jun 2024to 31 Dec 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The subject must be ≥20 years of age with angina and/or evidence of myocardial ischemia.
- Patients with type 2 diabetes based on the need for treatment with insulin or oral hypoglycemic drugs or a confirmed elevated blood glucose level (fasting plasma glucose elevation on >1 occasion of ≥126 mg/dL [7.0 mmol/L] or 2-h postprandial of ≥200 mg/dL [11.1 mmol/L] during oral glucose tolerance test or random plasma glucose of ≥200 mg/dL [11.1 mmol/L] with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis or HbA1C ≥6.5% [48 mmol/mol]).
- Significant three-vessel CAD (defined as ≥ 50% diameter stenosis [DS] by visual estimation in each of the three major epicardial vessels or major side branches but not involving the left main coronary artery) and equivalently amenable to revascularization by means of either PCI or CABG as determined by the Heart Team at the trial site.
- The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.
Who cannot join
- Unprotected left main coronary artery disease.
- The presence of complex coronary disease anatomy or lesion characteristics or other cardiac condition(s) which leads the participating interventional cardiologist to believe that PCI is not suitable (i.e. the subject should be managed with CABG or medical therapy alone).
- Recent ST-elevation myocardial infarction(<5 days prior to randomization).
- Cardiogenic shock and/or need for mechanical/pharmacologic hemodynamic support.
- Severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <30%).
- Requirement for other cardiac or non-cardiac surgical procedure (e.g., valve replacement, aorta surgery, or carotid revascularization). However, a maze procedure or pulmonary vein isolation is allowed.
Show all 19Show fewer
- Contraindication or inability to take aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel) for at least 6 months.
- Prior CABG.
- Extremely calcified or tortuous vessels precluding FFR measurement or intracoronary imaging evaluation.
- More than one major epicardial vessel which is chronically occluded; enrollment of 1 Chronic total occlusion lesion is allowed.
- Subjects requiring or who may require additional surgery (cardiac or noncardiac) within 1 year.
- End-stage renal disease requiring renal replacement therapy.
- Liver cirrhosis.
- Pregnant and/or lactating women.
- Concurrent medical condition with a limited life expectancy of less than 2 years.
- Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period. However, where at least one or more conditions are satisfied, it could be an exception according to an investigator's discretion;
- 1) Participated in the observational study expected no effect on the safety and/or effectiveness evaluation of this trial.
- 2) Screening failed before any interventional factor is involved.
- 3) Participated in academic trials like strategic comparison studies conducted under standard therapy provided that there is no additional risk or a specific procedure to a subject and no interference between this trial and other studies.
Trial locations and contacts
39 sites in 14 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
39 sites in 14 countries
South Korea21 sites, 20 recruiting
- Recruiting
Bucheon Sejong Hospital
Bucheon-si
Young-jin Choi, MD
Young-jin Choi, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
Daegu
Jin-bae Lee, MD
Jin-bae Lee, MD
- Recruiting
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Daegu
Chul-hyun Lee, MD
Chul-hyun Lee, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Yeungnam University Medical Center
Daegu
Woong Kim, MD
Woong Kim, MD
- Recruiting
Chungnam National University Hospital
Daejeon
Jin-ok Jeong, MD
Jin-ok Jeong, MD
- Withdrawn
Konyang University Hospital
Daejeon
- Not yet recruiting
Gangneung Asan Hospital
Gangneung
Han-bit Park, MD
Han-bit Park, MD
- Recruiting
Chonnam National University Hospital
Gwangju
Young-keun Ahn, MD
Young-keun Ahn, MD
- Recruiting
National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital
Ilsan
Ji-yong Jang, MD
Ji-yong Jang, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Gachon University Gil Hospital
Incheon
Seung-hwan Han, MD
Seung-hwan Han, MD
- Recruiting
Dong-A Medical Center
Pusan
Yong-rak Cho, MD
Yong-rak Cho, MD
- Recruiting
Seoul university Bundang hospital
Seongnam-si
Si-Hyuck Kang, MD
Si-Hyuck Kang, MD
- Recruiting
Asan Medical Center
Seoul
Duk-woo Park, MD
Duk-woo Park, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Hanyang University Seoul Hospital
Seoul
Young-hyo Lim, MD
Young-hyo Lim, MD
- Recruiting
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul
Joo-yong Han, MD
Joo-yong Han, MD
- Not yet recruiting
SNU Boramae Medical Center
Seoul
Sang-hyun Kim, MD
Sang-hyun Kim, MD
- Recruiting
The Catholic Univ. of Korea Seoul St. Mary's hospital
Seoul
Byung-hee Hwang, MD
Byung-hee Hwang, MD
- Not yet recruiting
The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent's Hospital
Suwon
Sung-ho Hur, MD
Sung-ho Hur, MD
- Recruiting
The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu ST. Mary's Hospital
Uijeongbu-si
Hyo-seok Ahn, MD
Hyo-seok Ahn, MD
- Recruiting
Ulsan University Hospital
Ulsan
Eun-seok Shin, MD
Eun-seok Shin, MD
- Recruiting
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Yangsan
Jeong-cheon Choi, MD
Jeong-cheon Choi, MD
India3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Mody Harvard Cardiac Institute
Bathinda
Rohit Mody, MD
Rohit Mody, MD
- Recruiting
Medanta - The Medicity
Gurugram
Rajneesh Kapoor, MD
Rajneesh Kapoor, MD
- Recruiting
Fortis Escorts Heart Institute
New Delhi
Ashok Seth, MD
Ashok Seth, MD
Thailand3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Siriraj Hospital
Bangkok
Karokoth Towashiraporn, MD
Karokoth Towashiraporn, MD
- Recruiting
Siriraj Hospital
Bangkok
Korakoth Towashiraporn, MD
Korakoth Towashiraporn, MD
- Recruiting
Srinagarind Hospital
Khon Kaen
Chaiyasith Wongvipaporn, MD
Chaiyasith Wongvipaporn, MD
China2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS)
Beijing
Kefei Dou, MD
Kefei Dou, MD
- Recruiting
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hanzhou
Jian'an Wang, MD
Jian'an Wang, MD
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Palo Alto VA Medical Center
Palo Alto, California, 94304
Fearon F. William, MD
Fearon F. William, MD
Australia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Victorian Heart Institute
Clayton
James Sapontis, MD
James Sapontis, MD
Hong Kong1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong
Frankie CC Tam, MD
Frankie CC Tam, MD
Japan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Tsuchiura Kyodo Hospital
Tsuchiura
Tsunekazu Kakuta, MD
Tsunekazu Kakuta, MD
Latvia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital
Riga
Andrejs Erglis, MD
Andrejs Erglis, MD
Lithuania1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos
Vilnius
Giedrius Davidavicius, MD
Giedrius Davidavicius, MD
Malaysia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Sarawak Heart Centre
Kota Samarahan
Alan Fong, MD
Alan Fong, MD
Serbia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Clinical Center of Serbia
Belgrade
Branko Beleslin, MD
Branko Beleslin, MD
Singapore1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
National Heart Centre Singapore (NHCS)
Singapore
Tan Wei Chieh Jack, MD
Tan Wei Chieh Jack, MD
Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei
Paul Hsien Li Kao, MD
Paul Hsien Li Kao, MD
About this study
Official title: A Comparison of Imaging- and Physiology-Guided State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Diabetes and Three-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: DEFINE-DM Trial (Diabetes-Centered Evaluation of Revascularization Strategy of Functional and Imaging-CombiNEd State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease)
The objective of this randomized study was to compare outcomes of imaging-and physiology-guided state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with diabetes and three-vessel CAD (not involving left main).
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Stenosis
- Being tested
- State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, standard CABG
- Keywords
- Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease, state of the art, State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting, Diabetes Mellitus
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Stenosis, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary InterventionProcedure or surgery
supported by intracoronary imaging (e.g., intravascular ultrasound [IVUS] or optical coherence tomography [OCT]), intracoronary physiology (e.g., fractional flow reserve [FFR] or instantaneous wave-free ratio [iFR]), contemporary metallic DES (durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents; XIENCE family stent system, Abbott Vascular), guideline-directed optimal medical therapy [GDMT] with advanced cardiovascular (e.g., high-dose statin and advanced strategy of antiplatelet regimens) and anti-diabetic medications [e.g., a sodium-glucose cotransporter [SGLT]-2 inhibitors or Glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1] agonists) in patients with type 2 diabetes and three-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) (not involving left main)
standard CABGProcedure or surgery
Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Imaging- and Physiology-Guided State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
| Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: standard CABG |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The event rate of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events
Major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were defined as a composite of hard clinical endpoints of death from any causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke.
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (19)
The event rate of death from any cause
Measured: 5 years
The event rate of myocardial infarction
Measured: 5 years
The event rate of repeat revascularization
Measured: 5 years
The event rate of stroke
Measured: 5 years
The event rate of composite of death from any causes, cardiovascular causes, or noncardiovascular causes
Measured: 5 years
The event rate of myocardial infarction
any, spontaneous or procedural
Measured: 5 years
The event rate of composite of death or myocardial infarction
Measured: 5 years
The event rate of composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke or repeat revascularization
Measured: 5 years
The event rate of stent thrombosis
by an Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definition
Measured: 5 years
The event rate of symptomatic graft occlusion or stenosis
Measured: 5 years
The event rate of bleeding complications
BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) criteria
Measured: 5 years
The event rate of periprocedural major adverse events
Periprocedural major adverse events means major arrhythmia, any unplanned surgery or therapeutic radiologic procedure, development of acute renal failure, sternal wound dehiscence, infection requiring antibiotics, prolonged intubation (>48 hours), post-pericardiotomy syndrome, etc.
Measured: 5 years
Length of hospital stay
Measured: 7 days
The event rate of rehospitalization
any, cardiac, or noncardiac causes
Measured: 7 days
The change of functional class
Assessed by The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Angina Score Classification.
The minimum and maximum values are 1 and 4 respectively. A higher score of CCS angina score classification means severe exertional angina.
Measured: 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 60 months
The change of angina-related quality of life index by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ]
The SAQ is a disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) with 5 domains.
The minimum and maximum values are 0 and 100 respectively. A lower score represents poor health status and a high score represents good health status.
Measured: 1, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
The change of angina-related quality of life index by the EQ-5D
EQ-5D is a standardised measure of health-related quality of life developed by the EuroQol Group.
The minimum and maximum values are 5 and 15 respectively. A higher score of EQ-5D means a low quality of life.
Measured: 1, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
The number of anti-anginal medications used
Measured: 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 60 months
Total healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness assessed using total medical expenditures and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)
Total medical cost will be calculated using predefined cost components related to the index revascularization procedure (PCI or CABG) and subsequent healthcare utilization. The list of cost items includes (but is not limited to): diagnostic catheters, guide catheters, guidewires, balloons, stents, adjunctive devices (e.g., rotablation system, intravascular lithotripsy), professional procedure fees, CABG-related graft categories, hospitalization cost per day (Intensive care unit and ward), and non-invasive cardiac tests. Total costs will be aggregated for each participant and compared between study groups at each scheduled time point.
Cost-effectiveness will be assessed using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), calculated as the difference in total costs divided by the difference in clinical effectiveness between the study groups.
Measured: 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 60 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Apr 2023
- Study start14 Jun 2024
- Primary completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery StenosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Duk-Woo Park, MD
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Duk-Woo Park, MD, Asan Medical Center
- Investigators
- Seung-jung Park, MD, Study chair, Asan Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05831085
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AMCCV2023-03
- Acronym
- DEFINE-DM
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 24 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Comparison of Imaging- and Physiology-Guided State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Diabetes and Three-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: DEFINE-DM Trial (Diabetes-Centered Evaluation of Revascularization Strategy of Functional and Imaging-CombiNEd State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05831085
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DEFINE-DM / AMCCV2023-03
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Stenosis
- Keywords
- Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease, state of the art, State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting, Diabetes Mellitus
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Duk-Woo Park, MDUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea
- Study start
- 14 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this randomized study was to compare outcomes of imaging-and physiology-guided state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with diabetes and three-vessel CAD (not involving left main).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Imaging- and Physiology-Guided State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention | Experimental | Procedure: State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
| Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting | Active comparator | Procedure: standard CABG |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- The subject must be ≥20 years of age with angina and/or evidence of myocardial ischemia.
- Patients with type 2 diabetes based on the need for treatment with insulin or oral hypoglycemic drugs or a confirmed elevated blood glucose level (fasting plasma glucose elevation on >1 occasion of ≥126 mg/dL [7.0 mmol/L] or 2-h postprandial of ≥200 mg/dL [11.1 mmol/L] during oral glucose tolerance test or random plasma glucose of ≥200 mg/dL [11.1 mmol/L] with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis or HbA1C ≥6.5% [48 mmol/mol]).
- Significant three-vessel CAD (defined as ≥ 50% diameter stenosis [DS] by visual estimation in each of the three major epicardial vessels or major side branches but not involving the left main coronary artery) and equivalently amenable to revascularization by means of either PCI or CABG as determined by the Heart Team at the trial site.
- The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Unprotected left main coronary artery disease.
- The presence of complex coronary disease anatomy or lesion characteristics or other cardiac condition(s) which leads the participating interventional cardiologist to believe that PCI is not suitable (i.e. the subject should be managed with CABG or medical therapy alone).
- Recent ST-elevation myocardial infarction(<5 days prior to randomization).
- Cardiogenic shock and/or need for mechanical/pharmacologic hemodynamic support.
- Severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <30%).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Interventionsupported by intracoronary imaging (e.g., intravascular ultrasound [IVUS] or optical coherence tomography [OCT]), intracoronary physiology (e.g., fractional flow reserve [FFR] or instantaneous wave-free ratio [iFR]), contemporary metallic DES (durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents; XIENCE family stent system, Abbott Vascular), guideline-directed optimal medical therapy [GDMT] with advanced cardiovascular (e.g., high-dose statin and advanced strategy of antiplatelet regimens) and anti-diabetic medications [e.g., a sodium-glucose cotransporter [SGLT]-2 inhibitors or Glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1] agonists) in patients with type 2 diabetes and three-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) (not involving left main) | Procedure or surgery | Imaging- and Physiology-Guided State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
| standard CABGCoronary-Artery Bypass Grafting | Procedure or surgery | Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting |
Primary outcome
The event rate of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events
Time frame: 2 years
Major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were defined as a composite of hard clinical endpoints of death from any causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke.
19 secondary outcomes
The event rate of death from any cause
Time frame: 5 years
The event rate of myocardial infarction
Time frame: 5 years
The event rate of repeat revascularization
Time frame: 5 years
The event rate of stroke
Time frame: 5 years
The event rate of composite of death from any causes, cardiovascular causes, or noncardiovascular causes
Time frame: 5 years
The event rate of myocardial infarction
Time frame: 5 years
The event rate of composite of death or myocardial infarction
Time frame: 5 years
The event rate of composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke or repeat revascularization
Time frame: 5 years
The event rate of stent thrombosis
Time frame: 5 years
The event rate of symptomatic graft occlusion or stenosis
Time frame: 5 years
The event rate of bleeding complications
Time frame: 5 years
The event rate of periprocedural major adverse events
Time frame: 5 years
Length of hospital stay
Time frame: 7 days
The event rate of rehospitalization
Time frame: 7 days
The change of functional class
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 60 months
The change of angina-related quality of life index by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ]
Time frame: 1, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
The change of angina-related quality of life index by the EQ-5D
Time frame: 1, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
The number of anti-anginal medications used
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 60 months
Total healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness assessed using total medical expenditures and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 60 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Coronary Artery Stenosis
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Inclisiran to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in High-risk Primary Prevention Patients.
Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Recruiting
Positron Emission Tomography to Assess the Effect of Camzyos on Ischaemia in HOCM: PEACH Trial
Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy \(HOCM\), Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction
RecruitingObservational study
A 10-Minute Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Protocol for Cardiac Disease
Coronary Artery Disease, Myocarditis
Recruiting
Effects of Percutaneous Transluminal Renal Angioplasty of Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis in High-Risk Patients.
Renovascular Hypertension, Renovascular Hypertension With Renal Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Seung-jung Park, MD study chair
Asan Medical Center
39 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and standard CABG in people with Coronary Artery Stenosis, run by Duk-Woo Park, MD at 39 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 39 sites in South Korea, India, Thailand, China, United States and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jung-hee Ham, Project manager (82-2-3010-4728, cvcrc5@amc.seoul.kr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The event rate of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2026.