AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT05820295

Improving How Older Adults at Risk for Cardiovascular Outcomes Are Selected for Care Coordination

A study testing Care coordination delivered based on perceived need in people with Cardiovascular Diseases and Myocardial Infarction, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This pragmatic clinical trial embedded in an accountable care organization will determine the comparative effectiveness of two approaches for assigning care coordinators to older adults at risk for cardiovascular outcomes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
What is being tested?
Care coordination delivered based on perceived need
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
400 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
17 May 2023to 11 Jul 2024
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older,
  • Attributed to the NewYork Quality Care accountable care organization,
  • Are community-dwelling,
  • Have cardiovascular disease or 1 or more cardiovascular risk factors, and
  • Had highly fragmented ambulatory care in the prior year (defined as a reversed Bice-Boxerman Index greater than or equal to 0.85)

Who cannot join

  • Those who reside in long-term care or nursing home facilities (based on addresses in Medicare claims)
  • Enrolled in home hospice
  • Dementia (as measured in claims using the Bynum Standard 1-year definition)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medicine

    New York, New York, 10065

Other trials in United States

About this study

This pragmatic clinical trial embedded in an accountable care organization will determine the comparative effectiveness of two approaches for assigning care coordinators to older adults at risk for cardiovascular outcomes. The hypothesis is that assigning care coordinators to older adults based on perceived need will be more effective at preventing emergency department visits and hospitalizations compared to usual care.

Read the detailed description

This project will use a pragmatic clinical trial embedded in an accountable care organization (ACO) to determine the comparative effectiveness of two different approaches for selecting older adults at risk for cardiovascular outcomes to receive support from care coordinators: (1) an approach that assigns older adults to care coordinators based on self-reported difficulty with care coordination, or (2) usual care, which generally assigns older adults to care coordinators after hospital discharge, regardless of perceived need. The investigators will include community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years old with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or 1 or more CVD risk factors who have been attributed to the NewYork Quality Care ACO and who have fragmented care. The investigators will randomize the participants into two groups. This study is highly pragmatic, and the intervention is sustainable and scalable. Moreover, the proposed approach has the potential to improve care delivery and outcomes for older adults at risk for cardiovascular outcomes.

Being tested
Care coordination delivered based on perceived need, Care coordination delivered based on usual care (e.g. discharge from hospital)
Keywords
care coordination, accountable care organization
Medical subject headings
Cardiovascular Diseases, Myocardial Infarction, Atrial Fibrillation, Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Failure, Hyperlipidemias, Hypertension, Myocardial Ischemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Care coordination delivered based on perceived needBehavioural

    If patients in intervention group report on the survey that they experience difficulty coordinating care among their providers, the patient will be selected for care management services. Those services will attempt to address the problems with care coordination that the proxy reported.

  • Care coordination delivered based on usual care (e.g. discharge from hospital)Behavioural

    If a patient is discharged from a hospital, the patient will be selected for care management services.

Study groups in NCT05820295
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalThe intervention group will assign care coordinators to individuals based on perceived need for assistance with care coordination. Perceived need will be measured through a proxy's responses to a previously validated telephone survey on perceptions of care coordination.
Receives: Behavioral: Care coordination delivered based on perceived need
ControlActive comparatorUsual care assigns patients to care coordinators in response to a discharge from a hospital or a direct referral from a physician.
Receives: Behavioral: Care coordination delivered based on usual care (e.g. discharge from hospital)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Emergency Department Visits or Hospital Admissions

    Occurrence of an emergency department visit or hospital admission, as measured in Medicare claims. This outcome measure allows more than one event per participant.

    Measured: Over 12 months (beginning 1 month after the start of care coordination)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Acceptability

    Number of people in each group who accept care management

    Measured: Up to 1 year of follow-up

  2. Appropriateness

    Number of participants who requested care management services that were in scope for the care managers' credentials

    Measured: Up to 1 year of follow-up

  3. Fidelity

    Number of participants who received care management services, among those who requested care management services.

    Measured: Up to 1 year of follow-up

  4. Efficiency

    The total number of care management encounters per group. This measure allows more than one encounter per participant.

    Measured: Up to 1 year of follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Apr 2023
  2. Study start17 May 2023
  3. Primary completion31 May 2024
  4. Study completion11 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
400 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05820295
Sponsor's protocol ID
22-09025263
Other IDs
1K18HS029255-01
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
7 Apr 2023
Last updated
23 Jul 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Kern LM, Aucapina JE, Banerjee S, Ringel JB, Tobin JN, Fisseha S, Meiri H, Han J, Wu K, Bialor J, Sterling MR, Stange KC, Safford MM, Casale PN. Care Coordination and Hospitalization in Older Adults With or at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2026 Apr 1;9(4):e269110. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.9110.

    PubMed 42048081

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in