Atrial Fibrillation New OnsetNCT05818592
Screening for Atrial Fibrillation With Self Pulse Monitoring
A study testing Self-Pulse Monitoring in people with Atrial Fibrillation New Onset, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the efficacy of self-pulse monitoring in detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) in adult patients at increased risk of stroke. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is self-screening an effective modality for diagnosis of AF? Are there clinical differences and outcomes… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation New Onset
- What is being tested?
- Self-Pulse Monitoring
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 526 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 21 Sep 2020to 31 May 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 or greater
- No known history of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
- Access to MyChart
- CHA2DS2-VASc sore (described below) >/= 2 (male) or >/=3 (female) based on the following criteria:
- Two points: Age ≥75, prior stroke
- One point: Age ≥65-74, congestive heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, vascular disease
Who cannot join
- Prior diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
- Unable to consent
- Currently incarcerated
- Self-pay/uninsured
- Taking anticoagulation for other medical conditions than atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
About this study
Official title: Screening for Atrial Fibrillation With Self Pulse Monitoring in Patients at Increased Risk of Stroke
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the efficacy of self-pulse monitoring in detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) in adult patients at increased risk of stroke.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Is self-screening an effective modality for diagnosis of AF?
- Are there clinical differences and outcomes for patients who self-screen?
Eligible participants will be randomized to either the intervention group or control group. The control group will continue with usual standard of care. Participants randomized to the intervention group will be asked to:
- View an online educational video to teach them the appropriate way to manually check their pulse for irregularities.
- Manually check their pulse for 30 seconds twice daily for 14 days.
- Patients who screen positive for irregularities will be sent a 14-day wearable cardiac monitor to assess for underlying arrhythmias.
Researchers will compare the intervention group to the control group to see if there are clinical differences and outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Participants will be recruited for this study using MyChart recruiting. Participants meeting inclusion criteria will be invited to participate and can respond "interested" or "decline." Participants who respond interested will complete a brief survey to confirm eligibility prior to consenting. One the participant consents, they will be randomized to the self-pulse check/intervention group or control group.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation New Onset
- Being tested
- Self-Pulse Monitoring
- Keywords
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Self-Pulse MonitoringOther
Participants will manually monitor pulse for irregularities.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Pulse Monitoring Intervention Group | Experimental | Participants view an educational video instructing them on how to manually check their pulse for irregularities. Participants will be instructed to check their pulse for 30 seconds twice daily for 2 weeks. Receives: Other: Self-Pulse Monitoring |
| Control Group Standard of Care | No intervention | The control group will continue with usual care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants diagnosed with AF in intervention group who screened positive.
Participants assigned to the intervention group are instructed on how to manually check their pulse to detect irregularities. Those who screen positive for irregularities will be sent a 14-day wearable cardiac monitor to confirm diagnosis of AF. Diagnosis of AF can also be confirmed by electrocardiogram (ECG) at an outpatient clinic visit.
Measured: 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Total number of participants diagnosed with AF
Participant data will be collected from the electronic health record one year after randomization to assess how many participants from each arm are subsequently diagnosed with AF.
Measured: 1-year
Amount of time in days to diagnosis of AF from randomization
Participant data will be collected from the electronic health record one year after randomization to assess how many participants from each arm are subsequently diagnosed with AF. For participants with a diagnosis of AF, the time in days from randomization to diagnosis will be calculated.
Measured: 1-year
Number of participants prescribed anticoagulation
Participant data will be collected from the electronic health record one year after randomization to assess how many participants are prescribed anticoagulation medications.
Measured: 1-year
Number of participants with stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or systemic embolism
Participant data will be collected from the electronic health record one year after randomization to assess how many participants have a diagnosis of stroke, TIA, or systemic embolism.
Measured: 1-year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Apr 2023
- Study start21 Sep 2020
- Primary completion31 May 2022
- Study completion31 May 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial Fibrillation New OnsetStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of North Carolina, Chapel HillThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Eligible participants will be randomized to either the intervention group or control group.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 526 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Anil Gehi, MD, Principal investigator, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05818592
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 19-2254
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 12 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Publications
US Preventive Services Task Force; Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Caughey AB, Davidson KW, Doubeni CA, Epling JW Jr, Kemper AR, Kubik M, Landefeld CS, Mangione CM, Silverstein M, Simon MA, Tseng CW, Wong JB. Screening for Atrial Fibrillation With Electrocardiography: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2018 Aug 7;320(5):478-484. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.10321.
PubMed 30088016Yaghi S, Kamel H. Stratifying Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation: Beyond Clinical Risk Scores. Stroke. 2017 Oct;48(10):2665-2670. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017084. Epub 2017 Sep 15. No abstract available.
PubMed 28916670Freedman B, Camm J, Calkins H, Healey JS, Rosenqvist M, Wang J, Albert CM, Anderson CS, Antoniou S, Benjamin EJ, Boriani G, Brachmann J, Brandes A, Chao TF, Conen D, Engdahl J, Fauchier L, Fitzmaurice DA, Friberg L, Gersh BJ, Gladstone DJ, Glotzer TV, Gwynne K, Hankey GJ, Harbison J, Hillis GS, Hills MT, Kamel H, Kirchhof P, Kowey PR, Krieger D, Lee VWY, Levin LA, Lip GYH, Lobban T, Lowres N, Mairesse GH, Martinez C, Neubeck L, Orchard J, Piccini JP, Poppe K, Potpara TS, Puererfellner H, Rienstra M, Sandhu RK, Schnabel RB, Siu CW, Steinhubl S, Svendsen JH, Svennberg E, Themistoclakis S, Tieleman RG, Turakhia MP, Tveit A, Uittenbogaart SB, Van Gelder IC, Verma A, Wachter R, Yan BP; AF-Screen Collaborators. Screening for Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the AF-SCREEN International Collaboration. Circulation. 2017 May 9;135(19):1851-1867. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026693.
PubMed 28483832Steinhubl SR, Waalen J, Edwards AM, Ariniello LM, Mehta RR, Ebner GS, Carter C, Baca-Motes K, Felicione E, Sarich T, Topol EJ. Effect of a Home-Based Wearable Continuous ECG Monitoring Patch on Detection of Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation: The mSToPS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Jul 10;320(2):146-155. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8102.
PubMed 29998336Svennberg E, Engdahl J, Al-Khalili F, Friberg L, Frykman V, Rosenqvist M. Mass Screening for Untreated Atrial Fibrillation: The STROKESTOP Study. Circulation. 2015 Jun 23;131(25):2176-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014343. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
PubMed 25910800Engdahl J, Andersson L, Mirskaya M, Rosenqvist M. Stepwise screening of atrial fibrillation in a 75-year-old population: implications for stroke prevention. Circulation. 2013 Feb 26;127(8):930-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.126656. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
PubMed 23343564Lowres N, Neubeck L, Redfern J, Freedman SB. Screening to identify unknown atrial fibrillation. A systematic review. Thromb Haemost. 2013 Aug;110(2):213-22. doi: 10.1160/TH13-02-0165. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
PubMed 23595785
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Screening for Atrial Fibrillation With Self Pulse Monitoring in Patients at Increased Risk of Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05818592
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 19-2254
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation New Onset
- Keywords
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 526 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel HillUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Study start
- 21 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the efficacy of self-pulse monitoring in detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) in adult patients at increased risk of stroke.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is self-screening an effective modality for diagnosis of AF?
- Are there clinical differences and outcomes for patients who self-screen?
Eligible participants will be randomized to either the intervention group or control group. The control group will continue with usual standard of care. Participants randomized to the intervention group will be asked to:
- View an online educational video to teach them the appropriate way to manually check their pulse for irregularities.
- Manually check their pulse for 30 seconds twice daily for 14 days.
- Patients who screen positive for irregularities will be sent a 14-day wearable cardiac monitor to assess for underlying arrhythmias.
Researchers will compare the intervention group to the control group to see if there are clinical differences and outcomes.
Detailed description
Participants will be recruited for this study using MyChart recruiting. Participants meeting inclusion criteria will be invited to participate and can respond "interested" or "decline." Participants who respond interested will complete a brief survey to confirm eligibility prior to consenting. One the participant consents, they will be randomized to the self-pulse check/intervention group or control group.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Eligible participants will be randomized to either the intervention group or control group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Pulse Monitoring Intervention Group | Experimental | Other: Self-Pulse MonitoringParticipants view an educational video instructing them on how to manually check their pulse for irregularities. Participants will be instructed to check their pulse for 30 seconds twice daily for 2 weeks. |
| Control Group Standard of Care | No intervention | –The control group will continue with usual care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 18 or greater
- No known history of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
- Access to MyChart
- CHA2DS2-VASc sore (described below) >/= 2 (male) or >/=3 (female) based on the following criteria:
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Prior diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
- Unable to consent
- Currently incarcerated
- Self-pay/uninsured
- Taking anticoagulation for other medical conditions than atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Pulse MonitoringParticipants will manually monitor pulse for irregularities. | Other | Self-Pulse Monitoring Intervention Group |
Primary outcome
Number of participants diagnosed with AF in intervention group who screened positive.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Participants assigned to the intervention group are instructed on how to manually check their pulse to detect irregularities. Those who screen positive for irregularities will be sent a 14-day wearable cardiac monitor to confirm diagnosis of AF. Diagnosis of AF can also be confirmed by electrocardiogram (ECG) at an outpatient clinic visit.
4 secondary outcomes
Total number of participants diagnosed with AF
Time frame: 1-year
Amount of time in days to diagnosis of AF from randomization
Time frame: 1-year
Number of participants prescribed anticoagulation
Time frame: 1-year
Number of participants with stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or systemic embolism
Time frame: 1-year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Apr 2023.
- Background: PubMed 30088016US Preventive Services Task Force; Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Caughey AB, Davidson KW, Doubeni CA, Epling JW Jr, Kemper AR, Kubik M, Landefeld CS, Mangione CM, Silverstein M, Simon MA, Tseng CW, Wong JB. Screening for Atrial Fibrillation With Electrocardiography: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2018 Aug 7;320(5):478-484. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.10321.
- Background: PubMed 28916670Yaghi S, Kamel H. Stratifying Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation: Beyond Clinical Risk Scores. Stroke. 2017 Oct;48(10):2665-2670. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017084. Epub 2017 Sep 15. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 28483832Freedman B, Camm J, Calkins H, Healey JS, Rosenqvist M, Wang J, Albert CM, Anderson CS, Antoniou S, Benjamin EJ, Boriani G, Brachmann J, Brandes A, Chao TF, Conen D, Engdahl J, Fauchier L, Fitzmaurice DA, Friberg L, Gersh BJ, Gladstone DJ, Glotzer TV, Gwynne K, Hankey GJ, Harbison J, Hillis GS, Hills MT, Kamel H, Kirchhof P, Kowey PR, Krieger D, Lee VWY, Levin LA, Lip GYH, Lobban T, Lowres N, Mairesse GH, Martinez C, Neubeck L, Orchard J, Piccini JP, Poppe K, Potpara TS, Puererfellner H, Rienstra M, Sandhu RK, Schnabel RB, Siu CW, Steinhubl S, Svendsen JH, Svennberg E, Themistoclakis S, Tieleman RG, Turakhia MP, Tveit A, Uittenbogaart SB, Van Gelder IC, Verma A, Wachter R, Yan BP; AF-Screen Collaborators. Screening for Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the AF-SCREEN International Collaboration. Circulation. 2017 May 9;135(19):1851-1867. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026693.
- Background: PubMed 29998336Steinhubl SR, Waalen J, Edwards AM, Ariniello LM, Mehta RR, Ebner GS, Carter C, Baca-Motes K, Felicione E, Sarich T, Topol EJ. Effect of a Home-Based Wearable Continuous ECG Monitoring Patch on Detection of Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation: The mSToPS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Jul 10;320(2):146-155. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8102.
- Background: PubMed 25910800Svennberg E, Engdahl J, Al-Khalili F, Friberg L, Frykman V, Rosenqvist M. Mass Screening for Untreated Atrial Fibrillation: The STROKESTOP Study. Circulation. 2015 Jun 23;131(25):2176-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014343. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
- Background: PubMed 23343564Engdahl J, Andersson L, Mirskaya M, Rosenqvist M. Stepwise screening of atrial fibrillation in a 75-year-old population: implications for stroke prevention. Circulation. 2013 Feb 26;127(8):930-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.126656. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
- Background: PubMed 23595785Lowres N, Neubeck L, Redfern J, Freedman SB. Screening to identify unknown atrial fibrillation. A systematic review. Thromb Haemost. 2013 Aug;110(2):213-22. doi: 10.1160/TH13-02-0165. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 12 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation New Onset
Recruiting
BoxX-NoAF Clinical Trial
Post Operative Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Fibrillation, Postoperative
Recruiting
The Impact of LBBAP vs RVP on the Incidence of New-onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Atrioventricular Block
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing, Right Ventricular Pacing
RecruitingPhase 3
Short Term Anti-aRrhythmic Therapy for Post-Operative AF in Cardiac Surgery Patients Pilot Trial
Atrial Fibrillation New Onset
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Ligament of Marshall Excision During Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery-Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (MICS-CABG) on the Prevention of Postoperative New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Triple-Blinded Study
Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Validation of SMD-AFECG for Predicting New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Within 2 Hours Using Single-Lead ECG Data
Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Atrial Fibrillation New Onset
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anil Gehi, MD principal investigator
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Self-Pulse Monitoring in people with Atrial Fibrillation New Onset, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants diagnosed with AF in intervention group who screened positive. (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05818592, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2023.