Neonatal Intensive CareNCT05806320
The Effect of Simulated Intrauterine Sound Applied to Preterms
A study testing Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 1 and Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 2 in people with Neonatal Intensive Care and Preterm, run by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Preterm infants lack intrauterine sounds suitable for their development as they are born early. In addition, they are exposed to many unfamiliar sounds for weeks or months in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) where their follow-up and care are continued. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 26 to 36 weeksHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Neonatal Intensive Care, Preterm
- What is being tested?
- Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 1 and Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 2
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 15 Aug 2020to 31 May 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 26 to 36 weeks
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Being at -26-36,6 GW,
- In the first week after birth,
- Absence of a congenital anomaly,
- Not being sedated,
- If the baby has been given eye drops, 4-6 hours have passed,
- 20-30 minutes have passed since the last painful attempt
Who cannot join
- Below 26 GW or above 37 GW,
- Absence in the first week after birth,
- Having a congenital anomaly,
- Being sedated,
- The baby is receiving phototherapy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Simulated Intrauterine Sound Applied to Preterms on Heart Rate, Oxygen Saturation and Comfort Level
Preterm infants lack intrauterine sounds suitable for their development as they are born early. In addition, they are exposed to many unfamiliar sounds for weeks or months in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) where their follow-up and care are continued. , one of evidences is that the maternal voices have an effect on the physiological, neurobehavioral and autonomic functions of the preterm infants. Also, the fact that the maternal voice is a non-pharmacological and non-invasive application has importance for the preterm infant. Therefore, considering the optimal well-being of the infant, it is predicted that using the applications that simulate the extrauterine environment of the preterm infant to the intrauterine environment would decrease the stress behaviors of the infants and would provide the physiological values to be followed up in the positive direction, and as a result of these, it would contribute to supporting the recovery and shortening the discharge period. The study was planned as a randomized controlled experimental design in order to determine the effect of the sound applied on the 26-37 week-old preterm infants on their heart rate, oxygen saturation and comfort level.
Read the detailed description
Preterm infants lack intrauterine sounds suitable for their development as they are born early. In addition, they are exposed to many unfamiliar sounds for weeks or months in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) where their follow-up and care are continued. It is known that the preterm infants hear the sounds from the extrauterine and respond to these sounds after the 26th gestational week. The types of the sounds and the level of the noise in the NICU is quite different from the uterus environment. The ambient noise composed of the ventilators, monitors, pagers and alarms of NICU take place of the low-frequency maternal voices in the amniotic environment. For this reason, the preterm infants lack the normal audial stimulants and they are disturbed by the sounds in the NICU environment. As a result, the development of the auditory and language skills and the socio-emotional development of the infants may get harmed. The recent evidences have suggested that the auditory learning and voice recognition experiences of the infants are based on their prenatal experiences. Therefore, it is quite important to make the preterm infants listen to their mothers' voice and the heart rate sound which they are lack of due to their preterm birth and therefore keeping them away from the sounds of the NICU environment.
In the light of this information, one of evidences is that the maternal voices have an effect on the physiological, neurobehavioral and autonomic functions of the preterm infants. Also, the fact that the maternal voice is a non-pharmacological and non-invasive application has importance for the preterm infant. Therefore, considering the optimal well-being of the infant, it is predicted that using the applications that simulate the extrauterine environment of the preterm infant to the intrauterine environment would decrease the stress behaviors of the infants and would provide the physiological values to be followed up in the positive direction, and as a result of these, it would contribute to supporting the recovery and shortening the discharge period.
- Conditions
- Neonatal Intensive Care, Preterm
- Being tested
- Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 1, Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 2
- Keywords
- Sound
- Medical subject headings
- Premature Birth
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 1Other
This group consisted of 15 infants with 26-32,6 GW. A total of one hour of noise measurement was made inside and outside the incubator before, during and after the procedure. The babies were listened to the sound obtained in 3 time periods. If the baby is fed enterally, the feeding of the baby was completed at 10.15/13.00/16.15 before the application, the baby was placed in the prone position and the baby was rested for 30 minutes to ensure gastric emptying. Before the procedure, the baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 10.45-11.00/13.30-13.45/16.45-17.00. During the baby procedure, uterine sound was listened to the baby in the prone position monitored with a monitor device and recorded on video between 11:00-11.30/13.45-14.15/17.00-17.30 hours. After the procedure, the baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 11.30-11.45/14.15 and 14.30/17.30-17.45.
Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 2Other
This group consisted of 15 infants with 33-36,6 GW. A total of one hour of noise measurement was made inside and outside the incubator before, during and after the procedure. The babies were listened to the sound obtained in 3 time periods. If the baby is fed enterally, the feeding of the baby was completed at 10.15/13.00/16.15 before the application, the baby was placed in the prone position and the baby was rested for 30 minutes to ensure gastric emptying. Before the procedure, the baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 10.45-11.00/13.30-13.45/16.45-17.00. During the baby procedure, uterine sound was listened to the baby in the prone position monitored with a monitor device and recorded on video between 11:00-11.30/13.45-14.15/17.00-17.30 hours. After the procedure, the baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 11.30-11.45/14.15 and 14.30/17.30-17.45.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 1 | Experimental | This group consisted of 15 infants with 26-32,6 GW. A total of one hour of noise measurement was made inside and outside the incubator before, during and after the procedure. The babies were listened to the sound obtained in 3 time periods. If the baby is fed enterally, the feeding of the baby was completed at 10.15/13.00/16.15 before the application, the baby was placed in the prone position and the baby was rested for 30 minutes to ensure gastric emptying. Before the procedure, the baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 10.45-11.00/13.30-13.45/16.45-17.00. During the baby procedure, uterine sound was listened to the baby in the prone position monitored with a monitor device and recorded on video between 11:00-11.30/13.45-14.15/17.00-17.30 hours. After the procedure, the baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 11.30-11.45/14.15 and 14.30/17.30-17.45. Receives: Other: Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 1 |
| Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 2 | Experimental | This group consisted of 15 infants with 33-36,6 GW. A total of one hour of noise measurement was made inside and outside the incubator before, during and after the procedure. The babies were listened to the sound obtained in 3 time periods. If the baby is fed enterally, the feeding of the baby was completed at 10.15/13.00/16.15 before the application, the baby was placed in the prone position and the baby was rested for 30 minutes to ensure gastric emptying. Before the procedure, the baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 10.45-11.00/13.30-13.45/16.45-17.00. During the baby procedure, uterine sound was listened to the baby in the prone position monitored with a monitor device and recorded on video between 11:00-11.30/13.45-14.15/17.00-17.30 hours. After the procedure, the baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 11.30-11.45/14.15 and 14.30/17.30-17.45. Receives: Other: Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 2 |
| Control Group 1 | No intervention | This group consisted of 15 infants with 26-32,6 GW. A total of one hour of noise measurement was made inside and outside the incubator before, during and after the procedure. Babies in this group were followed up at specified time intervals without any intervention. If the baby is fed enterally, the feeding of the baby was completed at 10.15/13.00/16.15 before the application, the baby was placed in the prone position and the baby was rested for 30 minutes to ensure gastric emptying. The baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 10.45-11.00/13.30-13.45/16.45-17.00 hours; 11:00-11.30/13.45-14.15/17.00-17.30 hours; 11.30-11.45/14.15- 14.30/17.30-17.45. |
| Control Group 2 | No intervention | This group consisted of 15 infants with 33-36,6 GW. A total of one hour of noise measurement was made inside and outside the incubator before, during and after the procedure. Babies in this group were followed up at specified time intervals without any intervention. If the baby is fed enterally, the feeding of the baby was completed at 10.15/13.00/16.15 before the application, the baby was placed in the prone position and the baby was rested for 30 minutes to ensure gastric emptying. The baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 10.45-11.00/13.30-13.45/16.45-17.00 hours; 11:00-11.30/13.45-14.15/17.00-17.30 hours; 11.30-11.45/14.15- 14.30/17.30-17.45. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Newborn Comfort Behavior Scale (COMFORTneo)
The comfort scale (CS) is a scale developed by Ambuel et al., (1992) in order to assess the distress of the children taking the mechanic ventilation support and followed up in the pediatric intensive care unit. The scale was revised by Van Dijk et al. (2009) and developed only for assessing behaviors in the newborns without the physiological parameters. While the lowest score to be obtained from the scale is 6, the highest score is 30. A high score indicates that the infant does not feel comfortable and needs interventions to provide comfort and also 4-6 points indicate moderate pain and distress and 7-10 points indicate severe pain and distress. Kahraman et al., (2014) conducted the Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale with the infants of 24-42 GW.
Measured: 5 minutes
Heart rate
The heart rate of the infants will measured as monitorized.
Measured: 1 minutes
Peripheral oxygen saturation level
The peripheral oxygen saturation level of the infants will measured as monitorized.
Measured: 1 minutes
Noise level
Noise measurement will be made with noise meter from the outside of the incubator during the hours when the study would be conducted.
Measured: 1 minutes
Sound level
In order for the baby to hear the sound created in the incubator; Before each procedure, a noise measuring device was placed in the incubator and the level of sound heard by the baby in the incubator was recorded as dBA. Then the Mp3 device is set to the appropriate volume.
Measured: 1 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Apr 2023
- Study start15 Aug 2020
- Primary completion31 May 2022
- Study completion31 May 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Neonatal Intensive CareStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Istanbul University - CerrahpasaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Birsen Mutlu, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
- Investigators
- Müjde ÇALIKUŞU İNCEKAR, PhD, Principal investigator, Yuksek Ihtisas UniversityGökhan DENEÇ, PhD, Principal investigator, Istanbul Technical UniversityAyhan TAŞTEKİN, MD, Principal investigator, Medipol University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05806320
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IUC-B-M-001
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 2 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 10 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Simulated Intrauterine Sound Applied to Preterms on Heart Rate, Oxygen Saturation and Comfort Level
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05806320
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IUC-B-M-001
- Conditions
- Neonatal Intensive Care, Preterm
- Keywords
- Sound
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul University - CerrahpasaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Preterm infants lack intrauterine sounds suitable for their development as they are born early. In addition, they are exposed to many unfamiliar sounds for weeks or months in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) where their follow-up and care are continued. , one of evidences is that the maternal voices have an effect on the physiological, neurobehavioral and autonomic functions of the preterm infants. Also, the fact that the maternal voice is a non-pharmacological and non-invasive application has importance for the preterm infant. Therefore, considering the optimal well-being of the infant, it is predicted that using the applications that simulate the extrauterine environment of the preterm infant to the intrauterine environment would decrease the stress behaviors of the infants and would provide the physiological values to be followed up in the positive direction, and as a result of these, it would contribute to supporting the recovery and shortening the discharge period. The study was planned as a randomized controlled experimental design in order to determine the effect of the sound applied on the 26-37 week-old preterm infants on their heart rate, oxygen saturation and comfort level.
Detailed description
Preterm infants lack intrauterine sounds suitable for their development as they are born early. In addition, they are exposed to many unfamiliar sounds for weeks or months in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) where their follow-up and care are continued. It is known that the preterm infants hear the sounds from the extrauterine and respond to these sounds after the 26th gestational week. The types of the sounds and the level of the noise in the NICU is quite different from the uterus environment. The ambient noise composed of the ventilators, monitors, pagers and alarms of NICU take place of the low-frequency maternal voices in the amniotic environment. For this reason, the preterm infants lack the normal audial stimulants and they are disturbed by the sounds in the NICU environment. As a result, the development of the auditory and language skills and the socio-emotional development of the infants may get harmed. The recent evidences have suggested that the auditory learning and voice recognition experiences of the infants are based on their prenatal experiences. Therefore, it is quite important to make the preterm infants listen to their mothers' voice and the heart rate sound which they are lack of due to their preterm birth and therefore keeping them away from the sounds of the NICU environment.
In the light of this information, one of evidences is that the maternal voices have an effect on the physiological, neurobehavioral and autonomic functions of the preterm infants. Also, the fact that the maternal voice is a non-pharmacological and non-invasive application has importance for the preterm infant. Therefore, considering the optimal well-being of the infant, it is predicted that using the applications that simulate the extrauterine environment of the preterm infant to the intrauterine environment would decrease the stress behaviors of the infants and would provide the physiological values to be followed up in the positive direction, and as a result of these, it would contribute to supporting the recovery and shortening the discharge period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 1 | Experimental | Other: Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 1This group consisted of 15 infants with 26-32,6 GW. A total of one hour of noise measurement was made inside and outside the incubator before, during and after the procedure. The babies were listened to the sound obtained in 3 time periods. If the baby is fed enterally, the feeding of the baby was completed at 10.15/13.00/16.15 before the application, the baby was placed in the prone position and the baby was rested for 30 minutes to ensure gastric emptying. Before the procedure, the baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 10.45-11.00/13.30-13.45/16.45-17.00. During the baby procedure, uterine sound was listened to the baby in the prone position monitored with a monitor device and recorded on video between 11:00-11.30/13.45-14.15/17.00-17.30 hours. After the procedure, the baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 11.30-11.45/14.15 and 14.30/17.30-17.45. |
| Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 2 | Experimental | Other: Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 2This group consisted of 15 infants with 33-36,6 GW. A total of one hour of noise measurement was made inside and outside the incubator before, during and after the procedure. The babies were listened to the sound obtained in 3 time periods. If the baby is fed enterally, the feeding of the baby was completed at 10.15/13.00/16.15 before the application, the baby was placed in the prone position and the baby was rested for 30 minutes to ensure gastric emptying. Before the procedure, the baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 10.45-11.00/13.30-13.45/16.45-17.00. During the baby procedure, uterine sound was listened to the baby in the prone position monitored with a monitor device and recorded on video between 11:00-11.30/13.45-14.15/17.00-17.30 hours. After the procedure, the baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 11.30-11.45/14.15 and 14.30/17.30-17.45. |
| Control Group 1 | No intervention | –This group consisted of 15 infants with 26-32,6 GW. A total of one hour of noise measurement was made inside and outside the incubator before, during and after the procedure. Babies in this group were followed up at specified time intervals without any intervention. If the baby is fed enterally, the feeding of the baby was completed at 10.15/13.00/16.15 before the application, the baby was placed in the prone position and the baby was rested for 30 minutes to ensure gastric emptying. The baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 10.45-11.00/13.30-13.45/16.45-17.00 hours; 11:00-11.30/13.45-14.15/17.00-17.30 hours; 11.30-11.45/14.15- 14.30/17.30-17.45. |
| Control Group 2 | No intervention | –This group consisted of 15 infants with 33-36,6 GW. A total of one hour of noise measurement was made inside and outside the incubator before, during and after the procedure. Babies in this group were followed up at specified time intervals without any intervention. If the baby is fed enterally, the feeding of the baby was completed at 10.15/13.00/16.15 before the application, the baby was placed in the prone position and the baby was rested for 30 minutes to ensure gastric emptying. The baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 10.45-11.00/13.30-13.45/16.45-17.00 hours; 11:00-11.30/13.45-14.15/17.00-17.30 hours; 11.30-11.45/14.15- 14.30/17.30-17.45. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 26 to 36 weeks
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Being at -26-36,6 GW,
- In the first week after birth,
- Absence of a congenital anomaly,
- Not being sedated,
- If the baby has been given eye drops, 4-6 hours have passed,
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Below 26 GW or above 37 GW,
- Absence in the first week after birth,
- Having a congenital anomaly,
- Being sedated,
- The baby is receiving phototherapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 1This group consisted of 15 infants with 26-32,6 GW. A total of one hour of noise measurement was made inside and outside the incubator before, during and after the procedure. The babies were listened to the sound obtained in 3 time periods. If the baby is fed enterally, the feeding of the baby was completed at 10.15/13.00/16.15 before the application, the baby was placed in the prone position and the baby was rested for 30 minutes to ensure gastric emptying. Before the procedure, the baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 10.45-11.00/13.30-13.45/16.45-17.00. During the baby procedure, uterine sound was listened to the baby in the prone position monitored with a monitor device and recorded on video between 11:00-11.30/13.45-14.15/17.00-17.30 hours. After the procedure, the baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 11.30-11.45/14.15 and 14.30/17.30-17.45. | Other | Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 1 |
| Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 2This group consisted of 15 infants with 33-36,6 GW. A total of one hour of noise measurement was made inside and outside the incubator before, during and after the procedure. The babies were listened to the sound obtained in 3 time periods. If the baby is fed enterally, the feeding of the baby was completed at 10.15/13.00/16.15 before the application, the baby was placed in the prone position and the baby was rested for 30 minutes to ensure gastric emptying. Before the procedure, the baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 10.45-11.00/13.30-13.45/16.45-17.00. During the baby procedure, uterine sound was listened to the baby in the prone position monitored with a monitor device and recorded on video between 11:00-11.30/13.45-14.15/17.00-17.30 hours. After the procedure, the baby was watched with a monitor device and recorded on video between 11.30-11.45/14.15 and 14.30/17.30-17.45. | Other | Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 2 |
Primary outcome
Newborn Comfort Behavior Scale (COMFORTneo)
Time frame: 5 minutes
The comfort scale (CS) is a scale developed by Ambuel et al., (1992) in order to assess the distress of the children taking the mechanic ventilation support and followed up in the pediatric intensive care unit. The scale was revised by Van Dijk et al. (2009) and developed only for assessing behaviors in the newborns without the physiological parameters. While the lowest score to be obtained from the scale is 6, the highest score is 30. A high score indicates that the infant does not feel comfortable and needs interventions to provide comfort and also 4-6 points indicate moderate pain and distress and 7-10 points indicate severe pain and distress. Kahraman et al., (2014) conducted the Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale with the infants of 24-42 GW.
Heart rate
Time frame: 1 minutes
The heart rate of the infants will measured as monitorized.
Peripheral oxygen saturation level
Time frame: 1 minutes
The peripheral oxygen saturation level of the infants will measured as monitorized.
Noise level
Time frame: 1 minutes
Noise measurement will be made with noise meter from the outside of the incubator during the hours when the study would be conducted.
Sound level
Time frame: 1 minutes
In order for the baby to hear the sound created in the incubator; Before each procedure, a noise measuring device was placed in the incubator and the level of sound heard by the baby in the incubator was recorded as dBA. Then the Mp3 device is set to the appropriate volume.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Apr 2023.
Related trials for Neonatal Intensive Care
Active, not recruiting
Maternal Sensory Interventions in Newborns
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Hospitalized Newborn
Recruiting
Effect of Support for Low-Income Mothers of Preterm Infants
Preterm Birth, Low; Birthweight, Extremely (999 Grams or Less)
Recruiting
The Effect of Digitally Enabled District (DED 2.0) Ecosystem on the Completeness and Timeliness of Maternal and Neonatal Services in Primary Health Care
Digital Health, Maternal Health Services
Recruiting
NIRS Monitoring in the NICU and AKI
Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), Postnatal AKI
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Neonatal Thrombocytopenia in the NICU
Thrombocytopenia, Neonatal Thrombocytopenia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Müjde ÇALIKUŞU İNCEKAR, PhD principal investigator
Yuksek Ihtisas University
Gökhan DENEÇ, PhD principal investigator
Istanbul Technical University
Ayhan TAŞTEKİN, MD principal investigator
Medipol University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 1 and Intrauterine Sound Listening Group 2 in people with Neonatal Intensive Care and Preterm, run by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Newborn Comfort Behavior Scale (COMFORTneo) (time frame: 5 minutes). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2023.