Red Blood Cell TransfusionNCT05798130
Assessment of Oxygen Extraction Rate Changes Following Red Blood Cell Transfusion in the Intensive Care Unit
An observational study of Red Blood Cell Transfusion and Oxygen Consumption, run by Izmir Katip Celebi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Restrictive and liberal approaches to hemoglobin targets are used when deciding on red blood cell transfusions in patients who do not have acute bleeding and have a hemodynamically stable course in the intensive care unit. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Red Blood Cell Transfusion, Oxygen Consumption
- How many people
- 88 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2023to 30 Dec 2023
- How long will I take part?
- 6 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Intensive care unit patients
Who may be able to join
- Patients over 18 years old
- Patients followed in the intensive care unit for at least 24 hours
- Patients with central venous catheters
- Patients who have received a decision to transfuse red blood cells
Who cannot join
- Patients with hemodynamically unstable
- Patients with acute bleeding
- Patients in hemorrhagic shock
- Patients with acute traumatic brain injury
- Pregnant patients
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Izmir, 35360
About this study
Official title: Assessment of Oxygen Extraction Rate Changes Following Red Blood Cell Transfusion in the Intensive Care Unit: a Prospective Observational Non-interventional Study
Restrictive and liberal approaches to hemoglobin targets are used when deciding on red blood cell transfusions in patients who do not have acute bleeding and have a hemodynamically stable course in the intensive care unit. However, physiologic trigger points that assess tissue oxygenation when deciding on blood transfusion in patients are also among the important topics of study in recent years. In this study, the investigators will evaluate the oxygen extraction rate, which is an important indicator of the balance between tissue oxygen delivery and consumption. Whether oxygen extraction rate can be used as a trigger for blood transfusion will be determined by clinical outcomes in ICU patients. If physiologic transfusion targets are feasible, the risks of unnecessary transfusions can be avoided with individualized targets, and the decision to transfuse blood can be made without delay in patients requiring red blood cell transfusion.
Read the detailed description
This study will be prospective and observational in the Intensive Care Unit of Izmir Katip Celebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital. The study will not include any intervention and intervention groups. The study will enroll patients who have no acute bleeding, are hemodynamically stable, have been followed in the ICU for at least 24 hours, have a central venous catheter, and for whom the decision to transfuse red blood cells has been made according to the critical care protocol. Informed consent is obtained from the patient or first-degree relatives.
No additional procedures will be performed on patients during the study, and the decision to transfuse will not be influenced by the results of the examinations. For patients in whom the decision to transfuse red blood cells was made in accordance with the critical care protocol, the clinical decision and policy to transfuse a single unit and, accordingly, a restrictive transfusion strategy with a target hemoglobin of 7 g/dl are applied.
The patient's oxygen extraction rate is calculated using the following formula by considering the difference between the oxygen content of the venous and arterial blood gasses measured before transfusion.
CaO2 = SaO2 x Hb x 1.39 + (PaO2 x 0.0031) CcvO2 = ScvO2 x Hb x 1.39 + (PcvO2 x 0.0031) O2ER = CaO2 - CcvO2/CaO2
Patients to be followed until day 90 post-transfusion will be evaluated in two separate groups according to oxygen extraction rate < 30% and ≥30% after pretransfusion blood gas analysis. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the percentage change in oxygen extraction rate after transfusion between the two groups with oxygen extraction rates of < 30% and ≥30%. The secondary objective is to examine the difference between the groups in 28-day mortality, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) values related to tissue oxygenation, amount of blood products consumed, and length of ICU stay, as well as complication rates such as acute renal failure and acute lung injury.
Age, sex, comorbidities, reasons for ICU hospitalization, and number of days in the ICU before transfusion of participants are demographically recorded. The following values will be noted by the observer before and after transfusion: systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, NIRS values, blood gas analysis; pH, PaO2, PaCO2, SaO2, base deficit, HCO3, lactate, PcvO2, PcvCO2, ScvO2, FiO2, CaO2, CcvO2, AV-O2 difference, O2ER, PaO2/FiO2, lactate clearance, CVP, vasoactive inotrope score. In addition, the SAPS, APACHE-II, SOFA scores of the 1st and 5th day, hemoglobin and hematocrit values of the first 5 days, MCV, MPV, RDW, INR, platelet count, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, number of mechanical ventilator-dependent days, number of vasopressor-dependent days, and number of the intensive care unit stay days are monitored. In addition, the development of complications such as acute respiratory failure, acute renal failure, development of infections, stroke, and myocardial infarction in participants will be tracked. The occurrence of mortality at day 7, 28, and 90 will be reported in the study results.
In the reference study1, patients were studied in 2 separate groups with oxygen extraction rates of < 30% and ≥30%. There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of change in oxygen extraction rate after 15 minutes. The mean±standard deviation of the groups was -5.2±7.8 and 0.7±5.8, respectively, and p=0.004. In the power analysis performed, it was assumed that the type 1 error was 0.05 and the power of the study was 0.80, so it would be sufficient to reach 29 patients in both groups. Considering a 10% probability of loss to data acquisition, it would be sufficient to reach a total of 65 patients.
All statistical analyzes will be performed using the SPSS 22 program. Descriptive statistics are expressed with mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and with numbers and percentages for categorical variables. Prior to all analyzes, skewness- kurtosis tests, normality tests, and histogram graphs are used to determine whether the data conform to the normal distribution. In determining differences in means between groups, the T test for independent variables or the T test for dependent variables is used for variables with normal distribution; the Mann-Whitney U test or the Wilcoxon test is used for variables that do not conform to normal distribution. The chi-square test or the Fischer exact test is used to determine the differences between groups for categorical variables. The difference values between the means of repeated measures in the groups are evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. In the case of more than two time periods, the evaluation of time, groups, and joint effects is performed with the two-way test ANOVA (analysis of variance) for repeated measures. Post-hoc analyzes will be performed using the Bonferonni test. The effect of independent variables on mortality is assessed by logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves will be analyzed with respect to the oxygen extraction rate predicting 28-day mortality in both groups. For all analyzes to be performed, a p< 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Red Blood Cell Transfusion, Oxygen Consumption
- Being tested
- No intervention group.
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
No intervention group.Other
No intervention group.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Oxygen Extraction Rate < 30% Group | Oxygen Extraction Rate < 30% Receives: Other: No intervention group. | |
| Oxygen Extraction Rate ≥ 30% Group | Oxygen Extraction Rate ≥ 30% Receives: Other: No intervention group. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage change in oxygen extraction rate
Evaluate the percentage change in oxygen extraction rate after and before red blood cell transfusion between the two groups with oxygen extraction rates of > 30% and ≥30%.
Measured: After transfusion of 15.minutes
Secondary outcomes (6)
7, 28 and 90 days mortality
7, 28 and 90 days mortality
Measured: 7, 28 and 90 days
Near infrared spectroscopy values change
Near infrared spectroscopy values change
Measured: After transfusion of 15.minutes
Length of ICU stay
Length of ICU stay
Measured: up to 90 days
Complication rates
Complication rates
Measured: up to 90 days
Length of hospital stay
Length of hospital stay
Measured: up to 90 days
Number of mechanical ventilation dependent days
Number of mechanical ventilation dependent days
Measured: up to 90 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Apr 2023
- Study start1 Apr 2023
- Primary completion30 Sep 2023
- Study completion30 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Red Blood Cell TransfusionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 88 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 6 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Izmir Katip Celebi University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ahmet Salih Tüzen, MD, Izmir Katip Celebi University
- Investigators
- Ahmet Salih Tüzen, Principal investigator, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and ReanimationMurat Aksun, Principal investigator, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05798130
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023-GOKAE-0103
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 3 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 12 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Orlov D, O'Farrell R, McCluskey SA, Carroll J, Poonawala H, Hozhabri S, Karkouti K. The clinical utility of an index of global oxygenation for guiding red blood cell transfusion in cardiac surgery. Transfusion. 2009 Apr;49(4):682-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.02022.x.
PubMed 19347976Tuzen AS, Aksun M, Sencan A, Girgin S, Golboyu BE, Kirbas G, Sanli O. Assessment of oxygen extraction rate changes following red blood cell transfusion in the intensive care unit: A prospective observational noninterventional study. Transfusion. 2025 May;65(5):863-875. doi: 10.1111/trf.18164. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
PubMed 40134137Tuzen AS, Aksun M, Sencan A, Girgin S, Golboyu BE, Kirbas G, Sanli O. Assessment of oxygen extraction rate changes following red blood cell transfusion in the intensive care unit: a protocol for a prospective observational non-interventional study. BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 30;13(8):e074413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074413.
PubMed 37648379
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of Oxygen Extraction Rate Changes Following Red Blood Cell Transfusion in the Intensive Care Unit: a Prospective Observational Non-interventional Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05798130
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2023-GOKAE-0103
- Conditions
- Red Blood Cell Transfusion, Oxygen Consumption
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 88 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Izmir Katip Celebi UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Restrictive and liberal approaches to hemoglobin targets are used when deciding on red blood cell transfusions in patients who do not have acute bleeding and have a hemodynamically stable course in the intensive care unit. However, physiologic trigger points that assess tissue oxygenation when deciding on blood transfusion in patients are also among the important topics of study in recent years. In this study, the investigators will evaluate the oxygen extraction rate, which is an important indicator of the balance between tissue oxygen delivery and consumption. Whether oxygen extraction rate can be used as a trigger for blood transfusion will be determined by clinical outcomes in ICU patients. If physiologic transfusion targets are feasible, the risks of unnecessary transfusions can be avoided with individualized targets, and the decision to transfuse blood can be made without delay in patients requiring red blood cell transfusion.
Detailed description
This study will be prospective and observational in the Intensive Care Unit of Izmir Katip Celebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital. The study will not include any intervention and intervention groups. The study will enroll patients who have no acute bleeding, are hemodynamically stable, have been followed in the ICU for at least 24 hours, have a central venous catheter, and for whom the decision to transfuse red blood cells has been made according to the critical care protocol. Informed consent is obtained from the patient or first-degree relatives.
No additional procedures will be performed on patients during the study, and the decision to transfuse will not be influenced by the results of the examinations. For patients in whom the decision to transfuse red blood cells was made in accordance with the critical care protocol, the clinical decision and policy to transfuse a single unit and, accordingly, a restrictive transfusion strategy with a target hemoglobin of 7 g/dl are applied.
The patient's oxygen extraction rate is calculated using the following formula by considering the difference between the oxygen content of the venous and arterial blood gasses measured before transfusion.
CaO2 = SaO2 x Hb x 1.39 + (PaO2 x 0.0031) CcvO2 = ScvO2 x Hb x 1.39 + (PcvO2 x 0.0031) O2ER = CaO2 - CcvO2/CaO2
Patients to be followed until day 90 post-transfusion will be evaluated in two separate groups according to oxygen extraction rate < 30% and ≥30% after pretransfusion blood gas analysis. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the percentage change in oxygen extraction rate after transfusion between the two groups with oxygen extraction rates of < 30% and ≥30%. The secondary objective is to examine the difference between the groups in 28-day mortality, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) values related to tissue oxygenation, amount of blood products consumed, and length of ICU stay, as well as complication rates such as acute renal failure and acute lung injury.
Age, sex, comorbidities, reasons for ICU hospitalization, and number of days in the ICU before transfusion of participants are demographically recorded. The following values will be noted by the observer before and after transfusion: systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, NIRS values, blood gas analysis; pH, PaO2, PaCO2, SaO2, base deficit, HCO3, lactate, PcvO2, PcvCO2, ScvO2, FiO2, CaO2, CcvO2, AV-O2 difference, O2ER, PaO2/FiO2, lactate clearance, CVP, vasoactive inotrope score. In addition, the SAPS, APACHE-II, SOFA scores of the 1st and 5th day, hemoglobin and hematocrit values of the first 5 days, MCV, MPV, RDW, INR, platelet count, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, number of mechanical ventilator-dependent days, number of vasopressor-dependent days, and number of the intensive care unit stay days are monitored. In addition, the development of complications such as acute respiratory failure, acute renal failure, development of infections, stroke, and myocardial infarction in participants will be tracked. The occurrence of mortality at day 7, 28, and 90 will be reported in the study results.
In the reference study1, patients were studied in 2 separate groups with oxygen extraction rates of < 30% and ≥30%. There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of change in oxygen extraction rate after 15 minutes. The mean±standard deviation of the groups was -5.2±7.8 and 0.7±5.8, respectively, and p=0.004. In the power analysis performed, it was assumed that the type 1 error was 0.05 and the power of the study was 0.80, so it would be sufficient to reach 29 patients in both groups. Considering a 10% probability of loss to data acquisition, it would be sufficient to reach a total of 65 patients.
All statistical analyzes will be performed using the SPSS 22 program. Descriptive statistics are expressed with mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and with numbers and percentages for categorical variables. Prior to all analyzes, skewness- kurtosis tests, normality tests, and histogram graphs are used to determine whether the data conform to the normal distribution. In determining differences in means between groups, the T test for independent variables or the T test for dependent variables is used for variables with normal distribution; the Mann-Whitney U test or the Wilcoxon test is used for variables that do not conform to normal distribution. The chi-square test or the Fischer exact test is used to determine the differences between groups for categorical variables. The difference values between the means of repeated measures in the groups are evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. In the case of more than two time periods, the evaluation of time, groups, and joint effects is performed with the two-way test ANOVA (analysis of variance) for repeated measures. Post-hoc analyzes will be performed using the Bonferonni test. The effect of independent variables on mortality is assessed by logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves will be analyzed with respect to the oxygen extraction rate predicting 28-day mortality in both groups. For all analyzes to be performed, a p< 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 6 Months
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Oxygen Extraction Rate < 30% Group | – | Other: No intervention group.Oxygen Extraction Rate < 30% |
| Oxygen Extraction Rate ≥ 30% Group | – | Other: No intervention group.Oxygen Extraction Rate ≥ 30% |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Intensive care unit patients
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients over 18 years old
- Patients followed in the intensive care unit for at least 24 hours
- Patients with central venous catheters
- Patients who have received a decision to transfuse red blood cells
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with hemodynamically unstable
- Patients with acute bleeding
- Patients in hemorrhagic shock
- Patients with acute traumatic brain injury
- Pregnant patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| No intervention group.No intervention group. | Other | Oxygen Extraction Rate < 30% Group, Oxygen Extraction Rate ≥ 30% Group |
Primary outcome
Percentage change in oxygen extraction rate
Time frame: After transfusion of 15.minutes
Evaluate the percentage change in oxygen extraction rate after and before red blood cell transfusion between the two groups with oxygen extraction rates of > 30% and ≥30%.
6 secondary outcomes
7, 28 and 90 days mortality
Time frame: 7, 28 and 90 days
Near infrared spectroscopy values change
Time frame: After transfusion of 15.minutes
Length of ICU stay
Time frame: up to 90 days
Complication rates
Time frame: up to 90 days
Length of hospital stay
Time frame: up to 90 days
Number of mechanical ventilation dependent days
Time frame: up to 90 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Mar 2024.
- Background: PubMed 19347976Orlov D, O'Farrell R, McCluskey SA, Carroll J, Poonawala H, Hozhabri S, Karkouti K. The clinical utility of an index of global oxygenation for guiding red blood cell transfusion in cardiac surgery. Transfusion. 2009 Apr;49(4):682-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.02022.x.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40134137Tuzen AS, Aksun M, Sencan A, Girgin S, Golboyu BE, Kirbas G, Sanli O. Assessment of oxygen extraction rate changes following red blood cell transfusion in the intensive care unit: A prospective observational noninterventional study. Transfusion. 2025 May;65(5):863-875. doi: 10.1111/trf.18164. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37648379Tuzen AS, Aksun M, Sencan A, Girgin S, Golboyu BE, Kirbas G, Sanli O. Assessment of oxygen extraction rate changes following red blood cell transfusion in the intensive care unit: a protocol for a prospective observational non-interventional study. BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 30;13(8):e074413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074413.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Red Blood Cell Transfusion
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Compare Elritercept With Epoetin Alfa to Treat Anemia in Adults With Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Who Need Regular Blood Transfusions
Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Anemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Dibotatug (DR-01) in Adults With Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes
Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes, Aplastic Anemias
RecruitingObservational study
First-Line Luspatercept in Transfusion-Dependent Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Neoplasms
Not yet recruiting
Hypoxic Red Blood Cells in Sickle Cell Anemia
Sickle Cell Anaemia, Sickle Cell Anemia Crisis
Recruiting
Blood Transfusion Strategies During Major Surgery
Perioperative Red Blood Cell Transfusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ahmet Salih Tüzen principal investigator
Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Murat Aksun principal investigator
Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Red Blood Cell Transfusion and Oxygen Consumption, run by Izmir Katip Celebi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage change in oxygen extraction rate (time frame: After transfusion of 15.minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05798130, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2024.