AzTrials
AzTrials

Charcot Joint of FootPhase 4DANCN-CKDNCT05797259

RANKL Antibody for Acute Charcot Neuro-osteoarthropathy

A Phase 4 study testing Danosumab and Normal Saline in people with Charcot Joint of Foot, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 1 site in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study's goal was to determine how denosumab 60 mg, combined with total contact casting and restricted weightbearing status, would affect the treatment of acute CN with CKD. METHODS Participants in the research were those who visited the outpatient foot clinic at PGIMER, CHD in India. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Charcot Joint of Foot
What is being tested?
Danosumab and Normal Saline
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
78 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
10 Mar 2019to 31 Mar 2023
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diabetes
  • Active Charcot neuroarthropathy of either left or right foot
  • Chronic Kidney disease defined as eGFR<60 ml/min/m2 and/or Urine protein >300 mg/day
  • Presence of all

Who cannot join

  • Active Pedal ulcer
  • Active malignancy
  • Hypocalcemia
  • Primary Hyperparathyroidism
  • Pregnancy and Breast Feeding
  • Prior treatment with anti-RANKL antibody
  • On corticosteroids

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

India1 site
  • Deptt of Endocrinology

    Chandigarh, 160012

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: RANKL Antibody (Danosumab) for Acute Charcot Neuro-osteoarthropathy Remission in Chronic Kidney Disease

This study's goal was to determine how denosumab 60 mg, combined with total contact casting and restricted weightbearing status, would affect the treatment of acute CN with CKD.

METHODS Participants in the research were those who visited the outpatient foot clinic at PGIMER, CHD in India. During the study period, 446 persons with CN were identified, 102 of whom met the criteria for the first screening, and 78 of whom were ultimately enrolled in the study.

Aim: To assess the clinico-radiological remission of Acute Charcot-neuroarthropathy in patients of CKD.

Read the detailed description

Participants attending the outpatient diabetic foot facility of tertiary care hospital in North India were assessed for active CN. An active CN of the foot was considered in the presence of localised erythema, edoema, and a temperature differential of more than 20C compared to a similar location on the opposite foot. Participants were diagnosed with "active on chronic" CN if they met the requirements for active CN in the context of foot deformities suggestive of chronic CN (rocker bottom deformity). Those with self-reported diabetes or those who were already receiving treatment for diabetes, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/m2 (CKD-EPI equation) and more than 500 mg of urine protein/24 hours were considered as having diabetic CKD. Patients with active pedal ulcer, inactive charcot foot, peripheral vascular disease (ankle brachial index ABI <0.9), prior exposure to medications affecting bone metabolism particularly bisphosphonates, teriparatide, denosumab or steroids in the past 12 months, hypocalcemia, active malignancy, CKD on dialysis and pregnancy or lactating women were excluded. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments, the International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and its applicable regulatory requirements. All participants provided their signed, fully informed consent and study protocol was approved by the institutional Ethics Committee ref INT/IEC/SPE-1664.

The foot temperature was determined by an infrared dermal thermometry [(FLIR Systems Inc, Orlando, USA) with a pixel resolution of 4800 (80*60), thermal sensitivity of 0.15 C, and a detection range of -20 C to 250 C] after 30 minutes of removing footwear or cast. X-ray and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to confirm the diagnosis of an active CN (3T scanner Siemens MagnetromVerio). The involved area of foot was classified anatomically for pattern of involvement using the Sanders-Frykberg classification. Clinical information was documented, including the duration of the symptoms, duration of diabetes, concomitant microvascular and macrovascular complications. Comprehensive neurological testing included vibration perception threshold (VPT>25 mV was considered abnormal) by biothesiometer-Vibrometer-VPT1 (Diabetik Foot Care, Madras Engineering Service, India), perception of 10-g monofilament at 5 standardised plantar locations, and ankle reflex.

Interventions:

Participants were randomly assigned in 1:2 ratio to receive either injection denosumab 60 gm (Group A) or equal volume of normal saline (Group B) subcutaneous over abdomen as a single dose (denosumab and normal saline were provided in similar looking syringe). The investigator administering the treatment, radiologist and the patient were blinded to treatment allocation. A conventional below knee, non-walking, non-removable fibreglass total contact cast (TCC) were provided to all participants irrespective of the group allocation for offloading.

Procedures:

Participants visited the study site initially during screening, randomization and subsequently four weekly for the monitoring of foot temperature. During randomization visit, blood samples were drawn for HbA1c, renal functions, calcium, phosphate and vitamin D. An average of three temperature readings at the afflicted site of the foot were taken and temperature difference (0C) were noted. The study drug or placebo were administered by blinded investigator and TCC was provided. Subsequently, during 4-weekly follow up visits the cast was removed for 30 minutes and skin temperature (mean of three readings) difference was noted. A change of cast was performed four weekly or earlier to avoid "pistoning" effect caused by the edema diminution until clinical remission. Patients with vitamin D deficiency (25 (OH)D3<30 ng/ml were supplemented with weekly oral cholecalciferol 60,000 IU for 8 weeks , then monthly till end of follow up.

A temperature difference of <2C between the afflicted foot and a similar site on the other foot documented twice (four weeks apart) along with the absence of signs of inflammation was considered "clinical remission" of active CN.

Following the clinical remission of active CN, the TCC shall be discontinued, and participants received cast walkers or customised footwear. Subsequently, foot examination shall be performed to monitor for the recurrence of CN (foot temperature assessment), the occurrence of deformities or ulcers (clinical examination), new-onset fractures (radiological assessment)or amputation for a minimum duration of 48 weeks following remission.

Being tested
Danosumab, Normal Saline

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DanosumabDrug

    Also called Drug Arm

    60 mg subcutaneous Danosumab

  • Normal SalineOther

    Also called Placebo

    Placebo comparator arm

Study groups in NCT05797259
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DanosumabExperimentalDanosumab 60mg subcutaneous once at diagnosis
Receives: Drug: Danosumab
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorSimilar Volume, and consistency placebo (Normal Saline) subcutaneous once at diagnosis
Receives: Other: Normal Saline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Remission of acute charcot

    Proportion of patients achieving remission

    Measured: 48 week

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Remission duration

    Remission duration in weeks or months

    Measured: 48 week

  2. Recurrence of CN

    Recurrence of active CN defined by temperature >2 C in the affected foot after documenting remission

    Measured: 48 week

  3. Mortality

    All cause death

    Measured: Death due to any cause during the study duration

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Apr 2023
  2. Study start10 Mar 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2023
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
78 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05797259
Sponsor's protocol ID
DANCN 01
Acronym
DANCN-CKD
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
6 Mar 2023
Last updated
30 Aug 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Danosumab and Normal Saline in people with Charcot Joint of Foot, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Remission of acute charcot (time frame: 48 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Aug 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in