Charcot Joint of FootPhase 4DANCN-CKDNCT05797259
RANKL Antibody for Acute Charcot Neuro-osteoarthropathy
A Phase 4 study testing Danosumab and Normal Saline in people with Charcot Joint of Foot, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
This study's goal was to determine how denosumab 60 mg, combined with total contact casting and restricted weightbearing status, would affect the treatment of acute CN with CKD. METHODS Participants in the research were those who visited the outpatient foot clinic at PGIMER, CHD in India. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Charcot Joint of Foot
- What is being tested?
- Danosumab and Normal Saline
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 78 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- 10 Mar 2019to 31 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diabetes
- Active Charcot neuroarthropathy of either left or right foot
- Chronic Kidney disease defined as eGFR<60 ml/min/m2 and/or Urine protein >300 mg/day
- Presence of all
Who cannot join
- Active Pedal ulcer
- Active malignancy
- Hypocalcemia
- Primary Hyperparathyroidism
- Pregnancy and Breast Feeding
- Prior treatment with anti-RANKL antibody
- On corticosteroids
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: RANKL Antibody (Danosumab) for Acute Charcot Neuro-osteoarthropathy Remission in Chronic Kidney Disease
This study's goal was to determine how denosumab 60 mg, combined with total contact casting and restricted weightbearing status, would affect the treatment of acute CN with CKD.
METHODS Participants in the research were those who visited the outpatient foot clinic at PGIMER, CHD in India. During the study period, 446 persons with CN were identified, 102 of whom met the criteria for the first screening, and 78 of whom were ultimately enrolled in the study.
Aim: To assess the clinico-radiological remission of Acute Charcot-neuroarthropathy in patients of CKD.
Read the detailed description
Participants attending the outpatient diabetic foot facility of tertiary care hospital in North India were assessed for active CN. An active CN of the foot was considered in the presence of localised erythema, edoema, and a temperature differential of more than 20C compared to a similar location on the opposite foot. Participants were diagnosed with "active on chronic" CN if they met the requirements for active CN in the context of foot deformities suggestive of chronic CN (rocker bottom deformity). Those with self-reported diabetes or those who were already receiving treatment for diabetes, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/m2 (CKD-EPI equation) and more than 500 mg of urine protein/24 hours were considered as having diabetic CKD. Patients with active pedal ulcer, inactive charcot foot, peripheral vascular disease (ankle brachial index ABI <0.9), prior exposure to medications affecting bone metabolism particularly bisphosphonates, teriparatide, denosumab or steroids in the past 12 months, hypocalcemia, active malignancy, CKD on dialysis and pregnancy or lactating women were excluded. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments, the International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and its applicable regulatory requirements. All participants provided their signed, fully informed consent and study protocol was approved by the institutional Ethics Committee ref INT/IEC/SPE-1664.
The foot temperature was determined by an infrared dermal thermometry [(FLIR Systems Inc, Orlando, USA) with a pixel resolution of 4800 (80*60), thermal sensitivity of 0.15 C, and a detection range of -20 C to 250 C] after 30 minutes of removing footwear or cast. X-ray and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to confirm the diagnosis of an active CN (3T scanner Siemens MagnetromVerio). The involved area of foot was classified anatomically for pattern of involvement using the Sanders-Frykberg classification. Clinical information was documented, including the duration of the symptoms, duration of diabetes, concomitant microvascular and macrovascular complications. Comprehensive neurological testing included vibration perception threshold (VPT>25 mV was considered abnormal) by biothesiometer-Vibrometer-VPT1 (Diabetik Foot Care, Madras Engineering Service, India), perception of 10-g monofilament at 5 standardised plantar locations, and ankle reflex.
Interventions:
Participants were randomly assigned in 1:2 ratio to receive either injection denosumab 60 gm (Group A) or equal volume of normal saline (Group B) subcutaneous over abdomen as a single dose (denosumab and normal saline were provided in similar looking syringe). The investigator administering the treatment, radiologist and the patient were blinded to treatment allocation. A conventional below knee, non-walking, non-removable fibreglass total contact cast (TCC) were provided to all participants irrespective of the group allocation for offloading.
Procedures:
Participants visited the study site initially during screening, randomization and subsequently four weekly for the monitoring of foot temperature. During randomization visit, blood samples were drawn for HbA1c, renal functions, calcium, phosphate and vitamin D. An average of three temperature readings at the afflicted site of the foot were taken and temperature difference (0C) were noted. The study drug or placebo were administered by blinded investigator and TCC was provided. Subsequently, during 4-weekly follow up visits the cast was removed for 30 minutes and skin temperature (mean of three readings) difference was noted. A change of cast was performed four weekly or earlier to avoid "pistoning" effect caused by the edema diminution until clinical remission. Patients with vitamin D deficiency (25 (OH)D3<30 ng/ml were supplemented with weekly oral cholecalciferol 60,000 IU for 8 weeks , then monthly till end of follow up.
A temperature difference of <2C between the afflicted foot and a similar site on the other foot documented twice (four weeks apart) along with the absence of signs of inflammation was considered "clinical remission" of active CN.
Following the clinical remission of active CN, the TCC shall be discontinued, and participants received cast walkers or customised footwear. Subsequently, foot examination shall be performed to monitor for the recurrence of CN (foot temperature assessment), the occurrence of deformities or ulcers (clinical examination), new-onset fractures (radiological assessment)or amputation for a minimum duration of 48 weeks following remission.
- Conditions
- Charcot Joint of Foot
- Being tested
- Danosumab, Normal Saline
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DanosumabDrug
Also called Drug Arm
60 mg subcutaneous Danosumab
Normal SalineOther
Also called Placebo
Placebo comparator arm
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Danosumab | Experimental | Danosumab 60mg subcutaneous once at diagnosis Receives: Drug: Danosumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Similar Volume, and consistency placebo (Normal Saline) subcutaneous once at diagnosis Receives: Other: Normal Saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Remission of acute charcot
Proportion of patients achieving remission
Measured: 48 week
Secondary outcomes (3)
Remission duration
Remission duration in weeks or months
Measured: 48 week
Recurrence of CN
Recurrence of active CN defined by temperature >2 C in the affected foot after documenting remission
Measured: 48 week
Mortality
All cause death
Measured: Death due to any cause during the study duration
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Apr 2023
- Study start10 Mar 2019
- Primary completion31 Mar 2023
- Study completion31 Mar 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Charcot Joint of FootStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ashu Rastogi, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05797259
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DANCN 01
- Acronym
- DANCN-CKD
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 6 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 30 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- RANKL Antibody (Danosumab) for Acute Charcot Neuro-osteoarthropathy Remission in Chronic Kidney Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05797259
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DANCN-CKD / DANCN 01
- Conditions
- Charcot Joint of Foot
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, ChandigarhUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study's goal was to determine how denosumab 60 mg, combined with total contact casting and restricted weightbearing status, would affect the treatment of acute CN with CKD.
METHODS Participants in the research were those who visited the outpatient foot clinic at PGIMER, CHD in India. During the study period, 446 persons with CN were identified, 102 of whom met the criteria for the first screening, and 78 of whom were ultimately enrolled in the study.
Aim: To assess the clinico-radiological remission of Acute Charcot-neuroarthropathy in patients of CKD.
Detailed description
Participants attending the outpatient diabetic foot facility of tertiary care hospital in North India were assessed for active CN. An active CN of the foot was considered in the presence of localised erythema, edoema, and a temperature differential of more than 20C compared to a similar location on the opposite foot. Participants were diagnosed with "active on chronic" CN if they met the requirements for active CN in the context of foot deformities suggestive of chronic CN (rocker bottom deformity). Those with self-reported diabetes or those who were already receiving treatment for diabetes, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/m2 (CKD-EPI equation) and more than 500 mg of urine protein/24 hours were considered as having diabetic CKD. Patients with active pedal ulcer, inactive charcot foot, peripheral vascular disease (ankle brachial index ABI <0.9), prior exposure to medications affecting bone metabolism particularly bisphosphonates, teriparatide, denosumab or steroids in the past 12 months, hypocalcemia, active malignancy, CKD on dialysis and pregnancy or lactating women were excluded. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments, the International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and its applicable regulatory requirements. All participants provided their signed, fully informed consent and study protocol was approved by the institutional Ethics Committee ref INT/IEC/SPE-1664.
The foot temperature was determined by an infrared dermal thermometry [(FLIR Systems Inc, Orlando, USA) with a pixel resolution of 4800 (80*60), thermal sensitivity of 0.15 C, and a detection range of -20 C to 250 C] after 30 minutes of removing footwear or cast. X-ray and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to confirm the diagnosis of an active CN (3T scanner Siemens MagnetromVerio). The involved area of foot was classified anatomically for pattern of involvement using the Sanders-Frykberg classification. Clinical information was documented, including the duration of the symptoms, duration of diabetes, concomitant microvascular and macrovascular complications. Comprehensive neurological testing included vibration perception threshold (VPT>25 mV was considered abnormal) by biothesiometer-Vibrometer-VPT1 (Diabetik Foot Care, Madras Engineering Service, India), perception of 10-g monofilament at 5 standardised plantar locations, and ankle reflex.
Interventions:
Participants were randomly assigned in 1:2 ratio to receive either injection denosumab 60 gm (Group A) or equal volume of normal saline (Group B) subcutaneous over abdomen as a single dose (denosumab and normal saline were provided in similar looking syringe). The investigator administering the treatment, radiologist and the patient were blinded to treatment allocation. A conventional below knee, non-walking, non-removable fibreglass total contact cast (TCC) were provided to all participants irrespective of the group allocation for offloading.
Procedures:
Participants visited the study site initially during screening, randomization and subsequently four weekly for the monitoring of foot temperature. During randomization visit, blood samples were drawn for HbA1c, renal functions, calcium, phosphate and vitamin D. An average of three temperature readings at the afflicted site of the foot were taken and temperature difference (0C) were noted. The study drug or placebo were administered by blinded investigator and TCC was provided. Subsequently, during 4-weekly follow up visits the cast was removed for 30 minutes and skin temperature (mean of three readings) difference was noted. A change of cast was performed four weekly or earlier to avoid "pistoning" effect caused by the edema diminution until clinical remission. Patients with vitamin D deficiency (25 (OH)D3<30 ng/ml were supplemented with weekly oral cholecalciferol 60,000 IU for 8 weeks , then monthly till end of follow up.
A temperature difference of <2C between the afflicted foot and a similar site on the other foot documented twice (four weeks apart) along with the absence of signs of inflammation was considered "clinical remission" of active CN.
Following the clinical remission of active CN, the TCC shall be discontinued, and participants received cast walkers or customised footwear. Subsequently, foot examination shall be performed to monitor for the recurrence of CN (foot temperature assessment), the occurrence of deformities or ulcers (clinical examination), new-onset fractures (radiological assessment)or amputation for a minimum duration of 48 weeks following remission.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Danosumab | Experimental | Drug: DanosumabDanosumab 60mg subcutaneous once at diagnosis |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: Normal SalineSimilar Volume, and consistency placebo (Normal Saline) subcutaneous once at diagnosis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diabetes
- Active Charcot neuroarthropathy of either left or right foot
- Chronic Kidney disease defined as eGFR<60 ml/min/m2 and/or Urine protein >300 mg/day
- Presence of all
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Active Pedal ulcer
- Active malignancy
- Hypocalcemia
- Primary Hyperparathyroidism
- Pregnancy and Breast Feeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DanosumabAlso: Drug Arm60 mg subcutaneous Danosumab | Drug | Danosumab |
| Normal SalineAlso: PlaceboPlacebo comparator arm | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Remission of acute charcot
Time frame: 48 week
Proportion of patients achieving remission
3 secondary outcomes
Remission duration
Time frame: 48 week
Recurrence of CN
Time frame: 48 week
Mortality
Time frame: Death due to any cause during the study duration
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Aug 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Charcot Joint of Foot
RecruitingObservational study
Factors Associated With an Evolution in the Quality of Life of Diabetic Patients With Chronic, Wound-free Charcot Foot
Charcot Joint of Foot, Osteoarthropathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Danosumab and Normal Saline in people with Charcot Joint of Foot, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Remission of acute charcot (time frame: 48 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Aug 2023.