AzTrials
AzTrials

Disability PhysicalIADLINCT05790798

The Effect of Occupational Therapy-Based Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Intervention in People With Disabilities

A study testing occupational therapy-based instrumental daily living activities intervention and Quite recreation activity in people with Disability Physical, run by Hacettepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of occupational therapy-based instrumental activities of daily living intervention on stress levels, quality of life, and participation in people with disability. The participants were recruited from the Etimesgut Family and Life Center in Ankara. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Disability Physical
What is being tested?
occupational therapy-based instrumental daily living activities intervention and Quite recreation activity
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
18 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
15 Sep 2022to 16 Mar 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • were to be 18 years of age or older,
  • to have a score of 17 and below according to the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activity of Daily Living Scale,
  • to have a score of 24 and above in the Modified Mini-Mental test.

Who cannot join

  • not participating regularly in the intervention program.
  • Having a communication problem that prevented the participant from completing the assessment and the kits;

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Hacettepe University

    Ankara, 06100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Occupational Therapy-Based Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Intervention on Stress Level, Quality of Life, and Participation in People With Disabilities

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of occupational therapy-based instrumental activities of daily living intervention on stress levels, quality of life, and participation in people with disability. The participants were recruited from the Etimesgut Family and Life Center in Ankara. In this study, an individualized occupational therapy-based instrumental activities of daily living intervention were implemented for a total of 8 weeks, lasting 16 sessions, which included an intervention group (n=9) and a control group (n=9). Changes before and after the intervention were assessed with the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, Waisman Activities of Daily Living Scale, Modified Mini-Mental State Examination Test, SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire, Perceived Stress Scale, and Community Integration Questionnaire.

Read the detailed description

The concept of disability refers to the limitation in activity and social participation and loss of function due to the inability to fulfill the roles expected from the people depending on the level of development, sex, and social factors resulting from an impairment or handicap. The number of people with disabilities is increasing daily in the world, and it was determined that 15.6% of the population over 18 has a disability. People with disabilities experience problems in activities such as bathing, dressing, eating, shopping, money management, preparing food, cleaning, and using drugs, due to physical, cognitive, sensory, and psychosocial impairments. The above-mentioned activities are the tasks of everyday life called activities of daily living (ADL). ADLs are classified as basic activities of daily living (basic ADLs; bathing, eating, toilet, etc.), and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs; shopping, money management, meal preparation, shopping, dog walking, paying bills, etc.).

People with disabilities need IADLs to a large extent in order to continue living more independently in the community. IADLs are meaningful and purposeful activities that give meaning to people's lives and reflect their social values and cultures. IADLs include activities such as taking care of others, using public transport, health management, and household chores, and have a more complex structure than basic ADLs. Unlike basic ADLs, IADLs require more complex cognitive skills such as planning, organization, decision-making, and executive functions, or fine motor, visual sharpness, or hearing skills. In addition, IADLs are also affected by contextual factors (age, sex, habits, education, culture, environment, etc.) independently of daily living activities. Because IADLs are carried out in many social areas outside the home and include activities based on the people's home, work, school, and social participation. Factors such as environmental suitability, social stigma, and stress of people with disabilities, limit participation in their IADLs and negatively affect their quality of life. Therefore, it is seen that low social participation, decreased quality of life, and increased perceived stress are closely related to IADL performance problems.

In the literature, it is seen that intervention methods are used to improve the IADLs of people with disabilities. Clarke et al. implemented an 8-week physiotherapy and occupational therapy-based intervention program in people with mild and moderate Parkinson's disease (n=762). They made individualized practices on sleep, fatigue, personal care, dressing, in-home mobility, housework, and environmental problems within the scope of the intervention. As a result, it was observed that there was a significant increase in IADL performance, and they recommended the use of activity-based intensified intervention programs for future studies. In a survey study conducted with 105 hand therapists in the USA, 97% of therapists stated that interventions that include meaningful and purposeful activities would be more beneficial for people with upper extremity problems, rather than traditional intervention programs using physical agent modalities or progressive resistance exercises. Egan et al. reported a significant increase in the performance and satisfaction levels of self-care, productivity and leisure activities of the therapy group in the activity-based intervention program applied to improve the occupational performance of 16 people with stroke. Studies with high levels of evidence have emphasized that the use of the daily living activities in intervention programs improves the quality of life of people with disabilities. Politis et al. implemented a 4-week kit-based intervention that included activities of daily living for 37 people with dementia. As a result of the intervention, it was found that the increased quality of life and decreased apathy in people with dementia. It has been stated that the use of kits in intervention programs is relatively inexpensive compared to traditional intervention programs, it is colorful and interesting, is enthusiastically welcomed by people, and it is easy to build. In another study, it was determined that 10 activity kits used to improve the leisure activities of people with Alzheimer's and dementia living in nursing homes increased the quality of life of people.

In occupational therapy, Dy and Yancosek, who developed IADLs kits consisting of daily living activities, created an 8-week intervention program within the scope of hand rehabilitation. Activity kits were used to examine the personal opinions of occupational therapists in terms of the ease of application of the kits before and after they were applied to people. As a result, the use of activity kits in evaluation and interventions has been suggested because they are easy and functional compared to biomechanical intervention programs. Berlet and Kaskutas prepared 10 activity kits in the hand therapy clinic for 642 people who have undergone hand surgery, for the areas of basic and instrumental ADLs where they have the most difficulty. They sent the prepared kits to 30 occupational therapists working in the fields of hand and community rehabilitation and received their opinions about these kits. Occupational therapists stated that the kits eliminate the waste of time in building the materials to be used during the intervention and increase the efficiency of the intervention as it deals with the occupational performance of the kits.

In the systematic reviews, it is seen that studies examining the effects of interventions for IADLs are more common in the elderly and that IADL interventions for people with disabilities are limited. In addition, in studies with IADL kits, programs that develop fine motor skills were focused on. According to the studies, it was thought that the proposed IADL interventions to increase the independence of individuals with disabilities should be planned with a new approach. Therefore, it was aimed to examine the effect of the intervention to be made with the kits created for IADLs on people with disabilities. Specifically, The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of occupational therapy-based instrumental activities of daily living intervention on stress levels, quality of life, and participation in people with disabilities.

Being tested
occupational therapy-based instrumental daily living activities intervention, Quite recreation activity
Keywords
Participation, Stress Level, Quality of Life, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • occupational therapy-based instrumental daily living activities interventionOther

    Occupational therapy-based instrumental activities of daily living intervention were applied to 9 people with disabilities in the intervention group, with sessions consisting of 45 minutes twice a week (totally 8 weeks/16 sessions). While the activity intervention program was being created for the intervention group, the problem areas in the ADL and IADL determined by the evaluations made before the intervention were identified. Ten occupation kits including 2 ADLs (dressing and feeding nutrition), and 8 IADLs (laundry, meal preparation, light cleaning, paperwork, use of technology, lifting and carrying, fine motor and gross motor leisure groups) were used as interventions. Various materials (jar, shirt, spoon, teapot, play dough, stapler, plastic bag, sponge, etc.) were prepared to be used in each occupation kit and to simulate daily activities.

  • Quite recreation activityOther

    For the control group, information about the scope, duration and requirements of the research was shared throughout the process. During this period, reading activities continued. The final evaluation of all participants was made at the end of the 8th week of the study and the study was completed.

Study groups in NCT05790798
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
intervention groupExperimentalThe universe of this research, which has a randomized controlled design, is all people with disabilities aged 18 and older who are attended at the Etimesgut Family and Life Center in Ankara. The inclusion criteria of this study were to be 18 years of age or older, to have a score of 17 and below according to the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activity of Daily Living Scale, to have a score of 24 and above in the Modified Mini-Mental test. In addition, there are some exclusion criteria for research. Exclusion criteria from the study were: Having a communication problem that prevented the participant from completing the assessment and the kits; not participating regularly in the intervention program. For this study, people who attended the Family and Life Center and people with disabilities who regularly come to this center for various reasons were contacted. People (n=35) who met the criteria of the study were informed about the study and invited to participate in this study.
Receives: Other: occupational therapy-based instrumental daily living activities intervention
Control GroupActive comparatorThe universe of this research, which has a randomized controlled design, is all people with disabilities aged 18 and older who are attended at the Etimesgut Family and Life Center in Ankara. The inclusion criteria of this study were to be 18 years of age or older, to have a score of 17 and below according to the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activity of Daily Living Scale, to have a score of 24 and above in the Modified Mini-Mental test. In addition, there are some exclusion criteria for research. Exclusion criteria from the study were: Having a communication problem that prevented the participant from completing the assessment and the kits; not participating regularly in the intervention program. For this study, people who attended the Family and Life Center and people with disabilities who regularly come to this center for various reasons were contacted. People (n=35) who met the criteria of the study were informed about the study and invited to participate in this study.
Receives: Other: Quite recreation activity

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale

    It consists of 8 questions including information about telephone use, meal preparation, shopping, doing daily household chores, laundry, getting on transportation, traveling, medication use and management of finances.

    Measured: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Waisman Activities of Daily Living Scale (W-ADL):

    It is a scale developed according to the measurement criteria in the literature to measure the ADL of adolescents and adults with developmental disorders (Maenner et al., 2013). It aims to measure the level of independence while performing typical daily living activities in developmental disorders.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  2. Modified Mini-Mental State Examination Test (MMSE-E):

    It was created by Folstein et al. (1975) with the aim of evaluating the cognitive skills of people. The validity and reliability study were conducted by Babacan et al. (2014) for the Turkish population.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  3. SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire:

    The SF-36 assesses quality of life without being specific to any age, disease, or treatment group. It includes 36 questions in eight sub-dimensions: Physical Functioning, Social Functioning, Role Limitations (Physical Problems, Emotional Problems), Vitality, Bodily Pain, General Health Perceptions, and General Mental Health (Ware et al., 1993).

    Measured: 8 weeks

  4. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS):

    The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) developed by Cohen et al. (1997). Consisting of 14 items in total, PSS is designed to measure how stressful a person's life is perceived to be. Participants evaluate each item on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from "Never (0)" to "Very often (4)".

    Measured: 8 weeks

  5. Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ):

    This questionnaire developed by Willer et al. (1993) to assess community participation. The CIQ consists of 15 questions that assess a person's participation in home and family life, social and productive activities.

    Measured: 8 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Mar 2023
  2. Study start15 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion15 Feb 2023
  4. Study completion16 Mar 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
18 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05790798
Sponsor's protocol ID
59.2023fbu
Acronym
IADLI
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
16 Mar 2023
Last updated
30 Mar 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing occupational therapy-based instrumental daily living activities intervention and Quite recreation activity in people with Disability Physical, run by Hacettepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (time frame: 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in