AsthmaMyCADONCT05789927
Environmental Mycobiota: In-depth Characterisation and Determinants Involved in Asthma Emission
An observational study of Asthma, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 2 sites in France.
Trial summary
The analysis of the exposome of severe asthmatic patients and its correlation with the response profile to biotherapies used in the treatment of severe asthma and/or the frequency of exacerbations, could make it possible to identify individual and environmental components influencing the evolution of the asthmatic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma
- What is being tested?
- Assessment of the microbial exposome
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 17 Jan 2023to 17 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The inclusion of patients will be done prospectively among patients > 18 years old, severe "T2-High" asthmatics treated with biotherapy for more than a year and regularly monitored at the University Hospitals of Bordeaux and Toulouse.The monitoring of the asthmatic pathology must also have been well carried out the year preceding inclusion in MyCADO, with in particular the evaluation of the initial response to biotherapy and the number of exacerbations that occurred during this year.
Who may be able to join
- Patients > 18 years old,
- Patient with severe "T2-High" asthmatics,
- Treated with biotherapy for more than a year
- Regularly monitored at the University Hospitals of Bordeaux and Toulouse.
Who cannot join
- Severe asthmatic patients who have been treated with biotherapy for less than a year
- Severe asthmatic patients who have not been treated,
- Not Severe asthmatic patients
- Patient who are not regularly monitored at the Bordeaux and/or Toulouse University Hospitals
- Patients under the protection of justice, under guardianship, under curatorship.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
France2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Bourdeaux, 33000
Sebatien IMBERT, PharmD, sebastien.imbert@chu-bordeaux.fr
Patrick BERGER, MD PhD
- Recruiting
University Hospital, Toulouse
Toulouse, 31000
Laurent GUILLEMINAULT, PhD, guilleminault.l@chu-toulouse.fr
Laurent GUILLEMINAULT, PhD
About this study
The analysis of the exposome of severe asthmatic patients and its correlation with the response profile to biotherapies used in the treatment of severe asthma and/or the frequency of exacerbations, could make it possible to identify individual and environmental components influencing the evolution of the asthmatic pathology and/or response to treatment. An interventional approach could thus be developed, taking into account in particular the determinants of indoor air quality as well as the obstacles to the implementation of current recommendations for the prevention of exacerbations.
The patient will thus be returned to the center and considered as a main actor in his clinical history by offering him the most suitable intervention possible, according to the evaluation of his exposome, in order to ultimately reduce the morbidity and mortality linked to exacerbations.
This interventional approach could then be validated on a larger scale in a national multicenter study involving a larger number of patients.
Read the detailed description
Nowadays, 5 to 10% of the population of developed countries suffer from asthma, whose morbidity and mortality represent approximately 1% in years of life lost. Within this asthmatic population, there is a subgroup of patients with severe asthma (10% of total asthmatics). These severe asthma patients have a high risk of complications and exacerbations, poor quality of life, and increased mortality and morbidity. Moreover, these severe asthmatics represent 50% of the total health care costs associated with asthma. Among the formidable complications of severe asthma, exacerbations are still responsible for 900 deaths per year in France, while most of them are considered avoidable.
Severe asthma is currently described as a heterogeneous disease composed of multiple phenotypes, themselves linked to different pathophysiological mechanisms that define theendotypes. Phenotypic and endotypic characterization is important for the management of severe asthma, as recent therapeutic developments now make it possible to specifically target certain endotypes.In effect,in recent years, the development of new treatments using monoclonal antibodies (biotherapies) has improved the management of severe asthmatic patients with the "T2-High" phenotype, with a reduction in the frequency of exacerbations. However, the response to these new biotherapies is heterogeneous with super-responder patients (absence of exacerbations), partial responder patients (decrease but persistence of exacerbations) and non-responder patients (no effect on exacerbations).
Severe asthma, the diversity of phenotypes/endotypes observed, the frequency of exacerbations and the response to treatment, result from a combination of genetic and environmental factors. The exposome, which designates all of the exposures to external and environmental factors that a human undergoes from his development in utero until death, could therefore play a key role in the evolution of severe asthmatic pathology. Among these components of the exposome, the team find in particular microbial exposure (or environmental micro-mycobiota), including the omnipresent fungal spores in the air everybody breathe. Thus, in line with the hygienist hypothesis, recent studies have shown that environmental microbial exposures during early childhood, significantly reduced the incidence of respiratory disease in children with genetic susceptibility at chromosome 17q21. Additionally, chronic exposure to a microbial environment, particularly the fungal indoor environment, is associated with a wide range of adverse health effects, including asthma, and may influence its severity. More recently, severe asthma has also been associated with pulmonary microbial dysbiosis that would activate the inflammasome and other mediated pathways. However, the exposome is one of the factors that can influence this pulmonary microbial dysbiosis. particularly the fungal indoor environment, is associated with a wide range of adverse health effects, including asthma, and may influence its severity. More recently, severe asthma has also been associated with pulmonary microbial dysbiosis that would activate the inflammasome and other mediated pathways. However, the exposome is one of the factors that can influence this pulmonary microbial dysbiosis. particularly the fungal indoor environment, is associated with a wide range of adverse health effects, including asthma, and may influence its severity. More recently, severe asthma has also been associated with pulmonary microbial dysbiosis that would activate the inflammasome and other mediated pathways. However, the exposome is one of the factors that can influence this pulmonary microbial dysbiosis.
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Being tested
- Assessment of the microbial exposome
- Keywords
- mycobiota, Asthma, Environment
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Assessment of the microbial exposomeProcedure or surgery
The assessment of the microbial exposome will be carried out by the deployment of 4 dust collectors (1 per season) at the patient's home. The evaluation of the endogenous myco-microbiome will be carried out by analyzing patient sputum obtained during follow-up visits or during routine care in the event of an exacerbation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patient who received antibiotic prophylaxis | Severe "T2-High" asthmatics treated with biotherapy Receives: Procedure: Assessment of the microbial exposome |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
identify differences in bacterial and fungal of the microbial exposome
demonstration of an association between the components of the microbial exposome over an entire year and the response profile to biotherapies used in severe asthma (super-responder vs partial responders), evaluated according to Upham's criteria.
Measured: Month 3
identify differences in bacterial and fungal of the microbial exposome
demonstration of an association between the components of the microbial exposome over an entire year and the response profile to biotherapies used in severe asthma (super-responder vs partial responders), evaluated according to Upham's criteria.
Measured: Month 6
identify differences in bacterial and fungal of the microbial exposome
demonstration of an association between the components of the microbial exposome over an entire year and the response profile to biotherapies used in severe asthma (super-responder vs partial responders), evaluated according to Upham's criteria.
Measured: Month 9
identify differences in bacterial and fungal of the microbial exposome
demonstration of an association between the components of the microbial exposome over an entire year and the response profile to biotherapies used in severe asthma (super-responder vs partial responders), evaluated according to Upham's criteria.
Measured: Month 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Mar 2023
- Study start17 Jan 2023
- Primary completion17 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion17 Apr 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, BordeauxThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Bordeaux
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Bordeaux
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sébastien IMBERT, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Bordeaux
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05789927
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHUBX 2021/30
- Acronym
- MyCADO
- Status last verified
- Jul 2023
- First submitted
- 16 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 14 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Environmental Mycobiota: In-depth Characterisation and Determinants Involved in Asthma Emission
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05789927
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MyCADO / CHUBX 2021/30
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Keywords
- mycobiota, Asthma, Environment
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, BordeauxUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Bordeaux
- Study start
- 17 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 17 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The analysis of the exposome of severe asthmatic patients and its correlation with the response profile to biotherapies used in the treatment of severe asthma and/or the frequency of exacerbations, could make it possible to identify individual and environmental components influencing the evolution of the asthmatic pathology and/or response to treatment. An interventional approach could thus be developed, taking into account in particular the determinants of indoor air quality as well as the obstacles to the implementation of current recommendations for the prevention of exacerbations.
The patient will thus be returned to the center and considered as a main actor in his clinical history by offering him the most suitable intervention possible, according to the evaluation of his exposome, in order to ultimately reduce the morbidity and mortality linked to exacerbations.
This interventional approach could then be validated on a larger scale in a national multicenter study involving a larger number of patients.
Detailed description
Nowadays, 5 to 10% of the population of developed countries suffer from asthma, whose morbidity and mortality represent approximately 1% in years of life lost. Within this asthmatic population, there is a subgroup of patients with severe asthma (10% of total asthmatics). These severe asthma patients have a high risk of complications and exacerbations, poor quality of life, and increased mortality and morbidity. Moreover, these severe asthmatics represent 50% of the total health care costs associated with asthma. Among the formidable complications of severe asthma, exacerbations are still responsible for 900 deaths per year in France, while most of them are considered avoidable.
Severe asthma is currently described as a heterogeneous disease composed of multiple phenotypes, themselves linked to different pathophysiological mechanisms that define theendotypes. Phenotypic and endotypic characterization is important for the management of severe asthma, as recent therapeutic developments now make it possible to specifically target certain endotypes.In effect,in recent years, the development of new treatments using monoclonal antibodies (biotherapies) has improved the management of severe asthmatic patients with the "T2-High" phenotype, with a reduction in the frequency of exacerbations. However, the response to these new biotherapies is heterogeneous with super-responder patients (absence of exacerbations), partial responder patients (decrease but persistence of exacerbations) and non-responder patients (no effect on exacerbations).
Severe asthma, the diversity of phenotypes/endotypes observed, the frequency of exacerbations and the response to treatment, result from a combination of genetic and environmental factors. The exposome, which designates all of the exposures to external and environmental factors that a human undergoes from his development in utero until death, could therefore play a key role in the evolution of severe asthmatic pathology. Among these components of the exposome, the team find in particular microbial exposure (or environmental micro-mycobiota), including the omnipresent fungal spores in the air everybody breathe. Thus, in line with the hygienist hypothesis, recent studies have shown that environmental microbial exposures during early childhood, significantly reduced the incidence of respiratory disease in children with genetic susceptibility at chromosome 17q21. Additionally, chronic exposure to a microbial environment, particularly the fungal indoor environment, is associated with a wide range of adverse health effects, including asthma, and may influence its severity. More recently, severe asthma has also been associated with pulmonary microbial dysbiosis that would activate the inflammasome and other mediated pathways. However, the exposome is one of the factors that can influence this pulmonary microbial dysbiosis. particularly the fungal indoor environment, is associated with a wide range of adverse health effects, including asthma, and may influence its severity. More recently, severe asthma has also been associated with pulmonary microbial dysbiosis that would activate the inflammasome and other mediated pathways. However, the exposome is one of the factors that can influence this pulmonary microbial dysbiosis. particularly the fungal indoor environment, is associated with a wide range of adverse health effects, including asthma, and may influence its severity. More recently, severe asthma has also been associated with pulmonary microbial dysbiosis that would activate the inflammasome and other mediated pathways. However, the exposome is one of the factors that can influence this pulmonary microbial dysbiosis.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patient who received antibiotic prophylaxis | – | Procedure: Assessment of the microbial exposomeSevere "T2-High" asthmatics treated with biotherapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The inclusion of patients will be done prospectively among patients > 18 years old, severe "T2-High" asthmatics treated with biotherapy for more than a year and regularly monitored at the University Hospitals of Bordeaux and Toulouse.The monitoring of the asthmatic pathology must also have been well carried out the year preceding inclusion in MyCADO, with in particular the evaluation of the initial response to biotherapy and the number of exacerbations that occurred during this year.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients > 18 years old,
- Patient with severe "T2-High" asthmatics,
- Treated with biotherapy for more than a year
- Regularly monitored at the University Hospitals of Bordeaux and Toulouse.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Severe asthmatic patients who have been treated with biotherapy for less than a year
- Severe asthmatic patients who have not been treated,
- Not Severe asthmatic patients
- Patient who are not regularly monitored at the Bordeaux and/or Toulouse University Hospitals
- Patients under the protection of justice, under guardianship, under curatorship.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of the microbial exposomeThe assessment of the microbial exposome will be carried out by the deployment of 4 dust collectors (1 per season) at the patient's home. The evaluation of the endogenous myco-microbiome will be carried out by analyzing patient sputum obtained during follow-up visits or during routine care in the event of an exacerbation. | Procedure or surgery | Patient who received antibiotic prophylaxis |
Primary outcome
identify differences in bacterial and fungal of the microbial exposome
Time frame: Month 3
demonstration of an association between the components of the microbial exposome over an entire year and the response profile to biotherapies used in severe asthma (super-responder vs partial responders), evaluated according to Upham's criteria.
identify differences in bacterial and fungal of the microbial exposome
Time frame: Month 6
demonstration of an association between the components of the microbial exposome over an entire year and the response profile to biotherapies used in severe asthma (super-responder vs partial responders), evaluated according to Upham's criteria.
identify differences in bacterial and fungal of the microbial exposome
Time frame: Month 9
demonstration of an association between the components of the microbial exposome over an entire year and the response profile to biotherapies used in severe asthma (super-responder vs partial responders), evaluated according to Upham's criteria.
identify differences in bacterial and fungal of the microbial exposome
Time frame: Month 12
demonstration of an association between the components of the microbial exposome over an entire year and the response profile to biotherapies used in severe asthma (super-responder vs partial responders), evaluated according to Upham's criteria.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jul 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Compare the Relative Potency of Salbutamol Administered Via Metered Dose Inhalers (MDI) Containing Propellants HFA-152a to HFA-134a in Mild Asthmatics Aged 18 to 65 Inclusive
Asthma, Mild Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Assessing the Effect of Dupilumab on Inducing Clinical Remission in Asthma
Asthma Control
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Local Antibiotic Delivery for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sébastien IMBERT principal investigator
University Hospital, Bordeaux
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Asthma, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 2 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sébastien IMBERT (+335 57 82 09 82, sebastien.imbert@chu-bordeaux.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
identify differences in bacterial and fungal of the microbial exposome (time frame: Month 3). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2023.