AzTrials
AzTrials

DementiaKINDERNCT05783102

Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Exemplary Relationships (KINDER): Pilot Study

A study testing Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Exemplary Relationships in people with Dementia and Caregiver Burden, run by Case Western Reserve University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the KINDER intervention to family caregivers to persons living with dementia. Further, the investigators will examine the preliminary efficacy of the KINDER intervention at improving caregiver resourcefulness, relationship… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Dementia, Caregiver Burden, Relation, Family
What is being tested?
Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Exemplary Relationships
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 Mar 2023to 16 Mar 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Is age 18+
  • Provides care to a family member or friend living with Alzheimer's Disease or a related dementia.
  • Helps with at least 1 activity of daily living (e.g., bathing) or 2 instrumental activities of daily living (e.g., shopping)
  • Provides at least 8 hours of assistance to the care recipient per week
  • Does not intend to place the care recipient in a skilled nursing facility within 3 months of consenting into the study

Who cannot join

  • Does not read and speak English
  • Cannot reliably access a computer and internet

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Case Western Reserve University

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Exemplary Relationships (Pilot 2)

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the KINDER intervention to family caregivers to persons living with dementia. Further, the investigators will examine the preliminary efficacy of the KINDER intervention at improving caregiver resourcefulness, relationship quality, and quality of care, including reduction of potential verbal-type elder mistreatment.

During this study, participants will be asked to complete two (2) 30- to 45-minute surveys asking about their demographic information, caregiving situations, and relationship with the care recipient. The first survey will be sent within two weeks of beginning the KINDER intervention, the second will be sent within one week after participants complete the KINDER intervention so we can compare outcomes.

Being tested
Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Exemplary Relationships
Medical subject headings
Dementia, Caregiver Burden

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Exemplary RelationshipsBehavioural

    During this 9-week psychoeducational intervention, participants will complete eight weekly, self-paced lessons that include a short video vignette, written text, a reading quiz, and a reflection exercise. Topics include understanding a dementia diagnosis, communicating with a person you care for about challenging topics, finding a balance between safety concerns and independence, and more. Each lesson takes an estimated 1 hour to complete. Independent KINDER lessons can be completed using a printed or digital copy of the KINDER Workbook. In addition, participants will be asked to participate in three, 1.5-hour group discussion sessions with other caregivers and a facilitator. These sessions will take place over Zoom video conference.

Study groups in NCT05783102
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
KINDER InterventionExperimentalKINDER is a 9-week psychoeducational intervention.
Receives: Behavioral: Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Exemplary Relationships

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Resourcefulness

    Resourcefulness is measured using the 28-item Caregiver Resourcefulness Scale (α=0.85; Zauszniewski, 2006). This scale has two factors: one focused on help-seeking and another on self-help. Caregivers are asked the frequency at which they use different strategies to manage challenges, and may respond: Not at all like me (0), Pretty much not like me (1), A little bit not like me (2), A little bit like me (3), Pretty much like much like me (4), or Very much like me (5). Items are added together to create a total score. Scores range from 0 to 140, where higher scores indicate higher levels of resourcefulness. The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores until the post-intervention survey.

    Measured: Change from baseline to post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 9 weeks intervention).

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Caregiving Relationship Strain

    Relationship strain will be measured using the 5-item Strain Scale of the Dyadic Relationship Scale (α=0.69; Reamy et al., 2011). Respondents are asked to indicate agreement with statements such as, "The patient made too many requests," and may indicate Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Agree, or Strongly Agree. The scale has a range of scores from 4 to 20, where higher scores indicate greater levels of relationship strain. The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores until the post-intervention survey.

    Measured: Change from baseline to post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 9 weeks intervention).

  2. Quality of Caregiving

    Quality of caregiving will be measured with the Task Management Strategy Index (TMSI; α=0.74 to 0.81; McClendon \& Smyth, 2013). The 19-item TMSI was developed to assess caregivers' ability to manage their family member's functional disabilities. (Gitlin et al., 2002) Caregivers are asked how often they engage in strategies that support quality care. Caregivers indicate Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, or Always. Scores range from 19 to 95. Higher scores indicate higher quality of caregiving. The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores until the post-intervention survey.

    Measured: Change from baseline to post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 9 weeks intervention).

  3. Frequency of Psychological Elder Mistreatment

    The investigators will use a modified version of the Conflict Tactics Scale 2 to measure psychological elder mistreatment (MCTS 2; α=0.79; Straus et al., 2016). Items include behaviors such as insulting, swearing at, or yelling at a partner. To measure a range of psychological elder mistreatment behaviors, we will add three items: ignoring the care recipient (DeLiema et al., 2012), threatening to isolate the care recipient (Acierno et al., 2010), and talking about the care recipient as if they are not there (Conrad et al., 2011). To describe the severity of mistreatment (Burnes et al., 2017), participants will be asked to describe the frequency of each behavior, such that response options will include: None, Once, Twice, 3 to 5 times, 6 to 10 times, and More than 10 times. Scores range from 0 to 50. Higher scores indicate higher quality of caregiving. The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores until the post-intervention survey.

    Measured: Change from baseline to post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 9 weeks intervention).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Mar 2023
  2. Study start13 Mar 2023
  3. Primary completion16 Mar 2024
  4. Study completion16 Mar 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05783102
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY20221333
Acronym
KINDER
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
13 Mar 2023
Last updated
9 Jan 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Acierno R, Hernandez MA, Amstadter AB, Resnick HS, Steve K, Muzzy W, Kilpatrick DG. Prevalence and correlates of emotional, physical, sexual, and financial abuse and potential neglect in the United States: the National Elder Mistreatment Study. Am J Public Health. 2010 Feb;100(2):292-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.163089. Epub 2009 Dec 17.

    PubMed 20019303
  • Burnes D, Pillemer K, Lachs MS. Elder Abuse Severity: A Critical but Understudied Dimension of Victimization for Clinicians and Researchers. Gerontologist. 2017 Aug 1;57(4):745-756. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv688.

    PubMed 26874186
  • Conrad KJ, Iris M, Ridings JW, Langley K, Anetzberger GJ. Self-report measure of psychological abuse of older adults. Gerontologist. 2011 Jun;51(3):354-66. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq103. Epub 2010 Dec 20.

    PubMed 21173437
  • DeLiema M, Gassoumis ZD, Homeier DC, Wilber KH. Determining prevalence and correlates of elder abuse using promotores: low-income immigrant Latinos report high rates of abuse and neglect. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Jul;60(7):1333-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04025.x. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

    PubMed 22697790
  • Gitlin LN, Winter L, Dennis MP, Corcoran M, Schinfeld S, Hauck WW. Strategies used by families to simplify tasks for individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders: psychometric analysis of the Task Management Strategy Index (TMSI). Gerontologist. 2002 Feb;42(1):61-9. doi: 10.1093/geront/42.1.61.

    PubMed 11815700
  • McClendon MJ, Smyth KA. Quality of informal care for persons with dementia: dimensions and correlates. Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(8):1003-15. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2013.805400. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

    PubMed 24171485
  • Reamy AM, Kim K, Zarit SH, Whitlatch CJ. Understanding discrepancy in perceptions of values: individuals with mild to moderate dementia and their family caregivers. Gerontologist. 2011 Aug;51(4):473-83. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr010. Epub 2011 Mar 7.

    PubMed 21383111
  • Straus, MA, Hamby, SL, Boney-McCoy, SUE, & Sugarman, DB. The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2). Journal of Family Issues. 2016; 17(3): 283-316. doi: 10.1177/01925139601700300.

  • Zauszniewski JA, Lai CY, Tithiphontumrong S. Development and testing of the Resourcefulness Scale for Older Adults. J Nurs Meas. 2006 Spring-Summer;14(1):57-68. doi: 10.1891/jnum.14.1.57.

    PubMed 16764178
  • Meyer K, Wei W, Yonashiro-Cho J, Mage S, Kim S, Irani E, Burant C, Gassoumis Z, Lamb EG, Zauszniewski JA, Benton D. Acceptability of an Intervention to Prevent Older Adult Mistreatment Among Family Caregivers to Persons With Dementia: Multimethod Pilot Study. JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 30;9:e73778. doi: 10.2196/73778.

    PubMed 40737062

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Exemplary Relationships in people with Dementia and Caregiver Burden, run by Case Western Reserve University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Jan 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Resourcefulness (time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 9 weeks intervention).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05783102, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in