AzTrials
AzTrials

Alcohol DrinkingNCT05773027

Integrated Alcohol and Sexual Assault Intervention for College Men

A study testing SAFE in people with Alcohol Drinking and Sexual Assault, run by Lifespan at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This research will evaluate a new intervention that integrates evidence-based alcohol intervention strategies and promising sexual assault prevention strategies with the goal of decreasing sexual aggression among men who report heavy drinking; a particularly high risk group. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 22 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Alcohol Drinking, Sexual Assault
What is being tested?
SAFE
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
115 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
17 Oct 2013to 13 Dec 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 22 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Engaging in binge drinking, defined as 5 or more drinks per day for men on the same occasion by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration on two or more occasions in the past month.
  • Engaging in oral, vaginal, or anal sexual intercourse with a female partner one or more times in the past four months

Who cannot join

  • Displaying symptoms consistent with alcohol use withdrawal
  • Reporting current suicidal or homicidal ideation
  • Meeting criteria consistent with a diagnosis of Antisocial Personality Disorder

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Rhode Island Hospital

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02904

Other trials in United States

About this study

This research will evaluate a new intervention that integrates evidence-based alcohol intervention strategies and promising sexual assault prevention strategies with the goal of decreasing sexual aggression among men who report heavy drinking; a particularly high risk group. Specifically, this study will conduct a randomized controlled pilot trial with college men who report heavy drinking to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of the proposed intervention. The main questions the study will answer are: 1) what is the feasibility of the recruitment plans, research design, intervention training methods, and delivery of the program?; and 2) does the intervention, relative to a mindfulness-based control condition, produce reductions in the quantity and frequency of alcohol use, perpetration of sexual aggression, and attitudes associated with sexual aggression over the 2- and 6-month follow-up. Follow-up assessments are completed at 2- and 6-months following the program. The intervention is compared to the mindfulness-based control group.

Being tested
SAFE, Mindfulness-Based Control Condition
Medical subject headings
Alcohol Drinking

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SAFEBehavioural

    SAFE includes a motivational interviewing session addressing alcohol use and risk for sexual aggression, a workshop addressing alcohol use and sexual aggression, and a booster session review.

  • Mindfulness-Based Control ConditionBehavioural

    The program includes the same amount of contacts as SAFE, including an individual session focused on mindfulness and stress, a group session, and a booster session review.

Study groups in NCT05773027
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sexual Assault and Alcohol Feedback and Education (SAFE)ExperimentalSAFE includes a motivational interviewing session addressing alcohol use and risk for sexual aggression, a workshop addressing alcohol use and sexual aggression, and a booster session review.
Receives: Behavioral: SAFE
Mindfulness-Based Control ConditionActive comparatorThe program includes the same amount of contacts as SAFE, including an individual session focused on mindfulness and stress, a group session, and a booster session review.
Receives: Behavioral: Mindfulness-Based Control Condition

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Alcohol use, heavy drinking quantity

    Number of heavy drinking days in the past month (Minimum = 0, Maximum = 31), assessed via the timeline follow-back. Greater scores mean worse outcomes.

    Measured: Change from baseline alcohol use at 6 months.

  2. Alcohol use, drinks per week

    The average number of drinks per week (Minimum = 0, Maximum = unspecified), assessed via the timeline follow-back. Greater scores mean worse outcomes.

    Measured: Change from baseline alcohol use at 6 months.

  3. Sexual aggression perpetration

    Assessed via the sexual experiences survey. Scored based on frequency and severity (Minimum = 0, Maximum = 63). Higher scores mean worse outcomes.

    Measured: Change in severity and frequency in comparison to control at 6-months.

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Protective behavioral strategies

    Assessed via the Self Control Questionnaire (Minimum = 37, Maximum = 185). Higher scores mean more positive outcomes.

    Measured: Change in protective behavioral strategy use in comparison to control at 6-months.

  2. Perceived peer drinking norms

    Assessed via the drinking norms rating form (Minimum = 0, Maximum = unspecified). Higher scores mean worse outcomes.

    Measured: Change in perceived peer norms relative to control at 6-months.

  3. Perceived peer norms regarding sexual aggression: Perceived peer bystander intervention

    Assessed via the sexual social norms inventory, perceived peer bystander intervention (Minimum = 8, Maximum = 40, higher scores better outcomes).

    Measured: Change in perceived peer bystander intervention in comparison to control at 6-months.

  4. Perceived peer norms regarding sexual aggression: Perceived peer engagement in sexual coercion

    Assessed via the sexual social norms inventory, regarding perceived peer engagement in sexual coercion (Minimum = 7, Maximum = 35, lower are better outcomes).

    Measured: Change in perceived peer engagement in comparison to control at 6-months.

  5. Perceived peer norms regarding sexual aggression: Peer comfort with sexual aggression

    Assessed via the sexual social norms inventory, perception of peer comfort with sexual aggression (Minimum = 7 , Maximum = 35, lower are better outcomes).

    Measured: Change in peer comfort with sexual aggression relative to control at 6-months.

  6. Attitudes relating to sexual aggression: Rape myth acceptance

    Assessed via the rape myth acceptance scale (Minimum = 7, Maximum = 140, higher are worse outcomes).

    Measured: Change in rape myth acceptance relative to control at 6-months.

  7. Attitudes relating to sexual aggression: Hyper gender ideology

    Assessed via the hyper gender ideology scale (Minimum = 19, Maximum = 114, higher scores are worse outcomes).

    Measured: Change in hyper gender ideology and increases relative to control at 6-months.

  8. Attitudes relating to sexual aggression: Labeling of consent

    Assessed via the labeling of consent scenarios (Minimum = 1, Maximum= 10, higher scores are better outcomes).

    Measured: Change in labeling of consent relative to control at 6-months.

  9. Bystander intervention intention to help strangers

    Assessed via the intentions to help strangers scale (Minimum = 0, Maximum = 800, higher scores are better outcomes).

    Measured: Change in intention to help strangers relative to control at 6-months.

  10. Bystander intervention intention to help friends

    Assessed via the bystander intentions to help friends scale (Minimum = 0, Maximum = 1000, higher scores are better outcomes).

    Measured: Change in intent to help friends relative to control at 6-months.

  11. Bystander intervention attitudes

    Assessed via the bystander attitudes scale (Minimum = 51, Maximum = 255, higher scores are better outcomes).

    Measured: Change in bystander attitudes relative to control at 6-months.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2023
  2. Study start17 Oct 2013
  3. Primary completion13 Dec 2017
  4. Study completion13 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
115 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05773027
Sponsor's protocol ID
R34AA020852
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
22 Feb 2023
Last updated
17 Mar 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data sharing requests can be made by contacting the study PI.

Publications

  • Orchowski LM, Merrill JE, Oesterle DW, Barnett NP, Borsari B, Zlotnick C, Haikalis MP, Bekowitz AD. Integrated Alcohol Use and Sexual Assault Prevention Program for College Men Who Engage in Heavy Drinking: Randomized Pilot Study. JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 23;7:e47354. doi: 10.2196/47354.

    PubMed 37995129

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing SAFE in people with Alcohol Drinking and Sexual Assault, run by Lifespan at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Alcohol use, heavy drinking quantity (time frame: Change from baseline alcohol use at 6 months.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05773027, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in