White Spot Lesion of ToothNCT05764187
Incidence of White Spot Lesions Around Ceramic Brackets Compared With Metal Brackets
A study testing Orthodontic fixed appliance therapy in people with White Spot Lesion of Tooth, run by Jordan University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Jordan.
Trial summary
The main objective of this study was to investigate the relation between ceramic brackets and the development of white spot lesions (WSLs) compared to that associated with conventional metal brackets. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- White Spot Lesion of Tooth
- What is being tested?
- Orthodontic fixed appliance therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 51 participants
- Where
- 1 siteJordan
- Study dates
- 28 Dec 2021to 1 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy subjects seeking orthodontic treatment with mild-to-moderate crowding (not exceeding 5 mm)
- No previous orthodontic treatment
- Optimum oral hygiene
- Maximum of 3 restored teeth
- Absence of defective enamel formation in the form of hypocalcification or hypoplasia.
Who cannot join
- Subjects with poor oral hygiene
- Defective enamel
- Patients with syndromes and Oro-facial anomalies or salivary glands diseases
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Incidence of White Spot Lesions Around Ceramic Brackets Compared With Metal Brackets Evaluated With Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence: A Randomized Clinical Trial
The main objective of this study was to investigate the relation between ceramic brackets and the development of white spot lesions (WSLs) compared to that associated with conventional metal brackets.
Read the detailed description
Objectives : The main objective of this study was to investigate the relation between ceramic brackets and the development of WSL compared to that associated with conventional metal brackets.
Study design: Randomized 2-parallel arm clinical trial. Materials and methods: Quantitative light induced fluorescence (QLF) images were taken for the two randomly allocated groups (Ceramic group, n=26; Metal group, n=25) of patients at T0: before the start of treatment; T1: after 2 months and T2: at 4 months after treatment). The QLF images were analyzed; Primary outcome measures: The lesion area (Pixels) and Mean amount of fluorescence loss (∆F)% and the number of newly developed lesions. Secondary outcome: Maximum fluorescence loss (∆F-Max)% and plaque surface area (∆R 30)%. Means and standard deviations for all the measured parameters at T0, T1 and T2 were calculated. Split plot analysis of variance (SPANOVA) test was used to determine the changes within each group at the different time intervals, and between the two groups. Chi square was used to compare between the two groups regarding the number of new lesions during the treatment. P value was set at 0.05 level.
- Conditions
- White Spot Lesion of Tooth
- Being tested
- Orthodontic fixed appliance therapy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Orthodontic fixed appliance therapyOther
Follow up of white spot lesion development using quantitative light induced fluorescence in patients bonded with ceramic brackets versus patients bonded with conventional metal brackets
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ceramic orthodontic brackets | Experimental | Patients bonded with ceramic brackets for orthodontic treatment Receives: Other: Orthodontic fixed appliance therapy |
| Metal orthodontic brackets | Active comparator | Patients bonded with metal brackets for orthodontic treatment Receives: Other: Orthodontic fixed appliance therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lesion area
Surface area of the lesion measured in Pixels
Measured: 4 months
Mean fluorescence loss ∆F(%)
Mean lesion fluorescence loss reflecting mineral loss measured in percent
Measured: 4 months
Maximum fluorescence loss ∆Fmax(%)
Deepest point of the lesion
Measured: 4 months
Incidence of white spot lesions
The number of newly developed white spot lesions
Measured: 4 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Plaque measurement
Amount of plaque around the orthodontic fixed appliance
Measured: 4 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Mar 2023
- Study start28 Dec 2021
- Primary completion7 Jul 2022
- Study completion1 Dec 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (31)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for White Spot Lesion of ToothStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Two parallel arm randomized clinical trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jordan University of Science and Technology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Susan Al-Khateeb, Professor, Principal investigator, Faculty of Dentistry/Jordan University of Science and Technology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05764187
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- JUST20220107
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Feb 2023
- Last updated
- 11 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data will be available upon request
Publications
Chalmers JM. Minimal intervention dentistry: part 1. Strategies for addressing the new caries challenge in older patients. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006 Jun;72(5):427-33.
PubMed 16772067Chapman JA, Roberts WE, Eckert GJ, Kula KS, Gonzalez-Cabezas C. Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug;138(2):188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.10.019.
PubMed 20691360Tufekci E, Dixon JS, Gunsolley JC, Lindauer SJ. Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2011 Mar;81(2):206-10. doi: 10.2319/051710-262.1.
PubMed 21208070Birnie D. Ceramic brackets. Br J Orthod. 1990 Feb;17(1):71-4. doi: 10.1179/bjo.17.1.71.
PubMed 2178681Russell JS. Aesthetic orthodontic brackets. J Orthod. 2005 Jun;32(2):146-63. doi: 10.1179/146531205225021024.
PubMed 15994990Fournier A, Payant L, Bouclin R. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Oct;114(4):414-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70186-6.
PubMed 9790325Rammohan SN, Juvvadi SR, Gandikota CS, Challa P, Manne R, Mathur A. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans to different bracket materials. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012 Aug;4(Suppl 2):S212-6. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.100206.
PubMed 23066254Passariello C, Gigola P. Adhesion and biofilm formation by oral streptococci on different commercial brackets. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Jun;14(2):125-30.
PubMed 23758462Raju, A.S., Hegde, N.A., Reddy, V.P., Chandrashekar, B.S., Mahendra, S. and Harishkoushik, S.R. (2013) An in vivo study on bacterial colonization with metal, ceramic and self-ligating brackets: A scanning electron microscopy study. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 47, 88-96.
al-Khateeb S, Oliveby A, de Josselin de Jong E, Angmar-Mansson B. Laser fluorescence quantification of remineralisation in situ of incipient enamel lesions: influence of fluoride supplements. Caries Res. 1997;31(2):132-40. doi: 10.1159/000262388.
PubMed 9118185Al-Khateeb S, Forsberg CM, de Josselin de Jong E, Angmar-Mansson B. A longitudinal laser fluorescence study of white spot lesions in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Jun;113(6):595-602. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70218-5.
PubMed 9637561van der Veen MH, de Josselin de Jong E. Application of quantitative light-induced fluorescence for assessing early caries lesions. Monogr Oral Sci. 2000;17:144-62. doi: 10.1159/000061639.
PubMed 10949838Benson PE, Parkin N, Millett DT, Dyer FE, Vine S, Shah A. Fluorides for the prevention of white spots on teeth during fixed brace treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD003809. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003809.pub2.
PubMed 15266503SILNESS J, LOE H. PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN PREGNANCY. II. CORRELATION BETWEEN ORAL HYGIENE AND PERIODONTAL CONDTION. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964 Feb;22:121-35. doi: 10.3109/00016356408993968. No abstract available.
PubMed 14158464Loe H. The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. J Periodontol. 1967 Nov-Dec;38(6):Suppl:610-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.1967.38.6.610. No abstract available.
PubMed 5237684
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Incidence of White Spot Lesions Around Ceramic Brackets Compared With Metal Brackets Evaluated With Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05764187
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- JUST20220107
- Conditions
- White Spot Lesion of Tooth
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jordan University of Science and TechnologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 28 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of this study was to investigate the relation between ceramic brackets and the development of white spot lesions (WSLs) compared to that associated with conventional metal brackets.
Detailed description
Objectives : The main objective of this study was to investigate the relation between ceramic brackets and the development of WSL compared to that associated with conventional metal brackets.
Study design: Randomized 2-parallel arm clinical trial. Materials and methods: Quantitative light induced fluorescence (QLF) images were taken for the two randomly allocated groups (Ceramic group, n=26; Metal group, n=25) of patients at T0: before the start of treatment; T1: after 2 months and T2: at 4 months after treatment). The QLF images were analyzed; Primary outcome measures: The lesion area (Pixels) and Mean amount of fluorescence loss (∆F)% and the number of newly developed lesions. Secondary outcome: Maximum fluorescence loss (∆F-Max)% and plaque surface area (∆R 30)%. Means and standard deviations for all the measured parameters at T0, T1 and T2 were calculated. Split plot analysis of variance (SPANOVA) test was used to determine the changes within each group at the different time intervals, and between the two groups. Chi square was used to compare between the two groups regarding the number of new lesions during the treatment. P value was set at 0.05 level.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Two parallel arm randomized clinical trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ceramic orthodontic brackets | Experimental | Other: Orthodontic fixed appliance therapyPatients bonded with ceramic brackets for orthodontic treatment |
| Metal orthodontic brackets | Active comparator | Other: Orthodontic fixed appliance therapyPatients bonded with metal brackets for orthodontic treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Healthy subjects seeking orthodontic treatment with mild-to-moderate crowding (not exceeding 5 mm)
- No previous orthodontic treatment
- Optimum oral hygiene
- Maximum of 3 restored teeth
- Absence of defective enamel formation in the form of hypocalcification or hypoplasia.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subjects with poor oral hygiene
- Defective enamel
- Patients with syndromes and Oro-facial anomalies or salivary glands diseases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Orthodontic fixed appliance therapyFollow up of white spot lesion development using quantitative light induced fluorescence in patients bonded with ceramic brackets versus patients bonded with conventional metal brackets | Other | Ceramic orthodontic brackets, Metal orthodontic brackets |
Primary outcome
Lesion area
Time frame: 4 months
Surface area of the lesion measured in Pixels
Mean fluorescence loss ∆F(%)
Time frame: 4 months
Mean lesion fluorescence loss reflecting mineral loss measured in percent
Maximum fluorescence loss ∆Fmax(%)
Time frame: 4 months
Deepest point of the lesion
Incidence of white spot lesions
Time frame: 4 months
The number of newly developed white spot lesions
1 secondary outcome
Plaque measurement
Time frame: 4 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jul 2025.
- Background: PubMed 16772067Chalmers JM. Minimal intervention dentistry: part 1. Strategies for addressing the new caries challenge in older patients. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006 Jun;72(5):427-33.
- Background: PubMed 20691360Chapman JA, Roberts WE, Eckert GJ, Kula KS, Gonzalez-Cabezas C. Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug;138(2):188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.10.019.
- Background: PubMed 21208070Tufekci E, Dixon JS, Gunsolley JC, Lindauer SJ. Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2011 Mar;81(2):206-10. doi: 10.2319/051710-262.1.
- Background: PubMed 2178681Birnie D. Ceramic brackets. Br J Orthod. 1990 Feb;17(1):71-4. doi: 10.1179/bjo.17.1.71.
- Background: PubMed 15994990Russell JS. Aesthetic orthodontic brackets. J Orthod. 2005 Jun;32(2):146-63. doi: 10.1179/146531205225021024.
- Background: PubMed 9790325Fournier A, Payant L, Bouclin R. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Oct;114(4):414-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70186-6.
- Background: PubMed 23066254Rammohan SN, Juvvadi SR, Gandikota CS, Challa P, Manne R, Mathur A. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans to different bracket materials. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012 Aug;4(Suppl 2):S212-6. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.100206.
- Background: PubMed 23758462Passariello C, Gigola P. Adhesion and biofilm formation by oral streptococci on different commercial brackets. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Jun;14(2):125-30.
- BackgroundRaju, A.S., Hegde, N.A., Reddy, V.P., Chandrashekar, B.S., Mahendra, S. and Harishkoushik, S.R. (2013) An in vivo study on bacterial colonization with metal, ceramic and self-ligating brackets: A scanning electron microscopy study. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 47, 88-96.
- Background: PubMed 9118185al-Khateeb S, Oliveby A, de Josselin de Jong E, Angmar-Mansson B. Laser fluorescence quantification of remineralisation in situ of incipient enamel lesions: influence of fluoride supplements. Caries Res. 1997;31(2):132-40. doi: 10.1159/000262388.
- Background: PubMed 9637561Al-Khateeb S, Forsberg CM, de Josselin de Jong E, Angmar-Mansson B. A longitudinal laser fluorescence study of white spot lesions in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Jun;113(6):595-602. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70218-5.
- Background: PubMed 10949838van der Veen MH, de Josselin de Jong E. Application of quantitative light-induced fluorescence for assessing early caries lesions. Monogr Oral Sci. 2000;17:144-62. doi: 10.1159/000061639.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data will be available upon request
Related trials for White Spot Lesion of Tooth
Active, not recruiting
A Split-Mouth Clinical Trial Evaluating the Bond Failure Rate of a New Etch-Free Orthodontic Adhesive
Bracket Bonding, Orthodontic Treatment
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Artificial Intelligence Versus Clinical Examination in White Spot Lesions Detection, Identification, And Scoring
White Spot Lesion of Tooth
Recruiting
EFFICACY OF BIOMIN FLUORIDE VERSUS SODIUM FLUORIDE VARNISHES, WITH AND WITHOUT DIODE LASER ON WHITE SPOT LESIONS REMINERALIZATION IN PRIMARY TEETH.
White Spot Lesions [Initial Caries] on Smooth Surface of Tooth
Not yet recruiting
S-PRG Filler for Preventing White Spot Lesions During Orthodontic Treatment
White Spot Lesion of Tooth, Orthodontic Treatment
Recruiting
Clinical Investigation of the Performance of Epinamel for Dental White Spot Lesions
White Spot Lesions [Initial Caries] on Smooth Surface of Tooth
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Susan Al-Khateeb, Professor principal investigator
Faculty of Dentistry/Jordan University of Science and Technology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Orthodontic fixed appliance therapy in people with White Spot Lesion of Tooth, run by Jordan University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Jordan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Jordan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lesion area (time frame: 4 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05764187, which also lists 31 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2025.