AzTrials
AzTrials

Invasive CandidiasisCOUNTNCT05763251

Comparison of Uncomplicated Candidemia Therapy Duration in Children

A study testing therapy duration in people with Invasive Candidiasis, run by Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute at 22 sites in 2 countries.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare antifungal therapy duration in pediatric uncomplicated candidemia. The specific aims are: Compare the desirability of outcome ranking in children with uncomplicated candidemia randomized to 7 additional days of antifungal therapy (standard-course) versus no additional… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 120 days and older
Conditions the study is for
Invasive Candidiasis
What is being tested?
therapy duration
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
420 participants
Where
22 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
8 Sep 2023to 30 Jun 2032
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 120 days and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age > 120 days at the time of the first negative blood culture at any participating site;
  • Candidemia with at least one positive blood culture for any Candida spp;
  • Receiving/received an echinocandin (caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin, or rezafungin) as primary antifungal therapy for candidemia for at least 2 days from day of first negative culture with continuation of uninterrupted systemic antifungal therapy at the time of enrollment);
  • Sustained clearance of Candida spp. defined as negative blood culture(s) obtained after onset of candidemia and before day of randomization;
  • Partial or complete clinical response, as defined by published guidelines (Table 5), on or before day of randomization;
  • Between the onset of qualifying candidemia and randomization, no suspicion of disseminated candidiasis by patient's clinical team or, if deemed clinically necessary, documented negative radiological imaging such as an abdominal ultrasound or abdominal CT scan.

Who cannot join

  • Already receiving antifungal therapy for a previously diagnosed systemic invasive fungal disease;
  • Neutropenic (absolute neutrophil count < 500 cells/µl) at the time of enrollment or anticipated to be neutropenic in the week following randomization;
  • Have an underlying condition that requires them to be on antifungal prophylaxis when not receiving directed therapy for an invasive fungal disease;
  • Previous enrollment in this trial;
  • Females of childbearing age with a current pregnancy diagnosis or without a negative pregnancy test for their current admission;
  • A documented DNR order;
  • Have an implantable cardiac device (e.g., ventricular assist device, pacemaker)

Trial locations and contacts

22 sites in 2 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Sarah K Johnson, PhD contact

501-364-3057

skjohnson@uams.edu

Sydney Shuster, MPH contact

267-425-1462

shusters@chop.edu

22 sites in 2 countries

United States21 sites, 21 recruiting
  • CS Mott Children's Hospital

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

    Recruiting
  • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta

    Atlanta, Georgia, 31193

    Recruiting
  • Dell Children's Medical Center

    Austin, Texas, 78723

    Recruiting
  • Children's Hospital of Alabama

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

    Recruiting
  • Boston Children's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

    Recruiting
  • Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

    Recruiting
  • Comer Children's Hospital

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

    Recruiting
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229

    Recruiting
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital

    Columbus, Ohio, 43205

    Recruiting
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75390

    Recruiting
  • Duke Children's Hospital

    Durham, North Carolina, 27705

    Recruiting
  • Riley Children's Hospital

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

    Recruiting
  • Arkansas Children's Hospital

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202

    Recruiting
  • Children's Hospital of Wisconsin

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

    Recruiting
  • Yale New Haven Children's Hospital

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06510

    Recruiting
  • Weill Cornell Medical College

    New York, New York, 10065

    Recruiting
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68198

    Recruiting
  • Children's Hospital of Orange County

    Orange, California, 92868

    Recruiting
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

    Syd Shuster, 267-425-1462, shusters@chop.edu

    Recruiting
  • Primary Children's Hospital

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84113

    Recruiting
  • Washington University St. Louis

    St Louis, Missouri, 63130

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

Australia1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Perth Children's Hospital

    Perth, Western Australia, 6009

    Recruiting

Other trials in Australia

About this study

Official title: Short Course Versus Standard Course Antifungal Therapy for Uncomplicated Candidemia in Children and Adolescents: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare antifungal therapy duration in pediatric uncomplicated candidemia. The specific aims are:

  • Compare the desirability of outcome ranking in children with uncomplicated candidemia randomized to 7 additional days of antifungal therapy (standard-course) versus no additional antifungal therapy (short-course) after already receiving 7 days of echinocandin therapy.
  • Compare the 14-day desirability of outcome measure for subjects with a negative and those with a positive T2Candida® biomarker at day 7 of therapy within randomized groups.

Participants meeting eligibility criteria will be approached and consented between day 5 and 7 of primary systemic antifungal therapy. On day 7 of primary systemic antifungal therapy, inclusion and exclusion criteria will again be reviewed for consented patients and those still eligible will be randomized 1:1 to the two study arms. Researchers will compare no additional antifungal therapy (short-course) versus 7 additional days of systemic antifungal therapy (standard-course) in pediatric patients with uncomplicated candidemia who have already received 7 days of primary systemic antifungal therapy to see if shorter durations are as effective as longer durations in treating uncomplicated candidemia.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this study will be addressed with a multi-center open label randomized controlled trial designed to compare no additional antifungal therapy (short-course) versus 7 additional days of systemic antifungal therapy (standard-course) in pediatric patients with uncomplicated candidemia who have already received 7 days of primary systemic antifungal therapy. The secondary objective of this study is an embedded observational biomarker study. This objective will determine if the novel T2Candida® biomarker performed at the time of randomization (i.e. Day 7 of systemic antifungal therapy) will be associated with patient outcomes assessed at Day 14. The results of the T2Candida® biomarker will not be available in real-time and thus will not impact the primary study objective. Eligible patients will be any hospitalized patient at a participating center with uncomplicated candidemia that is older than 120 days and <18 years of age at time of candidemia onset. Patients need to receive an echinocandin as their primary antifungal therapy for at least three days and continue systemic antifungal therapy (either with an echinocandin or step-down to an azole) for a total of 7 days from their first negative blood culture and have no evidence of metastatic foci of candidemia at the time of randomization. Patients with neutropenia or anticipated to have neutropenia during the study follow-up window will not be eligible. Patients can only be enrolled to the study once. This study population will serve as the source cohort for both study objectives. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to one of two study arms, short-course therapy or standard-course therapy. Patients will be followed for 21 days from the day of randomization (Day 7 to Day 28) to capture primary and secondary outcome measures.

Being tested
therapy duration
Medical subject headings
Candidiasis, Invasive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • therapy durationOther

    the standard-course arm will receive 14 days total of antifungal therapy and the short-course arm will only receive 7 days of therapy

Study groups in NCT05763251
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Short-course therapyExperimentalpediatric patients with uncomplicated candidemia who have already received 7 days of primary systemic antifungal therapy will receive no additional antifungal therapy
Receives: Other: therapy duration
Standard-course therapyNo interventionpediatric patients with uncomplicated candidemia who have already received 7 days of primary systemic antifungal therapy will receive 7 additional days of systemic antifungal therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Compare the desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) in short-course vs standard-course arm

    The primary analysis for the primary objective will compare the DOOR distributions at 7 days from randomization (i.e., outcome assessment on Day 14 from first negative blood culture) between subjects from the two study groups, based on randomized treatment assignments, in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle. The primary analysis will use the DOORs assigned on this day to assess which therapy course is better, short-course or standard-course.

    Measured: The measures assigned on Day 14 will inform the primary analysis for the primary objective

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Compare the DOOR for subjects with a negative vs positive T2 Candida® biomarker at day 7

    The results of the Day 7 T2Candida® biomarker (i.e. detected versus not detected) and the randomization group (i.e. short-course versus standard-course) will allow for the following four subsets of patients: 1. Patient is randomized to short-course group and has a not-detected result for the T2Candida® biomarker at time of randomization; 2. patient is randomized to short-course group and has a detected T2Candida® biomarker at time of randomization; 3. patient is randomized to standard-course group and has a not-detected result for the T2Candida® biomarker at time of randomization; 4. patient is randomized to standard-course group and has a detected T2Candida® biomarker at time of randomization. This analysis will compare the DOOR categories between the first two groups (i.e. short-course and not-detected versus short-course and detected) and then be repeated for the second two groups (i.e. standard-course and not detected versus standard-course and detected).

    Measured: The DOOR measure on Day 14 will be used for the primary analysis for the secondary objective.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Mar 2023
  2. Study start8 Sep 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2030 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2032 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
420 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05763251
Sponsor's protocol ID
22-020057
Other IDs
1R01AI170385-01
Acronym
COUNT
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
23 Feb 2023
Last updated
17 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing therapy duration in people with Invasive Candidiasis, run by Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute at 22 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 22 sites in United States, Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sarah K Johnson, PhD (501-364-3057, skjohnson@uams.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Compare the desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) in short-course vs standard-course arm (time frame: The measures assigned on Day 14 will inform the primary analysis for the primary objective). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in