Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsOmegaNCT05757687
Evaluation of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of the Omega System for the Treatment of LUTS Due to BPH
A study testing Omega device in people with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by ProArc Medical at 5 sites in Georgia.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, two-stage, multi-center, pilot clinical study to evaluate the safety/tolerability/efficacy of the Omega System device. The Omega arc-shaped implant is inserted by the Omega delivery system into the prostate tissue of subjects to relieve lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
- What is being tested?
- Omega device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 11 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesGeorgia
- Study dates
- 7 Feb 2023to 1 Feb 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male ≥50 years of age and ≤ 80 years old.
- Will undergo planned prostatectomy.
- Participant understands and is willing to the informed consent form.
- Prostate Volume between 30cc and 80cc.
- Prostate length ≥ 3cm
- Male ≥50 years old.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Suspected symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
- International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) >13.
- Peak flow rate ≤ 12 ml/sec (with voided volume ≥ 125ml).
- Participant understands and is willing to the informed consent form.
- Prostate Volume between 30cc and 80cc.
- Prostate length ≥ 3cm and ≤ 5cm
Who cannot join
- Unable to comply with the clinical protocol.
- Vulnerable population such as inmates or developmentally delayed individuals.
- Any medical condition or treatment, which in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the procedure, such as:
- Patient with coagulopathy due to medications or congenital condition - inability to stop taking anticoagulants and/or antiplatelets for at least 3 days prior to the procedure or coumadin for at least 5 days prior to the procedure (low dose aspirin therapy is not prohibited).
- Use of alpha-blockers within 2 weeks of pre-treatment (baseline) evaluation.
- Use of 5-α-reductase inhibitors within 6 months of pre-treatment (baseline) evaluation.
Show all 43Show fewer
- American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) > 3.
- Previous prostate surgery such as: TURP, stent implantations, laser prostatectomy, hyperthermia or another invasive treatment to the prostate.
- Presence of an artificial urinary sphincter or stent(s) in the urethra or prostate.
- Other urethral conditions that may prevent insertion of Delivery Device into prostatic urethra.
- Previous rectal surgery, other than hemorrhoidectomy
- Current gross hematuria.
- Known allergy to nickel or titanium or stainless steel.
- Stage 2
- Diagnosed or suspected prostate cancer. If suspected, prostate cancer must be ruled out.
- Concomitant participation in another interventional study.
- Unable to comply with the clinical protocol including all the follow-up requirements.
- Vulnerable population such as inmates or developmentally delayed individuals.
- Significant comorbidities which would affect study participation.
- Any medical condition or treatment, which in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the procedure ,such as:
- Use of concomitant medications (e.g., anticholinergics, antispasmodics, or antidepressants) affecting bladder function.
- Patient with coagulopathy due to medications or congenital condition - inability to stop taking anticoagulants and/or antiplatelets for at least 3 days prior to the procedure or coumadin for at least 5 days prior to the procedure; low dose aspirin therapy not prohibited.
- Alpha-blockers within 2 weeks of pre-treatment (baseline) evaluation.
- Taking 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) within 6 months (3 months for type II 5-ARI) of pre-treatment (baseline) evaluation unless evidence of same drug dose for at least 6 months with a stable voiding pattern (the drug dose should not be altered or discontinued throughout the study).
- Patient is taking steroids. [Note: Patients approved for the trial who are using the above medications will continue using them after the trial, except for Alpha blockers.]
- Previous prostate surgery such as: TURP, stent implantations, laser prostatectomy, hyperthermia or another invasive treatment to the prostate.
- Compromised renal function due to obstructive uropathy.
- Active Urinary Tract Infection (UTI).
- Obstructive or protruding median lobe.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) > 3.
- Known neurogenic bladder or neurological disorders that might affect bladder or function.
- Recent myocardial infarction (less than three months).
- Concomitant bladder stones.
- Current gross hematuria.
- Active or history of epididymitis within the past 3 months.
- Presence of an artificial urinary sphincter or stent(s) in the urethra or prostate.
- Confirmed or suspected malignancy of bladder.
- History or presence of strictures in the anterior urethra or bladder neck contracture or detrusor muscle spasms.
- Other urethral conditions that may prevent insertion of Delivery Device into prostatic urethra.
- Bacterial prostatitis within the last 12 months.
- Previous rectal surgery, other than hemorrhoidectomy.
- Current uncontrolled diabetes (i.e., hemoglobin A1c ≥ 9%).
- Known allergy to nickel or titanium or stainless steel.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Georgia5 sites
N(N)LE New Vision University Hospital
Tbilisi, 0159
Israeli-Georgian Medical Research Clinic Healthycore
Tbilisi
JSC L.Managadze National Center of Urology
Tbilisi
Tbilisi Heart Center
Tbilisi
Todua Clinic
Tbilisi
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy the Omega System for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
This is a prospective, two-stage, multi-center, pilot clinical study to evaluate the safety/tolerability/efficacy of the Omega System device. The Omega arc-shaped implant is inserted by the Omega delivery system into the prostate tissue of subjects to relieve lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The study will first evaluate the Omega system on patients undergoing prostatectomy, which is not indicated for the device.
- Being tested
- Omega device
- Medical subject headings
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Prostatic Hyperplasia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Omega deviceDevice
The ProArc Medical Omega system is a prostatic reshaping device. The Omega System is comprised of two main components: Omega Delivery Device and Omega Implant.
The delivery system uses a diathermy electrode to perform a circular and superficial incision through the urethral wall into the prostate tissue, into which the arc-shaped permanent implant is placed. The implant is made up of commonly used surgical implantable nitinol material, coated with Parylene coating. The implant expands the obstructed area, reducing the fluid obstruction through the prostatic urethra.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Omega procedure | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Omega device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary Safety (Stage 1 and Stage 2) - Incidence and severity of procedural and device related adverse events.
Incidence and severity of procedural and device related adverse events.
Measured: 12 Months
Primary Safety (Stage 2) - Incidence of post-operative catheterization after 7 days, up to 14 days.
Incidence of post-operative catheterization after 7 days, up to 14 days.
Measured: 2 weeks
Efficacy (Stage 2) - Change in urinary related symptom
Improvement in urinary related symptoms as evidenced by at least 30% decrease in International Prostate Symptom Score (A score of 0-7 indicates mild symptoms, 8-19 indicates moderate symptoms and 20-35 indicates severe symptoms)
Measured: 3 Months
Secondary outcomes (14)
Functionality (Stage 1) - Location and orientation of Omega implant in the prostate before prostatectomy is as planned: Yes/No
Evaluating whether the outcome of the Omega implant's location and orientation turned out as the surgeon planned prior to the Omega procedure.
Measured: Procedure day
Functionality (Stage 1) - Location and depth Omega incision in the excised prostate is as planned: Yes/No.
Evaluating whether the Omega incision location and depth outcome turned out as the surgeon planned prior to the Omega procedure.
Measured: Procedure day
Usability (Stage 1 and Stage 2) - Evaluate the usability of the device and entire process
Evaluate the usability of the device and the entire process using the usability questionnaire (The highest score of 60 indicates that the device is extremely user-friendly, while the lowest score of 12 indicates that the device is very difficult to use)
Measured: Procedure day
Efficacy (Stage 2) - Improvement in urinary related symptoms
Evaluate the improvement in urinary-related symptoms as evidenced by a decrease of at least 30% in the IPSS score. (A score of 0-7 indicates mild symptoms, 8-19 indicates moderate symptoms and 20-35 indicates severe symptoms)
Measured: 1 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
Efficacy (Stage 2) - Improvement of peak urinary flow rate as evidenced by an increase of at least 25% in uroflowmetry Qmax
Measured: 1 Months, 3 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
Exploratory - Change in PSA compared to baseline
Measured: 1 Months, 6 Months and 12 Months
Exploratory - Change in sexual function assessments from screening to 3, 6 and 12 months using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Function (MSHQ-EjD).
The IIEF-15 score ranges from 6 to 75 and is used to classify erectile dysfunction (ED).
An MSHQ-EjD score of 20 indicates the absence of ejaculatory dysfunction, while a score of 0 indicates a high level of ejaculatory dysfunction.
Measured: 3 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
Exploratory - Change in VAS pain score
A VAS pain score of (0-1 mm) indicates no pain,(2-4 mm) - mild pain, (4-7 mm) - moderate pain, and (7-10 mm) - severe pain.
Measured: Procedure day, 1-2 weeks and 1 month
Exploratory - Change in post-void residual (PVR) test
Measured: 1 Months, 3 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
Exploratory - Incidence of inflammation, assessed by cystoscope
Measured: 6 months
Exploratory - Omega coverage assessed by cystoscope
Measured: 6 months
Exploratory - Change in the BPHII score from Baseline
Measured: 1 Months, 3 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
Incidence of repeat invasive treatment for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) or increase in dosage or initiation of new medication to treat symptoms of BPH
Measured: 12 months
Incidence of Device removal
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Mar 2023
- Study start7 Feb 2023
- Primary completion30 Apr 2026
- Study completion1 Feb 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ProArc Medical
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Frank Mastandrea, Dr, Study director, Board Member and Medical Director
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05757687
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PA-CP-22
- Acronym
- Omega
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Feb 2023
- Last updated
- 24 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy the Omega System for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05757687
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Omega / PA-CP-22
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- ProArc MedicalIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 7 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, two-stage, multi-center, pilot clinical study to evaluate the safety/tolerability/efficacy of the Omega System device. The Omega arc-shaped implant is inserted by the Omega delivery system into the prostate tissue of subjects to relieve lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The study will first evaluate the Omega system on patients undergoing prostatectomy, which is not indicated for the device.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Omega procedure | Experimental | Device: Omega device |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Male ≥50 years of age and ≤ 80 years old.
- Will undergo planned prostatectomy.
- Participant understands and is willing to the informed consent form.
- Prostate Volume between 30cc and 80cc.
- Prostate length ≥ 3cm
Key exclusion criteria (43 listed)
- Unable to comply with the clinical protocol.
- Vulnerable population such as inmates or developmentally delayed individuals.
- Any medical condition or treatment, which in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the procedure, such as:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) > 3.
- Previous prostate surgery such as: TURP, stent implantations, laser prostatectomy, hyperthermia or another invasive treatment to the prostate.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Omega deviceThe ProArc Medical Omega system is a prostatic reshaping device. The Omega System is comprised of two main components: Omega Delivery Device and Omega Implant. The delivery system uses a diathermy electrode to perform a circular and superficial incision through the urethral wall into the prostate tissue, into which the arc-shaped permanent implant is placed. The implant is made up of commonly used surgical implantable nitinol material, coated with Parylene coating. The implant expands the obstructed area, reducing the fluid obstruction through the prostatic urethra. | Device | Omega procedure |
Primary outcome
Primary Safety (Stage 1 and Stage 2) - Incidence and severity of procedural and device related adverse events.
Time frame: 12 Months
Incidence and severity of procedural and device related adverse events.
Primary Safety (Stage 2) - Incidence of post-operative catheterization after 7 days, up to 14 days.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Incidence of post-operative catheterization after 7 days, up to 14 days.
Efficacy (Stage 2) - Change in urinary related symptom
Time frame: 3 Months
Improvement in urinary related symptoms as evidenced by at least 30% decrease in International Prostate Symptom Score (A score of 0-7 indicates mild symptoms, 8-19 indicates moderate symptoms and 20-35 indicates severe symptoms)
14 secondary outcomes
Functionality (Stage 1) - Location and orientation of Omega implant in the prostate before prostatectomy is as planned: Yes/No
Time frame: Procedure day
Functionality (Stage 1) - Location and depth Omega incision in the excised prostate is as planned: Yes/No.
Time frame: Procedure day
Usability (Stage 1 and Stage 2) - Evaluate the usability of the device and entire process
Time frame: Procedure day
Efficacy (Stage 2) - Improvement in urinary related symptoms
Time frame: 1 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
Efficacy (Stage 2) - Improvement of peak urinary flow rate as evidenced by an increase of at least 25% in uroflowmetry Qmax
Time frame: 1 Months, 3 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
Exploratory - Change in PSA compared to baseline
Time frame: 1 Months, 6 Months and 12 Months
Exploratory - Change in sexual function assessments from screening to 3, 6 and 12 months using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Function (MSHQ-EjD).
Time frame: 3 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
Exploratory - Change in VAS pain score
Time frame: Procedure day, 1-2 weeks and 1 month
Exploratory - Change in post-void residual (PVR) test
Time frame: 1 Months, 3 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
Exploratory - Incidence of inflammation, assessed by cystoscope
Time frame: 6 months
Exploratory - Omega coverage assessed by cystoscope
Time frame: 6 months
Exploratory - Change in the BPHII score from Baseline
Time frame: 1 Months, 3 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
Incidence of repeat invasive treatment for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) or increase in dosage or initiation of new medication to treat symptoms of BPH
Time frame: 12 months
Incidence of Device removal
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Recruiting
Addressing Nocturia in Older Women Utilizing Behavioral Sleep Intervention and Brief Mindfulness
Nocturia, Insomnia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Examining the Effects of Intra-detrusor Botox at Time of HoLEP in Men With Overactive Bladder Symptoms
Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder Syndrome
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Recruiting
UCon Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Males
Urinary Incontinence, Urge Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Frank Mastandrea, Dr study director
Board Member and Medical Director
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Omega device in people with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by ProArc Medical at 5 sites in Georgia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 43 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Georgia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary Safety (Stage 1 and Stage 2) - Incidence and severity of procedural and device related adverse events. (time frame: 12 Months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2026.