AzTrials
AzTrials

Placenta Accreta SpectrumNCT05752513

Early vs Late Bladder Dissection During CS Hysterectomy in Patients With PAS With Bladder Invasion

A study testing Late bladder dissection and early bladder dissection in people with Placenta Accreta Spectrum and Cesarean Hysterectomy, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Thirty-six singleton pregnant women with PAS and bladder invasion; total anterior or anterolateral invasion, who were scheduled for cesarean hysterectomy were randomly assigned into two equal groups Group 1: included 18 pregnant women scheduled for classical cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta with or without… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Late bladder dissection and early bladder dissection
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
23 Feb 2023to 1 May 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age: reproductive age.
  • Pregnant with singleton living fetus.
  • Previous one or more cesarean sections.
  • Gestational age: > 34 weeks.
  • Elective or non-emergency cesarean sections.
  • Preoperative hemoglobin more than 9.5 gm/dl.

Who cannot join

  • Women with history of any medical disorder with pregnancy eg. gestational diabetes, hypertension, or anemia.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Abdalla Mousa, Lecturer contact

01277664430

Dr_abdallamousa@hotmail.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Cairo University

    Cairo

    Ahmed Rashwan, 01002592250, ahmedrashwan1981@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Early vs Late Bladder Dissection During Cesarean Hysterectomy in Patients With Placenta Accreta Spectrum With Bladder Invasion

Thirty-six singleton pregnant women with PAS and bladder invasion; total anterior or anterolateral invasion, who were scheduled for cesarean hysterectomy were randomly assigned into two equal groups

  • Group 1: included 18 pregnant women scheduled for classical cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta with or without ligation of anterior division of internal iliac artery before cesarean section.
  • Group 2: included 18 pregnant women scheduled for bladder last cesarean hysterectomy with or without ligation of anterior division of internal iliac artery.
Being tested
Late bladder dissection, early bladder dissection
Medical subject headings
Placenta Accreta

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Late bladder dissectionProcedure or surgery

    The bladder dissection is reserved as the last step of the cesarean hysterectomy with excellent dissection of the ureteric course till the ureteric tunnel to reduce the incidence of inadvertent ureteric clamping during uterine vessel ligating and transection

  • early bladder dissectionProcedure or surgery

    The bladder dissection is early as in classic cesarean hysterectomy

Study groups in NCT05752513
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1Placebo comparator18 pregnant women scheduled for classical cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta
Receives: Procedure: early bladder dissection
Group 2Experimental18 pregnant women scheduled for bladder last cesarean hysterectomy
Receives: Procedure: Late bladder dissection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Amount of blood loss

    Measured: during cesarean hysterectomy

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Operative time

    Measured: during cesarean hysterectomy

  2. bladder injury

    Measured: during cesarean hysterectomy

  3. ureteric injury

    Measured: during cesarean hysterectomy

  4. Need for massive blood transfusion

    Measured: during cesarean hysterectomy

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Mar 2023
  2. Study start23 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion1 May 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 May 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
36 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05752513
Sponsor's protocol ID
MS-345-2022
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
22 Feb 2023
Last updated
2 Mar 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Late bladder dissection and early bladder dissection in people with Placenta Accreta Spectrum and Cesarean Hysterectomy, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Abdalla Mousa, Lecturer (01277664430, Dr_abdallamousa@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Amount of blood loss (time frame: during cesarean hysterectomy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in