AzTrials
AzTrials

Ethics, NarrativeNCT05722431

Ethical Deliberation in the Intensive Care Unit, Impact of Formalized Multidisciplinary Team Meetings, a Pilot Study

An observational study of Ethics, Narrative, run by University Hospital, Tours at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Most patients who die in the intensive care unit do so after a withholding or withdrawing of life sustaining treatments (WWLST) decision. The implementation of formalized interdisciplinary team meetings for ethical deliberation in the ICU may improve nurses participation in WWLST decisions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Ethics, Narrative
How many people
450 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
15 Feb 2023to 31 Oct 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients admitted in the ICU

Who may be able to join

  • All patients admitted in the ICU

Who cannot join

  • Age below 18

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Trauma and surgical intensive care unit, Tours University Hospital

    Tours, 37000

Other trials in France

About this study

Most patients who die in the intensive care unit do so after a withholding or withdrawing of life sustaining treatments (WWLST) decision. The implementation of formalized interdisciplinary team meetings for ethical deliberation in the ICU may improve nurses participation in WWLST decisions. The investigators decided to implement such team meetings in their ICU. At this occasion, the investigators will measure job satisfaction, job related frustration and ethical decision making climate climate.

Read the detailed description

Most patients who die in the intensive care unit do so after a withholding or withdrawing of life sustaining treatments (WWLST) decision. Because those decisions are value-laden, guidelines as well as french regulations recommend that they should involve not only medical doctors but also nurses. Despite that, nurses' involvement remains incomplete. Poor collaboration between doctors and nurses on ethical decisions is associated with job dissatisfaction, burnout and desire to quit. The implementation of formalized interdisciplinary team meetings for ethical deliberation in the ICU may improve nurses participation in WWLST decisions.

For those reasons the investigators decided to implement such team meetings in their ICU. At this occasion, the investigators will measure job satisfaction, job related frustration and ethical decision making climate climate.

Keywords
End of life decisions in the ICU, Multidisciplinary team meetings, Ethical decision making climate, Nurses job satisfaction
Medical subject headings
Narration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in nurses perception of ethical decision making climate in the ICU

    Nurses answers to the questionnaire "Ethical Decision-Making Climate Questionnaire (7 factors evaluated, for each factor score ranges from 1 to 5, higher scores indicate a better climate)".

    Measured: june 2023, january 2024

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in nurses psychological well being at work

    Nurses answers to the Index of psychological well being at work (5 factors, for each factor score ranges from 1 to 5, higher scores indicate more well being).

    Measured: 2 evaluations: may 2023, january 2024

  2. Change in nurses frustration of job's related psychological needs

    Nurses answers to the Job related psychological needs frustration score (3 factors, for each factor score ranges from 1 to 5, higher score indicate more frustration)

    Measured: 2 evaluations: may 2023, january 2024

  3. Change in nurses desire to leave

    Nurses answers to a one question questionnaire:

    "I have thoughts about leaving my current position/job" (lickert scale, score range from 1 to 5, higher score indicate a higher desire to leave)

    Measured: 2 evaluations: may 2023, january 2024

  4. Non beneficial care

    Duration of mechanical ventilation in patients who ultimately die (number of days)

    Measured: January 2024

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Feb 2023
  2. Study start15 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
450 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05722431
Sponsor's protocol ID
DER
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
11 Jan 2023
Last updated
1 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Ethics, Narrative, run by University Hospital, Tours at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in nurses perception of ethical decision making climate in the ICU (time frame: june 2023, january 2024). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in