AzTrials
AzTrials

Inclusion Body MyositisPhase 2/3NCT05721573

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABC008 for Inclusion Body Myositis

A Phase 2/3 study testing ABC008 in people with Inclusion Body Myositis, run by Abcuro, Inc. at 45 sites in 7 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A Phase II/III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of ABC008 in the Treatment of Subjects with Inclusion Body Myositis Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Inclusion Body Myositis
What is being tested?
ABC008
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
272 participants
Where
45 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
28 Feb 2023to 27 Nov 2025
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult males and females age >40 years at the time of the first dose of study medication;
  • Weight >40 and <150 kg;
  • Diagnosis of either clinico-pathologically defined IBM, clinically defined IBM, or probable IBM according to the European Neuromuscular Centre (ENMC) IBM 2011 research diagnostic criteria (Rose et al., 2013). Documented histopathology results must be available prior to Baseline (Day 1) to confirm eligibility;
  • Able to arise from a chair (with armrests), with use of their arms but without support from another person or device (e.g., cane, walking stick), at Screening and Baseline (Day 1);
  • Able to walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down, with or without assistive device. Once arisen from the chair, subject may use any walking device but cannot be supported by another person, furniture, or a wall;

Who cannot join

  • Any other form of myositis or myopathy other than IBM, e.g., metabolic or drug-induced myopathy, drug-induced myositis, anti-synthetase syndrome, polymyositis or dermatomyositis, cancer-associated myositis (myositis diagnosed within 3 years, either before or after), myositis in overlap with another autoimmune disease (e.g., systemic lupus, systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis), or muscular dystrophy;
  • Any condition, e.g., severe degenerative arthritis with limited range of motion, which precludes the ability to quantitate muscle strength or perform functional assessments (e.g., mTUG), in the Investigator's opinion;.
  • Presence of another autoimmune or autoinflammatory disease other than indication under study, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthropathy, inflammatory bowel disease, systemic lupus erythematosus. Subjects with Sjogren's syndrome, T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia (T-LGLL), or well-controlled thyroid disease are permitted;

Trial locations and contacts

45 sites in 7 countries.

45 sites in 7 countries

United States34 sites
  • University of Colorado Hospital Anschutz Outpatient Pavillion

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Austin Neuromuscular Center

    Austin, Texas, 78759

  • Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21224

  • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

  • Neuromuscular Diagnostic Center - Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Brigham and Womens Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 021158

  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Department of Neurology (Clinic)

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • Texas Neurology

    Dallas, Texas, 75206

  • Duke Neurological Disorders Clinic -1L

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • Virginia Commonwealth University

    Henrico, Virginia, 23233

  • Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

    Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033

  • Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • University of California Irvine Medical Center (UCIMC) - Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Neuromuscular Center

    Irvine, California, 92868

  • Mayo Clinic

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32224

  • University of Kansas Medical

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160

  • Keck Hosptial of USC

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • UCLA Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • Medical College of Wisconsin

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

  • Yale School of Medicine

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06519

  • Hospital for Special Surgery

    New York, New York, 10021

  • Columbia University Medical Center / The Neurological Institute of New York

    New York, New York, 10032

  • University of Nebraska Medical Center

    Omaha, Nebraska, 98198

  • Stanford Neuroscience Medical Center

    Palo Alto, California, 94304

  • University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Neuromuscular Research Center

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85028

  • UPMC Arthritis and Autoimmunity Center, Falk Clinic

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Oregon Health & Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • University of California, San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94143

  • University of Washington Medical Center - Montlake

    Seattle, Washington, 98195

  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Wake Forrest School of Medicine

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157

Other trials in United States

Australia3 sites
  • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

    Herston, Queensland, 4006

  • Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science

    Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009

  • Royal North Shore Hospital

    Saint Leonards, New South Wales, 2065

Other trials in Australia

Canada2 sites
  • Heritage Medical Research Clinic - University of Calgary

    Calgary, Alberta, 3M 1M4

  • Genge Partners Inc.

    Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3T2

Other trials in Canada

Germany2 sites
  • Krankenhaus und Poliklinik Rüdersdorf GmbH

    Berlin, 15562

  • University Hosptial Duesseldorf

    Düsseldorf, 40225

Other trials in Germany

United Kingdom2 sites
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (NHNN)

    London, WC1N 3BG

  • Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust

    Salford, M6 8HD

Other trials in United Kingdom

Belgium1 site
  • AZ Sint-Lucas & Volkskliniek

    Ghent, 9000

Other trials in Belgium

France1 site
  • Hospital Pitie-Salpetriere - AP-HP

    Paris, 75013

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: A Phase II/III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABC008 in the Treatment of Subjects With Inclusion Body Myositis

A Phase II/III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of ABC008 in the Treatment of Subjects with Inclusion Body Myositis

Read the detailed description

A Phase II/III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of ABC008 in the Treatment of Subjects with Inclusion Body Myositis Detailed Description: A Phase II/III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of ABC008 in the Treatment of Subjects with Inclusion Body Myositis Detailed Description: This is a Phase II/III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel multicenter study with 3 parts.

The study will include a sentinel cohort (Part A) of 30 subjects who will receive first three doses of the study drug. Safety data from subjects in the sentinel cohorts will be evaluated by a Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) before further dosing of the sentinel cohort, as well as initiation of enrollment in the double-blind safety and efficacy cohort (Part B). After completion of Part A or Part B, subjects have the option of enrolling in an open-label long-term extension study or progressing to the pharmacodynamics (PD) recovery cohort (Part C), to evaluate the recovery of the depletion of killer cell lectin-like receptor G1 (KLRG1)+ cells after the end of treatment with ABC008.

Efficacy, safety, HRQoL, and HRU assessments will be conducted. Blood samples will be obtained to evaluate the serum PK, PD, and immunogenicity of ABC008 throughout the study.

Being tested
ABC008
Keywords
Muscular Diseases, Inflammatory Myopathy, Myositis, Neuromuscular Diseases, Nervous System Disease
Medical subject headings
Myositis, Inclusion Body, Muscular Diseases, Myositis, Neuromuscular Diseases, Nervous System Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ABC008Drug

    Given by subcutaneous injection

Study groups in NCT05721573
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
0.5 mg/kg ABC008Active comparatorPart A - ABC008 N=12 Part B - ABC008 N= 67
Receives: Drug: ABC008
2.0 mg/kg ABC008Active comparatorPart A - ABC008 N=12 Part B - ABC008 N= 67
Receives: Drug: ABC008
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPart A - Placebo N= 6 Part B - Placebo N= 67
Receives: Drug: ABC008

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant participating in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug.

    Measured: Up to Week 80

  2. Part A: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity

    A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug and was graded by severity per protocol-specified Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria: Grade 1, Mild (asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated); Grade 2, Moderate (minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limited age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL)); Grade 3, Severe or medically significant (medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care ADL); Grade 4, Life-threatening (threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated); and Grade 5, Death (death related to an AE).

    Measured: Up to Week 80

  3. Part A: Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Study Drug

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant participating in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug. An AE with missing relationship to study drug was considered as related to study drug.

    Measured: Up to Week 80

  4. Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in the Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS) Total Score at Week 76

    The IBMFRS was used as an ordinal rating scale to determine participant's assessments of their capabilities. It included 10 measures (swallowing, handwriting, cutting food and handling utensils, fine motor tasks, dressing, hygiene, turning in bed and adjusting covers, changing position from sitting to standing, walking, and climbing stairs) graded on a Likert scale (a psychometric tool) from 0 (being unable to perform) to 4 (normal). The sum of the 10 items provided a value between 0 and 40, with a higher score representing less functional limitation or better functional status. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 76

  5. Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant participating in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug.

    Measured: Day 1 to Week 80

  6. Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity

    A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug and was graded by severity per protocol-specified CTCAE criteria: Grade 1, Mild (asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated); Grade 2, Moderate (minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limited age-appropriate instrumental ADL); Grade 3, Severe or medically significant (medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care ADL); Grade 4, Life-threatening (threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated); and Grade 5, Death (death related to an AE).

    Measured: Day 1 to Week 80

  7. Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Study Drug

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant participating in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug. An AE with missing relationship to study drug was considered as related to study drug.

    Measured: Day 1 to Week 80

  8. Part B: Mean Change From Baseline in the IBMFRS Total Score at Week 76

    The IBMFRS was used as an ordinal rating scale to determine participant's assessments of their capabilities. It included 10 measures (swallowing, handwriting, cutting food and handling utensils, fine motor tasks, dressing, hygiene, turning in bed and adjusting covers, changing position from sitting to standing, walking, and climbing stairs) graded on a Likert scale (a psychometric tool) from 0 (being unable to perform) to 4 (normal). The sum of the 10 items provided a value between 0 and 40, with a higher score representing less functional limitation or better functional status. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Up to Week 76

  9. Part C: Time to PD Recovery

    Recovery was defined as the return of KLRG1+ cell counts toward baseline levels during the PD follow-up period.

    Measured: Up to Week 24

Secondary outcomes (27)
  1. Part A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    A TESAE was defined as a serious AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug and met seriousness criteria per protocol (including death, life-threatening event, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or other medically important event).

    Measured: Up to Week 80

  2. Part A and B: Number of Participants With TEAEs With Onset Within 24 Hours From the Start of Any Study Medication Administration

    A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug, with onset assessed within 24 hours following the dosing.

    Measured: Within 24 hours following each dose, Up to Week 80

  3. Part A and B: Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation

    A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug that led to discontinuation of study.

    Measured: Up to Week 80

  4. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Absolute Neutrophil Count, Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, and Platelets

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters: Absolute Neutrophil Count, Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, and Platelets. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  5. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter - Erythrocytes

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter Erythrocytes. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  6. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Hemoglobin and Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters: Hemoglobin and Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  7. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter - Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters: Hemoglobin and Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  8. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  9. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Hematocrit

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter Hematocrit. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  10. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aldolase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Lactate Dehydrogenase, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters: ALT, Aldolase, AST, GGT and Lactate Dehydrogenase. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  11. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Albumin and Protein

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters Albumin and Protein. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  12. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Alkaline Phosphatase and Creatine Kinase (CK)

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters Alkaline Phosphatase and CK. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  13. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium and Urea

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, and Urea. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  14. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Urate. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  15. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Parameter - pH

    Urine samples were collected for the analysis of Urinalysis parameter: pH. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  16. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Parameter- Specific Gravity

    Urine samples were collected for the analysis of Urinalysis parameters- specific gravity. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  17. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Complement Parameters - C3 and C4

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of complement parameters included C3 and C4. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  18. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Complement Parameters - Hemolytic Complement Filtration (CH50)

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of complement parameter- hemolytic complement filtration (CH50). Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  19. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in C Reactive Protein (CRP)

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameter- CRP. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  20. Part A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs

    Vital signs were planned to be measured after 5 minutes of rest and taken in the same position throughout the study. Vital signs included blood pressure, pulse, temperature, and respiration rate. Clinically significant changes in vital signs were defined according to protocol-specified criteria for abnormal values (or clinically significant worsening from baseline) as determined by the Investigator.

    Measured: Up to Week 76

  21. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Mean Heart Rate

    Triplicate 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position for at least 5 minutes. Changes in ECG parameters were defined according to protocol-specified criteria for change from baseline values as determined by the Investigator. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-baseline visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  22. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval and Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Interval

    Triplicate 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position for at least 5 minutes. Changes in ECG parameters were defined according to protocol-specified criteria for change from baseline values as determined by the Investigator. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  23. Part A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant partaking in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. AESIs included injection site reactions, systemic injection reactions (e.g., hypersensitivity, systemic inflammatory response), and infection.

    Measured: Up to Week 80

  24. Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Manual Muscle Testing - 12 (MMT-12) Score at Week 76

    Manual Muscle Testing - 12 assessed the muscle strength across the muscle groups that included neck flexion and both right and left shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, elbow extension, wrist extension, wrist flexion, flexor pollicis longus, hip flexors, hip abduction, hip extension, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion. Scores were calculated by summing the outcomes, with the Investigator providing the score, on a scale of 0 (no contraction) to 5 (normal strength), which is then converted by a standard procedure to a Kendall score equivalent on a scale of 0 to 10. Individual scores are summed to generate a total score ranging from 0 to 60. A higher score reflects better muscle strength. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76

  25. Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Hand Grip Strength Score by Dynamometry at Week 76

    Grip strength was assessed using a handheld dynamometer which provided a precise measurement of the force that a muscle can exert and reflects muscle strength of the hand. Positive values indicated increased grip strength and negative values indicated decreased grip strength. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76

  26. Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Quadriceps Strength Score by Dynamometry at Week 76

    Quadriceps strength was measured using a dynamometer which provided the applied force of leg extension and reflects muscle strength of the dominant leg. Positive values indicated increased strength and negative values indicated decreased strength. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76

  27. Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Timed Up and Go Test (mTUG) at Week 76

    The mTUG assessed functional mobility by measuring the time required for a participant to rise from a standard armchair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down (assistive devices permitted after standing, but no support from a caregiver, or a wall). Negative values indicated faster performance and positive values indicated slower performance. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Feb 2023
  2. Study start28 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion6 Nov 2025
  4. Study completion27 Nov 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
272 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05721573
Sponsor's protocol ID
ABC008-IBM-201
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
1 Feb 2023
Last updated
1 Oct 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing ABC008 in people with Inclusion Body Myositis, run by Abcuro, Inc. at 45 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 45 sites in United States, Australia, Canada, Germany, United Kingdom and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Oct 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (time frame: Up to Week 80). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in