AzTrials
AzTrials

Knee OsteoarthritisPhase 1/2NCT05721352

Arthritis Ease Study

A Phase 1/2 study testing Virtual Reality Nature scene plus heart rate variability biofeedback phone application in people with Knee Osteoarthritis and Chronic Pain, run by Arizona State University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to test using a pain and anxiety reduction phone application in older adults with knee osteoarthritis and chronic pain. The main questions it seeks to answer are: 1. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 to 74 years
Conditions the study is for
Knee Osteoarthritis, Chronic Pain, Kinesiophobia
What is being tested?
Virtual Reality Nature scene plus heart rate variability biofeedback phone application
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
15 Sep 2022to 11 Sep 2024
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 to 74 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • English speaking adults
  • Diagnosed osteoarthritis of the knee(s)
  • smart phone access
  • Pain scale rating of 4-10 on the numerical pain rating scale (0- 10) \
  • Pain duration of 3 months or greater
  • Score of 15 or greater on the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (fear of movement) scale
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Eligibility includes:
  • Willingness to engage in the study for 8 weeks
  • Being available for 1-3 phone calls for data collection at pre- and post-8-week intervention and at 4 weeks post-intervention conclusion

Who cannot join

  • Self-report of: acute illness,
  • Cancer
  • HIV
  • Systemic inflammatory disease (rheumatoid arthritis, lupus)
  • History of neurologic disease, seizure disorder,
  • Current or history of mental illness illness with hallucinations
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Motion sickness or vestibular disorders
  • Acute or chronic respiratory disease
  • Dysrhythmic heart disease
  • Beta or calcium channel blocker medication use
  • Monovision \\
  • Current use of Heart rate variability training activities will also be excluded

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Arizona State University

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85005

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Arthritis Pain Reduction in Older Adults

The goal of this clinical trial is to test using a pain and anxiety reduction phone application in older adults with knee osteoarthritis and chronic pain. The main questions it seeks to answer are:

  1. How acceptable is using a phone app in older adults with knee osteoarthritis and chronic pain to lower pain, pain stress and reduce fear of movement?
  2. What are the effects of combining biofeedback with a virtual reality nature scene and paced breath training to increase heart rate variability on pain and anxiety among older adults with knee osteoarthritis?
  3. What is the role of self-regulation and body awareness in predicting or strengthening the effect of combining virtual reality, heart rate variability biofeedback in older adults with knee osteoarthritis?.
Read more

Participants will be asked to:

  1. use a phone application for 7-10 minute sessions twice daily 5 days a week for 8 weeks.
  2. receive relaxation reminders weeks 9 through 12 to see if use continues past the intervention phase.
  3. complete surveys describing pain, physical activity, fear of movement, body awareness and self-regulation, pain stress pre/post the app use.
  4. complete a survey and interview after 8 weeks of phone app use to describe the experience of its use.
Read the detailed description

Purpose: This single-group pre-post intervention design, study will explore the feasibility of using a multicomponent phone-based app for 8 weeks to reduce pain, pain stress effects, decreased heart rate variability and fear of movement in 24 older adults with knee osteoarthritis and to examine sustained use and or effects at 4 weeks after intervention period.

Aim 1 Evaluate the feasibility (adherence and satisfaction) of a multicomponent phone app combining virtual reality and heart rate variability biofeedback for use in older adults with knee osteoarthritis and chronic pain and gain descriptive evaluations of the experience in exit interviews.

Adherence: The adherence benchmark will be 80% of participants will participate at least 5 days per week during the initial 8-week intervention period. Adherence will be examined (not benchmarked) during the 4-week follow-up period.

Satisfaction: Exit interviews will demonstrate that 80% of participants practicing with the phone app rate the experience as satisfying or highly satisfying.

Aim 2 Evaluate the preliminary effects of multicomponent phone app use (5 days a week for 8 weeks) in older adults with knee osteoarthritis, in relation to pain, pain stress effects, and fear of movement (kinesiophobia), and examine sustained use patterns and effects with only reminders from the app during the 4-week follow-up period.

Aim 3: Examine the role of body awareness and self-regulation to moderate (predict) or mediate (strengthen) the effect of a virtual reality nature scene and heart rate variability biofeedback phone application in older adults with knee osteoarthritis.

Being tested
Virtual Reality Nature scene plus heart rate variability biofeedback phone application
Keywords
Heart Rate Variability, Biofeedback, Virtual Reality, Body awareness, Self regulation
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Chronic Pain, Kinesiophobia, Self-Control

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Virtual Reality Nature scene plus heart rate variability biofeedback phone applicationBehavioural

    phone app for slow- paced breath training with biofeedback in a virtual reality nature scene

Study groups in NCT05721352
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single Arm StudyExperimental* All participants will receive access to the phone application with a virtual reality headset and heart rate variability Bluetooth ear sensor. * Participants will be instructed to download a free phone app Elite Heart Rate Variability, login using study provided de-identified research email address, pair the Bluetooth ear sensor and record a five-minute resting heart rate variability reading at baseline and each time point of the study prior to beginning intervention. * Participants will be asked to use the intervention phone application for 7-10 minute sessions twice daily 5 days a week for 8 weeks. * For the first 8 weeks, participants will receive brief, daily texts encouraging participation in the smart phone application. * During weeks 9 through 12, will receive relaxation reminders daily via text to determine if use is sustained past the intervention phase
Receives: Behavioral: Virtual Reality Nature scene plus heart rate variability biofeedback phone application

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Adherence Measure

    The adherence benchmark will be 80% of participants will participate at least 5 days per week during the initial 8-week intervention period. Adherence will be examined (not benchmarked) during the 4-week follow-up period

    Measured: 8 weeks

  2. Satisfaction Measure

    Exit interviews will demonstrate that 80% of participants practicing with the phone app rate the experience as satisfying or highly satisfying

    Measured: 8-12 Weeks

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Patient-reported outcomes measurement information -29 v2.0 system-29 Profile v2.0

    The Patient-reported outcomes measurement information -29 v2.0 profile assesses pain intensity using a single 0-10 numeric rating item (lower score is better) and seven physical and mental health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) using four items per domain. Each question has a 5 point Likert scale and each domain has a minimum score of 4 and a maximum score of 20,,with higher score being better.is no composite score as individual items are scored within each health domain.

    Measured: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks

  2. Multidimensional Assessment of Somatic Sense Scale

    8 Scale (32 items) Self-report measure of dimensions of body awareness and self regulation (noticing, not distracting, not worrying, attention regulation, attention regulation, emotional awareness, body listening, trust and self regulation) Each scale has a 0-5 point Likert Scale with higher numbers being better. The range for each scale score mean is derived and compared to baseline values and indexed mean values..

    Minimum and maximum scores depend on the number of items in each domain which ranges from 3-7 items. A minimum score for a domain of 0 (worse) to a maximum of 15 for example and higher numbers are better.

    Measured: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks

  3. Heart Rate

    Heart rate data will be measured and compared from pre to post intervention

    Measured: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks

  4. Heart rate variability data

    Heart rate variability data collected for spectral analysis (vagal tone)

    Time domain analysis of vagal tone:

    Root mean squared of successive R-R interval difference change score between baseline and intervention time frames

    Frequency analysis of vagal tone:

    High frequency heart rate variability

    Measured: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks

  5. Brief Fear of Movement scale adapted from the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia 11 (TSK-11)

    Self report scale of fear avoidance and somatic focus with 11 questions and responses ranging from Strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (4) on a 4 point Likert Scale. Scores range from a minimum of 11 to a maximum of 44 points with higher scores indicating greater fear of pain, movement, and injury

    Measured: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks

  6. Stanford Brief Activity Survey

    2 question- self report of usual daily work and leisure time activity and activity intensity to classify 5 activity levels, ranging from inactive to very hard intensity, using established metabolic equivalents for activity levels.

    The first item describes 5 different patterns of on-the-job activity, ranging from mostly sedentary to hard physical labor (such as carrying heavy loads). Similarly, the second item describes 5 patterns of leisure-time activity, ranging from sedentary to regular vigorous activity, such as running, on 5 or more days per week. Respondents select the 1 pattern that best describes their on-the-job activity and the 1 pattern that best describes their leisure-time activity. Each response pattern includes a global statement about the activity and the dimensions of frequency, intensity, time, and type of activity

    Measured: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks

  7. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Severity Index (WOMAC- Stiffness scale

    2 Likert Scale questions of self-report joint stiffness The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4, which correspond to: none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), and extreme (4).

    The minimum score is 0 and the maximum is 8 and larger scores indicate worse stiffness.

    Measured: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks

  8. Customized Technology Adoption Survey

    Modified Technology adoption survey of phone app use.(12 -6 point Likert Scaled questions ranging from 0 Very strongly disagree to very strongly agree ) with larger scores indicating better ease of use, attitude towards use and intent to use. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 72.

    Measured: 12th Week

  9. Post-Intervention Qualitative Interview

    Semi-structured qualitative interview regarding phone app usability (ease of use), acceptability (satisfaction), pain, fear of pain, physical activity,

    Measured: Between 8th and 12th Week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Feb 2023
  2. Study start15 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion11 Sep 2024
  4. Study completion11 Sep 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Single-group pre-post intervention design
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05721352
Sponsor's protocol ID
00013939
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
31 Jan 2023
Last updated
23 Sep 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Virtual Reality Nature scene plus heart rate variability biofeedback phone application in people with Knee Osteoarthritis and Chronic Pain, run by Arizona State University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Adherence Measure (time frame: 8 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Sep 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in