Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseNCT05721326
Sequential EHR Based Interventions to Increase Genetic Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Predisposition
A study testing Sequential EHR Communications in people with Genetic Predisposition to Disease and Breast Cancer Female, run by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this sequential study design is to increase genetic testing in those meeting national clinical guidelines. The main question it aims to answer is: which intervention is most effective in uptake of genetic testing for the target population? Participants will receive genetic testing and counseling that may… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 100 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Breast Cancer Female, Ovarian Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Sequential EHR Communications
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,283 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 May 2023to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 100 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with serous ovarian cancer diagnosed more than two years prior to study contact
- Patients with breast cancer diagnosed at <50 years of age more than two years prior to study contact
- Patients with triple negative breast cancer diagnosed more than two years prior to study contact
- Unaffected individuals reporting a family history of ovarian cancer
- Unaffected individuals reporting a family history of male breast cancer
- Unaffected individuals reporting a family history of breast cancer <50 years
Who cannot join
- 1. Patients who have previously received genetic counseling and/or testing
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
About this study
Official title: Sequential EHR Based Interventions to Increase Genetic Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Predisposition Across Diverse Patient Populations in Gynecology Practices at Penn Medicine
The goal of this sequential study design is to increase genetic testing in those meeting national clinical guidelines. The main question it aims to answer is: which intervention is most effective in uptake of genetic testing for the target population? Participants will receive genetic testing and counseling that may initiate life-saving screenings.
Read the detailed description
Germline genetic testing is recommended by the National Cancer Center Network (NCCN) for individuals with a personal history of ovarian cancer, young-onset (<50 years) breast cancer, and a family history of ovarian cancer or male breast cancer, among others. Recent publications demonstrate that the uptake of genetic testing is under-utilized, overall, and rates are consistently lower in minority populations. EHR-based algorithms will be used to identify patients of two Penn Medicine Ob/Gyn practices for whom genetic testing is recommended based on NCCN guidelines and to test pragmatic methods using messages delivered to patients or clinicians to encourage testing. The ACC Electronic Phenotyping Core developed the algorithms based on cancer registry data along with family history fields and this study will develop and test messages directed at patients and clinicians to encourage testing. The aims are:
- Identification of at-risk populations through electronic health record (EHR) searches followed by patient nudges (MPM and then Way To Health) to increase the uptake of genetic counseling referral and testing in patients at gynecology practices at Dickens Center and Penn Medicine Radnor.
- In patients who have not responded to patient nudges (Aim 1), test a provider nudge to increase the uptake of genetic counseling referral and testing in gynecology practices at Dickens Center and Penn Medicine Radnor (Aim 2).
- Conditions
- Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Breast Cancer Female, Ovarian Cancer, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Hereditary Cancer Syndrome, Hereditary Diseases
- Being tested
- Sequential EHR Communications
- Keywords
- NCCN guidelines, genetic testing, hereditary cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, intervention, sequential intervention, message-based intervention, text message, diverse patient population, genetics, female, digital health technology, germline genetic testing, nudge, EHR based intervention, genetic counseling
- Medical subject headings
- Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Ovarian Neoplasms, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome, Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sequential EHR CommunicationsOther
The intervention includes 3 message types: an EHR message, followed by a text message, followed by physician nudge. Each subsequent type will be activated if the previous type does not yield a response.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential Communications | Experimental | This sequential arm contains three types of communication to be employed following non-response to the previous type. The initial communication will be a direct message to the patient via the MyPennMedicine. The subsequent message will be sent as a text via the Way To Health app(lication). The final communication will be a nudge to the patient's physician which will send upon opening the patient's chart and will remain as a flag thereafter. Receives: Other: Sequential EHR Communications |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Genetic Counseling Appointments Completed Following MPM Delivery
Scheduling and completion of genetic counseling appointments will be monitored through EHR. MPM stands for MyPennMedicine message which will be sent directly to the patient through the medical record.
Measured: Within six months of MPM delivery
Number of Genetic Counseling Appointments Completed Following Provider Nudge
Scheduling and completion of genetic counseling appointments will be monitored through EHR. The provider nudge will be delivered as a Best Practice Alert (BPA) upon opening the patient's chart.
Measured: Within six months of provider nudge
Secondary outcomes (2)
Open Rate of MPM
The proportion of eligible participants who open the invitation to receive genetic counseling and testing compared to the total amount of eligible participants sent an MPM.
Measured: Within one month of receiving MPM
Response Rate of Way To Health text
The proportion of eligible participants who respond to a text message invitation to receive genetic counseling and testing compared to the total amount of eligible participants sent a Way To Health (WTH) text.
Measured: Within one month of receiving text
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Feb 2023
- Study start1 May 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025
- Study completion31 Dec 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- Eligible patients will be sent a message through the patient portal to encourage genetic counseling and testing. If the patient does not respond, they will be sent a text message. Should there be no response, the patient\'s clinician will receive a nudge
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,283 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05721326
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 25922
- Other IDs
- 851980
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 30 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 17 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Srivastava SK, Ahmad A, Miree O, Patel GK, Singh S, Rocconi RP, Singh AP. Racial health disparities in ovarian cancer: not just black and white. J Ovarian Res. 2017 Sep 21;10(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13048-017-0355-y.
PubMed 28931403Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Singh N, Ryan A, Karpinskyj C, Carlino G, Taylor J, Massingham SK, Raikou M, Kalsi JK, Woolas R, Manchanda R, Arora R, Casey L, Dawnay A, Dobbs S, Leeson S, Mould T, Seif MW, Sharma A, Williamson K, Liu Y, Fallowfield L, McGuire AJ, Campbell S, Skates SJ, Jacobs IJ, Parmar M. Ovarian cancer population screening and mortality after long-term follow-up in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021 Jun 5;397(10290):2182-2193. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00731-5. Epub 2021 May 12.
PubMed 33991479Reid S, Cadiz S, Pal T. Disparities in Genetic Testing and Care among Black women with Hereditary Breast Cancer. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2020 Sep;12(3):125-131. doi: 10.1007/s12609-020-00364-1. Epub 2020 May 19.
PubMed 33603954Jatoi I, Sung H, Jemal A. The Emergence of the Racial Disparity in U.S. Breast-Cancer Mortality. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 23;386(25):2349-2352. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2200244. Epub 2022 Jun 18. No abstract available.
PubMed 35713541Domchek SM, Robson ME. Update on Genetic Testing in Gynecologic Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep 20;37(27):2501-2509. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00363. Epub 2019 Aug 12. No abstract available.
PubMed 31403865Daly MB, Pal T, Berry MP, Buys SS, Dickson P, Domchek SM, Elkhanany A, Friedman S, Goggins M, Hutton ML; CGC; Karlan BY, Khan S, Klein C, Kohlmann W; CGC; Kurian AW, Laronga C, Litton JK, Mak JS; LCGC; Menendez CS, Merajver SD, Norquist BS, Offit K, Pederson HJ, Reiser G; CGC; Senter-Jamieson L; CGC; Shannon KM, Shatsky R, Visvanathan K, Weitzel JN, Wick MJ, Wisinski KB, Yurgelun MB, Darlow SD, Dwyer MA. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Jan 6;19(1):77-102. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001.
PubMed 33406487Smith-Uffen M, Bartley N, Davies G, Best M. Motivations and barriers to pursue cancer genomic testing: A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jun;104(6):1325-1334. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.024. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
PubMed 33390305Kurian AW, Ward KC, Howlader N, Deapen D, Hamilton AS, Mariotto A, Miller D, Penberthy LS, Katz SJ. Genetic Testing and Results in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients and Ovarian Cancer Patients. J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 20;37(15):1305-1315. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01854. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
PubMed 30964716McBride CM, Pathak S, Johnson CE, Alberg AJ, Bandera EV, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Bondy ML, Cote ML, Moorman PG, Peres LC, Peters ES, Schwartz AG, Terry PD, Schildkraut JM. Psychosocial factors associated with genetic testing status among African American women with ovarian cancer: Results from the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study. Cancer. 2022 Mar 15;128(6):1252-1259. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34053. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
PubMed 34882782Hamilton JG, Symecko H, Spielman K, Breen K, Mueller R, Catchings A, Trottier M, Salo-Mullen EE, Shah I, Arutyunova A, Batson M, Gebert R, Pundock S, Schofield E, Offit K, Stadler ZK, Cadoo K, Carlo MI, Narayan V, Reiss KA, Robson ME, Domchek SM. Uptake and acceptability of a mainstreaming model of hereditary cancer multigene panel testing among patients with ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. Genet Med. 2021 Nov;23(11):2105-2113. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01262-2. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
PubMed 34257420Lau-Min KS, Guerra CE, Nathanson KL, Bekelman JE. From Race-Based to Precision Oncology: Leveraging Behavioral Economics and the Electronic Health Record to Advance Health Equity in Cancer Care. JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Feb 17;5:PO.20.00418. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00418. eCollection 2021. No abstract available.
PubMed 34250405Kukafka R, Pan S, Silverman T, Zhang T, Chung WK, Terry MB, Fleck E, Younge RG, Trivedi MS, McGuinness JE, He T, Dimond J, Crew KD. Patient and Clinician Decision Support to Increase Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222092. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22092.
PubMed 35849397Symecko H, Schnoll R, Beidas RS, Bekelman JE, Blumenthal D, Bauer AM, Gabriel P, Boisseau L, Doucette A, Powers J, Cappadocia J, McKenna DB, Richardville R, Cuff L, Offer R, Clement EG, Buttenheim AM, Asch DA, Rendle KA, Shelton RC, Fayanju OM, Wileyto EP, Plag M, Ware S, Shulman LN, Nathanson KL, Domchek SM. Protocol to evaluate sequential electronic health record-based strategies to increase genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk across diverse patient populations in gynecology practices. Implement Sci. 2023 Nov 6;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01308-w.
PubMed 37932730
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Sequential EHR Based Interventions to Increase Genetic Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Predisposition Across Diverse Patient Populations in Gynecology Practices at Penn Medicine
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05721326
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 25922
- Conditions
- Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Breast Cancer Female, Ovarian Cancer, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Hereditary Cancer Syndrome, Hereditary Diseases
- Keywords
- NCCN guidelines, genetic testing, hereditary cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, intervention, sequential intervention, message-based intervention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,283 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Abramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this sequential study design is to increase genetic testing in those meeting national clinical guidelines. The main question it aims to answer is: which intervention is most effective in uptake of genetic testing for the target population? Participants will receive genetic testing and counseling that may initiate life-saving screenings.
Detailed description
Germline genetic testing is recommended by the National Cancer Center Network (NCCN) for individuals with a personal history of ovarian cancer, young-onset (<50 years) breast cancer, and a family history of ovarian cancer or male breast cancer, among others. Recent publications demonstrate that the uptake of genetic testing is under-utilized, overall, and rates are consistently lower in minority populations. EHR-based algorithms will be used to identify patients of two Penn Medicine Ob/Gyn practices for whom genetic testing is recommended based on NCCN guidelines and to test pragmatic methods using messages delivered to patients or clinicians to encourage testing. The ACC Electronic Phenotyping Core developed the algorithms based on cancer registry data along with family history fields and this study will develop and test messages directed at patients and clinicians to encourage testing. The aims are:
- Identification of at-risk populations through electronic health record (EHR) searches followed by patient nudges (MPM and then Way To Health) to increase the uptake of genetic counseling referral and testing in patients at gynecology practices at Dickens Center and Penn Medicine Radnor.
- In patients who have not responded to patient nudges (Aim 1), test a provider nudge to increase the uptake of genetic counseling referral and testing in gynecology practices at Dickens Center and Penn Medicine Radnor (Aim 2).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Eligible patients will be sent a message through the patient portal to encourage genetic counseling and testing. If the patient does not respond, they will be sent a text message. Should there be no response, the patient\'s clinician will receive a nudge
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential Communications | Experimental | Other: Sequential EHR CommunicationsThis sequential arm contains three types of communication to be employed following non-response to the previous type. The initial communication will be a direct message to the patient via the MyPennMedicine. The subsequent message will be sent as a text via the Way To Health app(lication). The final communication will be a nudge to the patient's physician which will send upon opening the patient's chart and will remain as a flag thereafter. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 100 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with serous ovarian cancer diagnosed more than two years prior to study contact
- Patients with breast cancer diagnosed at <50 years of age more than two years prior to study contact
- Patients with triple negative breast cancer diagnosed more than two years prior to study contact
- Unaffected individuals reporting a family history of ovarian cancer
- Unaffected individuals reporting a family history of male breast cancer
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Patients who have previously received genetic counseling and/or testing
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential EHR CommunicationsThe intervention includes 3 message types: an EHR message, followed by a text message, followed by physician nudge. Each subsequent type will be activated if the previous type does not yield a response. | Other | Sequential Communications |
Primary outcome
Number of Genetic Counseling Appointments Completed Following MPM Delivery
Time frame: Within six months of MPM delivery
Scheduling and completion of genetic counseling appointments will be monitored through EHR. MPM stands for MyPennMedicine message which will be sent directly to the patient through the medical record.
Number of Genetic Counseling Appointments Completed Following Provider Nudge
Time frame: Within six months of provider nudge
Scheduling and completion of genetic counseling appointments will be monitored through EHR. The provider nudge will be delivered as a Best Practice Alert (BPA) upon opening the patient's chart.
2 secondary outcomes
Open Rate of MPM
Time frame: Within one month of receiving MPM
Response Rate of Way To Health text
Time frame: Within one month of receiving text
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 28931403Srivastava SK, Ahmad A, Miree O, Patel GK, Singh S, Rocconi RP, Singh AP. Racial health disparities in ovarian cancer: not just black and white. J Ovarian Res. 2017 Sep 21;10(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13048-017-0355-y.
- Background: PubMed 33991479Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Singh N, Ryan A, Karpinskyj C, Carlino G, Taylor J, Massingham SK, Raikou M, Kalsi JK, Woolas R, Manchanda R, Arora R, Casey L, Dawnay A, Dobbs S, Leeson S, Mould T, Seif MW, Sharma A, Williamson K, Liu Y, Fallowfield L, McGuire AJ, Campbell S, Skates SJ, Jacobs IJ, Parmar M. Ovarian cancer population screening and mortality after long-term follow-up in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021 Jun 5;397(10290):2182-2193. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00731-5. Epub 2021 May 12.
- Background: PubMed 33603954Reid S, Cadiz S, Pal T. Disparities in Genetic Testing and Care among Black women with Hereditary Breast Cancer. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2020 Sep;12(3):125-131. doi: 10.1007/s12609-020-00364-1. Epub 2020 May 19.
- Background: PubMed 35713541Jatoi I, Sung H, Jemal A. The Emergence of the Racial Disparity in U.S. Breast-Cancer Mortality. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 23;386(25):2349-2352. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2200244. Epub 2022 Jun 18. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 31403865Domchek SM, Robson ME. Update on Genetic Testing in Gynecologic Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep 20;37(27):2501-2509. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00363. Epub 2019 Aug 12. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 33406487Daly MB, Pal T, Berry MP, Buys SS, Dickson P, Domchek SM, Elkhanany A, Friedman S, Goggins M, Hutton ML; CGC; Karlan BY, Khan S, Klein C, Kohlmann W; CGC; Kurian AW, Laronga C, Litton JK, Mak JS; LCGC; Menendez CS, Merajver SD, Norquist BS, Offit K, Pederson HJ, Reiser G; CGC; Senter-Jamieson L; CGC; Shannon KM, Shatsky R, Visvanathan K, Weitzel JN, Wick MJ, Wisinski KB, Yurgelun MB, Darlow SD, Dwyer MA. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Jan 6;19(1):77-102. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001.
- Background: PubMed 33390305Smith-Uffen M, Bartley N, Davies G, Best M. Motivations and barriers to pursue cancer genomic testing: A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jun;104(6):1325-1334. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.024. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
- Background: PubMed 30964716Kurian AW, Ward KC, Howlader N, Deapen D, Hamilton AS, Mariotto A, Miller D, Penberthy LS, Katz SJ. Genetic Testing and Results in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients and Ovarian Cancer Patients. J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 20;37(15):1305-1315. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01854. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
- Background: PubMed 34882782McBride CM, Pathak S, Johnson CE, Alberg AJ, Bandera EV, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Bondy ML, Cote ML, Moorman PG, Peres LC, Peters ES, Schwartz AG, Terry PD, Schildkraut JM. Psychosocial factors associated with genetic testing status among African American women with ovarian cancer: Results from the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study. Cancer. 2022 Mar 15;128(6):1252-1259. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34053. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
- Background: PubMed 34257420Hamilton JG, Symecko H, Spielman K, Breen K, Mueller R, Catchings A, Trottier M, Salo-Mullen EE, Shah I, Arutyunova A, Batson M, Gebert R, Pundock S, Schofield E, Offit K, Stadler ZK, Cadoo K, Carlo MI, Narayan V, Reiss KA, Robson ME, Domchek SM. Uptake and acceptability of a mainstreaming model of hereditary cancer multigene panel testing among patients with ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. Genet Med. 2021 Nov;23(11):2105-2113. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01262-2. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
- Background: PubMed 34250405Lau-Min KS, Guerra CE, Nathanson KL, Bekelman JE. From Race-Based to Precision Oncology: Leveraging Behavioral Economics and the Electronic Health Record to Advance Health Equity in Cancer Care. JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Feb 17;5:PO.20.00418. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00418. eCollection 2021. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 35849397Kukafka R, Pan S, Silverman T, Zhang T, Chung WK, Terry MB, Fleck E, Younge RG, Trivedi MS, McGuinness JE, He T, Dimond J, Crew KD. Patient and Clinician Decision Support to Increase Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222092. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22092.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Genetic Predisposition to Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Hereditary Leiomyomatosis Renal Cell Cancer - Study of the Genetic Cause and the Predisposition to Renal Cancer
Renal Tumor Histology, Cutaneous Leiomyoma
RecruitingObservational study
Genetic Analysis of Birt Hogg-Dube Syndrome and Characterization of Predisposition to Kidney Cancer
Kidney Neoplasms, Kidney Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Vascular Disease Discovery Protocol
Vascular Dysfunction, Genetic Mutations
RecruitingObservational study
Precision-Based Genomics in Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Tumors and Cancer Predisposition in Individuals and Families
Cancer, Hereditary Neoplasms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Sequential EHR Communications in people with Genetic Predisposition to Disease and Breast Cancer Female, run by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Genetic Counseling Appointments Completed Following MPM Delivery (time frame: Within six months of MPM delivery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05721326, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2026.