Intracranial ArteriosclerosisMaurora ICASNCT05719883
Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the Maurora® DES in ICAS
A study testing Maurora® Sirolimus Eluting Stent System and APOLLO™ Intracranial Stent System in people with Intracranial Arteriosclerosis and Stroke (CVA) or TIA, run by Beijing Tiantan Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The purpose of the RCT trial is to evaluate whether implantation of drug-eluting stent (DES) is more efficacious than bare metal stent (BMS) in prevention of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and improvement of outcomes for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Intracranial Arteriosclerosis, Stroke (CVA) or TIA
- What is being tested?
- Maurora® Sirolimus Eluting Stent System and APOLLO™ Intracranial Stent System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 156 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 20 Feb 2023to 15 May 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age from 18 to 80 years;
- Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis (Definition: Stroke or transient ischemic attack [TIA] associated with intracranial atherosclerosis within 90 days of enrollment);
- A major intracranial artery (carotid artery, MCA stem [M1], vertebral artery, or basilar artery) with 70% to 99% stenosis on the angiography (According to WASID method);
- The target lesion length ≤15 mm and the vessel diameter between 2.5mm and 5.0mm, distal vessel diameter >1.5mm;
- Only one stent planned for the target lesion;
- A Modified Rankin Score of ≤ 3;
- Patients understand the purpose and requirements of the study, and can make him/herself understood, and has provided informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Ischemic stroke within 2 weeks before the procedure;
- Tandem extracranial or intracranial stenosis (70%-99%) of the target lesion;
- Patients with stroke caused by perforating artery occlusion;
- Severe calcification at target lesion;
- Any history of brain parenchymal or other intracranial subarachnoid, subdural or extradural hemorrhage in the past 6 weeks;
- History of stenting or angioplasty of an intracranial artery;
Show all 17Show fewer
- Intracranial tumor, aneurysm or intracranial arteriovenous malformation;
- Intracranial artery stenosis caused by non-atherosclerotic lesions, including: moya-moya disease, vasculitis disease, herpes zoster, varicella-zoster or other viral vascular diseases, neurosyphilis, any other intracranial infections, radiation-induced vascular disease, fibromuscular dysplasia, sickle cell disease, neurofibromatosis, central nervous system benign vascular disease, post-partum vascular disease, suspected vasospasm, suspicious embolism recanalization;
- Presence of any unequivocal cardiac source of embolism (e.g. atrial fibrillation);
- Those who cannot tolerate general anesthesia due to insufficiency of cardiac or pulmonary function, not suitable for procedure;
- Known allergy or contraindication to heparin, aspirin, ticlopidine, ticagrelor, sirolimus, anaesthetics and contrast agents;
- Severe renal and hepatic insufficiency (ALTor AST > 3x upper limit, creatinine > 1.5x upper limit);
- Major surgery within the past 30 days or planned within 90 days, or requiring simultaneous intervention to renal artery, iliac artery, and coronary artery;
- Life expectancy <12 months;
- Pregnant or lactating women, or planning for pregnancy;
- Participated in another investigational device or drug study within 30 days;
- According to the judgement of the investigator, other situations that are not suitable for enrollment.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Maurora® Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus the Apollo Stent in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis(Maurora ICAS Trial)
The purpose of the RCT trial is to evaluate whether implantation of drug-eluting stent (DES) is more efficacious than bare metal stent (BMS) in prevention of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and improvement of outcomes for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. This trial is prospective, multi-center, randomized 1:1 single blind trial using Maurora sirolimus eluting stent versus Apollo bare metal stent conducted in approximately 10 interventional neurology centers in China. The study is sponsored by Alain Medical (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
Read the detailed description
This trial is a prospective, multi-center, 1:1 randomized using drug-eluting (Sirolimus) stent versus bare metal stent (BMS) to treat intracranial stenosis of 70-99% degree. The primary endpoint is in-stent restenosis rate(ISR) within 12 months after revascularization procedure of the qualifying lesion during follow-up.
- Conditions
- Intracranial Arteriosclerosis, Stroke (CVA) or TIA
- Being tested
- Maurora® Sirolimus Eluting Stent System, APOLLO™ Intracranial Stent System
- Keywords
- Intracranial Atherosclerotic stenosis, Drug-eluting stent, Ischemia stroke
- Medical subject headings
- Intracranial Arteriosclerosis, Stroke, Ischemic Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Maurora® Sirolimus Eluting Stent SystemDevice
Also called Maurora
The Maurora® for intracranial PTA treatment comprises of a balloon expandable sirolimus eluting stent and a delivery catheter that features a rapid exchange catheter design with a semi-compliant balloon located at its distal end.
APOLLO™ Intracranial Stent SystemDevice
Also called APOLLO
The Apollo stent system comprises of a balloon expandable stent and a delivery catheter that features a rapid exchange catheter design with a semi-compliant balloon located at its distal end.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Maurora® Sirolimus Eluting Stent System | Experimental | Device: Maurora® Sirolimus Eluting Stent System A sirolimus eluting intracranial stent system with platform is made of L605 CoCr alloys. Receives: Device: Maurora® Sirolimus Eluting Stent System |
| APOLLO™ Intracranial Stent System | Active comparator | Device: Apollo Intracranial Stent System A 316L stainless steel balloon-expandable intracranial stent system. Receives: Device: APOLLO™ Intracranial Stent System |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
In-stent restenosis rate(ISR) within 12 months after procedure
Angiographic evidence of in-stent stenosis ≥50% at 12 months after procedure
Measured: 12 months after procedure
Secondary outcomes (12)
Implantation success rate
Implantation success was defined as successful arrival of stent to the lesion and subsequent release of the stent delivery system.
Measured: During the procedure
Technical success rate
Technical success was defined as successful arrival of stent to the lesion and subsequent release of the stent delivery system with a residual stenosis of <30%.
Measured: During the procedure
Clinical success rate
Clinical success was defined as successful arrival of stent to the lesion and subsequent release of the stent delivery system with a residual stenosis of <30%, and free from major adverse event within 12 months after procedure.
system with a residual stenosis of <30%
Measured: 12 months after procedure
Stroke or death within 30 days after procedure
Any stroke included ischemic stroke or/and symptomatic brain hemorrhage and all-cause death.
Measured: within 30 days after procedure
Stroke in the target vessel territory or death within 30 days after procedure
Death or any stroke events related to target vessel after revascularization.
Measured: within 30 days after procedure
Ischemic stroke in the target vessel territory between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Any ischemic stroke events related to target vessel after revascularization.
Measured: between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Ischemic stroke in other vessel territory between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Any ischemic stroke events unrelated to target vessel after revascularization.Ischemic stroke is defined as a new focal neurological deficit of sudden onset, that is associated with infarction lesion on CT or MRI. Ischemic strokes are classified as in or out of the territory of the symptomatic intracranial artery.
Measured: between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Any ischemic stroke between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Ischemic stroke is defined as a new focal neurological deficit of sudden onset, that is associated with infarction lesion on CT or MRI. Ischemic strokes are classified as in or out of the territory of the symptomatic intracranial artery.
Measured: between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Any subdural, epidural hemorrhage or a systemic hemorrhage between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Any subdural or epidural hemorrhage or a systemic hemorrhage is required hospitalization, blood transfusion, or surgery.
Measured: between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Death between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
All-cause death.
Measured: between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Transient Ischemic Attack within 1 year after the procedure
A transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a temporary period of symptoms similar to those of a stroke. A TIA usually lasts only a few minutes up to 24 hours and doesn't cause permanent damage.
Measured: 1 year after the procedure
Functional outcome measured by the modified Rankin Scale
Focus on difference between 1 month and 12 months after procedure. The range of modified Rankin Scale was from 0 to 6. 0-No symptoms; 1-No significant disability; 2-Slight disability; 3-Moderate disability; 4-Moderately severe disability; 5-Severe disability; 6 -Dead. A higher score indicates worse a outcome.
Measured: 1 and 12 months after procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Feb 2023
- Study start20 Feb 2023
- Primary completion30 Apr 2025
- Study completion15 May 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Intracranial ArteriosclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Beijing Tiantan HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 156 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Beijing Tiantan Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alain Medical (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ning Ma, MD, Principal investigator, Beijing Tiantan Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05719883
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- QX2022-021-02
- Acronym
- Maurora ICAS
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 31 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 26 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Zhou M, Wang H, Zeng X, Yin P, Zhu J, Chen W, Li X, Wang L, Wang L, Liu Y, Liu J, Zhang M, Qi J, Yu S, Afshin A, Gakidou E, Glenn S, Krish VS, Miller-Petrie MK, Mountjoy-Venning WC, Mullany EC, Redford SB, Liu H, Naghavi M, Hay SI, Wang L, Murray CJL, Liang X. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019 Sep 28;394(10204):1145-1158. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30427-1. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
PubMed 31248666GBD 2016 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):439-458. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
PubMed 30871944Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, Stern BJ, Hertzberg VS, Frankel MR, Levine SR, Chaturvedi S, Kasner SE, Benesch CG, Sila CA, Jovin TG, Romano JG; Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Trial Investigators. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 31;352(13):1305-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043033.
PubMed 15800226Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, Turan TN, Fiorella D, Lane BF, Janis LS, Lutsep HL, Barnwell SL, Waters MF, Hoh BL, Hourihane JM, Levy EI, Alexandrov AV, Harrigan MR, Chiu D, Klucznik RP, Clark JM, McDougall CG, Johnson MD, Pride GL Jr, Torbey MT, Zaidat OO, Rumboldt Z, Cloft HJ; SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):993-1003. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105335. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
PubMed 21899409Shin YS, Kim BM, Suh SH, Jeon P, Kim DJ, Kim DI, Kim BS, Kim KH, Heo JH, Nam HS, Kim YD. Wingspan stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: clinical outcomes and risk factors for in-stent restenosis. Neurosurgery. 2013 Apr;72(4):596-604; discussion 604. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182846e09.
PubMed 23277374Jin M, Fu X, Wei Y, Du B, Xu XT, Jiang WJ. Higher risk of recurrent ischemic events in patients with intracranial in-stent restenosis. Stroke. 2013 Nov;44(11):2990-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001824. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
PubMed 23963335
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Maurora® Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus the Apollo Stent in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis(Maurora ICAS Trial)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05719883
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Maurora ICAS / QX2022-021-02
- Conditions
- Intracranial Arteriosclerosis, Stroke (CVA) or TIA
- Keywords
- Intracranial Atherosclerotic stenosis, Drug-eluting stent, Ischemia stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 156 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Beijing Tiantan HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alain Medical (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
- Study start
- 20 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 May 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the RCT trial is to evaluate whether implantation of drug-eluting stent (DES) is more efficacious than bare metal stent (BMS) in prevention of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and improvement of outcomes for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. This trial is prospective, multi-center, randomized 1:1 single blind trial using Maurora sirolimus eluting stent versus Apollo bare metal stent conducted in approximately 10 interventional neurology centers in China. The study is sponsored by Alain Medical (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
Detailed description
This trial is a prospective, multi-center, 1:1 randomized using drug-eluting (Sirolimus) stent versus bare metal stent (BMS) to treat intracranial stenosis of 70-99% degree. The primary endpoint is in-stent restenosis rate(ISR) within 12 months after revascularization procedure of the qualifying lesion during follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Maurora® Sirolimus Eluting Stent System | Experimental | Device: Maurora® Sirolimus Eluting Stent SystemDevice: Maurora® Sirolimus Eluting Stent System A sirolimus eluting intracranial stent system with platform is made of L605 CoCr alloys. |
| APOLLO™ Intracranial Stent System | Active comparator | Device: APOLLO™ Intracranial Stent SystemDevice: Apollo Intracranial Stent System A 316L stainless steel balloon-expandable intracranial stent system. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age from 18 to 80 years;
- Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis (Definition: Stroke or transient ischemic attack [TIA] associated with intracranial atherosclerosis within 90 days of enrollment);
- A major intracranial artery (carotid artery, MCA stem [M1], vertebral artery, or basilar artery) with 70% to 99% stenosis on the angiography (According to WASID method);
- The target lesion length ≤15 mm and the vessel diameter between 2.5mm and 5.0mm, distal vessel diameter >1.5mm;
- Only one stent planned for the target lesion;
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Ischemic stroke within 2 weeks before the procedure;
- Tandem extracranial or intracranial stenosis (70%-99%) of the target lesion;
- Patients with stroke caused by perforating artery occlusion;
- Severe calcification at target lesion;
- Any history of brain parenchymal or other intracranial subarachnoid, subdural or extradural hemorrhage in the past 6 weeks;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Maurora® Sirolimus Eluting Stent SystemAlso: MauroraThe Maurora® for intracranial PTA treatment comprises of a balloon expandable sirolimus eluting stent and a delivery catheter that features a rapid exchange catheter design with a semi-compliant balloon located at its distal end. | Device | Maurora® Sirolimus Eluting Stent System |
| APOLLO™ Intracranial Stent SystemAlso: APOLLOThe Apollo stent system comprises of a balloon expandable stent and a delivery catheter that features a rapid exchange catheter design with a semi-compliant balloon located at its distal end. | Device | APOLLO™ Intracranial Stent System |
Primary outcome
In-stent restenosis rate(ISR) within 12 months after procedure
Time frame: 12 months after procedure
Angiographic evidence of in-stent stenosis ≥50% at 12 months after procedure
12 secondary outcomes
Implantation success rate
Time frame: During the procedure
Technical success rate
Time frame: During the procedure
Clinical success rate
Time frame: 12 months after procedure
Stroke or death within 30 days after procedure
Time frame: within 30 days after procedure
Stroke in the target vessel territory or death within 30 days after procedure
Time frame: within 30 days after procedure
Ischemic stroke in the target vessel territory between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Time frame: between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Ischemic stroke in other vessel territory between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Time frame: between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Any ischemic stroke between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Time frame: between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Any subdural, epidural hemorrhage or a systemic hemorrhage between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Time frame: between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Death between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Time frame: between 31 day to 1 year after procedure
Transient Ischemic Attack within 1 year after the procedure
Time frame: 1 year after the procedure
Functional outcome measured by the modified Rankin Scale
Time frame: 1 and 12 months after procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jun 2025.
- Background: PubMed 31248666Zhou M, Wang H, Zeng X, Yin P, Zhu J, Chen W, Li X, Wang L, Wang L, Liu Y, Liu J, Zhang M, Qi J, Yu S, Afshin A, Gakidou E, Glenn S, Krish VS, Miller-Petrie MK, Mountjoy-Venning WC, Mullany EC, Redford SB, Liu H, Naghavi M, Hay SI, Wang L, Murray CJL, Liang X. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019 Sep 28;394(10204):1145-1158. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30427-1. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
- Background: PubMed 30871944GBD 2016 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):439-458. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
- Background: PubMed 15800226Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, Stern BJ, Hertzberg VS, Frankel MR, Levine SR, Chaturvedi S, Kasner SE, Benesch CG, Sila CA, Jovin TG, Romano JG; Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Trial Investigators. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 31;352(13):1305-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043033.
- Background: PubMed 21899409Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, Turan TN, Fiorella D, Lane BF, Janis LS, Lutsep HL, Barnwell SL, Waters MF, Hoh BL, Hourihane JM, Levy EI, Alexandrov AV, Harrigan MR, Chiu D, Klucznik RP, Clark JM, McDougall CG, Johnson MD, Pride GL Jr, Torbey MT, Zaidat OO, Rumboldt Z, Cloft HJ; SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):993-1003. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105335. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
- Background: PubMed 23277374Shin YS, Kim BM, Suh SH, Jeon P, Kim DJ, Kim DI, Kim BS, Kim KH, Heo JH, Nam HS, Kim YD. Wingspan stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: clinical outcomes and risk factors for in-stent restenosis. Neurosurgery. 2013 Apr;72(4):596-604; discussion 604. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182846e09.
- Background: PubMed 23963335Jin M, Fu X, Wei Y, Du B, Xu XT, Jiang WJ. Higher risk of recurrent ischemic events in patients with intracranial in-stent restenosis. Stroke. 2013 Nov;44(11):2990-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001824. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Intracranial Arteriosclerosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® (Intravenous) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 (Oral) on Functional Brain Activity Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Metabolic Disorders
Metabolic Abnormalities, Obesity & Overweight
RecruitingObservational study
China HEalthy Aging and Dementia Study (HEAD)
Alzheimer Disease (AD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Comparison of Anti-coagulation and Anti-Platelet Therapies for Intracranial Vascular Atherostenosis
Intracranial Arteriosclerosis, Stroke
Not yet recruiting
EDAS Revascularization for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Steno-occlusive Disease
Intracranial Atherosclerosis, Intracranial Arterial Stenosis
RecruitingObservational study
Product Surveillance Registry
Cardiac Rhythm Disorders, Urological Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ning Ma, MD principal investigator
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Maurora® Sirolimus Eluting Stent System and APOLLO™ Intracranial Stent System in people with Intracranial Arteriosclerosis and Stroke (CVA) or TIA, run by Beijing Tiantan Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
In-stent restenosis rate(ISR) within 12 months after procedure (time frame: 12 months after procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05719883, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2025.