Pseudophakic Bullous KeratopathyPhase 4NCT05716945
The OPTIMISE Study
A Phase 4 study testing Fluorometholone 0.1% Oph Susp, Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic suspension and Stop steroids in people with Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy and Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 8 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Rationale: The cornea is the most transplanted tissue in the Netherlands, with more than 1,500 procedures performed each year. A minimally invasive technique called Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) has become the preferred method in the past decade. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy, Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy, Intraocular Pressure
- What is being tested?
- Fluorometholone 0.1% Oph Susp, Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic suspension and Stop steroids
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 342 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 29 Jul 2024to Mar 2029
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 21 years or older registered on the NOTR as candidates for DMEK corneal transplantation
Who cannot join
- Inability to complete follow up or comply with study procedures
- The participant is vulnerable
- Previous corneal graft in the study eye
- Known sensitivity or contraindication to the ingredients in the study medications
- History of uveitis
- History of any herpes simplex infection
Show all 9Show fewer
- Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) typed allograft
- Pregnancy (current and planned) or lactation
- Use of other local or systemic immunosuppressive drugs
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
8 sites in 1 country
Netherlands8 sites, 8 recruiting
- Recruiting
Amsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ
- Recruiting
Gelre Ziekenhuizen
Apeldoorn, Gelderland, 7300 DS
- Recruiting
Deventer Ziekenhuis
Deventer, Overijssel, 7400 GC
- Not yet recruiting
Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Groningen, Provincie Groningen, 9700 RB
- Recruiting
Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA
- Recruiting
Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+
Maastricht, Limburg, 6202 AZ
- Recruiting
Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6500 HB
- Not yet recruiting
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
Utrecht, Utrecht, 3584 CX
About this study
Official title: Optimized Immunosuppression for Corneal Transplantation: A Multi-center Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Rationale:
The cornea is the most transplanted tissue in the Netherlands, with more than 1,500 procedures performed each year. A minimally invasive technique called Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) has become the preferred method in the past decade. The main advantage of DMEK over previous techniques is a low graft rejection rate (1-2% per year). Despite this, rejection prophylaxis after DMEK follows the same high potency regimen as previous techniques in the first year, and patients are burdened with indefinite immunosuppression. The current project, OPTIMISE, aims to establish an evidence-based, cost-effective regimen that effectively prevents rejection and minimizes side effects.
Read more
Corticosteroid eye drops are the mainstay of ocular immunomodulatory therapy. Their main side effect is a steroid-induced increase in intraocular pressure (IOP). It manifests in about one-fourth of patients within the first year after surgery and can lead to irreversible optic nerve damage and vision loss. Patients with IOP elevation require additional medications and hospital visits resulting in reduced quality of life and increased costs. The optimal dosing regimen in the first year after DMEK and whether patients may safely stop steroids after one year remains unknown. As a result, protocols in the Netherlands vary considerably from surgeon to surgeon. Patients are potentially over-treated in the short and long-term, resulting in undue burden for the patient and increased costs. Consequently, the Dutch Ophthalmology Society (NOG) identified the optimal short- and long-term immunosuppressive protocol for corneal transplantation as one of its Top 10 knowledge gaps, underscoring relevance for clinical practice. With this work, the investigators expect to address this knowledge gap to the benefit of our patients and society.
Objective:
The OPTIMISE study aims to establish an evidence-based, cost-effective regimen that effectively prevents rejection and minimizes side effects. The hypothesis of this study is that Fluorometholone 0.1% in the first year and discontinuing medication in the second year is a cost-effective treatment strategy after DMEK.
Study design:
The design of this study is a randomized, controlled multicentre trial with a duration of 24 months.
Study population:
The study population will consist of 342 patients aged 21 years or older undergoing DMEK surgery in one eye.
Intervention:
All patients will receive Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. Following this procedure, patients will be randomized into the following post-operative regime in two stages:
STEP-I (Year 1):
Control group: DMS 0.1% 6 times a day for 1 month tapered off to once daily within 6 months and then once a day for 6 months.
Intervention group: DMS 0.1% 6 times a day for 1 month followed by FML 0.1% 4 times a day for two months tapered off to once daily within four months and then once a day for 6 months.
STEP-II (Year 2):
Control Group: Half the patients in each study arm will use FML 0.1% daily. Intervention Group: Half the patients in each study arm will discontinue steroids.
Main study parameters/endpoints:
Primary outcomes:
Step-I: IOP elevation compared to baseline Step-II: Endothelial cell loss (ECL) in the second year
Secondary outcomes are:
- Rejection free graft survival.
- Patient reported outcome measures.
- Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, including a short term trial-based economic evaluation (TBEE) and a life-long model-based economic evaluation (MBEE)
- Structural outcomes including corneal, central macular and retinal nerve fibre layer thicknesses, and optic nerve head imaging.
- Being tested
- Fluorometholone 0.1% Oph Susp, Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic suspension, Stop steroids
- Keywords
- Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty, Cornea
- Medical subject headings
- Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy, Corneal Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fluorometholone 0.1% Oph SuspDrug
Year 1: DMS 0.1% 6 times a day for 1 month followed by FML 0.1% 4 times a day for two months tapered off to once daily within four months and then once a day for 6 months.
Year 2: Half the patients in each study arm will use FML 0.1% daily.
Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic suspensionDrug
Year 1: DMS 0.1% 6 times a day for 1 month tapered off to once daily within 6 months and then once a day for 6 months.
Stop steroidsOther
Half the patients in each study arm will discontinue steroids.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention STEP I (Year 1 after DMEK) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Fluorometholone 0.1% Oph Susp; Drug: Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic suspension |
| Control STEP I (Year 1 after DMEK) | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic suspension |
| Intervention STEP II (Year 2 after DMEK) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Stop steroids |
| Control STEP II (Year 2 after DMEK) | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Fluorometholone 0.1% Oph Susp |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference of intraocular pressure elevation between the two arms
Measured: Year 1
Difference of endothelial cell loss (ECL) in the second year
Measured: Year 2
Secondary outcomes (3)
Difference of rejection free graft survival between arms
Measured: 1-2 years
Differences of patient reported outcome measures between groups
Measured: 1-2 years
Differences of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, including a short term trial-based economic evaluation (TBEE) and a life-long model-based economic evaluation (MBEE)
Measured: 1-2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Feb 2023
- Study start29 Jul 2024
- Primary completionSep 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pseudophakic Bullous KeratopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 342 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Maastricht University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05716945
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022-500109-41-00
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 30 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 6 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimized Immunosuppression for Corneal Transplantation: A Multi-center Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05716945
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2022-500109-41-00
- Keywords
- Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty, Cornea
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 342 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Maastricht University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 29 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rationale:
The cornea is the most transplanted tissue in the Netherlands, with more than 1,500 procedures performed each year. A minimally invasive technique called Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) has become the preferred method in the past decade. The main advantage of DMEK over previous techniques is a low graft rejection rate (1-2% per year). Despite this, rejection prophylaxis after DMEK follows the same high potency regimen as previous techniques in the first year, and patients are burdened with indefinite immunosuppression. The current project, OPTIMISE, aims to establish an evidence-based, cost-effective regimen that effectively prevents rejection and minimizes side effects.
Corticosteroid eye drops are the mainstay of ocular immunomodulatory therapy. Their main side effect is a steroid-induced increase in intraocular pressure (IOP). It manifests in about one-fourth of patients within the first year after surgery and can lead to irreversible optic nerve damage and vision loss. Patients with IOP elevation require additional medications and hospital visits resulting in reduced quality of life and increased costs. The optimal dosing regimen in the first year after DMEK and whether patients may safely stop steroids after one year remains unknown. As a result, protocols in the Netherlands vary considerably from surgeon to surgeon. Patients are potentially over-treated in the short and long-term, resulting in undue burden for the patient and increased costs. Consequently, the Dutch Ophthalmology Society (NOG) identified the optimal short- and long-term immunosuppressive protocol for corneal transplantation as one of its Top 10 knowledge gaps, underscoring relevance for clinical practice. With this work, the investigators expect to address this knowledge gap to the benefit of our patients and society.
Objective:
The OPTIMISE study aims to establish an evidence-based, cost-effective regimen that effectively prevents rejection and minimizes side effects. The hypothesis of this study is that Fluorometholone 0.1% in the first year and discontinuing medication in the second year is a cost-effective treatment strategy after DMEK.
Study design:
The design of this study is a randomized, controlled multicentre trial with a duration of 24 months.
Study population:
The study population will consist of 342 patients aged 21 years or older undergoing DMEK surgery in one eye.
Intervention:
All patients will receive Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. Following this procedure, patients will be randomized into the following post-operative regime in two stages:
STEP-I (Year 1):
Control group: DMS 0.1% 6 times a day for 1 month tapered off to once daily within 6 months and then once a day for 6 months.
Intervention group: DMS 0.1% 6 times a day for 1 month followed by FML 0.1% 4 times a day for two months tapered off to once daily within four months and then once a day for 6 months.
STEP-II (Year 2):
Control Group: Half the patients in each study arm will use FML 0.1% daily. Intervention Group: Half the patients in each study arm will discontinue steroids.
Main study parameters/endpoints:
Primary outcomes:
Step-I: IOP elevation compared to baseline Step-II: Endothelial cell loss (ECL) in the second year
Secondary outcomes are:
- Rejection free graft survival.
- Patient reported outcome measures.
- Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, including a short term trial-based economic evaluation (TBEE) and a life-long model-based economic evaluation (MBEE)
- Structural outcomes including corneal, central macular and retinal nerve fibre layer thicknesses, and optic nerve head imaging.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention STEP I (Year 1 after DMEK) | Experimental | Drug: Fluorometholone 0.1% Oph Susp, Drug: Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic suspension |
| Control STEP I (Year 1 after DMEK) | Active comparator | Drug: Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic suspension |
| Intervention STEP II (Year 2 after DMEK) | Experimental | Other: Stop steroids |
| Control STEP II (Year 2 after DMEK) | Active comparator | Drug: Fluorometholone 0.1% Oph Susp |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients aged 21 years or older registered on the NOTR as candidates for DMEK corneal transplantation
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Inability to complete follow up or comply with study procedures
- The participant is vulnerable
- Previous corneal graft in the study eye
- Known sensitivity or contraindication to the ingredients in the study medications
- History of uveitis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fluorometholone 0.1% Oph SuspYear 1: DMS 0.1% 6 times a day for 1 month followed by FML 0.1% 4 times a day for two months tapered off to once daily within four months and then once a day for 6 months. Year 2: Half the patients in each study arm will use FML 0.1% daily. | Drug | Control STEP II (Year 2 after DMEK), Intervention STEP I (Year 1 after DMEK) |
| Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic suspensionYear 1: DMS 0.1% 6 times a day for 1 month tapered off to once daily within 6 months and then once a day for 6 months. | Drug | Control STEP I (Year 1 after DMEK), Intervention STEP I (Year 1 after DMEK) |
| Stop steroidsHalf the patients in each study arm will discontinue steroids. | Other | Intervention STEP II (Year 2 after DMEK) |
Primary outcome
Difference of intraocular pressure elevation between the two arms
Time frame: Year 1
Difference of endothelial cell loss (ECL) in the second year
Time frame: Year 2
3 secondary outcomes
Difference of rejection free graft survival between arms
Time frame: 1-2 years
Differences of patient reported outcome measures between groups
Time frame: 1-2 years
Differences of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, including a short term trial-based economic evaluation (TBEE) and a life-long model-based economic evaluation (MBEE)
Time frame: 1-2 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Oct 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of EO2002 in Subjects With Corneal Edema Secondary to Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction
Corneal Edema, Fuchs
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
AURN001 Efficacy in Participants With Corneal Edema Secondary to Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction
Corneal Edema, Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The Belgian Endothelial Surgical Transplant of the Cornea
Corneal Edema, Corneal Endothelial Disorder
Recruiting
Effectiveness of PKP vs DSAEK in Terms of 2-year Postoperative Visual Acuity in Advanced BPK
Bullous Pseudophakic Keratopathy, Penetrating Keratoplasty
RecruitingObservational study
Prognosis of Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty
Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy, Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
8 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Fluorometholone 0.1% Oph Susp, Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic suspension and Stop steroids in people with Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy and Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 8 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yexin Ye, MD (+31 43 387 5406, yexin.ye@mumc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference of intraocular pressure elevation between the two arms (time frame: Year 1). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2025.