ObesityPSAMNCT05711758
Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Antral Myotomy as a Novel Weight Loss Procedure
An observational study of Obesity and Obesity, Morbid, run by Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MSc at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Gastric myotomy has been performed for several years as a means of addressing chronic stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy and treating gastroparesis. The Pylorus Sparing Antral Myotomy (PSAM) technique has the opposite effect by leaving the pylorus intact and extending the myotomy proximally to the distal gastric body. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity, Obesity, Morbid, Obesity, Primary
- What is being tested?
- PSAM Treatment Patients
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Sep 2023to Dec 2027
- Phase
- Observational
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults in the Center for Weight Management and Wellness program at Brigham and Women's Hospital with a BMI >35 kg/m2 who are pre-qualified by their insurance as recommended by their specialist to undergo an endoscopic bariatric procedure.
Who may be able to join
- subjects must be 18-70 years of age
- eligible for endoscopic and surgical weight loss procedures
- body mass index (BMI) greater than 35 kg/m2
- Individuals must be in excellent mental health
- able to understand and sign informed consent
- available to return for all routine follow-up study visits
Who cannot join
- untreated H. pylori infection
- gastroparesis
- active smoking
- an ongoing or a history of treatment with opioids in the last 12 months prior to enrollment
- previous pyloromyotomy or pyloroplasty
- gastrointestinal obstruction
Show all 22Show fewer
- severe coagulopathy
- esophageal or gastric varices and/or portal hypertensive gastropathy
- pregnancy or puerperium
- any inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract (including but not limited to severe (LA Grade C or D) esophagitis, active gastric ulceration, active duodenal ulceration, or specific inflammation such as Crohn's disease)
- malignant or premalignant gastric diseases (such as high grade dysplasia, gastric cancer, or GIST)
- severe cardiopulmonary disease or a history of coronary artery disease (including myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, poorly controlled hypertension, required use of NSAIDs)
- lactation
- history of gastrointestinal surgery
- any serious health condition unrelated to their weight that would increase the risk of endoscopy
- chronic abdominal pain
- active psychological issues preventing participation in a lifestyle modification program
- a known history of endocrine disorders affecting weight (uncontrolled hypothyroidism)
- an inability to provide informed consent
- use of any medication that may interfere with weight loss
- use of any medication that may interfere with gastric emptying
- any other condition which the investigator may deem as an impediment to compliance or hinder completion of the proposed study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Michele B. Ryan, MS, 6175258266, mryan@bwh.harvard.edu
Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MSc
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Antral Myotomy as a Novel Weight Loss Procedure: A Pilot Study
Gastric myotomy has been performed for several years as a means of addressing chronic stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy and treating gastroparesis. The Pylorus Sparing Antral Myotomy (PSAM) technique has the opposite effect by leaving the pylorus intact and extending the myotomy proximally to the distal gastric body. PSAM was initially combined with ESG and shown to delay gastric emptying and provide greater weight loss without impacting tolerability (GCSI score) or the safety profile of the procedure (2 DDW GEM abstracts). PSAM has not been evaluated alone, without concomitant ESG. Since delayed gastric emptying alone is known to promote weight loss, it is thought that PSAM alone (without ESG) may provide similar efficacy, while reducing procedure time and adverse events. There have been no clinical studies that investigate the efficacy of PSAM independent of ESG. This pilot study aims to address this lack of information by evaluating the safety, tolerability, and short-term efficacy of PSAM, in addition to exploring its impact on gastric physiology. This will also provide data that may be used in designing a larger clinical trial.
Read the detailed description
Obesity, defined as body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m2 in adults, is affecting 30% of the global population and a significant healthcare burden. [1] Obesity has increased dramatically over the last few decades, with over 650 million adults, or 13% of the world's total adult population, diagnosed with the disease in 2016 - a figure that has nearly tripled since 1975.[1] In the U.S the obesity prevalence for U.S. adults increased from 14.1% to 26.7%, or an 89.9% increase between 1993 and 2008.[1,2,3] As a result, current and potential interventions, and treatment strategies to combat obesity have become more important.
The current treatment of obesity involves multiple strategies with combination of non-pharmacologic, pharmacologic, endoscopic, and surgical interventions. There are several FDA-approved pharmacotherapies for the treatment of obesity such as orlistat, phentermine-topiramate, naltrexone-bupropion, liraglutide, and semaglutide. For adults with a body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m2 or 35 kg/m2 and obesity-related comorbidity, bariatric surgery can be offered. [4, 5] Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMT) have emerged as an alternative treatment for patients with obesity with a BMI over 30kg/m2 or 27 kg/m2 with an obesity-related comorbidity. The interest in EBMT is growing given their safety, efficacy, and non-invasive nature. Current FDA-cleared devices that can be used for EBMT include intragastric balloons and suturing devices for endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG). Additionally, a variety of Endo surgical knifes are approved for tissue dissection such as myotomy.
Gastric interventions used to treat obesity work by interfering with gastric accommodation, breakdown and mixing of food, or gastric emptying. Delaying gastric emptying was shown to be a major mechanism of action for both ESG and IGB which is also correlated with weight loss [6].
Antral peristalsis constitutes an important mechanism for gastric emptying. The antrum also serves as a food sensor which needs to be filled to a certain level before food is pumped into the duodenum. [7] Therefore, targeting the antrum is a feasible strategy to delay gastric emptying, induce satiety, and promote weight loss.
In fact, one of the recently FDA-cleared EBMT devices, the Transpyloric Shuttle (Baronova, MA), focuses on inhibiting the antral pump as its primary mechanism of action. This device consists of two interconnected large and small bulbs, positioned in the antrum and duodenum respectively, that cause intermittent obstruction of the pylorus, leading to a delay in gastric emptying (10).
As such, a pylorus sparing antral myotomy (PSAM) with a submucosal tunneling technique was developed. Gastric myotomy has been performed for several years as a means of addressing chronic stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy and treating gastroparesis. The PSAM technique has the opposite effect by leaving the pylorus intact and extending the myotomy proximally to the distal gastric body. PSAM was initially combined with ESG and shown to delay gastric emptying and provide greater weight loss without impacting tolerability (GCSI score) or the safety profile of the procedure (2 DDW GEM abstracts). PSAM has not been evaluated alone, without concomitant ESG. Since delayed gastric emptying alone is known to promote weight loss, it is thought that PSAM alone (without ESG) may provide similar efficacy, while reducing procedure time and adverse events.
Traditional bariatric surgery is very effective at treating obesity, however, only 1% of eligible patients elect to undergo this treatment option. Additionally, the majority of patients with obesity do not qualify for bariatric surgery. [5] Due to the less invasive nature of PSAM, and relative technical simplicity compared to ESG) this procedure may provide a more widely available and more acceptable treatment option for some patients.
There have been no clinical studies that investigate the efficacy of PSAM independent of ESG. This pilot study aims to address this lack of information by evaluating the safety, tolerability, and short-term efficacy of PSAM, in addition to exploring its impact on gastric physiology. This will also provide data that may be used in designing a larger clinical trial.
- Conditions
- Obesity, Obesity, Morbid, Obesity, Primary, Metabolic Disease, Delayed Gastric Emptying Following Procedure
- Being tested
- PSAM Treatment Patients
- Keywords
- Pylorus Sparing Antral Myotomy (PSAM), Gastric physiology, Gastric emptying, Pylorus-sparing antral myotomy, Myotomy, Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG), TransPyloric Shuttle (TPS), Intragastric balloon (IGB), Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMT), Gut Hormones, Gastric Emptying Breath Test
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity, Obesity, Morbid, Metabolic Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PSAM Treatment PatientsProcedure or surgery
Also called PSAM
PSAM is a pylorus-sparing antral myotomy performed under general anesthesia. Endoscopic myotomy is then performed applying the principles of submucosal endoscopy and techniques used during gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM). A submucosal bleb is created proximal to the pylorus. A longitudinal mucosal incision is made with an endoscopic knife. The endoscope is then introduced into the submucosal space, and the knife is used to dissect the submucosal fibers. Antral myotomy is performed starting proximal to the pyloric ring extending to the mucosal access site. The myotomy entails cutting of the inner circular and oblique muscle bundles or may be full thickness at the discretion of the endoscopist. The mucosal entry is then closed using endoscopic suturing or clips.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PSAM Treatment Patients with no prior endoscopic bariatric therapies | Subjects with no prior endoscopic bariatric therapies having esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with Pylorus Sparing Antral Myotomy (PSAM) with standard of care lifestyle modification therapy. Receives: Procedure: PSAM Treatment Patients | |
| PSAM Treatment Patients with prior primary endoscopic bariatric therapies | Subjects with prior primary endoscopic bariatric therapies having esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with Pylorus Sparing Antral Myotomy (PSAM) with standard of care lifestyle modification therapy. Receives: Procedure: PSAM Treatment Patients | |
| PSAM Treatment Patients with prior revision endoscopic bariatric therapies | Subjects with prior revision endoscopic bariatric therapies having esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with Pylorus Sparing Antral Myotomy (PSAM) with standard of care lifestyle modification therapy. Receives: Procedure: PSAM Treatment Patients |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Weight change compared to baseline
Percent total body weight loss
Measured: Screening, Procedure day, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 months
Adverse Events
Changes to health compared to baseline
Measured: Procedure day, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 months
Change in tolerability from procedure day to 12 months
How the subjects feel after the procedure based on pain scale and AE's
Measured: Procedure day, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
Change in Quality of Life compared to baseline
Overall quality of life questionnaire
Measured: Screening, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 months
Gastric Emptying compared to baseline
Gastric emptying using a gastric emptying breath test (GEBT)
Measured: Screening, 6 months, 12 months
Ghrelin levels compared to baseline
Laboratory analysis of blood samples to test ghrelin levels
Measured: Screening, 6 months, 12 months
Insulin levels compared to baseline
Laboratory analysis of blood samples to test insulin metabolic profiles
Measured: Screening, 6 months, 12 months
HgA1c levels compared to baseline
Laboratory analysis of blood samples to test HgA1c metabolic profiles
Measured: Screening, 6 months, 12 months
Glucose levels compared to baseline
Laboratory analysis of blood samples to test Glucose metabolic profiles
Measured: Screening, 6 months, 12 months
HOMA-IR blood plasma levels compared to baseline
Laboratory analysis of blood samples to test changes in insulin resistance
Measured: Screening, 6 months, 12 months
Physiologic Changes of gastric motility/transit compared to baseline
Upper GI series comparing pre-procedure barium transit to post-procedure 6 and 12 month time points.
Measured: Screening, 6 months, 12 months
Gastric Motility compared to baseline
Dynamic MRI
Measured: Screening, 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Feb 2023
- Study start22 Sep 2023
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ObesityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MSc
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MSc, Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Investigators
- Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MSc, Principal investigator, Brigham and Women's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05711758
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022P003420
- Acronym
- PSAM
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 29 Dec 2022
- Last updated
- 2 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: As this is a pilot study to collect data for a larger NIH grant submission, we do not have plans to share data at this time.
Publications
Klem ML, Wing RR, Chang CC, Lang W, McGuire MT, Sugerman HJ, Hutchison SL, Makovich AL, Hill JO. A case-control study of successful maintenance of a substantial weight loss: individuals who lost weight through surgery versus those who lost weight through non-surgical means. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 May;24(5):573-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801199.
PubMed 10849578James PT, Leach R, Kalamara E, Shayeghi M. The worldwide obesity epidemic. Obes Res. 2001 Nov;9 Suppl 4:228S-233S. doi: 10.1038/oby.2001.123.
PubMed 11707546Jia H, Lubetkin EI. Obesity-related quality-adjusted life years lost in the U.S. from 1993 to 2008. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Sep;39(3):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.03.026.
PubMed 20709253Tak YJ, Lee SY. Anti-Obesity Drugs: Long-Term Efficacy and Safety: An Updated Review. World J Mens Health. 2021 Apr;39(2):208-221. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.200010. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
PubMed 32202085Abu Dayyeh BK, Rajan E, Gostout CJ. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: a potential endoscopic alternative to surgical sleeve gastrectomy for treatment of obesity. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Sep;78(3):530-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.04.197. Epub 2013 May 24.
PubMed 23711556Gomez V, Woodman G, Abu Dayyeh BK. Delayed gastric emptying as a proposed mechanism of action during intragastric balloon therapy: Results of a prospective study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Sep;24(9):1849-53. doi: 10.1002/oby.21555. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
PubMed 27465076Abu Dayyeh BK, Acosta A, Camilleri M, Mundi MS, Rajan E, Topazian MD, Gostout CJ. Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Alters Gastric Physiology and Induces Loss of Body Weight in Obese Individuals. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;15(1):37-43.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.12.030. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
PubMed 26748219Goyal RK, Guo Y, Mashimo H. Advances in the physiology of gastric emptying. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019 Apr;31(4):e13546. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13546. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
PubMed 30740834Aghaie Meybodi M, Qumseya BJ, Shakoor D, Lobner K, Vosoughi K, Ichkhanian Y, Khashab MA. Efficacy and feasibility of G-POEM in management of patients with refractory gastroparesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2019 Mar;7(3):E322-E329. doi: 10.1055/a-0812-1458. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
PubMed 30842971Mohan BP, Chandan S, Jha LK, Khan SR, Kotagiri R, Kassab LL, Ravikumar NPG, Bhogal N, Chandan OC, Bhat I, Hewlett AT, Jacques J, Ponnada S, Asokkumar R, Adler DG. Clinical efficacy of gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) in the treatment of refractory gastroparesis and predictors of outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis using surgical pyloroplasty as a comparator group. Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3352-3367. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07135-9. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
PubMed 31583465